Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Rapid test to detect agents that damage human DNA

Abstract

PERHAPS the most successful screening test to detect potential mutagens and/or carcinogens is that of Ames et al.1, using Salmonella. Attempts to use mammalian cells have generally involved measuring some cellular response to DNA damage, for example, induction of DNA repair2; if the response implies that an agent has damaged the DNA, the agent is considered to be a potential mutagen and/or carcinogen. An early response to DNA damage in human cells is inhibition of DNA synthesis. But certain non-DNA-damaging agents also inhibit DNA synthesis. I show here that DNA-damaging and non-DNA-damaging agents can be distinguished by the changes in the rates of DNA synthesis after treatment: with a DNA-damaging agent, the rate of DNA synthesis continues to decrease, but with a non-DNA-damaging agent the rate of DNA synthesis increases after treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ames, B. N., Durston, W. E., Yamasaki, E. & Lee, F. D. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 70, 2281–2285 (1973).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. San, R. H. C. & Stich, H. F. Int. J. Cancer 16, 284–291 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ames, B. N., McCann, J. & Yamasaki, E. Mutat. Res. 31, 347–364 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cleaver, J. E. & Thomas, G. H. Biochem. biophys. Res. Commun. 36, 203–208 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lehmann, A. R. J. molec. Biol. 66, 319–337 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Makino, F. & Okada, S. Radiat. Res. 62, 37–51 (1975).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Walters, R. A. & Hildebrand, C. E. Biochem. biophys. Res. Commun. 65, 265–271 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Painter, R. B. & Young, B. R. Radiat. Res. 64, 648–656 (1975).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Painter, R. B. Mutat. Res. (in the press).

  10. Painter, R. B. & Young, B. R. Biochim. biophys. Acta 418, 146–153 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Furst, A. & Haro, R. T. in Physico-Chemical Mechanics of Carcinogenesis (ed. Bergmann, E. D. & Pullman, B.), 310–320 (Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities, Jerusalem, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gautschi, J. R. & Kern, R. M. Expl Cell Res. 80, 15–26 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gautschi, J. R., Kern, R. M. & Painter, R. B. J. molec. Biol. 80, 393–403 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

PAINTER, R. Rapid test to detect agents that damage human DNA. Nature 265, 650–651 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1038/265650a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/265650a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing