Good intentions are not enough to advance diversity. This case study of a 2019 postdoctoral fellowship competition in astronomy illustrates how incorporating lessons from social science research into the evaluation process mitigates bias, identifies outstanding scientists, and improves diversity.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Strolger, L. & Natarajan, P. Doling out Hubble time with dual-anonymous evaluation. Phys. Today (1 March 2019); https://go.nature.com/2ZXVJ3B
Moss-Racusin, C. A. et al. Science 343, 615–616 (2014).
Lincoln, A. E., Pincus, S., Koster, J. B. & Leboy, P. S. Soc. Stud. Sci. 42, 307–320 (2012).
Stewart, A. J. & Valian, V. An Inclusive Academy: Achieving Diversity and Excellence (MIT Press, 2018).
Wennerås, C. & Wold, A. Nature 387, 341–343 (1997).
Kaiser, C. R. et al. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 104, 504–519 (2012).
Bertrand, M. & Mullainathan, S. Am. Econ. Rev. 94, 991–1013 (2004).
Steinpreis, R. E., Anders, K. A. & Ritzke, D. Sex Roles 41, 509–528 (1999).
Dutt, K., Pfaff, D. L., Bernstein, A. F., Dillard, J. S. & Block, C. J. Nat. Geosci. 9, 805–809 (2016).
Moss-Racusin, C. A., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Graham, M. J. & Handelsman, J. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 16474–16479 (2012).
Carnes, M. et al. J. Divers. High. Educ. 5, 63–77 (2012).
Danziger, S., Levav, J. & Avinaim-Pesso, L. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 6889–6892 (2011).
Kahneman, D. Thinking Fast and Slow (Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, 2011).
Witzburg, R. A. & Sondheimer, H. M. N. Engl. J. Med. 368, 1565–1567 (2013).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declares that she is serving as a paid consultant to the Heising-Simons Foundation and assisted them with the case study featured in this Comment.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yen, J.W. De-biasing the evaluation process of in-person review panels for a postdoctoral fellowship. Nat Astron 3, 1041–1042 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-019-0835-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-019-0835-7
This article is cited by
-
A dynamical systems description of privilege, power and leadership in academia
Nature Astronomy (2019)