Abstract
I AM indebted to the editor for the opportunity to reply at once to Miss Botley's comments on my letter to NATURE of April 5. It would, indeed, be “undesirable to take the question of sunlight apart from other climatic effects.” The whole purpose of my letter was to express a warning against one-sided statements of a many-sided case, and to suggest that if combined efforts were made to discover how different countries compare with an optimum allowance of sunshine, if possible, to be evaluated, the local problems of sunshine therapeutics would be greatly clarified. Apparently there is, or used to be, a belief in India, the Philippines, and other tropical lands, that excessive stimulation by the ultra-violet rays of the sun should be specially guarded against by suitably-coloured clothing, and this in itself would raise the question of an optimum, and of the need of investigating the subject in its geographical relationships, in view of recent pronouncements upon the therapeutic importance of ultra-violet light in temperate latitudes.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
BONACINA, L. Sunshine and Health in Different Lands. Nature 113, 674–675 (1924). https://doi.org/10.1038/113674b0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/113674b0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.