Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Inhibitory Effect of Isoantibody on in vivo Sensitization and on the in vitroCytotoxic Action of Immune Lymphocytes

Abstract

KALISS was able to show that the enhancement of tumour grafts in allogeneic recipients is mediated by antibody1. Three alternative mechanisms by which antibodies might exert their effect have been postulated by Billingham et al.2: (1) an afferent inhibition in which antibody combined with allogeneic cells prevents antigeneic determinants from reaching immunologically competent cells; (2) a central inhibition in which antibody, by direct action on lymphoid cells, prevents their sensitization; (3) an efferent inhibition in which antibody reacting with target cells protects against the cytotoxic action of immune lymphoid cells which are competing for the same antigenic receptors. Both the afferent and the central mechanisms would affect sensitization of lymphoid cells, thought to be the most important mediators of homograft rejection. Brent and Medawar3 demonstrated that extracts of antigenic tissue injected into recipients treated with antiserum did not provide immunization against a subsequent skin graft. Snell et al.4 showed that lymphoid cells from tumour allograft recipients which had been treated with antiserum were less efficient in inhibiting tumour growth than lymphoid cells from untreated recipients. Passive immunization is also known, however, to inhibit the synthesis of antibodies4–6, and experiments involving transfer of immunologically competent cells cannot critically distinguish between cellular and humoral immunity. We have therefore analysed the effect of passive immunization on “cell bound immunity” using in vitro methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kaliss, N., Cancer Res., 18, 992 (1958).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Billingham, R. E., Brent, L., and Medawar, P. B., Transpl. Bull., 3, 84 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brent, L., and Medawar, P. B., Proc. Roy. Soc., B, 155, 392 (1962).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Snell, G. D., Winn, H. J., Stimpfling, J. H., and Parker, S. J., J. Exp. Med., 112, 293 (1960).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Müller, G., J. Nat. Cancer Inst., 30, 1153 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rowley, D. A., and Fitch, F. W., J. Exp. Med., 120, 987 (1964).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Brunner, K. T., Mauel, J., and Schindler, R., Immunology, 11, 499 (1966).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Müller, G., Transplantation, 2, 405 (1964).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Müller, E., J. Exp. Med., 122, 11 (1965).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Brondz, B. D., Transplantation, 3, 356 (1965).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

BRUNNER, K., MAUEL, J. & SCHINDLER, R. Inhibitory Effect of Isoantibody on in vivo Sensitization and on the in vitroCytotoxic Action of Immune Lymphocytes. Nature 213, 1246–1247 (1967). https://doi.org/10.1038/2131246a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/2131246a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing