Abstract
Was Stonehenge used to predict eclipses? Previous claims have assumed a high degree of sophistication on the part of the builders of Stonehenge, and that the number of Aubrey holes (56) is particularly significant. It may be that neither assumption is justified or necessary, and that if the builders of Stonehenge did predict eclipses, they did it in much simpler ways.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
References
Stukeley, W., Stonehenge (1740).
Lockyer, N., and Penrose, F. C., Proc. Roy. Soc., 69, 137 (1901).
Newham, C. A., Yorkshire Post (March 16, 1963).
Hawkins, G. S., Nature, 200, 306 (1963).
Hawkins, G. S., Nature, 202, 1253 (1964).
Hawkins, G. S., Amer. Scientist, 53, 391 (1965).
Hawkins, G. S., and White, J. B., Stonehenge Decoded (Souvenir Press, London, 1965).
Atkinson, R. J. C., Nature, 210, 1302 (1966).
Atkinson, R. J. C., Antiquity, 40, 212 (1966).
Discovery attributed to Meton (433 B.C.).
Spencer Jones, H., General Astronomy (Edward Arnold, London, 1934).
Taton, R. ed., Ancient and Medieval Science (Thames and Hudson, London, 1957).
Hoyle, F., Nature, 211, 454 (1966).
Atkinson, R. J. C., Stonehenge (Hamish Hamilton, London, 1956).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
COLTON, R., MARTIN, R. Eclipse Cycles and Eclipses at Stonehenge. Nature 213, 476–478 (1967). https://doi.org/10.1038/213476a0
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/213476a0
This article is cited by
-
Stones, pits and Stonehenge
Nature (1981)
-
Stonehenge I and lunar dynamics
Nature (1977)
-
Possible Use of Stonehenge
Nature (1972)
-
Eclipse Prediction at Stonehenge
Nature (1969)
-
Stonehenge 56 Year Cycle
Nature (1967)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.