Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Are transmitter release statistics meaningful?

Abstract

A BASIC premise of synaptic physiology is that neurotransmitter is released from motor nerve terminals in multimolecular packets called quanta1,2. The rate of release of quanta is low at rest, but when an action potential invades the nerve terminal there is a large increase in the mean rate of release leading to the generation of an endplate potential. It has been found that the distribution of the number of quanta released by an action potential is accurately described by a binomial distribution3–8. The assumption which underlies the binomial process is that n independent units (quanta) each have the same probability of success (release), p, on a single trial (stimulation). The parameters n and p can be estimated from the mean and variance of the binomially distributed variable. Although it is not clear what the physical correlates of n and p might be, it has been suggested that n may refer to the number of releasable quanta1, or to the number of release sites which can be activated on stimulation6. The changes in the apparent values of n and p which occur during synaptic processes such as facilitation6,8 and depression7, have been interpreted as providing evidence for particular mechanisms which may underly those processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fatt, P. & Katz, B. J. Physiol., Lond. 115, 320–370 (1951).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Martin, A. R. Physiol. Rev. 46, 51–66 (1966).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Johnson, E. W. & Wernig, A. J. Physiol., Lond. 218, 757–767 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wernig, A. J Physiol., Lond. 226, 751–759 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wernig, A. J. Physiol., Lond. 226, 761–768 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Zucker, R. S. J. Physiol., Lond. 229, 787–810 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Betz, W. J. J. Physiol., Lond. 206, 629–644 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bennett, M. R., Florin, T. & Hall, R. J. Physiol., Lond. 247, 429–446 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Castelucci, V. & Kandel, E. R. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 71, 5004–5008 (1974).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cohen, I. S., Kita, H. & Van der Kloot, W. J. Physiol., Lond. 236, 327–339 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Barrent, E. F., Barrett, J. N., Martin, A. R. & Rahamimoff, R. J. Physiol., Lond. 237, 453–463 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. del Castillo, J. & Pumplin J. Physiol., Lond. 252, 491–508 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

BARTON, S., COHEN, I. Are transmitter release statistics meaningful?. Nature 268, 267–268 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1038/268267a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/268267a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing