Abstract
THE timescale of the response of solvent molecules to electronic rearrangement of solute molecules has a critical influence on the rates of chemical reactions in liquids1–10. In particular, if the solvent cannot adapt quickly enough to this rearrangement as the reactants pass through the transition state, the evolving products may recross the free-energy barrier, reducing the reaction rate. Computer simulations have shown11–18 that the response of a solvent to a change in solute charge distribution is strongly bimodal: there is an initial ultrafast response owing to inertial (mainly libra-tional) motions of the solvent molecules, followed by a slow component owing to diffusive motions. Water seems to be by far the 'fastest' solvent studied so far: simulations predict that well over half of the solvation response for atomic solutes is inertial, happening on a timescale of about 20 femtoseconds12,13. The presence of this ultrafast component implies that solvent friction plays an important role in many aqueous charge-transfer processes9,10,19–21. Experimental verification of this prediction has been lacking, however, in part because of the difficulty of obtaining sufficient time resolution. Here we present experimental measurements of the ultrafast solvation dynamics of a coumarin salt in water. When considered in conjunction with computer simulations, our results demonstrate that a solvent response on a timescale faster than 50 fs can dominate aqueous solvation dynamics.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hynes, J. T. in Ultrafast Dynamics of Chemical Systems (ed. Simon, J. D.) 345–381 (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1994).
Gertner, B. J., Whitnell, R. M., Wilson, K. R. & Hynes, J. T. J. Am. chem. Soc. 113, 74–87 (1991).
Berne, B. J., Borkovec, M. & Straub, J. J. phys. chem. 92, 3711–3725 (1988).
Frauenfelder, H. & Wolynes, P. G. Science 229, 337–345 (1985).
Maroncelli, M., Maclnnis, J. & Fleming, G. R. Science 243, 1674–1681 (1989).
Barbara, P. F. & Jarzeba, W. Adv. Photochem. 15, 1–68 (1990).
Maroncelli, M. J. molec. Liq. 57, 1–37 (1993).
Bagchi, B. & Chandra, A. Adv. chem. Phys. 80, 1–126 (1991).
Weaver, M. J. Chem. Rev. 92, 463–480 (1992).
Heitele, H. Angew Chem. int. Edn engl. 32, 359–377 (1993).
Impey, R. W., Madden, P. A. & McDonald, I. R. Molec. Phys. 46, 513–539 (1982).
Maroncelli, M. & Fleming, G. R. J. chem. Phys. 89, 5044–5069 (1988).
Bader, J. S. & Chandler, D. Chem. Phys. Lett. 157, 501–504 (1989).
Maroncelli, M. J. chem. Phys. 94, 2084–2103 (1991).
Carter, E. A. & Hynes, J. T. J. chem. Phys. 94, 5961–5979 (1991).
Fonseca, T. & Ladanyi, B. M. J. phys. Chem. 95, 2116–2119 (1991).
Muin̄o, P. L. & Callis, P. R. J. chem. Phys. 100, 4093–4109 (1994).
Barnett, R. B., Landman, U. & Nitzan, A. J. chem. Phys. 90, 4413–4422 (1989).
Smith, B. B., Staib, A. & Hynes, J. T. Chem. Phys. 176, 521–537 (1993).
Bader, J. S., Kuharski, R. A. & Chandler, D. J. chem. Phys. 93, 230–236 (1990).
Song, X. & Marcus, R. A. J. chem. Phys. 99, 7768–7773 (1993).
Jarzeba, W., Walker, G. C., Johnson, A. E., Kahlow, M. & Barbara, P. F. J. phys. Chem. 92, 7039–7041 (1988).
Rosenthal, S. J., Jimenez, R., Fleming, G. R., Kumar, P. V. & Maroncelli, M. J. molec. Liq. (in the press).
Maroncelli, M., Kumar, V. P. & Papazyan, A. J. phys. Chem. 917, 13–17 (1993).
Roy, S. & Bagchi, B. J. chem. Phys. 99, 9938–9943 (1993).
Raineri, F. O., Resat, H., Perng, B.-C., Hirata, F. & Friedman, H. L. J. chem. Phys. 100, 1477–1491 (1994).
Stratt, R. & Cho, M. J. chem. Phys. 100, 6700–6708 (1994).
Fee, R. S. & Maroncelli, M. Chem. Phys. (in the press).
Guillot, B. J. chem. Phys. 95, 1543–1551 (1991).
Beredensen, H. J. C., Grigera, J. R. & Straatsma, T. P. J. phys. Chem. 91, 6269–6271 (1987).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jimenez, R., Fleming, G., Kumar, P. et al. Femtosecond solvation dynamics of water. Nature 369, 471–473 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1038/369471a0
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/369471a0
This article is cited by
-
Nanosecond solvation dynamics in a polymer electrolyte for lithium batteries
Nature Materials (2024)
-
Observing the primary steps of ion solvation in helium droplets
Nature (2023)
-
Revealing core-valence interactions in solution with femtosecond X-ray pump X-ray probe spectroscopy
Nature Communications (2023)
-
Quadrupolar 23Na+ NMR relaxation as a probe of subpicosecond collective dynamics in aqueous electrolyte solutions
Nature Communications (2023)
-
Detection of ultrafast solvent dynamics employing a streak camera
Journal of Chemical Sciences (2023)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.