Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Structural evidence for a two-step process in the depinning of the superconducting flux-line lattice

Abstract

A TYPE II superconductor in a magnetic field is penetrated by a hexagonal lattice of quantized flux lines. An applied current imposes a Lorentz force on these lines, but motion of the lattice will always be inhibited by pinning to material defects. Beyond a certain 'critical' current density, the lattice can break free of its pins and flow, dissipating energy and destroying superconductivity in the sample. The microscopic nature of this process is still poorly understood; in particular, little is known about the detailed structure of the flux-line lattice as it begins to depin and flow in response to the applied current. We have used small-angle neutron scattering1á¤-3 to image the structure of the flux lattice in NbSe2 in the presence of a direct current, while also measuring the transport properties. Our observations of the structure of the flux lattice near the critical current verify theoretical predictions4 of the existence of three regimes as a function of increasing driving force (or current): first, no motion; then disordered, plastic motion; and finally, at high velocities, a coherently moving flux crystal.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cubitt, R. et al. Nature 365, 407–411 (1993).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Keimer, B. et al. Science 262, 83–86 (1993).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Yaron, U. et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 2748–2751 (1994).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Koshelev, A. E. & Vinokur, V. M. Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 3580–3583 (1994).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Oglesby, C. S., Bucher, E., Kloc, C. & Hohl, H. J. Cryst. Growth 137, 289–294 (1994).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Larkin, A. I. & Ovchinnikov, Yu. J. Low Temp. Phys. 34, 409–428 (1979).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Biatter, G., Feigel'man, M. V., Geshkenbein, V. B., Larkin, A. I. & Vinokur, V. M. Rev. mod. Phys. 66, 1125–1388 (1994).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bhattacharya, S. & Higgins, M. J. Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 2617–2620 (1993).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wördenweber, R., Kes, P. H. & Tsuei, C. C. Phys. Rev. B33, 3172–3180 (1986).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yaron, U., Gammel, P., Huse, D. et al. Structural evidence for a two-step process in the depinning of the superconducting flux-line lattice. Nature 376, 753–755 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1038/376753a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/376753a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing