Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Paper
  • Published:

Sexual disabilities are not singularities

International Journal of Impotence Research volume 14, pages 487–493 (2002)Cite this article

Abstract

This report is based on a survey (performed 1996) of sex life in a nationally representative sample of Swedish women (n=1335) and men (n=1475) aged 18–74 y. From that survey we have previously reported on prevalence of sexual disabilities and problems caused by them.1 The main object of this article is to describe intra- and inter-gender concurrence of sexual disabilities and problems in sexually active subjects. Furthermore, the relative risk of low level of sexual well-being as predicted by sexual disabilities and distress is addressed. Respondents (59% of target sample) participated in an investigation which combined structured interviews with questionnaires/checklists. Main results are that within and across genders sexual disabilities concur to significant degrees. Of the women 48 and 26% reported at least one own and partner sexual disability or distress caused by them, respectively. For the men the corresponding proportions were 26 and 17%, respectively. Odds ratios showed that for the women low sexual interest, difficulties in obtaining orgasm and partner's early ejaculation were significant predictors of low level of sexual well-being. For the men low level of interest and partner's difficulties in obtaining orgasm were the only, but equally powerful, predictors. It is concluded that in clinical practice and for those who have a partner, sexual disabilities and distress caused by them should be regarded from the partner relationship perspective.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sjögren Fugl-Meyer K, Fugl-Meyer AR . Sexual disabilities, problems, and satisfaction in 18–74 year old Swedes Scand J Sexol 1999; 3: 79–105.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Simons JS, Carey MP . Prevalence of sexual dysfunctions: Results from a decade of research Arch Sex Behav 2001; 30: 177–219.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ventegodt S . Sex and the quality of life in Denmark Arch Sex Behav 1998; 27: 295–307.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bejin A . Sexual pleasures, dysfunctions, fantasies and satisfaction In: Spira A, Bajos N (eds) ACSF Group Sexual behaviour and aids Avebury: Aldershot 1994 pp 163–171.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kontula O, Haavio-Manilla E . Sexual pleasures. Enhancement of sex life in Finland 1971–1992 Dartmouth: Aldershot 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lindal E, Stefansson JG . The lifetime prevalence of psychosexual dysfunction among 55 to 57-year-olds in Iceland Soc Psychiat Psychiatr Epidemiol 1993; 28: 91–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lauman EO, Paik A, Rosen RC . Sexual dysfunction in the United States JAMA 1999; 281: 537–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fugl-Meyer KS . Sexual disabilities and sexual problems In: Lewin B et al (eds) Sex in Sweden The National Institute of Public Health: Stockholm 2000 pp 199–215.

    Google Scholar 

  9. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders 4th edn. APA: Washington, DC 1994.

  10. Wagner G, Béjin A, Fugl-Meyer AR, Glina S, Kimoto Y, Lukacs CSB, Mulcahy J, O'Leary M . Symptom score and quality of life In: Jardin A, Wagner G, Khoury S, Giuliano F, Padman-Nathan H, Rosen R (eds) Erectile dysfunction. WHO: Geneva 2000 pp 105–113.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Basson R et al. Report of the international consensus development conference on female sexual dysfunction: definitions and classifications J Urol 2000; 163: 888–893.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. NIH Consensus Development Panel on Impotence. JAMA 1993; 270: 83–90.

  13. Fugl-Meyer AR, Bränholm I-B, Fugl-Meyer KS . Happiness and domain-specific life satisfaction in adult northern Swedes Clin Rehab 1991; 5: 25–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bejin A . Epidémiologie de l'ejaculation prématurée et de son cumul avec la dusfunction érectile Andrologie 1999; 9: 211–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Blanker MH et al. Correlates for erectile and ejaculatory dysfunction in older Dutch men; a community-based study J Am Geriat Soc 2001; 49: 436–442.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Viraq R, Beck-Ardilly L . Nosologie, épidémiologie, quantification clinique des dysfunctions érectils Rev Med Interne 1997; 18: (Suppl 1) 10–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Veenhoven R . Happy life-expectancy. A comprehensive measure of quality-of-life in nations Social Indicators Res 1996; 39: 1–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors greatly appreciate the support given by the Swedish National Institute of Public Health, in particular Kristina Ramstedt, and also acknowledge the co-authors, B Lewin, G Helmius, KA Månsson and A Lalos, of the original report (Sex in Sweden, 1998/2000).8

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden

    K Sjögren Fugl-Meyer & A R Fugl-Meyer

Authors
  1. K Sjögren Fugl-Meyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A R Fugl-Meyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A R Fugl-Meyer.

Appendix

Appendix

Women

Men

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sjögren Fugl-Meyer, K., Fugl-Meyer, A. Sexual disabilities are not singularities. Int J Impot Res 14, 487–493 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3900914

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3900914

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links