The fisheries industry promotes third-party eco-labels that signify sustainability, similar to those used in forestry and tourism (see Nature http://doi.org/nb5; 2013). In my view, these fail for three reasons.
First, consumers care strongly that labels for health and quality standards are accurate because they affect individuals, but care much less about eco-labels because their effects are spread across society.
Second, industries tend to use weak eco-labels in political games to avoid strong regulation.
Third, ineffective eco-labels closely mimic accurate ones. Because there are no adverse consequences for consumers who cannot tell them apart, a high proportion of mimics persists.
Eco-labels are thus no substitute for eco-laws.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Buckley, R. Three reasons for eco-label failure. Nature 500, 151 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/500151c
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/500151c
This article is cited by
-
The Positive Side of Negative Labelling
Journal of Consumer Policy (2015)