Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Use of polymerase chain reaction as a diagnostic tool for neonatal sepsis can result in a decrease in use of antibiotics and total neonatal intensive care unit length of stay

Abstract

Objective:

To retrospectively determine if a negative 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (PCR(−)) could lead to a decrease in the number of antibiotic doses and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) length of stay (LOS) for infants admitted to the NICU for presumed early-onset sepsis (EOS) with negative blood culture results (BC(−)).

Study design:

Analysis included 419 infants, greater than 35 weeks gestational age, with PCR(−), BC(−) and LOS>48 h. Both the investigators and clinical care team were unaware of the PCR results. The actual number of antibiotic doses (AAD) administered was compared to an estimated number of antibiotics doses (EAD) that would have been given until PCR(−) results were available by 18 h. The number of antibiotic doses saved was calculated as (AAD−EAD). The actual NICU LOS in hours (aLOS) for a subset of infants who remained in the hospital primarily for antibiotic therapy was compared to an estimated LOS (eLOS) if infants with PCR(−) were discharged from the NICU when clinically stable. The number of hours saved was calculated as (aLOS−eLOS).

Results:

Approximately eight antibiotic doses and 85 NICU hours per infant could be saved using PCR(−) results available at 18 h.

Conclusions:

Use of 16S rRNA PCR could decrease the number of antibiotics doses and NICU LOS for infants admitted for EOS. This may facilitate: (1) earlier NICU discharge; (2) parental satisfaction; and (3) decreased health care costs.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Escobar GJ . The neonatal ‘sepsis work-up’: personal reflections on the development of an evidence-based approach toward newborn infections in a managed care organization. Pediatrics 1999; 103 (Suppl E): 360–373.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. DaSilva O, Ohlsson A, Kenyon C . Accuracy of leukocyte indices and C-reactive protein for diagnosis of neonatal sepsis: a critical review. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1995; 14: 362.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Fowlie PW, Schmidt B . Diagnostic tests for bacterial infection from birth to 90 days: a systematic review. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1998; 78: F92–F98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mehr S, Doyle LW . Cytokines as markers of bacterial sepsis in newborn infants: a review. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2000; 19: 879–887.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Malik A, Hui CPS, Pennie RA, Kirpalani H . Beyond the complete blood cell count & c-reactive protein: a systematic review of modern diagnostic tests for neonatal sepsis. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2003; 157: 511–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Aronson MD, Bor DH . Blood cultures. Ann Intern Med 1987; 106: 246–253.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kellogg JA, Ferrentino FL, Goodstein MH, Liss J, Shapiro SL, Bankert DA . Frequency of low level bacteremia in infants from birth to two months of age. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1997; 16: 381–385.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Schelonka RL, Chai MK, Yoder BA, Hensley D, Brockett RM, Ascher DP . Volume of blood required to detect common neonatal pathogens. J Pediatr 1996; 129: 275–278.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Squire E, Favara B, Todd J . Diagnosis of neonatal bacterial infection: hematologic and pathologic findings in fatal and nonfatal cases. Pediatrics 1979; 64: 60–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ehrlich G . PCR-based protocols for the detection of specific organisms. In: Ehrlich GD, Greenberg SJ (eds). PCR-based Diagnostics in Infectious Disease. Blackwell Scientific Publications Inc: Cambridge, MA, 1994, pp 335–688.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jordan JA, Durso MB . Comparison of a 16S rRNA PCR assay and an automated blood culture system in the detection of neonatal bacteremia. JCM 2000; 38: 2574–2578.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Greisen K, Loeffelholz M, Purohit A, Leong D . PCR primers and probes for the 16S rRNA gene of most species of pathogenic bacteria, including bacteria found in cerebrospinal fluid. J Clin Microbiol 1994; 32: 335–351.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Jordan JA, Durso MB . Comparison of 16S rRNA gene PCR and BACTEC 9240 for detection of neonatal bacteremia. J Clin Microbiol 2000; 38: 2574–2578.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Gerdes JS . Diagnosis and management of bacterial infections in the neonate. Pediatr Clin N Am 2004; 51: 939–959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pierce JR, Merenstein GB, Stocker JD . Immediate postmortem cultures in an intensive care nursery. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1984; 3: 510–513.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Schelonka RL, Yoder BA, Bradley A . The WBC count and differential: its uses and misuses. Contemp Obstet Gynecol 1996; 13: 124–166.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Santana Reyes C, Garcia-Munoz F, Reyes D, Gonzalez G, Dominguez C, Domenech E . Role of cytokines (interleukin-1β, 6, 8, tumour necrosis factor-α, and soluble receptor on interleukin-2) and C-reactive protein in the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis. Acta Pediatr 2003; 92: 221–227.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Philip AGS, Mills PC . Use of C-reactive protein in minimizing antibiotic exposure experience with infants initially admitted to a well-baby nursery. Pediatrics 2000; 106 (1): 4–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Madan A, Adams MM, Philip AGS . Frequency and timing of symptoms in infants screened for sepsis: effectiveness of a sepsis-screening pathway. Clin Pediatr 2003; 42 (1): 11–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the NIH Grant # HD38559. The authors gratefully acknowledge assistance in data collection by Mary Kish, RNC and database management by AI Johnson, MHA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B S Brozanski.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brozanski, B., Jones, J., Krohn, M. et al. Use of polymerase chain reaction as a diagnostic tool for neonatal sepsis can result in a decrease in use of antibiotics and total neonatal intensive care unit length of stay. J Perinatol 26, 688–692 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7211597

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7211597

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links