Correction to: British Journal of Cancer (2015) 112, 1766–1771. doi:10.1038/bjc.2015.141; published online 5 May 2015
Following the publication of this manuscript, the authors have noticed an error in Table 1.
The sixth line, which reads ‘N2 metastasis in multiple or bilateral inguinal lymph nodes & Unilateral or bilateral metastasis in four or more inguinal lymph nodes without ENE, ENE of LNM or pelvic lymph nodes’, should be deleted. The correct table is reproduced below.
Change history
22 December 2015
This paper was modified 12 months after initial publication to switch to Creative Commons licence terms, as noted at publication
Additional information
The online version of the original article can be found at 10.1038/bjc.2015.141
Rights and permissions
From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Li, ZS., Yao, K., Chen, P. et al. Erratum: Modification of N staging systems for penile cancer: a more precise prediction of prognosis. Br J Cancer 113, 1746 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2015.457
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2015.457
This article is cited by
-
What you need to know: updates in penile cancer staging
World Journal of Urology (2021)