RNA-binding protein SAMD4 regulates skeleton development through translational inhibition of Mig6 expression

Niu, Ningning; Xiang, Jian-Feng; Yang, Qin; Wang, Lijun; Wei, Zhanying; Chen, Ling-Ling; Yang, Li; Zou, Weiguo

doi:10.1038/celldisc.2016.50

Download PDF

Article
Open access
Published: 24 January 2017

RNA-binding protein SAMD4 regulates skeleton development through translational inhibition of Mig6 expression

Ningning Niu¹,
Jian-Feng Xiang²,
Qin Yang³,
Lijun Wang¹,
Zhanying Wei⁴,
Ling-Ling Chen ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-9501-0305²,
Li Yang³ &
…
Weiguo Zou¹

Cell Discovery volume 3, Article number: 16050 (2017) Cite this article

4850 Accesses
18 Citations
Metrics details

Subjects

Abstract

Protein translation regulation has essential roles in inflammatory responses, cancer initiation and the pathogenesis of several neurodegenerative disorders. However, the role of the regulation of protein translation in mammalian skeleton development has been rarely elaborated. Here we report that the lack of the RNA-binding protein sterile alpha motif domain containing protein 4 (SAMD4) resulted in multiple developmental defects in mice, including delayed bone development and decreased osteogenesis. Samd4-deficient mesenchymal progenitors exhibit impaired osteoblast differentiation and function. Mechanism study demonstrates that SAMD4 binds the Mig6 mRNA and inhibits MIG6 protein synthesis. Consistent with this, Samd4-deficient cells have increased MIG6 protein level and knockdown of Mig6 rescues the impaired osteogenesis in Samd4-deficient cells. Furthermore, Samd4-deficient mice also display chondrocyte defects, which is consistent with the regulation of MIG6 protein level by SAMD4. These findings define SAMD4 as a previously unreported key regulator of osteoblastogenesis and bone development, implying that regulation of protein translation is an important mechanism governing skeletogenesis and that control of protein translation could have therapeutic potential in metabolic bone diseases, such as osteoporosis.

Human skeletal muscle aging atlas

Article Open access 15 April 2024

Multimodal cell atlas of the ageing human skeletal muscle

Article Open access 22 April 2024

Nuclear mRNA decay: regulatory networks that control gene expression

Article 18 April 2024

Introduction

Protein translational regulation of gene expression is necessary for the ability of cells to rapidly respond to the changes in the environment [1], especially in response to stress-causing stimuli, such as ultraviolet irradiation, temperature changes, nutrient limitation, oxidative stress and various drugs or toxins [2, 3]. Protein translational control is also involved in cancer development and progression, related to tumor cell survival, angiogenesis, transformation, invasion and metastasis [4, 5]. Translational regulation is also involved in mammalian development, for example, in the muscle [6], neuron [7] and early embryo [8]. However, the function of protein synthesis regulation in mammalian skeleton development remains elusive.

Skeleton development and remodeling are critical for maintenance of the biomechanical properties of bone [9]. The long bones are mainly formed through endochondral bone formation and are maintained by bone remodeling [9]. During endochondral bone formation, the chondrocytes of the cartilage template proliferate axially and subsequently undergo hypertrophy and expansion in cellular volume [10]. Osteoblasts, a group of specialized mesenchymal cells, are crucial for the mineralization of the embryonic skeleton and bone mass maintenance during postnatal bone remodeling [11, 12]. Defects in osteoblast function are a major cause of reduction in bone density, as is seen in osteoporosis, the most common skeletal disease worldwide [13, 14]. Several genes, including different transcription factors [15–17], kinases [18], ubiquitin E3 ligases [19, 20] and miRNAs [21], have been reported to have important roles during bone development. However, little is known about whether protein translational regulation acts on this process.

To elucidate the role of protein translation regulation in bone development, we conducted an unbiased forward genetic screen of a library of mutant mouse lines, which included around 4 000 different genetically manipulated lines constructed by using a piggyBac (PB) transposon system to mediate germline mutagenesis [22]. In screening this library for skeletal phenotypes, we identified sterile alpha motif domain containing 4 (Samd4)-deficient mice strain displaying striking lean body and narrowed thoracic cavity. SAMD4 is a mammalian homolog of Drosophila SMAUG protein, which has been demonstrated as a protein translational repressor [23]. The Drosophila SMAUG protein has been linked in vivo to Drosophila maternal mRNA destabilization [24], the maternal-to-zygotic transition [25] and early embryo development [26, 27]. The Smaug protein contains a sterile alpha motif (SAM), which directly binds RNA with stem-loop structures known as Smaug recognition elements (SREs) that contain the consensus sequence CNGG or CNGGN on target mRNAs [28]. At the same time, Smaug recruits various proteins, such as CUP [29], Argonaute 1 [30] and CUG triplet repeat RNA binding protein 1 (CUBP1) [31], to target mRNA for translational repression and/or transcript decay. Mammalian SAMD4 has been reported to be a translational repressor by in vitro translation assays using luciferase carrying SRE motifs [32]. However, the in vivo function of mammalian SAMD4 involves RNA binding and translational repression remains to be clarified.

In this study, we demonstrated that Samd4^PB/PB mice exhibited markedly defects in skeleton development and bone mass, along with impaired osteoblastogenesis and chondrogenesis. Further mechanism study displayed that SAMD4 binds to mitogen-inducible gene 6 (Mig6, also annotated as ERBB receptor feedback inhibitor 1, Errfi1) mRNA and repressed its translation. MIG6 is a non-kinase scaffolding adaptor [33, 34] that is highly expressed in both chondrocytes and osteoblasts [35]. Furthermore, Mig6 deficiency in mice lead to excessive articular chondrocyte proliferation following an osteoarthritis-like disorder [35, 36]. The higher MIG6 protein level in Samd4^PB/PB mice resulted in impaired skeletogenesis. These observations demonstrated that in vivo function of SAMD4 was related to protein translational regulation and suggested that SAMD4 was a novel skeletogenesis regulator. To our knowledge, this is the first report about the protein translation in the anabolic bone formation and indicates that the control of protein translation could have therapeutic potential in metabolic bone diseases, such as osteoporosis.

Results

The construction and identification of Samd4-deficient mice

We screened a mutant mouse library that was constructed using a PB transposon system to mediate germline mutagenesis [22]. We observed a mouse strain displaying striking lean body and narrowed thoracic cavity. The sequencing analysis indicated that PB transposon was inserted into Samd4 locus (Figure 1a and b). Samd4 is widely expressed in different tissues (Figure 1c), and the insertion of PB transposon at Samd4 locus resulted in a dramatic reduction of Samd4 transcript and protein level in mice homozygous for the PB transposon allele (Samd4^PB/PB; Figure 1d and e). Analysis of littermates born to male and female mice heterozygous for the Samd4 PB allele (Samd4^PB/+) revealed that Samd4^PB/PB mice exhibited a large reduction in body size and weight (Figure 1f and g) and had a shortened lifespan when compared with age- and sex-matched wild-type (WT) littermates (Figure 1h).

Recently, a Samd4 missense mutant mouse model (spmd) was generated from N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea mutagenesis of C57BL/6J mice [37]. The spmd mice displayed leanness and myopathy [37]. Mechanistically, Samd4 may interfere with mTORC1 signaling through its interaction with 14-3-3 proteins, and one amino-acid mutation in the SAMD4 protein (SAMD4^H86P) was shown to disrupt this interaction [37]. To examine whether there are overlapped phenotypes between Samd4^PB/PB mice and spmd mice, we also investigated the epididymal white adipose tissue and gastrocnemius of WT and Samd4^PB/PB littermates at 3-week-old age. Indeed, similar to spmd mice, Samd4^PB/PB mice exhibited a significant reduction in epididymal white adipose tissue weight (Figure 2a and b) after normalization to total body weight. Histological analysis indicated reduced cell size in white adipose tissue from 3-week-old Samd4^PB/PB mice compared with WT littermates (Figure 2c). In addition, Samd4^PB/PB mice displayed a significant decrease in gastrocnemius weight (Figure 2d), along with abnormalities in the morphology of myofibers (Figure 2e). Collectively, these data indicate that Samd4^PB/PB mice recapitulated the phenotypes of spmd mice.

Samd4^PB/PB mice exhibit impaired skeletogenesis

It is known that myocytes, adipocytes and osteoblasts are differentiated from mesenchymal stem cells. However, spmd mice exhibited normal bone mineral density or bone mineral content [37]. On the basis of the wide expression of Samd4 and the reduced skeleton size of Samd4^PB/PB mice, we hypothesized that SAMD4 has effects on skeleton development. We characterized the whole-mount skeleton of mice by alizarin red and alcian blue staining at postnatal day 1. Compared with WT mice, Samd4^PB/PB mice exhibited abnormal skull shape and less alizarin-red-stained craniofacial region, along with delayed ossified long bones (Figure 3a). Bone ossification and mineralization were also examined by von Kossa staining of mice at embryo day 16.5. As shown in Figure 3b, Samd4^PB/PB mice displayed less mineralization compared with the WT mice in both calvarium and tibia. At 3-week-old age, Samd4^PB/PB mice exhibited less trabecula bones compared with WT controls (Figure 3c). To further determine the in vivo effects of Samd4 in the skeleton system, we used microquantitative computed tomography to determine the bone density of 3-week-old mice. As shown in Figure 3d–g, Samd4^PB/PB mice exhibited a nearly 75% reduction in femoral trabecular bone volume/total volume (Figure 3d and e), along with a dramatic decrease both in trabecular number (Figure 3d and f) and trabecular thickness (Figure 3d and g), indicating a severe osteopenic phenotype in Samd4^PB/PB mice. In the meantime, cortical thickness was decreased in Samd4^PB/PB mice compared with WT controls (Figure 3d and h). Consistent with the deficiency in osteogenesis and skeletal mineralization, the expression of characteristic osteoblast marker genes, collagen type I alpha 1 (Col1a1), osteocalcin and runt-related transcription factor 2 (Runx2), was reduced in 7-day-old Samd4^PB/PB tibia as determined by immunostaining (Figure 3i). Quantitative reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR) analyses also confirmed that the expression of osteoblast marker genes, including Col1a1, alkaline phosphatase (Alp) and Runx2, was significantly decreased in the femurs from Samd4^PB/PB mice (Figure 3j–l). Taken together, these data suggested that deficiency of Samd4 gene impaired bone ossification and mineralization in mice.

SAMD4 promotes osteoblast differentiation in vitro

We next examined the effects of Samd4 on osteoblasts differentiation in vitro. Primary osteoblasts were collected from calvaria of 7-day-old Samd4^PB/PB and WT mice. After 7 and 14 days of culture under osteoblast differentiation medium, Alp activity was monitored as an early osteoblast differentiation maker and alizarin red staining was monitored as mineral deposition, respectively. Consistent with the osteopenic phenotype in Samd4^PB/PB mice, osteoblasts from Samd4^PB/PB mice revealed an approximately 20% reduction in Alp activity and a significant decrease in alizarin red staining compared with the cells from WT mice (Figure 4a–c), implying that the lack of Samd4 impaired both early and late osteoblast differentiation. Similarly, osteoblasts from Samd4^PB/PB mice revealed decreased the expression of osteoblast markers, including Col1a1, Alp and Runx2 (Figure 4d–f). We next examined the effects of exogenous expression of Samd4. As shown in Figure 4g–i, exogenous SAMD4 could promote osteoblast differentiation determined by Alp activity and alizarin red staining. Taken together, these data indicate that SAMD4 regulates osteoblast differentiation and function in vitro.

Considering that Samd4^PB/PB mice displayed significant bone development impairment and Samd4 H86P missense mutant, spmd, which has one amino-acid mutation and the interaction with 14-3-3 protein is disrupted, has normal bone density, we hypothesized that RNA-binding activity of SAMD4 is important for skeleton development. SAM is RNA-binding motif in SAMD4. As shown in Drosophila SMAUG and S. cerevisiae VTS1, several amino acids were crucial for SRE motif binding [38, 39]. To examine whether RNA-binding function of SAM motif is necessary for SAMD4’s effects on bone development, we generated two Samd4 mutants, SAMD4^{K245A R248A K251Q} and SAMD4^A281Q (sequences in Supplementary Table S1). We isolated osteoblast from Samd4^PB/PB calvaria, and infected cells with lentivirus-expressing green fluorescent protein, SAMD4 or two SAMD4 mutants, respectively. As shown in Figure 4j–m, SAMD4 could rescue the deficiency of Samd4 in Samd4^PB/PB osteoblasts, while both SAMD4^{K245A R248A K251Q} and SAMD4^A281Q were unable to increase osteoblast differentiation determined by Alp staining and the expression of osteoblast marker genes, including Col1a1 and Alp, confirming the requirement of RNA-binding function of SAMD4 in osteoblastogenesis.

SAMD4 regulates osteoblast differentiation by repressing Mig6 translation

The dependence of RNA-binding motif SAM domain in SAMD4 to promote osteoblast differentiation suggests that SAMD4 could probably regulate some mRNA targets during osteoblast differentiation through binding to some specific mRNA targets. We next sought to investigate the target mRNAs of Samd4 to investigate its role in translational regulation. An RNA ImmunoPrecipitation (RIP) assay followed by sequencing was performed in osteoblast cells expressing Flag-SAMD4 owing to the lack of a high-quality anti-SAMD4 antibody (Figure 5a). RNA libraries were generated from the RNAs extracted from anti-IgG and anti-Flag samples by using the TruSeq RNA Library Preparation Kit (Illumina). RNA sequencing analysis revealed that 33 genes were enriched in anti-Flag samples compared with anti-IgG samples (Supplementary Table S2). Among those targets, we found that two genes, Mig6 [35, 36] and Tnfrsf12a [40, 41], had been reported to be involved in the regulation of bone development (Figure 5b and Supplementary Table S2).

MIG6 is a non-kinase scaffolding adaptor [33, 34] that is highly expressed in the articular cartilage and growth plates, which comprise both chondrocytes and osteoblasts [35]. Given that Samd4-deficient mice exhibited osteopenic phenotype and that Mig6-deficient mice displayed a subchondral bone phenotype [35, 36], we hypothesized that SAMD4 may regulate Mig6 by binding and inhibiting the translation of Mig6 mRNA. Indeed, upregulating the expression of SAMD4 resulted in a decrease in MIG6 protein level (Figure 5c). We also examined the RNA and protein level of MIG6 in Samd4^PB/PB and WT calvaria from 5-day-old littermates and found increased MIG6 protein level in Samd4^PB/PB calvarium lysates (Figure 5d), whereas there was no obvious difference in RNA level between WT and Samd4^PB/PB mice (Figure 5e). Consistently, immunohistochemical staining analysis revealed more MIG6 protein in 7-day-old Samd4^PB/PB tibia, both in the proliferation zone and trabecular bone zone compared with the WT littermates (Figure 5f). These data support the idea that SAMD4 regulates the translation of Mig6 in vivo. However, we could not detect obvious difference of TNFRSF12a protein level between Samd4^PB/PB and WT calvarium lysates (Supplementary Figure S1a and b). Consistent with this, excess SAMD4 could not restrain the protein level of TNFRSF12a (Supplementary Figure S1c). We next determined the effects of increased MIG6 protein and found that overexpression of MIG6 could decrease the differentiation of osteoblasts, as determined by Alp activity and alizarin red staining (Figure 5g).

To further determine whether the decreased osteoblatogenesis in Samd4-deficient cells was due to the dysregulation of MIG6 protein level, we constructed a series of shRNAs (short hairpin RNA) targeting Mig6 (shRNA sequences are shown in Supplementary Table S1). As shown in Supplementary Figure S2, two Mig6-specific shRNAs decreased the transcription of Mig6, determined by quantitative RT-PCR. These two shRNAs rescued the decreased osteoblast differentiation in Samd4^PB/PB osteoblasts, compared with WT osteoblasts (Figure 5h and i). We also examined the effects of Mig6 shRNAs on the expression of osteoblast marker genes and confirmed that knockdown of Mig6 could increase the expression of Col1a1, Alp and Runx2 in Samd4^PB/PB osteoblasts (Supplementary Figure S2d–g). These data support that lower osteoblastogenesis of Samd4^PB/PB mice was derived, at least in part, from higher MIG6 protein level.

SAMD4 binds to SREs on Mig6 mRNA

Previous in vitro studies showed that mammalian SAMD4 repressed the translation of luciferase carrying SRE motifs [32]. Interestingly, we identified three putative SRE elements at 5′ untranslated region (UTR) of Mig6 mRNA, but not at the 3′UTR. We next examined whether SAMD4 had the effects on the reported SRE sequence and whether the SRE sequence could be located at either 3′UTR or 5′UTR. We performed luciferase reporter assays in C3H10T1/2 cells and found that SAMD4 remarkably downregulated luciferase activity when 3× SRE DNA sequences was fused to the 3′ terminal of luciferase cDNA; in contrast, Samd4 had no effects when those SREs were replaced with the poly A sequence (Supplementary Figure S3a). Strikingly, SAMD4 could also decrease the luciferase activity when 3×SRE sequence was fused to the 5′ terminal of luciferase cDNA (Supplementary Figure S3b), indicating that the effects of SAMD4 on SREs were not restricted to 3′UTR. We next examined the effect of SAMD4 on 5′UTR of Mig6 mRNA. As shown in Figure 6a, SAMD4 could dose-dependently repress luciferase activity when 5′UTR of Mig6 was fused to the 5′ terminal of luciferase cDNA (5′UTR, sequence shown in Supplementary Table S1). Moreover, the effects of the SAMD4 were abolished when the SREs in Mig6 5′UTR were mutated (5′UTR^Δ, sequence shown in Supplementary Table S1) (Figure 6b). Moreover, SAMD4 could also inhibit luciferase activity in a similar way when the 5′UTR of Mig6 was moved to 3′ end of luciferase cDNA (Figure 6c). We next asked whether RNA-binding function is necessary for SAMD4’s effects on 5′UTR of Mig6 mRNA. As shown in Figures 6d and e, the mutations in the RNA-binding function (SAMD4^{K245A R248A K251Q} and SAMD4^A281Q) impaired the SAMD4’s effects in this luciferase activity assay. These data suggest that SAMD4 could bind to 5′UTR of Mig6 mRNA and repress MIG6 protein translation.

SAMD4 promotes chondrogenesis and chondrocyte differentiation

Cartilage-specific deletion of Mig6 was shown to result in osteoarthritis-like disorder with excessive articular chondrocyte [35, 36]. The repression of MIG6 expression by SAMD4 implied that SAMD4 have effects on chondrocyte. Samd4^PB/PB mice dwarfed remarkably in contrast to WT littermates (Figure 1f), supporting the chondrocyte phenotype in Samd4^PB/PB mice. We examined the growth plate of 3-week-old Samd4^PB/PB mice tibia by safranin O staining. As shown in Figure 7a, Samd4^PB/PB mice displayed shortened resting and columnar zones, although the growth plate was almost normal-organized. Consistently, the expression of characteristic chondrocyte marker genes, collagen type II alpha 1 (Col2a1) and collagen type X alpha 1 (Col10a1) was reduced in 3-week-old Samd4^PB/PB tibia as determined by immunostaining (Figure 7b). We also did chondrocyte micromass culture and found that chondrocytes from Samd4^PB/PB mice revealed significant reduction in alcian blue staining (Figure 7c). Consistently, chondrocytes cultured from Samd4^PB/PB mice revealed decreased expression of marker genes, including Col2a1 and Col10a1 (Figure 7d and e). We also examined the effects of exogenous expression of SAMD4 in chondrocytes and found that SAMD4 could promote chondrocyte differentiation (Figure 7f–h). Next we explored the dependence of Mig6 for the augmented chondrocyte differentiation in Samd4^PB/PBcells. As shown in Figure 7i and Supplementary Figure S4a–c, two Mig6-specific shRNAs increased chondrocyte differentiation determined by alcian blue staining and the expression levels of marker genes in chondrocytes from Samd4^PB/PB mice. Taken together, these data indicate that SAMD4 regulate chondrogenesis and chondrocyte differentiation and function in vivo and in vitro, consistent with the mechanism by which deficiency of Samd4 in osteoblast results in higher MIG6 protein level.

Discussion

Our current study demonstrates that RNA-binding protein SAMD4 could regulate osteoblast and chondrocyte differentiation, indicating that SAMD4 is a novel regulator for skeletogenesis. Samd4^PB/PB mice exhibit multiple bone defects, including shortened body length, decreased bone mass, hypomineralization and so on (Figures 1f and g and 3a–h). Furthermore, SAMD4 promotes osteoblast and chondrocyte differentiation in vitro (Figures 4a–i and 7c and d). Previous reports showed that the spmd mice have normal bone mineral density or bone mineral content [37]. The difference of skeleton phenotype between these two mice models could be explained by the fact that spmd mutant only affects a histidine (H86P) in the protein [37]. However, Samd4^PB/PB mice are accompanied with the deletion of whole SAMD4 protein. The requirement of SAM domain for SAMD4 function in osteoblast and chondrocyte supports that the severe skeleton phenotype of Samd4^PB/PB mice is through the depletion of whole protein (Figures 4j–m and 7e–h). Furthermore, we detected that, similar to SAMD4, SAMD4^H86P inhibited the activity of luciferase constructs containing SREs (Supplementary Figure S5a and b) indicating that the H86P mutation did not disrupt the function of SAMD4 as a translational repressor, which was demonstrated by the result that SAMD4^H86P could rescue the impaired differentiation of Samd4^PB/PB osteoblasts (Supplementary Figure S5c).

The decreased bone mass present in the long bones of Samd4^PB/PB mice may also result from increased osteoclast differentiation and/or function. To address this, we analyzed tibia from 3-week-old WT and Samd4^PB/PB mice for the presence of tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP)-positive osteoclasts. In comparison with age-matched WT controls, Samd4^PB/PB mice showed similar numbers of TRAP-positive cells in the proximal tibia of 3-week-old mice (Supplementary Figure S6a). Consistently, the expression of characteristic osteoclast marker genes, including cathepsin K (Ctsk), matrix metallopeptidase 9 (Mmp9), osteoclast-associated receptor (Oscar), dendritic cell-specific transmembrane protein (Dc-stamp) and nuclear factor of activated T cells and cytoplasmic 1 (Nfatc1), was not significantly different between Samd4^PB/PB mice and WT bone marrow (Supplementary Figure S6b). Further supporting these in vivo results, culture of bone marrow harvested from Samd4^PB/PB mice and WT mice in the presence of macrophage colony-stimulating factor and receptor activator of NF-κB ligand resulted in the formation of a similar number of multinucleated TRAP-positive osteoclasts (Supplementary Figure S6c). Further analysis of these cultures via quantitative PCR (qPCR) revealed that the osteoclast-specific markers, including Ctsk, Mmp9, Oscar, Dc-stamp and Nfatc1, were induced to similar levels in Samd4^PB/PB mice and WT cultures (Supplementary Figure S6d). Collectively, these results suggest that the osteopenic phenotype observed in Samd4^PB/PB mice is due to decreased bone formation by osteoblasts as opposed to augmented bone resorption by osteoclasts.

A list of SAMD4 target mRNAs are identified by RIP assay, among which, Mig6 is enriched at the top of 33 genes (Figure 5b and Supplementary Table S2). Our study showed that SAMD4 impaired MIG6 protein level, and the deficiency of SAMD4 in Samd4^PB/PB results in higher level of MIG6 protein (Figure 5d). Knockdown of Mig6 rescues the decreased osteoblast differentiation in Samd4-deficient osteoblasts, supporting that higher protein level of MIG6 in Samd4-deficient osteoblasts is responsible for the impaired osteoblastogenesis (Figure 5h and i and Supplementary Figure S2). Furthermore, we discover that SAMD4 could block the translation of luciferase when 5′UTR of Mig6 mRNA is located in 5′ or 3′ end of luciferase mRNA (Figure 6a–c). Mig6 has been demonstrated as having an essential role in chondrocyte proliferation and differentiation [35, 36]. The chondrocyte defects in Samd4^PB/PB mice (Figure 7 and Supplementary Figure S4) are consistent with our description of the mechanism by which SAMD4 represses the Mig6 protein translation. Thus the decreased bone density of Samd4^PB/PB mice could be related to the protein translational regulation by SAMD4.

Overall, this study demonstrates that mammalian Samd4 is a translational repressor that inhibits Mig6 expression and regulates skeletal development. However, the function of the regulation of protein synthesis in skeletal development remains elusive. In this study, we identified mammalian SAMD4 as a novel regulator of osteogenesis, and our results suggest that control of protein translation could have a therapeutic potential in metabolic bone diseases, such as osteoporosis.

Materials and Methods

Mouse lines

Samd4^PB/PB mice were obtained from the PB Mutagenesis Center, Institute of Developmental Biology and Molecular Medicine, Fudan University. All mice analyzed were maintained on an FVB background. All animals were maintained in pathogen-free conditions in accordance with the guidelines of the Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.

Cell culture

Human embryonic kidney cell line (HEK293T) was obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) and maintained in high glucose minimum essential medium (Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). Mouse embryonic fibroblast cells (C3H10T1/2) were obtained from ATCC and maintained in minimum essential medium (MEM) alpha containing 10% FBS. Primary murine osteoblasts were isolated from calvaria of P5–P7 mice as described previously [42]. For osteoblast differentiation, primary osteoblasts were cultured in low glucose alpha MEM containing 10% FBS and induced in 50 μg ml⁻¹ L-ascorbic acid and 1080 mg ml⁻¹ β-glycerophosphate. The osteoblast differentiation level assay was performed following a previously published method [43]. The isolation and differentiation of primary osteoclasts were also previously described [44]. For the chondrogenic differentiation, the chondrocytes were separated from the articular cartilage from P3 to P5 mice and cultured in low glucose alpha MEM containing 10% FBS. A two-dimensional micromass culture was initiated by spotting 2.5×10⁵ chondrocytes in 15 μl to each well of a 12-well-plate and maintained in chondrogenesis medium supplemented with 500 nM ml⁻¹ TGFβ3 (R&D Systems, Lille, France, 243-B3-200). After 7 days of differentiation, the micromass culture was stained by 1% alcian blue.

Histological analyses

For histological analyses, tissues were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde overnight at 4 °C. For gastrocnemius and epididymal white adipose tissue, samples were dehydrated in 60% sucrose/phosphate-buffered saline solution overnight at room temperature and then embedded in an optimal cutting temperature compound (Tissue-Tek, Sakura, Torrance, CA, USA) under a stereomicroscope and transferred onto dry ice to solidify. Postnatal tibia samples were decalcified in 20% EDTA for 14 days (P7) and 3-week-old. Decalcified samples were dehydrated using graded ethanol overnight and embedded in paraffin. Paraffin-embedded tissue samples were sectioned into 8 μm sections. Immunohistochemical staining was performed as previously described [45]. Images were captured using a microscope (Olympus BX51, Tokyo, Japan). For TRAP staining, the sections of tibia from 3-week-old littermates were fixed in 100% methanol for 5 min, washed 5 min in phosphate-buffered saline twice and then stained using the Leukocyte Acid Phosphatase (TRAP) Kit (Sigma, 387 A-1KT, St Louis, MO, USA).

Microquantitative computed tomography analysis

Femurs isolated from age- and sex-matched 3-week-old mice were fixed in 70% ethanol and scanned using SkyScan1176 (Bruker, Kartuizersweg, Belgium). Femurs and skulls were scanned at 8.96-micron resolution. For analysis of femoral bone mass, a region of trabecular bone 2.0 mm wide was contoured, starting 600 microns from the proximal end of the distal femoral growth plate. For femoral trabecular bone, a threshold of 80–255 permille was used. The region of interest of the femoral cortical bone was 1.0 mm wide, starting 3.7 mm from the proximal end of the distal femoral growth plate. For femoral cortical bone, a threshold of 125–255 permille was used. Three-dimensional reconstructions were created by stacking the two-dimensional images from the contoured regions.

Real-time RT-PCR

Total RNA was prepared from cells or tissues using TRIzol (T9424, Sigma) and reverse transcribed into cDNA using the PrimeScript RT Reagent Kit (PR037A, TakaRa, Dalian, China). The cDNA quantity was analyzed by the BioRad CFX96 system (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA). The primer sets used were as follows: Hprt sense 5′- GTTAAGCAGTACAGCCCCAAA-3′ and antisense 5′- AGGGCATATCCAACAACAAACTT-3; Samd4 sense 5′- CTCTCGGGATTCTGGGATTTGC-3′ and antisense 5′- TACTTGTGCAGGCGGAGGCTT-3; Alp sense 5′- GGGCAACTCCATCTTTGGTCTG-3′ and antisense 5′- TTCACCGTCCACCACCTTGT-3′; Col1a1 sense 5′- GCTCCTCTTAGGGGCCACT-3′ and antisense 5′- CCACGTCTCACCATTGGGG-3′; Runx2 sense 5′- ATGATGACACTGCCACCTCTGACT-3′ and antisense 5′- ATGAAATGCTTGGGAACTGCCTGG-3′; Tnfrsf12a sense 5′- CAGGACCCGTCGGAACTGAATC-3′ and antisense 5′- CAGCCACTCACTGTCCCGTCCA-3′; Mig6 sense 5′- GCCTACAATCTGAACTCCCCTGC-3′ and antisense 5′- TAATGGGTGTAAGTGGAGGTGTGGA-3′; Col2a1 sense 5′- CGGTCCTACGGTGTCAGG-3′ and antisense 5′- GCAGAGGACATTCCCAGTGT-3′; Col10a1 sense 5′- CCCACAGGCATAAAGGGCCCAC-3′ and antisense 5′- GGACCTGGGTGTCCTCGAGGTCC-3′; Ctsk sense 5′- GAAGAAGACTCACCAGAAGCAG-3′ and antisense 5′- TCCAGGTTATGGGCAGAGATT-3; Mmp9 sense 5′- CTGGACAGCCAGACACTAAAG-3′ and antisense 5′- CTCGCGGCAAGTCTTCAGAG-3′; Nfatc1 sense 5′- GACCCGGAGTTCGACTTCG-3′ and antisense 5′- TGACACTAGGGGACACATAACTG-3′; Oscar sense 5′- CCTAGCCTCATACCCCCAG-3′ and antisense 5′- CGTTGATCCCAGGAGTCACAA-3′; and Dc-stamp sense 5′- GGGGACTTATGTGTTTCCACG-3′ and antisense 5′- ACAAAGCAACAGACTCCCAAAT-3′.

RIP and RNA sequencing

A total of 10⁷ Flag-Samd4-expressing Samd4^PB/PB osteoblasts were resuspended in IP buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl Ph 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate and 1 mM phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride), subjected to gentle sonication and centrifuged to obtain cell extracts. Protein–RNA complex immunoprecipitation and RNA sequencing was performed as previously described [46]. The RIP-seq data reported in this study have been deposited in NCBI’s GEO, series accession number GSE90818.

Luciferase reporter assays

C3H10T1/2 cells plated on 12-well-plates were transiently transfected using polyetherimide (Sigma, 408727) with the luciferase reporter constructs and pRL-TK (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) as a normalization control for transfection efficiency, together with plasmids encoding SAMD4 and SAMD4 mutants. Forty-eight hours after transfection, the cells were lysed and luciferase activity was measured using the Dual Luciferase Assay.

Antibodies

Anti-RUNX2 antibody (SC-390351), anti-SAMD4 antibody (SC-163329) and anti-TUBULIN antibody (SC-23948) were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA); monoclonal anti-Flag antibody (F3165) was from Sigma-Aldrich; anti-MIG6 antibody (11630) was from ProteinTech, Rosemont, IL, USA; and anti-Tnfrsf12a (ab109365) was from Abcam (San Francisco, CA, USA).

Plasmids and lentivirus

To generate the Flag-Samd4 construct, Samd4 was amplified from the total cDNA library of 10.5-day-old embryonic mice (E10.5) and cloned into the modified pHAGE vector containing Flag using restriction enzymes Not I and BamH I. The full-length Samd4 open reading frame was obtained from total mouse cDNA and inserted into pHAGE vector using restriction enzymes Not I and BamH I. The targeting sequences of specific shRNAs, which are listed in Supplementary Table S1, were cloned into pLKO.1 lentiviral vectors, and the insertions were confirmed by DNA sequencing. The lentivirus were produced by co-transfection of plasmids with VSVG and Δ8.9 plasmids into HEK293T cells following the protocol from Open Biosystems (GE Healthcare).

Statistical analysis

For statistical analysis, in most graphs mean values with s.d. are shown. Data were generated from several independently replicates. P-values were obtained from two-tailed Student’s t-tests. P-value<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

References

Lipshitz HD, Smibert CA. Mechanisms of RNA localization and translational regulation. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2000; 10: 476–488.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Holcik M, Sonenberg N. Translational control in stress and apoptosis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2005; 6: 318–327.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Holcik M, Lefebvre C, Yeh C, Chow T, Korneluk RG. A new internal-ribosome-entry-site motif potentiates XIAP-mediated cytoprotection. Nat Cell Biol 1999; 1: 190–192.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Barna M, Pusic A, Zollo O et al. Suppression of Myc oncogenic activity by ribosomal protein haploinsufficiency. Nature 2008; 456: 971–975.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Silvera D, Formenti SC, Schneider RJ. Translational control in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2010; 10: 254–266.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Zismanov V, Chichkov V, Colangelo V et al. Phosphorylation of eIF2alpha is a translational control mechanism regulating muscle stem cell quiescence and self-renewal. Cell Stem Cell 2016; 18: 79–90.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Shyh-Chang N, Daley GQ. Lin28: primal regulator of growth and metabolism in stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 2013; 12: 395–406.
Article Google Scholar
Kwon SC, Yi H, Eichelbaum K et al. The RNA-binding protein repertoire of embryonic stem cells. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2013; 20: 1122–1130.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Karsenty G, Ferron M. The contribution of bone to whole-organism physiology. Nature 2012; 481: 314–320.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Mackie EJ, Tatarczuch L, Mirams M. The skeleton: a multi-functional complex organ. The growth plate chondrocyte and endochondral ossification. J Endocrinol 2011; 211: 109–121.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Harada S, Rodan GA. Control of osteoblast function and regulation of bone mass. Nature 2003; 423: 349–355.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Karsenty G, Wagner EF. Reaching a genetic and molecular understanding of skeletal development. Dev Cell 2002; 2: 389–406.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Feng X, McDonald JM. Disorders of bone remodeling. Annu Rev Pathol 2011; 6: 121–145.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Zaidi M. Skeletal remodeling in health and disease. Nat Med 2007; 13: 791–801.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Ducy P. Cbfa1: a molecular switch in osteoblast biology. Dev Dyn 2000; 219: 461–471.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Yang X, Karsenty G. ATF4 the osteoblast accumulation of which is determined post-translationally, can induce osteoblast-specific gene expression in non-osteoblastic cells. J Biol Chem 2004; 279: 47109–47114.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Ortuno MJ, Susperregui AR, Artigas N, Rosa JL, Ventura F. Osterix induces Col1a1 gene expression through binding to Sp1 sites in the bone enhancer and proximal promoter regions. Bone 2013; 52: 548–556.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Greenblatt MB, Shim JH, Glimcher LH. Mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways in osteoblasts. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2013; 29: 63–79.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Zou W, Chen X, Shim JH et al. The E3 ubiquitin ligase Wwp2 regulates craniofacial development through mono-ubiquitylation of Goosecoid. Nat Cell Biol 2011; 13: 59–65.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Yamashita M, Ying SX, Zhang GM et al. Ubiquitin ligase Smurf1 controls osteoblast activity and bone homeostasis by targeting MEKK2 for degradation. Cell 2005; 121: 101–113.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Lian JB, Stein GS, van Wijnen AJ et al. MicroRNA control of bone formation and homeostasis. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2012; 8: 212–227.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Ding S, Wu X, Li G, Han M, Zhuang Y, Xu T. Efficient transposition of the piggyBac (PB) transposon in mammalian cells and mice. Cell 2005; 122: 473–483.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Smibert CA, Wilson JE, Kerr K, Macdonald PM. smaug protein represses translation of unlocalized nanos mRNA in the Drosophila embryo. Genes Dev 1996; 10: 2600–2609.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Tadros W, Goldman AL, Babak T et al. SMAUG is a major regulator of maternal mRNA destabilization in Drosophila and its translation is activated by the PAN GU kinase. Dev Cell 2007; 12: 143–155.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Benoit B, He CH, Zhang F et al. An essential role for the RNA-binding protein Smaug during the Drosophila maternal-to-zygotic transition. Development 2009; 136: 923–932.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Dahanukar A, Walker JA, Wharton RP . Smaug, a novel RNA-binding protein that operates a translational switch in Drosophila. Mol Cell 1999; 4: 209–218.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Semotok JL, Luo H, Cooperstock RL et al. Drosophila maternal Hsp83 mRNA destabilization is directed by multiple SMAUG recognition elements in the open reading frame. Mol Cell Biol 2008; 28: 6757–6772.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Chen L, Dumelie JG, Li X et al. Global regulation of mRNA translation and stability in the early Drosophila embryo by the Smaug RNA-binding protein. Genome Biol 2014; 15: R4.
Article Google Scholar
Nelson MR, Leidal AM, Smibert CA. Drosophila Cup is an eIF4E-binding protein that functions in Smaug-mediated translational repression. EMBO J 2004; 23: 150–159.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Pinder BD, Smibert CA. microRNA-independent recruitment of Argonaute 1 to nanos mRNA through the Smaug RNA-binding protein. EMBO Rep 2013; 14: 80–86.
Article CAS Google Scholar
de Haro M, Al-Ramahi I, Jones KR, Holth JK, Timchenko LT, Botas J. Smaug/SAMD4A restores translational activity of CUGBP1 and suppresses CUG-induced myopathy. PLoS Genet 2013; 9: e1003445.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Baez MV, Boccaccio GL. Mammalian smaug is a translational repressor that forms cytoplasmic foci similar to stress granules. J Biol Chem 2005; 280: 43131–43140.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Zhang X, Pickin KA, Bose R, Jura N, Cole PA, Kuriyan J. Inhibition of the EGF receptor by binding of MIG6 to an activating kinase domain interface. Nature 2007; 450: 741–744.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Zhang YW, Vande Woude GF . Mig-6 signal transduction, stress response and cancer. Cell Cycle 2007; 6: 507–513.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Staal B, Williams BO, Beier F, Vande Woude GF, Zhang YW. Cartilage-specific deletion of Mig-6 results in osteoarthritis-like disorder with excessive articular chondrocyte proliferation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2014; 111: 2590–2595.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Joiner DM, Less KD, Van Wieren EM, Zhang YW, Hess D, Williams BO. Accelerated and increased joint damage in young mice with global inactivation of mitogen-inducible gene 6 after ligament and meniscus injury. Arthritis Res Ther 2014; 16: R81.
Article Google Scholar
Chen Z, Holland W, Shelton JM et al. Mutation of mouse Samd4 causes leanness, myopathy, uncoupled mitochondrial respiration, and dysregulated mTORC1 signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2014; 111: 7367–7372.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Ravindranathan S, Oberstrass FC, Allain FHT . Increase in backbone mobility of the VTS1p-SAM domain on binding to SRE-RNA. J Mol Biol 2010; 396: 732–746.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Aviv T, Lin Z, Lau S, Rendl LM, Sicheri F, Smibert CA . The RNA-binding SAM domain of Smaug defines a new family of post-transcriptional regulators. Nat Struct Biol 2003; 10: 614–621.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Robinson LJ, Borysenko CW, Blair HC. Tumor necrosis factor family receptors regulating bone turnover - New observations in osteoblastic and osteoclastic cell lines. Ann Ny Acad Sci 2007; 1116: 432–443.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Matsui H, Fukuno N, Kanda Y et al. The expression of Fn14 via mechanical stress-activated JNK contributes to apoptosis induction in osteoblasts. J Biol Chem 2014; 289: 6438–6450.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Yoshida Y, Tanaka S, Umemori H et al. Negative regulation of BMP/Smad signaling by Tob in osteoblasts. Cell 2000; 103: 1085–1097.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Zou W, Greenblatt MB, Shim JH et al. MLK3 regulates bone development downstream of the faciogenital dysplasia protein FGD1 in mice. J Clin Invest 2011; 121: 4383–4392.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Wein MN, Jones DC, Shim JH et al. Control of bone resorption in mice by Schnurri-3. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012; 109: 8173–8178.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Zou W, Greenblatt MB, Brady N et al. The microtubule-associated protein DCAMKL1 regulates osteoblast function via repression of Runx2. J Exp Med 2013; 210: 1793–1806.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Yin QF, Yang L, Zhang Y et al. Long noncoding RNAs with snoRNA ends. Mol Cell 2012; 48: 219–230.
Article CAS Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Institute of Developmental Biology and Molecular Medicine, Fudan University for providing Samd4^PB/PBmice and thank the members of the Zou laboratory for useful discussions. We thank Dr Matthew B Greenblatt for critical reading of the manuscript. This work was supported in part by grants from 973 Program from the Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST) (2014CB964704 and 2015CB964503) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (31371463 and 31501170), and WZ is a scholar of the ‘National 1000 Young Talents Program of China’ and ‘the National Science Fund for Excellent Young Scholars’ (NSFC) (81322027).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

State Key Laboratory of Cell Biology, CAS Center for Excellence in Molecular Cell Sciences, Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China
Ningning Niu, Lijun Wang & Weiguo Zou
State Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology, CAS Center for Excellence in Molecular Cell Sciences, Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China
Jian-Feng Xiang & Ling-Ling Chen
Key Laboratory of Computational Biology, CAS-MPG Partner Institute for Computational Biology, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China
Qin Yang & Li Yang
Division of Osteoporosis and Bone Disease, Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Metabolic Bone Disease and Genetic Research Unit, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Six People’s Hospital, Shanghai, China
Zhanying Wei

Authors

Ningning Niu
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Jian-Feng Xiang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Qin Yang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Lijun Wang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Zhanying Wei
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Ling-Ling Chen
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Li Yang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Weiguo Zou
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

WZ and NN conceived and supervised the project. NN performed most of experiments and data analysis. JX performed the RIP experiment. QY and LY helped with statistical analysis. LW helped with animal experiments. ZW helped with microquantitative computed tomographic analysis. NN and WZ wrote the paper with the help from LC and LY.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Weiguo Zou.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

( Supplementary information is linked to the online version of the paper on the Cell Discovery website.)

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (PDF 682 kb)

Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Niu, N., Xiang, JF., Yang, Q. et al. RNA-binding protein SAMD4 regulates skeleton development through translational inhibition of Mig6 expression. Cell Discov 3, 16050 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/celldisc.2016.50

Download citation

Received: 30 August 2016
Accepted: 05 December 2016
Published: 24 January 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/celldisc.2016.50

This article is cited by

RNA binding protein SAMD4: current knowledge and future perspectives
- Xin-Ya Wang
- Li-Na Zhang
Cell & Bioscience (2023)
SAMD4 family members suppress human hepatitis B virus by directly binding to the Smaug recognition region of viral RNA
- Yuze Wang
- Xinrui Fan
- Jiahuai Han
Cellular & Molecular Immunology (2021)