Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Prestigious European grants might be biased, study suggests

Institutional affiliations of panellists seem to skew European Research Council decisions — especially in the life sciences.
  1. Diana Kwon

    1. Diana Kwon is a freelance science journalist based in Berlin.

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed  Google Scholar

Funding panels are more likely to give prestigious European Union early-career grants to applicants connected to the institutions of some of the panellists, a study of the 2014 funding round suggests.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Nature 593, 490-491 (2021)

doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-01362-8

Updates & Corrections

  • Update 07 June 2021: The article has been updated to include further details about the ERC's conflict-of-interest policy and a comment from Jean-Pierre Bourguignon and the response from the authors of the paper. The ERC had initially declined to comment on the merits of the paper because it has not yet been peer reviewed.

References

  1. Mom, C. S. & Van den Besselaar, P. Preprint at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344461606 (2021).

Download references

Subjects

Latest on:

Nature Careers

Jobs

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing

Search

Advanced search

Quick links