Introduction

Neonates with systemic sepsis, meningitis or septic-arthritis often need long-term intravenous (IV) antibiotic therapy. Peripheral IV catheter (PIVC) in such neonates have intermittent usage and tend to get blocked by blood clot at its distal tip, prompting frequent reinsertions. Repeated skin breach exposes the vulnerable newborns to infection and painful experiences which might potentially affect neurodevelopmental outcome.1 Although limb immobilization with splint2 at cannula site has not been shown to prolong the patency of PIVC, Heparin, acting as an anticoagulant, has been hypothesized to prolong the functional duration of a PIVC and reduce the number of catheterization attempts. There have been conflicting results of benefits of heparin lock in neonates.3 Cochrane meta-analysis reported inconclusive evidence for use of heparinized saline lock in prolonging duration of catheter in neonates and recommended that more studies are needed.3 We therefore conducted this study with the objective to evaluate the efficacy and safety of heparinized saline flush in concentration of 10 U ml−1 on functional duration of PIVC among term and preterm neonates.

Materials and methods

This randomized controlled trial was conducted in neonatal unit of a teaching hospital of North India from October 2009 to September 2010. Study protocol was cleared by Institutional Ethical Committee of the hospital. Informed written consent was obtained from either parents before enrollment. Term and preterm neonates born at >32 weeks of gestation who required peripheral IV catheter for intermittent administration of antibiotics with expected duration of hospital stay >5 days were eligible for enrollment in the study. Neonates with intracranial hemorrhage, platelet count <150 000 mm−3,4 coagulopathy or major congenital malformation were excluded.

Allocation of group was done by block randomization. Randomization sequence was generated in blocks of 8 using a computer program. Allocation sequences were then placed in serially numbered, opaque and sealed envelopes. When a baby was eligible for enrollment a new PIVC was inserted after obtaining written consent from one of the parents. Enrolled neonates were randomized to receive either heparin or normal saline, immediately before and after each dose of antibiotic. Babies in treatment group received 1.0 ml of heparinized saline containing 10 U ml−1 and babies in control group received 1.0 ml of normal saline.

The allotted medications were prepared every day and labelled as A or B by either of the two doctors who were not involved in the study. The code of A or B was disclosed only after completion of trial. Blinding was preserved by dispensing drugs and placebo in identical, indistinguishable containers. They were administered by a separately identified team of three resident doctors and one nurse. Care giving staff and parents were blinded to the group allocation. In neonates not requiring continuous IV fluids, one PIVC was inserted and used for administering antibiotics only. In neonates on continuous IV fluid infusion, a separate PIVC was used for administering antibiotics, so as to not interrupt the IV line. The catheter to be used for administering intermittent IV antibiotics was included in the study. A 24-gauge PIVC (NEOCAN Eastern Medikit Limited, Delhi, India) were used for catheterization in all neonates. Insertion and fixation of PIVC was done by trained resident doctor and nurses. Before the onset of the study, all healthcare personnel involved in insertion and fixation of catheter in the NICU were given demonstration on the technique of insertion and fixation of PIVC. Study medication was administered immediately after catheter insertion and then immediately before and after each antibiotics injection. Antibiotics were mostly administered at 8 or 12 hourly interval in both groups. The catheter site was monitored every 6 h for development of thrombophlebitis or any other sign of removal. The signs of removal were presence of any one of the following (i) Occlusion: defined as inability to infuse fluid. This was confirmed by resident doctor who attempted to push 1 ml of normal saline using a 5-ml syringe (ii) Phlebitis: defined as pain, swelling, erythema or indurations at the site of catheter with or without a palpable venous cord and (iii) Infiltration: infusate entering the subcutaneous tissue instead of the vein leading to swelling and difficulty in pushing antibiotics.

Platelet count was obtained at time of enrollment and then every third day till end of enrollment. Coagulation profile was done at the time of stopping study drug or if coagulation abnormality was suspected clinically. Study medication was stopped if neonates developed thrombocytopenia or coagulation defect or intracranial bleed and patients were analyzed by intention to treat analysis. Intracranial hemorrhage was recognized by ultrasound, which was obtained before enrollment on seventh day and at discharge from hospital.

Primary outcome variable was functional duration of first PIVC defined as the time between insertion and removal of the first catheter. Secondary outcome variable was average catheter duration of any catheter inserted, defined as total number of hours of catheterization divided by total number of catheterizations. Other outcomes analyzed were complications associated with PIVC including occlusion, phlebitis or infiltration, incidence of abnormal coagulation profile, allergic reaction to study medication (fever, high blood pressure, heart rate >160 min−1 , respiratory distress, skin rashes consisting of red spot), heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) defined as platelet count <15 0000 mm−3 after exclusion of other cause of thrombocytopenia.5, 6

We needed to enroll 56 subjects in each group to detect a 30% increase in functional duration of PIVC from baseline duration of 24±15 h (reported in a study from India)2 with 80% power and 95% confidence interval (CI). To account for some unforeseen loss of the cases, it was decided to randomize 120 babies in two equal groups.

All baseline and outcome data were recorded prospectively on a predesigned proforma. The data were checked daily for completion, consistency and accuracy. Analysis was performed using Stata version 11 (STATA 11.1, Stata Corp, College Station, TX, USA) by intention to treat. Categorical variables were compared with χ2-square test for discrete variable and Student t-test was used for continuous variables. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was carried out to compare the rate of catheter change with time between the two groups. A P-value of <0.05 was considered significant.

Observation and Results

Of the 130 eligible neonates, 10 babies were excluded owing to refusal of consent. Remaining 120 neonates were randomized in to two groups of 60 neonates each (Figure 1). The two groups were comparable with respect to postnatal age, sex, birth weight, mode of delivery, nature of IV antibiotics, site of catheterization and person inserting the catheter (Table 1). Number of IV canula inserted in heparin group were 96 and 100 in saline group.

Figure 1
figure 1

Flow diagram of participant’s enrollment.

Table 1 Base line characteristics of neonates enrolled in two groups

Primary outcome

There was a statistically significant increase in functional duration of first catheter in neonates in heparinized saline group as compared to normal saline group. Mean functional duration of first catheter was more in heparinized saline group, mean (s.d.) of 71.68 h (27.3) as compared with 57.7 h (23.6) in normal saline group (P<0.005). Between the two groups, mean difference (95% CI) in functional duration of catheter was 13.9 h (4.7–23.1) in favor of heparinized saline group (Figure 2). Kaplan–Meier survival estimate showed that at 90 h of duration, 7 first canula (10.0%) were patent in normal saline group compared with 17 first canula (25.0%) in heparinized saline group (P<0.001) ( Figure 2).

Figure 2
figure 2

Kaplan–Meier survival estimates for comparison of functional duration of first peripheral intravenous cathereter in the two groups.

Secondary outcomes

Average catheter duration (of any catheters used on a baby) was more in heparinized saline group, with mean (s.d.) of 71.12 h (23.86) as compared with 57.29 h (18.66) in normal saline group (P<0.001). Between the two groups, mean difference (95% CI) in average catheter duration was 13.86 h (7.84–19.88) in favor of heparinized saline group (Figure 3). Kaplan–Meier survival analysis showed that 63.0%, 13.0% and 1.0% of the catheters on saline infusion were patent at 50, 75 and 90 h, respectively, as against 82.3%, 49.0% and 11.5% in the heparinized group at respective time points (Figure 3). These differences were statistically significant (P<0.001).

Figure 3
figure 3

Duration of any peripheral intravenous catheter.

Occlusion at catheter site was commonest indication for catheter removal in both groups (77.3% vs 71.7%). Phlebitis was next most common cause (28 and 22% in two groups). There was no significant difference in abnormality in platelet count and coagulation profile, intracranial bleed and allergic reaction in either group.

Discussion

Our study demonstrated that use of heparinized saline flush (10 U ml−1) before and after intermittent IV antibiotics resulted in prolonged functional duration of 24-gauge peripheral IV catheter in neonates by almost 16 h. There exists equivocal evidence that use of heparin prolongs the duration of PIVC in neonatal age group. Mudge et al.4 had earlier demonstrated the effectiveness of heparin flush solutions in maintaining the patency of 24-gauge peripheral intermittent infusion devices. It was, however, a nonrandomized, sequential, but blinded study. The survival analysis in their study demonstrated that the median duration of catheter flushed with heparin was 42 h and with saline was 35.3 h (P=0.02). Danek et al.7 also reported that heparinized saline was more effective in prolonging duration of 24-gauge PIVC in neonates. Tayler et al.8 had demonstrated that heparin lock is probably better than continuous infusion fluids for prolongation of PIVC. In a cohort study using historical controls, Flint and Davies9 reported that intermittent flushing with heparin works as well as continuous infusion of heparin. A recent study by Pereza et al.10 reported that intermittent flushing with even normal saline was better than continuous infusion of normal saline at rate of 2 ml h−1 for prolonging duration of PIVC in newborns.

Contrary to above studies, Kotter et al.11 did not find significant prolongation of IV catheter patency with use of 10 U ml−1 of heparinized saline to flush the catheters. Similarly, Paisley et al.12 and Hanrahan et al.13 also did not demonstrate any increase in functional duration of PIVC with use of heparinized saline. A recent trial by Arnts et al.14 also failed to demonstrate any advantage of heparin solution when compared to normal saline flush in neonates. In addition, Schultz et al.15 reported decrease in duration of patency of PIVC with use of heparinized saline. Another recent trial by Cook et al.16 also reported that saline flushed PIVC lasts longer than heparinized saline flushed PIVC by average of 13 h. Cochrane systemic review reported inconclusive evidence for heparin use for IV catheters in neonates with two studies reporting benefit4, 17 and one study reporting harm,15 whereas two studies reporting no difference.11, 18 Paisley et al.12 reported that duration of patency was significantly longer in term, but not in preterm infants.

Increasing the concentration of heparin has been tried to increase the efficacy of heparinized saline to maintain the patency of IV catheter. In a randomized, double blinded trial on 90 neonates, Heilskov et al.18 demonstrated that increasing concentration of heparinized saline flush solutions (2 and 10 U ml−1), did not have any effect on the duration of IV catheter patency. A recent trial by Bertolino et al.19 in adult patients reported efficacy of 100 U ml−1 heparinized saline flush in reducing catheter related phlebitis/occlusion and number of catheter per patients. This study used maximum concentration of heparin tried in heparinized solutions but it did not demonstrate any increase in heparin related complications.

Most previous studies have used heparin flush only after IV antibiotics. However, our study used heparin flush both before and after IV antibiotics. This could be the reason for prolongation of fuctional duration of catheter patency in our study. Another strength of our study was the double blind trial, as many previous study were either open labeled or used historical controls.

From the above results, we can conclude that administration of 10 U ml−1 heparinized saline before and after IV antibiotics increases the functional duration of PIVC in neonates without any significant side effects.