This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Lottmann HB et al. (2000) The efficacy and paranchymal consequences of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in infants. BJU Int 85: 311–315
Manohar T et al. (2006) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for complex caliceal calculi and staghorn stones in children less than 5 years of age. J Endourol 20: 547–551
Desai M et al. (1999) Pediatric percutenous nephrolithotomy: assessing impact of technical innovations on safety and efficacy. J Endourol 13: 359–364
Dretler SP and Spencer BA (2001) CT and stone fragility. J Endourol 15: 31–36
Wang LJ et al. (2005) Predictions of outcomes of renal stones after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy from stone characteristics determined by unenhanced helical computed tomography: a multivariate analysis. Eur Radiol 15: 2238–2243
Acknowledgements
The synopsis was written by Tamsin Osborne, Associate Editor, Nature Clinical Practice, and Mahesh R Desai.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declares no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Desai, M. What is the best treatment modality for children with renal stones of 1–2 cm diameter?. Nat Rev Urol 4, 70–71 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpuro0707
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpuro0707