Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Resource
  • Published:

Multicolor quantitative confocal imaging cytometry

Abstract

Multicolor 3D quantitative imaging of large tissue volumes is necessary to understand tissue development and organization as well as interactions between distinct cell types in situ. However, tissue imaging remains technically challenging, particularly imaging of bone and marrow. Here, we describe a pipeline to reproducibly generate high-dimensional quantitative data from bone and bone marrow that may be extended to any tissue. We generate thick bone sections from adult mouse femurs with preserved tissue microarchitecture and demonstrate eight-color imaging using confocal microscopy without linear unmixing. We introduce XiT, an open-access software for fast and easy data curation, exploration and quantification of large imaging data sets with single-cell resolution. We describe how XiT can be used to correct for potential artifacts in quantitative 3D imaging, and we use the pipeline to measure the spatial relationship between hematopoietic cells, bone matrix and marrow Schwann cells.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: A method for bone and bone marrow imaging.
Figure 2: Quantitative comparison of clearing media.
Figure 3: Multiplexing immunofluorescent staining for bone and bone marrow thick-tissue cytometry.
Figure 4: Multi(x)-dimensional image analysis toolbox (XiT) for cytometry of large imaging data sets.
Figure 5: Automated analysis of c-Kit+ cell subpopulations.
Figure 6: Spatial distribution of c-Kit+ cell subpopulations relative to bone and Schwann cells.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schroeder, T. Imaging stem-cell-driven regeneration in mammals. Nature 453, 345–351 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Coutu, D.L. & Schroeder, T. Probing cellular processes by long-term live imaging—historic problems and current solutions. J. Cell Sci. 126, 3805–3815 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Flores-Figueroa, E., Essers, M. & Bowman, T.V. Hematopoiesis “awakens”: evolving technologies, the force behind them. Exp. Hematol. 44, 101–105 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rieger, M.A. & Schroeder, T. Hematopoiesis. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 4, a008250 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bianco, P. Bone and the hematopoietic niche: a tale of two stem cells. Blood 117, 5281–5288 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Beerman, I., Luis, T.C., Singbrant, S., Lo Celso, C. & Méndez-Ferrer, S. The evolving view of the hematopoietic stem cell niche. Exp. Hematol. 50, 22–26 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Acar, M. et al. Deep imaging of bone marrow shows non-dividing stem cells are mainly perisinusoidal. Nature 526, 126–130 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kunisaki, Y. et al. Arteriolar niches maintain haematopoietic stem cell quiescence. Nature 502, 637–643 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Li, W., Germain, R.N. & Gerner, M.Y. Multiplex, quantitative cellular analysis in large tissue volumes with clearing-enhanced 3D microscopy (Ce3D). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114, E7321–E7330 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Richardson, D.S. & Lichtman, J.W. Clarifying tissue clearing. Cell 162, 246–257 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Schnell, U., Dijk, F., Sjollema, K.A. & Giepmans, B.N. Immunolabeling artifacts and the need for live-cell imaging. Nat. Methods 9, 152–158 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hama, H. et al. Scale: a chemical approach for fluorescence imaging and reconstruction of transparent mouse brain. Nat. Neurosci. 14, 1481–1488 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ma, Y.D. et al. Defects in osteoblast function but no changes in long-term repopulating potential of hematopoietic stem cells in a mouse chronic inflammatory arthritis model. Blood 114, 4402–4410 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Nombela-Arrieta, C. et al. Quantitative imaging of haematopoietic stem and progenitor cell localization and hypoxic status in the bone marrow microenvironment. Nat. Cell Biol. 15, 533–543 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Yamazaki, S. et al. Nonmyelinating Schwann cells maintain hematopoietic stem cell hibernation in the bone marrow niche. Cell 147, 1146–1158 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gruber, H.E. & Ingram, J.A. In Handbook of Histology Methods for Bone and Cartilage (eds. An, Y.H. & Martin, K.L.) 281–286 (Humana Press, 2003).

  17. Kiel, M.J. et al. SLAM family receptors distinguish hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells and reveal endothelial niches for stem cells. Cell 121, 1109–1121 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Méndez-Ferrer, S. et al. Mesenchymal and haematopoietic stem cells form a unique bone marrow niche. Nature 466, 829–834 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang, L. et al. Identification of a clonally expanding haematopoietic compartment in bone marrow. EMBO J. 32, 219–230 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kusumbe, A.P., Ramasamy, S.K. & Adams, R.H. Coupling of angiogenesis and osteogenesis by a specific vessel subtype in bone. Nature 507, 323–328 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Li, X.-M., Hu, Z., Jorgenson, M.L. & Slayton, W.B. High levels of acetylated low-density lipoprotein uptake and low tyrosine kinase with immunoglobulin and epidermal growth factor homology domains-2 (Tie2) promoter activity distinguish sinusoids from other vessel types in murine bone marrow. Circulation 120, 1910–1918 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Fischer, A.H., Jacobson, K.A., Rose, J. & Zeller, R. Cryosectioning tissues. CSH Protoc. 2008, 4991 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Staudt, T., Lang, M.C., Medda, R., Engelhardt, J. & Hell, S.W. 2,2′-thiodiethanol: a new water soluble mounting medium for high resolution optical microscopy. Microsc. Res. Tech. 70, 1–9 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Bria, A., Iannello, G., Onofri, L. & Peng, H. TeraFly: real-time three-dimensional visualization and annotation of terabytes of multidimensional volumetric images. Nat. Methods 13, 192–194 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Pietzsch, T., Saalfeld, S., Preibisch, S. & Tomancak, P. BigDataViewer: visualization and processing for large image data sets. Nat. Methods 12, 481–483 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Gerner, M.Y., Kastenmuller, W., Ifrim, I., Kabat, J. & Germain, R.N. Histo-cytometry: a method for highly multiplex quantitative tissue imaging analysis applied to dendritic cell subset microanatomy in lymph nodes. Immunity 37, 364–376 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Coutu, D.L., Kokkaliaris, K.D., Kunz, L. & Schroeder, T. Three-dimensional map of non-hematopoetic bone and bone-marrow cells and molecules. Nat. Biotech. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt.4006 (2017).

  28. Mignone, J.L., Kukekov, V., Chiang, A.-S., Steindler, D. & Enikolopov, G. Neural stem and progenitor cells in nestin-GFP transgenic mice. J. Comp. Neurol. 469, 311–324 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Maes, C. et al. Osteoblast precursors, but not mature osteoblasts, move into developing and fractured bones along with invading blood vessels. Dev. Cell 19, 329–344 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Madisen, L. et al. A robust and high-throughput Cre reporting and characterization system for the whole mouse brain. Nat. Neurosci. 13, 133–140 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Ara, T. et al. Long-term hematopoietic stem cells require stromal cell-derived factor-1 for colonizing bone marrow during ontogeny. Immunity 19, 257–267 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Bilic-Curcic, I. et al. Visualizing levels of osteoblast differentiation by a two-color promoter-GFP strategy: Type I collagen-GFPcyan and osteocalcin-GFPtpz. Genesis 43, 87–98 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Huettl, R.-E. & Huber, A.B. In Laser Scanning Microscopy and Quantitative Image Analysis of Neuronal Tissue (eds. Bakota, L. & Brandt, R.) 145–162 (Humana Press, 2014).

Download references

Acknowledgements

D.L.C. would like to dedicate this article to Ian B.I. Copland (Emory University), who unexpectedly passed away on June 15th 2015 (http://www.hattrick4ian.com). The authors would like to thank T. Horn, A. Ponti and E.Montani for advice, technical support and useful discussions. This study was supported in part by the SystemsX StemSysMed grant to T. Schroeder.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

D.L.C. started the project and developed the method with K.D.K. and L.K. D.L.C., K.D.K. and L.K. planned and performed experiments and analyses. L.K. programed the XiT software with input from D.L.C. and K.D.K. All authors wrote the manuscript. T.S. funded and supervised the project.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Daniel L Coutu or Timm Schroeder.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Integrated supplementary information

Supplementary Figure 1 Experimental workflow for bone imaging.

Processing of individual samples from dissection to imaging can take up to 30 days, depending on the complexity of the immunostaining. However, a single user can easily process 10-20 samples simultaneously until imaging, which is the limiting step. The authors routinely use 0.5-1x104h of imaging time per year using two microscopes.

Supplementary Figure 2 Confirmation of specific signal using the anti-IGF2 antibody.

Sections were stained with rabbit anti-IGF2 antibody (Fig.1d) or rabbit whole IgGs (above), then detected using donkey anti-rabbit AlexaFluor 555. The signal observed near cortical bone (CB) in Fig.1d is not detectable in the isotype control.

Supplementary Figure 3 Eight colors immunostaining validation.

Acquisition setup and snapshots from the full bone scan shown in figure 3. The table should be read by rows and shows that the white arrowheads only points at a specific structure in the channel dedicated to this marker/fluorophore (red box). Snapshots from the other channels show lack of bleed-through between channels. When markers are highly correlated, and detected using spectrally similar fluorophores and/or detected simultaneously (e.g. of CD105 and Sca1, magenta box), appearance of bleed-through can be misleading. However, the lack of bleed-through of AlexaFluor 555 into the CF633 channel (Ch7) is confirmed previously (green box). Of note, in the settings for acquisition scan 2 we also illustrate the excitation and emission spectra of Qdot655. As can be seen, the 488nm laser can excite Qdot655 and lead to significant bleed-through into the Chromeo494 channel (Ch4). Hence, the detection settings for Chromeo494 have to be selected carefully.

Supplementary Figure 4 Strategies used for complex, indirect immunofluorescent staining using primary antibodies of the same species.

a) Normal indirect immunofluorescent staining is followed by sequential blocking with IgGs and monovalent F(ab)s, and then a second round of immunostaining. b) Alternatively, detection of the primary antibody is directly performed with conjugated monovalent F(ab)s, before a second round of immunostaining (c).

Supplementary Figure 5 Workflow for optimization of complex immunofluorescence staining.

Perfect imaging quality is required for quantification. Thus, if FMO and other controls are not satisfactory repeat the process. When working with well-known antibodies, two to three iterations are typically enough to obtain a satisfactory staining/imaging quality. When working with poorly validated antibodies or for staining with more than five to six colors, up to 10 iterations might be required.

Supplementary Figure 6 Image preprocessing using third party software.

Image processing example for measuring HSPC to bone and neuron distance. a, b) Femur stained for c-Kit, Sca1, lineage markers, collagen 1 and GFAP in four replicates. c, d) c-Kit is used for the initial segmentation (iso). Adjacent cells are often split accurately (white arrows) but splitting errors can occur (white arrowhead). e) After segmentation of collagen 1 and GFAP (not shown), distance transformation (DT) generates a channel representing distances (distance to collagen 1 shown). Statistics of the segmented cells are then exported for analysis with XiT. Typically, 3 - 5 x 104 c-Kit+ cells are segmented per 250μm section. f) A typical image acquisition consists of 1024x1024 pixels fields of view acquired for 4-8 channels at each of 150 or more z planes. To cover the whole organ, 100 to 150 xy positions are acquired. In the example shown, a full femur imaged with four channels consists of 6x105 individual image frames at 1024x1024 resolution. Imaris significantly reduces the size of raw data but segmentation of 2-3 cell types or structures increases file size drastically. Saving segmentation results as a XiT workspace renders data more manageable for fast computational analyses.

Supplementary Figure 7 Validation of XiT gating performed using Imaris.

The Imaris Vantage module was used to display 100 randomly chosen cells from each of four quadrants (Sca1+Lin-, Sca1+Lin+, Sca1-Lin+, Sca1-Lin-). The Vantage module is useful for quick screening of cells and to exclude artefacts.

Supplementary Figure 8 Export function of XiT.

a) The distance between any segmented objects can be measured (here minimum and mean distance of GFAP+ glial cells and collagen 1+ bone matrix). b) Quantifying very large datasets such as 8 color scans presented in figure 3 is greatly facilitated by XiT.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Text and Figures

Supplementary Figures 1–8, Supplementary Note 1 and Supplementary Tables 2–3. (PDF 1892 kb)

Life Sciences Reporting Summary

Life Sciences Reporting Summary (PDF 130 kb)

Supplementary Protocol

Supplementary Protocol (PDF 303 kb)

Supplementary Table 1

Details of mounting media and clearing agents tested for this study. (XLSX 11 kb)

Supplementary Table 4

Comparison of data analysis time using Imaris and XiT on various computers. (XLSX 15 kb)

Supplementary Table 5

All antibodies tested in this study. (XLSX 30 kb)

Supplementary Table 6

List and details of all antibodies used in this study. (XLSX 13 kb)

Full bone scan image preprocessing and validation.

Example showing one of the four full femur sections used in figure 5 with c-Kit isosurface (green) and one cKit+Sca1+Lin- cell (magenta) identified using XiT, as well as the distance transform channels from GFAP and collagen 1 (jet color). Markers shown are: c-Kit (green), Sca1 (red), Lin (blue), GFAP (yellow), collagen 1 (grey). (MP4 6774 kb)

Source data

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Coutu, D., Kokkaliaris, K., Kunz, L. et al. Multicolor quantitative confocal imaging cytometry. Nat Methods 15, 39–46 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4503

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4503

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing