Abstract
Observers commonly experience functional blindness to unattended visual events, and this problem has fuelled an intense debate concerning the fate of unattended visual information in neural processing. Here we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to demonstrate that the type of task that a human subject engages in determines the way in which ignored visual background stimuli are processed in parahippocampal cortex. Increasing the perceptual difficulty of a foveal target task attenuated processing of task-irrelevant background scenes, whereas increasing the number of objects held in working memory did not have this effect. These dissociable effects of perceptual and working memory load clarify how task-irrelevant, unattended stimuli are processed in category-selective areas in human ventral visual cortex.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chun, M.M. & Marois, R. The dark side of visual attention. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 12, 184–189 (2002).
Chun, M.M. & Wolfe, J.M. Visual Attention. in Blackwell Handbook of Perception (ed. Goldstein, B.) 272–310 (Blackwell Publishers Ltd., Oxford, UK, 2001).
de Fockert, J.W., Rees, G., Frith, C.D. & Lavie, N. The role of working memory in visual selective attention. Science 291, 1803–1806 (2001).
Luck, S.J., Vogel, E.K. & Shapiro, K.L. Word meanings can be accessed but not reported during the attentional blink. Nature 383, 616–618 (1996).
Marois, R., Yi, D-J. & Chun, M.M. The neural fate of consciously perceived and missed events in the attentional blink. Neuron 41, 465–472 (2004).
Pashler, H. The Psychology of Attention (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1998).
Rees, G., Frith, C.D. & Lavie, N. Modulating irrelevant motion perception by varying attentional load in an unrelated task. Science 278, 1616–1619 (1997).
Rees, G., Russell, C., Frith, C.D. & Driver, J. Inattentional blindness versus inattentional amnesia for fixated but ignored words. Science 286, 2504–2507 (1999).
Treisman, A. Contextual cues in selective listening. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. A. 12, 242–248 (1960).
Lavie, N. Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 21, 451–468 (1995).
Kahneman, D. & Chajczyk, D. Tests of the automaticity of reading: dilution of Stroop effects by color-irrelevant stimuli. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 9, 497–509 (1983).
Treisman, A. Strategies and models of selective attention. Psychol. Rev. 76, 282–299 (1969).
Baddeley, A. Working memory. Science 255, 556–559 (1992).
Courtney, S.M., Ungerleider, L.G., Keil, K. & Haxby, J.V. Transient and sustained activity in a distributed neural system for human working memory. Nature 386, 608–611 (1997).
Jiang, Y., Haxby, J.V., Martin, A., Ungerleider, L.G. & Parasuraman, R. Complementary neural mechanisms for tracking items in human working memory. Science 287, 643–646 (2000).
Ranganath, C., DeGutis, J. & D'Esposito, M. Category-specific modulation of inferior temporal activity during working memory encoding and maintenance. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 20, 37–45 (2004).
Todd, J.J. & Marois, R. Capacity limit of visual short-term memory in human posterior parietal cortex. Nature 428, 751–754 (2004).
Vogel, E.K. & Machizawa, M.G. Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity. Nature 428, 748–751 (2004).
Woodman, G.F., Vogel, E.K. & Luck, S.J. Visual search remains efficient when visual working memory is full. Psychol. Sci. 12, 219–224 (2001).
Lavie, N., Hirst, A., de Fockert, J. & Viding, E. Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. (in press).
Grill-Spector, K. & Malach, R. fMR-adaptation: a tool for studying the functional properties of human cortical neurons. Acta Psychol. (Amst.) 107, 293–321 (2001).
Epstein, R. & Kanwisher, N. A cortical representation of the local visual environment. Nature 392, 598–601 (1998).
Moran, J. & Desimone, R. Selective attention gates visual processing in the extrastriate cortex. Science 229, 782–784 (1985).
Luck, S.J., Chelazzi, L., Hillyard, S.A. & Desimone, R. Neural mechanisms of spatial selective attention in areas V1, V2, and V4 of macaque visual cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 77, 24–42 (1997).
Kastner, S., De Weerd, P., Desimone, R. & Ungerleider, L.G. Mechanisms of directed attention in the human extrastriate cortex as revealed by functional MRI. Science 282, 108–111 (1998).
Miller, E.K. & Desimone, R. Parallel neuronal mechanisms for short-term-memory. Science 263, 520–522 (1994).
Buckner, R.L. et al. Functional-anatomic correlates of object priming in humans revealed by rapid presentation event-related fMRI. Neuron 20, 285–296 (1998).
Dobbins, I.G., Schnyer, D.M., Verfaellie, M. & Schacter, D.L. Cortical activity reductions during repetition priming can result from rapid response learning. Nature 428, 316–319 (2004).
Eger, E., Henson, R., Driver, J. & Dolan, R. BOLD repetition decreases in object-responsive ventral visual areas depend on spatial attention. J. Neurophysiol. (in press).
Ishai, A., Pessoa, L., Bikle, P.C. & Ungeleider, L.G. Repetition suppression of faces is modulated by emotion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 9827–9832 (2004).
Murray, S.O. & Wojciulik, E. Attention increases neural selectivity in the human lateral occipital complex. Nat. Neurosci. 7, 70–74 (2004).
Desimone, R. & Duncan, J. Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 18, 193–222 (1995).
Luck, S.J. & Vecera, S.P. Attention. in Stevens' Handbook of Experimental Psychology: Sensation and Perception. Edn. 3 Vol. 1 (eds. Pashler, H. & Yantis, S.) 235–286 (Wiley, New York, 2002).
Posner, M.I. & Petersen, S.E. The attention system of the human brain. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 13, 25–42 (1990).
Braver, T.S. et al. A parametric study of prefrontal cortex involvement in human working memory. Neuroimage 5, 49–62 (1997).
Awh, E. & Jonides, J. Overlapping mechanisms of attention and spatial working memory. Trends Cogn. Sci. 5, 119–126 (2001).
Oh, S.H. & Kim, M-S. The role of spatial working memory during visual search. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 11, 275–281 (2004).
Woodman, G. & Luck, S. Visual search is slowed when visuospatial working memory is occupied. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 11, 269–274 (2004).
Jolicoeur, P. Concurrent response-selection demands modulate the attentional blink. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 25, 1097–1113 (1999).
Gehring, W.J. & Knight, R.T. Lateral prefrontal damage affects processing selection but not attention switching. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 13, 267–279 (2002).
Jiang, Y. & Chun, M.M. The influence of temporal selection on spatial selection and distractor interference: an attentional blink study. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 27, 895–918 (2001).
Epstein, R., Graham, K.S. & Downing, P.E. Viewpoint-specific scene representations in human parahippocampal cortex. Neuron 37, 865–876 (2003).
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant EY014193 (M.M.C.). It was also partly supported by a Vanderbilt University Discovery Grant (M.M.C.), NIH grant F32 EY015043 (G.F.W.) and National Science Foundation grant BCS 0094992 (R.M.).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Video 1
Example trial in the low-demand baseline task (target present). You will see a stream of faces appearing in the middle of scenes, interleaved with masks. Ignore the scenes, and monitor the faces to detect a consecutive repetition of a face's identity (one-back task). The trial will end with the word “one” at fixation to remind the subject that she/he is performing the one-back task. Please do the task now before proceeding. (MOV 427 kb)
In this trial, a face was consecutively repeated (target-present) while six different scenes were presented in the background (unrepeated scene condition). Not shown here are the high perceptual demand task, which was identical except that the faces were degraded with noise, and the high working memory task, which was identical except that face repetitions occurred across two frames in target-present trials (target-absent trials were identical to the baseline condition).
Supplementary Video 2
Example trial in the low-demand baseline task (target absent). You will see a stream of faces appearing in the middle of scenes, interleaved with masks. Ignore the scenes, and monitor the faces to detect a consecutive repetition of a face's identity (one-back task). The trial will end with the word “one” at fixation to remind the subject that she/he is performing the one-back task. Please do the task now before proceeding. (MOV 448 kb)
In this trial, no face was repeated (target-absent) while two background scenes alternated across frames (repeated scene condition). You may also try the 2-back task with this example. Not shown here are the high perceptual demand task, which was identical except that the faces were degraded with noise, and the high working memory task, which was identical except that face repetitions occurred across two frames in target-present trials (target-absent trials were identical to the baseline condition).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yi, DJ., Woodman, G., Widders, D. et al. Neural fate of ignored stimuli: dissociable effects of perceptual and working memory load. Nat Neurosci 7, 992–996 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1294
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1294
This article is cited by
-
Effects of different virtual reality technology driven dual-tasking paradigms on posture and saccadic eye movements in healthy older adults
Scientific Reports (2022)
-
The Costs and Benefits of Goal-Directed Attention in Deep Convolutional Neural Networks
Computational Brain & Behavior (2021)
-
Are perspectival shapes seen or imagined? An experimental approach
Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences (2019)
-
Degradation of neural representations in higher visual cortex by sleep deprivation
Scientific Reports (2017)
-
Attention induced neural response trade-off in retinotopic cortex under load
Scientific Reports (2016)