Abstract
Flow injection electrospray mass spectrometry (FIE-MS) metabolite fingerprinting is widely used as a 'first pass' screen for compositional differences, where discrimination between samples can be achieved without any preconceptions. Powerful data analysis algorithms can be used to select and rank FIE-MS fingerprint variables highly explanatory of the biological problem under investigation. We describe how to create a species-specific FIE-MS/MSn metabolite database and how to then query the database to predict the identity of highly significant variables within FIE-MS fingerprints. The protocol details how to interpret m/z signals within the explanatory variable list based on a correlation analysis in conjunction with an investigation of mathematical relationships regarding (de)protonated molecular ions, salt adducts, neutral losses and dimeric associations routinely observed in FIE-MS fingerprints. Although designed for use by biologists/analytical chemists, collaboration with data-mining experts is generally advised. The protocol is applicable in any areas of bioscience research involving FIE-MS fingerprinting.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Rashed, M.S. Clinical applications of tandem mass spectrometry: ten years of diagnosis and screening for inherited metabolic diseases. J. Chromatogr. B 758, 27–48 (2001).
Wilcken, B., Wiley, V., Hammond, J. & Carpenter, K. Screening newborns for inborn errors of metabolism by tandem mass spectrometry. N. Engl. J. Med. 348, 2304–2312 (2003).
Catchpole, G.S. et al. Hierarchical metabolomics demonstrates substantial compositional similarity between genetically modified and conventional potato crops. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 14458–14462 (2005).
Ramos Catharino, R. et al. Characterization of vegetable oils by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry fingerprinting: classification, quality, adulteration, and aging. Anal. Chem. 77, 7429–7433 (2005).
Allen, J. et al. High-throughput classification of yeast mutants for functional genomics using metabolic footprinting. Nat. Biotechnol. 21, 692–696 (2003).
Smedsgaard, J. & Frisvad, J.C. Terverticillate Penicillia studied by direct electrospray mass spectrometric profiling of crude extracts. I. Chemosystematics. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 25, 51–64 (1997).
Enot, D.P., Beckmann, M., Overy, D.P. & Draper, J. Predicting interpretability of metabolome models based on behavior, putative identity, and biological relevance of explanatory signals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 14865–14870 (2006).
Beckmann, M., Parker, D., Enot, D.P., Duval, E. & Draper, J. High-throughput, nontargeted metabolite fingerprinting using nominal mass flow injection electrospray mass spectrometry. Nat. Protoc. 3, 486–504 (2008).
Dunn, W.B., Overy, S. & Quick, W.P. Evaluation of automated electrospray-TOF mass spectrometry for metabolic fingerprinting of the plant metabolome. Metabolomics 1, 137–148 (2005).
Gray, G.R. & Heath, D. A global reorganization of the metabolome in Arabidopsis during cold acclimation is revealed by metabolic fingerprinting. Physiol. Plant. 124, 236–248 (2005).
Cole, R.B. Some tenets pertaining to electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. J. Mass Spectrom. 35, 763–772 (2000).
Fernie, A.R., Trethewey, R.N., Krotzky, A.J. & Willmitzer, L. Metabolite profiling: from diagnostics to systems biology. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 5, 763–769 (2004).
Fiehn, O. Metabolomics—the link between genotypes and phenotypes. Plant Mol. Biol. 48, 155–171 (2002).
Trethewey, R.N. Metabolite profiling as an aid to metabolic engineering in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 7, 196–201 (2004).
Schug, K. & McNair, H.M. Adduct formation in electrospray ionization. Part 1: common acidic pharmaceuticals. J. Sep. Sci. 25, 760–766 (2002).
Kebarle, P. A brief overview of the present status of the mechanisms involved in electrospray mass spectrometry. J. Mass Spectrom. 35, 804–817 (2000).
Zhu, J. & Cole, R.B. Formation and decompositions of chloride adduct ions, [M + Cl]−, in negative ion electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 11, 932–941 (2000).
Enot, D. et al. Preprocessing, classification modeling and feature selection using flow injection electrospray mass spectrometry metabolite fingerprint data. Nat. Protoc. 3, 446–470 (2008).
Beckmann, M., Enot, D.P., Overy, D & Draper, J. Representation, comparison and interpretation of metabolome fingerprint data for total composition analysis and quality trait investigation in potato plants. J. Agric. Food Chem. 55, 3444–3451 (2007).
Kaneshisa, M. & Goto, S. KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 27–30 (2000).
Garcia-Hernandez, M. et al. TAIR: a resource for integrated Arabidopsis data. Funct. Integr. Genomics 2, 239–253 (2002).
Shinbo, Y. et al. KNApSAcK: a comprehensive species-metabolite relationship database. Biotechnol. Agric. Forest. 57, 165–184 (2006).
Wishart, D. et al. HMDB: the human metabolome database. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, D521–D526 (2007).
Wagner, A.B. SciFinder Scholar 2006: an empirical analysis of research topic query processing. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 46, 767–774 (2006).
Kind, T. & Fiehn, O. Metabolomic database annotations via query of elemental compositions: Mass accuracy is insufficient even at less than 1 ppm. BMC Bioinformatics 7, 234–243 (2006).
Baumann, C. et al. A library of atmospheric pressure ionization daughter ion mass spectra based on wideband excitation in an ion trap mass spectrometer. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 14, 349–356 (2000).
Fredenhagen, A., Derrien, C. & Gassmann, E. An MS/MS library on an ion-trap instrument for efficient dereplication of natural products. Different fragmentation patterns for [M + H]+ and [M + Na]+ ions. J. Nat. Prod. 68, 385–391 (2005).
Milman, B.L. Towards a full reference library of MSn spectra. Testing of a library containing 3126 MS2 spectra of 1743 compounds. Rapid Comm. Mass Spectrom. 19, 2833–2839 (2005).
Pavlic, M., Libiseller, K. & Oberacher, H. Combined use of ESI-QqTOF-MS and ESI-QqTOF-MS/MS with mass-spectral library search for qualitative analysis of drugs. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 386, 69–82 (2006).
Parker, D. et al. Rice blast infection of Brachypodium distachyon as a model system to study dynamic host/pathogen interactions. Nat. Protoc. 3, 435–445 (2008).
Broadhurst, D.I. & Kell, D.B. Statistical strategies for avoiding false discoveries in metabolomics and related experiments. Metabolomics 2, 171–196 (2006).
Lisec, J., Schauer, N., Kopka, J., Willmitzer, L. & Fernie, A.R. Gas chromatography mass spectrometry-based metabolite profiling in plants. Nat. Protoc. 1, 387–396 (2006).
Connolly, T. & Begg, C. Database Systems: a practical approach to design, implementation and management. Addison-Wesley, (2002).
Tolstikov, V.V., Lommen, A., Nakanishi, K., Tanaka, N. & Fiehn, O. Monolithic silica-based capillary reversed-phase liquid chromatography/electrospray mass spectrometry for plant metabolomics. Analytical Chemistry 75, 6737–6740 (2003).
Dear, G.J., James, A.D. & Sarda, S. Ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled to linear ion trap mass spectrometry for the identification of drug metabolites in biological samples. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 20, 1351–1360 (2006).
Gorlach, E. & Richmond, R. Discovery of quasi-molecular ions in electrospray spectra by automated searching for simultaneous adduct mass differences. Anal. Chem. 71, 5557–5562 (1999).
Nielsen, K.F. & Smedsgaard, J. Fungal metabolite screening: database of 474 mycotoxins and fungal metabolites for dereplication by standardised liquid chromatography-UV-mass spectrometry methodology. J. Chromatogr. A 1002, 111–136 (2003).
R Development Core Team. R: a Language and Environment for Statistical Computing R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-900007-900050, http://www.R-project.org (2006).
Acknowledgements
Research activities were funded by the Food Standards Agency under the project 'Development of unified data models and data pre-processing strategies and the generation of meaningful, standardized statistical analyses of metabolome variability in crop plants' (project code: GO3012).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Overy, D., Enot, D., Tailliart, K. et al. Explanatory signal interpretation and metabolite identification strategies for nominal mass FIE-MS metabolite fingerprints. Nat Protoc 3, 471–485 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2007.512
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2007.512
This article is cited by
-
Untargeted metabolomics reveals a new mode of action of pretomanid (PA-824)
Scientific Reports (2018)
-
Dereplication strategies in natural product research: How many tools and methodologies behind the same concept?
Phytochemistry Reviews (2017)
-
Flow infusion electrospray ionisation mass spectrometry for high throughput, non-targeted metabolite fingerprinting: a review
Metabolomics (2013)
-
Combining genetic diversity, informatics and metabolomics to facilitate annotation of plant gene function
Nature Protocols (2010)
-
High-throughput, nontargeted metabolite fingerprinting using nominal mass flow injection electrospray mass spectrometry
Nature Protocols (2008)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.