Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

Hypertension

New US blood-pressure guidelines — who asked the patients?

Nature Reviews Cardiology volume 15, pages 137–138 (2018)Cite this article

Subjects

The radical new US hypertension guidelines, released 3 years after the previous scientific statement, have implications far beyond their intended recipients. They include a new definition for hypertension, lower treatment targets, and extended guidance on the implementation of multidisciplinary care, including self-monitoring of blood pressure. Some recommendations are likely to generate controversy.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Blood-pressure thresholds and recommendations for treatment.

References

  1. Whelton, P. K. et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.11.006 (2017).

  2. Lim, S. S. et al. A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 380, 2224–2260 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ettehad, D. et al. Blood pressure lowering for prevention of cardiovascular disease and death: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 387, 957–967 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wright, J. T. Jr et al. A randomized trial of intensive versus standard blood-pressure control. N. Engl. J. Med. 373, 2103–2116 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. D'Agostino, R. B. Sr et al. General cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 117, 743–753 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Johnston, M. E. et al. Effects of labelling on income, work and social function among hypertensive employees. J. Chron. Dis. 37, 417–423 (1984).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Marshall, I. J., Wolfe, C. D. & McKevitt, C. Lay perspectives on hypertension and drug adherence: systematic review of qualitative research. BMJ 345, e3953 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Brunström, M. & Carlberg, B. Association of blood pressure lowering with mortality and cardiovascular disease across blood pressure levels: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Intern. Med. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.6015 (2017).

  9. Arima, H. et al. Lower target blood pressures are safe and effective for the prevention of recurrent stroke: the PROGRESS trial. J. Hypertens. 24, 1201–1208 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Albarqouni, L., Doust, J. & Glasziou, P. Patient preferences for cardiovascular preventive medication: a systematic review. Heart 103, 1578–1586 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

R.J.M. is funded by an NIHR Professorship (NIHR-RP-R2-12-015) and the NIHR Oxford CLAHRC.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Richard J. McManus is at the Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK.,

    Richard J. McManus

  2. Department of Public Health & Primary Care, Jonathan Mant is at the Primary Care Unit, Strangeways Research Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK.,

    Jonathan Mant

Authors
  1. Richard J. McManus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jonathan Mant
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard J. McManus.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

R.J.M. has received blood pressure monitoring equipment for research purposes from Lloyds Pharmacies and Omron. J.M. declares no competing interests.

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McManus, R., Mant, J. New US blood-pressure guidelines — who asked the patients?. Nat Rev Cardiol 15, 137–138 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrcardio.2017.222

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrcardio.2017.222

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing