Abstract
Homology is an essential idea of biology, referring to the historical continuity of characters, but it is also conceptually highly elusive. The main difficulty is the apparently loose relationship between morphological characters and their genetic basis. Here I propose that it is the historical continuity of gene regulatory networks rather than the expression of individual homologous genes that underlies the homology of morphological characters. These networks, here referred to as 'character identity networks', enable the execution of a character-specific developmental programme.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$189.00 per year
only $15.75 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hall, B. K. Evolutionary Developmental Biology (Chapman & Hall, London, 1998).
Wilkins, A. S. The Evolution of Developmental Pathways (Sinauer, Sunderland, 2002).
Butler, A. B. & Saidel, W. M. Defining sameness: historical, biological, and generative homology. BioEssays 22, 846–853 (2000).
VanValen, L. Homology and causes. J. Morphol. 173, 305–312 (1982).
Lewontin, R. C. Adaptation. Am. Sci. 239, 156–169 (1978).
Owen, R. On the Archetype and Homologies of the Vertebrate Skeleton (Voorst, London, 1848).
Futuyma, D. J. Evolutionary Biology (Sinauer, Sunderland, 2005).
Brigant, I. Homology in comparative, molecular, and evolutionary developmental biology: the radiation of a concept. J. Exp. Zool. B Mol. Dev. Evol. 299, 9–17 (2003).
Graur, D. & Li, W.-H. Fundamentals of Molecular Evolution (Sinauer, Sunderland, 2000).
Geeta, R. Structure trees and species trees: what they say about morphological development and evolution. Evol. Dev. 5, 609–621 (2003).
Oakley, T. H. The eye as a replicating and diverging, modular developmental unit. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18, 623–627 (2003).
Roth, V. L. Homology and hierarchies: problems solved and unresolved. J. Evol. Biol. 4, 167–194 (1991).
Ghiselin, M. T. Homology as a relation of correspondence between parts of individuals. Theor. Biosci. 124, 91–103 (2005).
Wagner, G. P. The biological role of homologues: a building block hypothesis. N. Jb. Geol. Paläont. Abh. 195, 279–288 (1995).
Wagner, G. P. in The Character Concept in Evolutionary Biology (ed. Wagner, G. P.) 1–10 (Academic, San Diego, 2001).
Wagner, G. P. The biological homology concept. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 20, 51–69 (1989).
Hall, B. K. in Evolutionary Biology Vol. 28 (eds Hecht, M. K., MacIntyre, R. J. & Clegg, M. T.) 1–30 (Plenum, New York, 1994).
Wray, G. A. & Abouheif, E. When is homology not homology? Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 8, 675–680 (1998).
Hall, B. K. Descent with modification: the unity underlying homology and homoplasy as seen through an analysis of development and evolution. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 78, 409–433 (2003).
Pankratz, M. J. & Jackle, H. in The Development of Drosophila melanogaster (eds Bate, M. & Martinez-Arias, A.) 467–516 (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Plainview, 1993).
Patel, N. H., Ball, E. F. & Goodman, C. S. Changing role of even-skipped during the evolution of insect pattern formation. Nature 357, 339–342 (1992).
Dawes, R., Dawson, I., Falciani, F., Tear, G. & Akam, M. Dax, a locust Hox gene related to fushi-tarazu but showing no pair-rule expression. Development 120, 1561–1572 (1994).
Peel, A. D., Chipman, A. D. & Akam, M. Arthropod segmentation: beyond the Drosophila paradigm. Nature Rev. Genet. 6, 905–916 (2005).
Arendt, D. Evolution of eyes and photoreceptor cell types. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 47, 563–571 (2003).
Arendt, D. Genes and homology in nervous system evolution: comparing gene functions, expression patterns, and cell type molecular fingerprints. Theor. Biosci. 124, 185–197 (2005).
Allan, D. W., Park, D., Pierre, S. E. S., Taghert, P. H. & Thor, S. Regulators acting in combinatorial codes also act independently in single differentiating neurons. Neuron 45, 689–700 (2005).
Shirasaki, R. & Pfaff, S. L. Transcriptional codes and the control of neuronal identity. Ann. Rev. Neurosci. 25, 251–281 (2002).
Davidson, E. H. The Regulatory Genome: Gene Regulatory Networks in Development and Evolution 144–159, 28 (Academic, Amsterdam, 2006).
Ghiselin, M. 'Definition, ' 'character' and other equivocal terms. Syst. Zool. 33, 104–110 (1984).
Deutsch, J. Hox and wings. BioEssays 27, 673–675 (2005).
Warren, R. W., Nagy, L., Senegue, J., Gates, J. & Carroll, S. Evolution of homeotic gene regulation and function in flies and butterflies. Nature 372, 458–461 (1994).
Wagner, G. P., Chiu, C.-H. & Laubichler, M. Developmental evolution as a mechanistic science: the inference from developmental mechanisms to evolutionary processes. Am. Zool. 40, 819–831 (2000).
Tomoyasu, Y., Wheeler, S. R. & Denell, R. E. Ultrabithorax is required for membranous wing identity in the beetle Tribolium castaneum. Nature 375, 58–61 (2005).
Gehring, W. J. & Ikeo, K. Pax6 mastering eye morphogenesis and eye evolution. Trends Genet. 15, 371–377 (1999).
Halder, G., Callerts, P. & Gehring, W. J. Induction of ectopic eyes by targeted expression of the eyeless gene in Drosophila. Science 267, 1788–1792 (1995).
Holland, P. W. H. in Homology Vol. 222 (eds Bock, G. R. & Cardew, G.) 226–236 (Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 1999).
Donner, A. L. & Maas, R. L. Conservation and non-conservation of genetic pathways in eye specification. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 48, 743–753 (2004).
Kozmik, Z. Pax genes in eye development and evolution. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 15, 430–438 (2005).
Zuber, M. E., Gestri, G., Viczian, A. S., Barsacchi, G. & Harris, W. A. Specification of the vertebrate eye by a network of eye field transcription factors. Development 130, 5155–5167 (2003).
Chow, R. L., Altmann, C. R., Lang, R. A. & Hemmati-Brivanlou, A. Pax6 induced ectopic eyes in a vertebrate. Development 126, 4213–4222 (1999).
Kardon, G., Heanue, T. A. & Tabin, C. J. in Modularity in Development and Evolution (eds Schlosser, G. & Wagner, G. P.) 59–80 (Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago and London, 2004).
Schlosser, G. Evolutionary origins of vertebrate placods: insights from developmental studies and from comparisons with other deuterostomes. J. Exp. Zool. B Mol. Dev. Evol. 304, 347–399 (2005).
Bailey, T. J. et al. Regulation of vertebrate eye development by Rx genes. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 48, 761–770 (2004).
Bebenek, I. G., Gates, R. D., Morris, J., Hartenstein, V. & Jacobs, D. K. sine oculis in basal Metazoa. Dev. Genes Evol. 214, 342–351 (2004).
Stierwald, M., Yanze, N., Bamert, R. P., Kammermeier, L. & Schmid, V. The sine oculis/six class family of homeobox genes in jellyfish with and without eyes: development and regeneration. Dev. Biol. 274, 70–81 (2004).
Arendt, D., Tessmar-Raible, K., Snyman, K., Dorresteijn, A. W. & Wittbrodt, J. Cilliary photoreceptors with a vertebrate-type opsin in an invertebrate brain. Science 306, 869–871 (2004).
Nilsson, D.-E. Eye evolution: a question of genetic promiscuity. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 14, 407–414 (2004).
Ogura, A., Ikeo, K. & Gojobori, T. Comparative analysis of gene expression for convergent evolution of camera eye between octopus and human. Genome Res. 14, 1555–1561 (2004).
Chan, S. K., Jaffe, L., Capovilla, M., Botas, J. & Mann, R. S. The DNA binding specificity of Ultrabithorax is modulated by cooperative interactions with extradenticle, another homeoprotein. Cell 78, 603–615 (1994).
McGinnis, N., Kuziora, M. A. & McGinnis, W. Human Hox-4.2 and Drosophila deformed encode similar regulatory specificities in Drosophila embryos and larvae. Cell 63, 969–976 (1990).
Hsia, C. C. & McGinnis, W. Evolution of transcription factor function. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 13, 199–206 (2003).
Grenier, J. K. & Carroll, S. B. Functional evolution of the Ultrabithorax protein. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 704–709 (2000).
Galant, R. & Carroll, S. B. Evolution of a transcriptional repression domain in an insect Hox protein. Nature 415, 910–913 (2002).
Hittinger, C. T., Stern, D. L. & Carroll, S. B. Pleiotropic functions of a conserved insect-specific Hox peptide motif. Development 132, 5261–5270 (2005).
Ronshaugen, M., McGinnis, N. & McGinnis, W. Hox protein mutation and macroevolution of the insect body plan. Nature 415, 914–917 (2002).
Ranganayakulu, G., Elliott, D. A., Harvey, R. P. & Olson, E. N. Divergent roles for NK-2 class homeobox genes in cardionenesis in flies and mice. Development 125, 3037–3048 (1998).
Lohr, U., Yussa, M. & Pick, L. Drosophila fishi tarazu: a gene on the border of homeotic function. Curr. Biol. 11, 1403–1412 (2001).
Zhao, Y. & Potter, S. S. Functional specificity of the Hoxa 13 homeobox. Development 128, 3197–3207 (2001).
Zhao, Y. & Potter, S. S. Functional comparison of the Hoxa 4, Hoxa 10, and Hoxa 11 Homeoboxes. Dev. Biol. 244, 21–36 (2002).
Tour, E., Hittinger, C. T. & McGinnis, W. Evolutionarily conserved domains required for activation and repression functions of the Drosophila Hox protein Ultrabithorax. Development 132, 5271–5281 (2005).
Lynch, V. J., Roth, J. J. & Wagner, G. P. Adaptive evolution of Hox-gene homoedomains after cluster duuplications. BMC Evol. Biol. 6, 86 (2006).
Sharkey, M., Graba, Y. & Scott, M. P. Hox genes in evolution: protein surfaces and paralog groups. Trends Genet. 13, 145–151 (1997).
Wagner, G. P. & Lynch, V. J. Molecular evolution of evolutionary novelties: the vagina and uterus of therian mammals. J. Exp. Zool. B Mol. Dev. Evol. 304, 580–592 (2005).
Davidson, E. H. & Erwin, D. H. Gene regulatory networks and the evolution of animal body plans. Science 311, 796–800 (2006).
Wagner, G. P. & Stadler, P. F. Quasi-independence, homology and the unity of type: a topological theory of characters. J. Theor. Biol. 220, 505–527 (2003).
Wiley, E. O. Homology, identity and transformation in Mesozoic fishes (eds Arrtia, G. & Schultze, H.-P.) (in the press).
Müller, G. B. & Wagner, G. P. Novelty in evolution: restructuring the concept. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 22, 229–256 (1991).
Miller, D. J. et al. Pax gene diversity in the basal cnidarian Acropora millepora (Cnidaria, Anthozoa): implications for the evolution of the Pax gene family. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 4475–4480 (2000).
Hadrys, T., DeSalle, R., Sagasser, S., Fischer, N. & Schierwater, B. The Trichoplax PaxB gene: a putative proto-PaxA/B/C gene predating the origin of nerve and sensory cells. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22, 1569–1578 (2005).
Acknowledgements
The author gratefully acknowledges the financial support for the research that led to the ideas expressed in this article: NSF IBN#0321470, OIB#0445971 and the Research Prize from the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation. I also want to thank the reviewers of this paper as well as M. Laubichler, M. Ghiselin, E. Wiley, M. Donaghue, A. Monteiro and the members of my laboratory for discussion and inspiration.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declares no competing financial interests.
Related links
Glossary
- Orthologue
-
Two genes are orthologues if their lineages are connected through a speciation event and without a duplication event.
- Paralogue
-
Two genes are paralogues if their lineages are connected through a gene duplication event.
- Pro-orthologue
-
For example, when one species has two copies of a gene, say Ga and Gb, and another species has a single copy G, and the speciation event that separated the species lineages occurred earlier than the gene duplication event, G is the pro-orthologue of Ga and Gb.
- Semi-orthologue
-
For example, if G is the pro-orthologue of Ga and Gb, then both Ga and Gb are the semi-orthologues of G.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wagner, G. The developmental genetics of homology. Nat Rev Genet 8, 473–479 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2099
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2099
This article is cited by
-
Beyond congruence: evidential integration and inferring the best evolutionary scenario
Biology & Philosophy (2022)
-
Proper functions: etiology without typehood
Biology & Philosophy (2022)
-
Body Plan Identity: A Mechanistic Model
Evolutionary Biology (2022)
-
What could cognition be, if not human cognition?: Individuating cognitive abilities in the light of evolution
Biology & Philosophy (2022)
-
The integrative approach to inferring homology: morphology and development combined
Biology & Philosophy (2022)