Key Points
-
The phenotype of an individual microbial cell is not determined by genes and environment alone. Rather, a number of cellular mechanisms produce phenotypic differences between genetically identical cells grown in homogeneous environments; these differences are referred to as phenotypic heterogeneity.
-
The degree of heterogeneity that arises in a given trait is influenced by the biochemical properties of molecules and by the architecture of gene-regulatory networks. Mutations and other genetic changes can therefore influence the degree of phenotypic heterogeneity.
-
As a consequence, phenotypic heterogeneity is an evolvable trait that can be shaped by natural selection. Increased levels of heterogeneity in specific phenotypic traits can evolve if this provides organisms with benefits in terms of increased survival and growth.
-
One possible benefit is that phenotypic heterogeneity can help organisms to cope with fluctuating environments. This effect is known as bet hedging.
-
Another possible benefit arises through division of labour. Individual cells with different phenotypic traits can specialize in different activities and behaviours and can engage in beneficial interactions.
-
Phenotypic heterogeneity is a potentially important component of biological diversity; it arises at the level of individual microbial cells and provides groups of microorganisms with added functionality.
Abstract
Most microbial communities consist of a genetically diverse assembly of different organisms, and the level of genetic diversity plays an important part in community properties and functions. However, biological diversity also arises at a lower level of biological organization, between genetically identical cells that reside in the same microenvironment. In this Review, I outline the molecular mechanisms responsible for phenotypic heterogeneity and discuss how phenotypic heterogeneity allows genotypes to persist in fluctuating environments. I also describe how it promotes interactions between phenotypic subpopulations in clonal groups, providing microbial groups with new functionality.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Smith, V. H. Microbial diversity–productivity relationships in aquatic ecosystems. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 62, 181–186 (2007).
Allison, S. & Martiny, J. Resistance, resilience, and redundancy in microbial communities. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 11512–11519 (2008).
Elowitz, M. B., Levine, A. J., Siggia, E. D. & Swain, P. S. Stochastic gene expression in a single cell. Science 297, 1183–1186 (2002).
Ozbudak, E. M., Thattai, M., Kurtser, I., Grossman, A. D. & van Oudenaarden, A. Regulation of noise in the expression of a single gene. Nat. Genet. 31, 69–73 (2002). References 3 and 4 are seminal papers that quantify gene expression noise and identify its cellular origins.
McAdams, H. H. & Arkin, A. Stochastic mechanisms in gene expression. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 814–819 (1997).
Novick, A. & Weiner, M. Enzyme induction as an all-or-none phenomenon. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 43, 553–566 (1957).
Raj, A. & van Oudenaarden, A. Nature, nurture, or chance: stochastic gene expression and its consequences. Cell 135, 216–226 (2008).
Sanchez, A., Choubey, S. & Kondev, J. Regulation of noise in gene expression. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 42, 469–491 (2013).
Raser, J. M. & O'Shea, E. K. Noise in gene expression: origins, consequences, and control. Science 309, 2010–2013 (2005).
Kaern, M., Elston, T. C., Blake, W. J. & Collins, J. J. Stochasticity in gene expression: from theories to phenotypes. Nat. Rev. Genet. 6, 451–464 (2005).
Avery, S. V. Microbial cell individuality and the underlying sources of heterogeneity. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 4, 577–587 (2006).
Balázsi, G., van Oudenaarden, A. & Collins, J. J. Cellular decision making and biological noise: from microbes to mammals. Cell 144, 910–925 (2011).
Altschuler, S. J. & Wu, L. F. Cellular heterogeneity: do differences make a difference? Cell 141, 559–563 (2010).
Levine, J. H., Lin, Y. & Elowitz, M. B. Functional roles of pulsing in genetic circuits. Science 342, 1193–1200 (2013).
Blake, W. J. et al. Phenotypic consequences of promoter-mediated transcriptional noise. Mol. Cell 24, 853–865 (2006).
Süel, G. M., Kulkarni, R. P., Dworkin, J., Garcia-Ojalvo, J. & Elowitz, M. B. Tunability and noise dependence in differentiation dynamics. Science 315, 1716–1719 (2007). This study provides direct evidence for a causal link between gene expression noise and phenotypic heterogeneity in B. subtilis.
Huh, D. & Paulsson, J. Non-genetic heterogeneity from stochastic partitioning at cell division. Nat. Genet. 43, 95–100 (2011). This research quantifies the impact of unequal partitioning of cell components on phenotypic heterogeneity.
Hallet, B. Playing Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde: combined mechanisms of phase variation in bacteria. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 4, 570–581 (2001).
Darmon, E. & Leach, D. R. F. Bacterial genome instability. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 78, 1–39 (2014).
Freed, N. E. et al. A simple screen to identify promoters conferring high levels of phenotypic noise. PLoS Genet. 4, e1000307 (2008).
Blake, W. J., Kaern, M., Cantor, C. R. & Collins, J. J. Noise in eukaryotic gene expression. Nature 422, 633–637 (2003).
Smits, W. K., Kuipers, O. P. & Veening, J.-W. Phenotypic variation in bacteria: the role of feedback regulation. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 4, 259–271 (2006).
Lenz, P. & Søgaard-Andersen, L. Temporal and spatial oscillations in bacteria. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 9, 565–577 (2011).
Macara, I. G. & Mili, S. Polarity and differential inheritance – universal attributes of life? Cell 135, 801–812 (2008).
Fredriksson, Å. & Nyström, T. Conditional and replicative senescence in Escherichia coli. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 9, 612–618 (2006).
Levy, S. F., Ziv, N. & Siegal, M. L. Bet hedging in yeast by heterogeneous, age-correlated expression of a stress protectant. PLoS Biol. 10, e1001325 (2012). This work shows that cellular age can be a driver of phenotypic heterogeneity in S. cerevisiae.
Caudron, F. & Barral, Y. A super-assembly of Whi3 encodes memory of deceptive encounters by single cells during yeast courtship. Cell 155, 1244–1257 (2013).
Bergmiller, T. & Ackermann, M. Pole age affects cell size and the timing of cell division in Methylobacterium extorquens AM1. J. Bacteriol. 193, 5216–5221 (2011).
Wakamoto, Y. et al. Dynamic persistence of antibiotic-stressed mycobacteria. Science 339, 91–95 (2013).
Reuven, P. & Eldar, A. Macromotives and microbehaviors: the social dimension of bacterial phenotypic variability. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 21, 759–767 (2011).
Snijder, B. et al. Population context determines cell-to-cell variability in endocytosis and virus infection. Nature 461, 520–523 (2009).
Waters, C. M. & Bassler, B. L. Quorum sensing: cell-to-cell communication in bacteria. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 21, 319–346 (2005).
Blango, M. G. & Mulvey, M. A. Bacterial landlines: contact-dependent signaling in bacterial populations. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 12, 177–181 (2009).
Miller-Jensen, K., Dey, S. S., Schaffer, D. V. & Arkin, A. P. Varying virulence: epigenetic control of expression noise and disease processes. Trends Biotechnol. 29, 517–525 (2011).
Snijder, B. & Pelkmans, L. Origins of regulated cell-to-cell variability. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 12, 119–125 (2011).
Leibler, S. & Kussell, E. Individual histories and selection in heterogeneous populations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 13183–13188 (2010).
Norman, T. M., Lord, N. D., Paulsson, J. & Losick, R. Memory and modularity in cell-fate decision making. Nature 503, 481–486 (2013).
Amundson, R. in Adaptation (eds Rose, M. R. & Lauder, G. V) 11–53 (Academic, 1996).
Balaban, N. Q., Merrin, J., Chait, R., Kowalik, L. & Leibler, S. Bacterial persistence as a phenotypic switch. Science 305, 1622–1625 (2004). This article establishes that phenotypic heterogeneity in bacterial growth rates leads to the formation of persisters that are tolerant to antibiotics.
Arnoldini, M. et al. Bistable expression of virulence genes in Salmonella leads to the formation of an antibiotic-tolerant subpopulation. PLoS Biol. 12, e1001928 (2014).
Ackermann, M. et al. Self-destructive cooperation mediated by phenotypic noise. Nature 454, 987–990 (2008). This study uses a combination of mathematical modelling and laboratory experiments to suggest that phenotypic heterogeneity can lead to the division of labour observed in bacterial pathogenesis.
Wolf, D. M., Vazirani, V. V. & Arkin, A. P. Diversity in times of adversity: probabilistic strategies in microbial survival games. J. Theor. Biol. 234, 227–253 (2005).
Thattai, M. & van Oudenaarden, A. Stochastic gene expression in fluctuating environments. Genetics 530, 523–530 (2004).
Acar, M., Mettetal, J. T. & van Oudenaarden, A. Stochastic switching as a survival strategy in fluctuating environments. Nat. Genet. 40, 471–475 (2008).
Kussell, E. & Leibler, S. Phenotypic diversity, population growth, and information in fluctuating environments. Science 309, 2075–2078 (2005). This theoretical paper establishes that phenotypic heterogeneity can increase long-term growth rates in fluctuating environments.
Perkins, T. J. & Swain, P. S. Strategies for cellular decision-making. Mol. Syst. Biol. 5, 326 (2009).
Frankel, N. W. et al. Adaptability of non-genetic diversity in bacterial chemotaxis. eLife 3, e03526 (2014).
Kashiwagi, A., Urabe, I., Kaneko, K. & Yomo, T. Adaptive response of a gene network to environmental changes by fitness-induced attractor selection. PLoS ONE 1, e49 (2006).
Philippi, T. & Seger, J. Hedging one's evolutionary bets, revisited. Trends Ecol. Evol. 4, 2–5 (1989). This article is an authoritative early review on bet hedging.
Kotte, O., Volkmer, B., Radzikowski, J. L. & Heinemann, M. Phenotypic bistability in Escherichia coli's central carbon metabolism. Mol. Syst. Biol. 10, 736 (2014).
Rotem, E. et al. Regulation of phenotypic variability by a threshold-based mechanism underlies bacterial persistence. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 12541–12546 (2010).
Chastanet, A. et al. Broadly heterogeneous activation of the master regulator for sporulation in Bacillus subtilis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 8486–8491 (2010).
Maamar, H., Raj, A. & Dubnau, D. Noise in gene expression determines cell fate in Bacillus subtilis. Science 317, 526–529 (2007). This report details an important analysis of the impact of noise on phenotypic heterogeneity in B. subtilis.
Stewart, M. K., Cummings, L. A., Johnson, M. L., Berezow, A. B. & Cookson, B. T. Regulation of phenotypic heterogeneity permits Salmonella evasion of the host caspase-1 inflammatory response. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 20742–20747 (2011).
Holland, S. L., Reader, T., Dyer, P. S. & Avery, S. V. Phenotypic heterogeneity is a selected trait in natural yeast populations subject to environmental stress. Environ. Microbiol. 16, 1729–1740 (2014).
Solopova, A. et al. Bet-hedging during bacterial diauxic shift. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 7427–7432 (2014).
Van Heerden, J. H. et al. Lost in transition: start-up of glycolysis yields subpopulations of nongrowing cells. Science 343, 1245114 (2014).
New, A. M. et al. Different levels of catabolite repression optimize growth in stable and variable environments. PLoS Biol. 12, e1001764 (2014).
Beaumont, H. J. E., Gallie, J., Kost, C., Ferguson, G. C. & Rainey, P. B. Experimental evolution of bet hedging. Nature 462, 90–93 (2009). References 58 and 59 show that increased levels of phenotypic heterogeneity can evolve in the laboratory, driven by experimentally imposed fluctuating selection.
López-Maury, L., Marguerat, S. & Bähler, J. Tuning gene expression to changing environments: from rapid responses to evolutionary adaptation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 9, 583–593 (2008).
Ackermann, M. Microbial individuality in the natural environment. ISME J. 7, 465–467 (2013).
Veening, J.-W. et al. Transient heterogeneity in extracellular protease production by Bacillus subtilis. Mol. Syst. Biol. 4, 184 (2008). This study demonstrates that the production of a secreted, and therefore potentially shared, extracellular compound is phenotypically heterogeneous.
Hautefort, I., Proença, M. J., Hinton, J. C. D. & Jose, M. Single-copy green fluorescent protein gene fusions allow accurate measurement of Salmonella gene expression in vitro and during infection of mammalian cells. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69, 7480–7491 (2003).
Stecher, B. et al. Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium exploits inflammation to compete with the intestinal microbiota. PLoS Biol. 5, 2177–2189 (2007).
Adams, D. G. Heterocyst formation in cyanobacteria. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 3, 618–624 (2000).
Foster, R. A., Sztejrenszus, S. & Kuypers, M. M. M. Measuring carbon and N2 fixation in field populations of colonial and free-living unicellular cyanobacteria using nanometer-scale secondary ion mass spectrometry1. J. Phycol. 49, 502–516 (2013).
Johnson, D. R., Goldschmidt, F., Lilja, E. E. & Ackermann, M. Metabolic specialization and the assembly of microbial communities. ISME J. 6, 1985–1991 (2012).
De Lorenzo, V., Sekowska, A. & Danchin, A. Chemical reactivity drives spatiotemporal organization of bacterial metabolism. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 39, 96–119 (2014).
Wagner, P. L. et al. Bacteriophage control of Shiga toxin 1 production and release by Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 44, 957–970 (2002).
Voth, D. E. & Ballard, J. D. Clostridium difficile toxins: mechanism of action and role in disease. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 18, 247–263 (2005).
Jack, R. W., Tagg, J. R. & Ray, B. Bacteriocins of gram-positive bacteria. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 59, 171–200 (1995).
Mutschler, H., Gebhardt, M., Shoeman, R. L. & Meinhart, A. A novel mechanism of programmed cell death in bacteria by toxin–antitoxin systems corrupts peptidoglycan synthesis. PLoS Biol. 9, e1001033 (2011).
Sturm, A. et al. The cost of virulence: retarded growth of Salmonella Typhimurium cells expressing type III secretion system 1. PLoS Pathog. 7, e1002143 (2011).
Wessel, A. K., Hmelo, L., Parsek, M. R. & Whiteley, M. Going local: technologies for exploring bacterial microenvironments. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 11, 337–348 (2013).
Nowak, M. A. & May, R. M. Evolutionary games and spatial chaos. Nature 359, 826–829 (1992).
Velicer, G. J. Social strife in the microbial world. Trends Microbiol. 11, 330–337 (2003).
Diard, M. et al. Stabilization of cooperative virulence by the expression of an avirulent phenotype. Nature 494, 353–356 (2013).
Crespi, B. J. The evolution of social behavior in microorganisms. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16, 178–183 (2001).
West, S. A., Griffin, A. S., Gardner, A. & Diggle, S. P. Social evolution theory for microorganisms. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 4, 597–607 (2006).
Celiker, H. & Gore, J. Cellular cooperation: insights from microbes. Trends Cell Biol. 23, 9–15 (2013).
Hamilton, W. D. The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. J. Theor. Biol. 7, 1–16 (1964).
Stewart, P. S. & Franklin, M. J. Physiological heterogeneity in biofilms. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 6, 199–210 (2008).
Chai, Y., Chu, F., Kolter, R. & Losick, R. Bistability and biofilm formation in Bacillus subtilis. Mol. Microbiol. 67, 254–263 (2008).
Hughes, J. B., Hellmann, J. J., Ricketts, T. H. & Bohannan, B. J. M. Counting the uncountable: statistical approaches to estimating microbial diversity. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67, 4399–4406 (2001).
Stocker, R. Marine microbes see a sea of gradients. Science 338, 628–633 (2012).
Griffiths, B. S. et al. Ecosystem response of pasture soil communities to fumigation-induced microbial diversity reductions: an examination of the biodiversity–ecosystem function relationship. Oikos 2, 279–294 (2000).
Mrak, P., Podlesek, Z., van Putten, J. P. M. & Zgur-Bertok, D. Heterogeneity in expression of the Escherichia coli colicin K activity gene cka is controlled by the SOS system and stochastic factors. Mol. Genet. Genom. 277, 391–401 (2007).
Nikel, P. I., Silva-Rocha, R., Benedetti, I. & de Lorenzo, V. The private life of environmental bacteria: pollutant biodegradation at the single cell level. Environ. Microbiol. 16, 628–642 (2014).
Ansel, J. et al. Cell-to-cell stochastic variation in gene expression is a complex genetic trait. PLoS Genet. 4, e1000049 (2008).
Fehrmann, S. et al. Natural sequence variants of yeast environmental sensors confer cell-to-cell expression variability. Mol. Syst. Biol. 9, 695 (2013).
Yvert, G. et al. Single-cell phenomics reveals intra-species variation of phenotypic noise in yeast. BMC Syst. Biol. 7, 54 (2013). This paper describes an extensive analysis of phenotypic heterogeneity in natural isolates of S. cerevisiae.
Newman, J. R. S. et al. Single-cell proteomic analysis of S. cerevisiae reveals the architecture of biological noise. Nature 441, 840–846 (2006). The article presents the first genome-wide study of phenotypic heterogeneity in a microorganism.
Bar-Even, A. et al. Noise in protein expression scales with natural protein abundance. Nat. Genet. 38, 636–643 (2006).
Silander, O. K. et al. A genome-wide analysis of promoter-mediated phenotypic noise in Escherichia coli. PLoS Genet. 8, e1002443 (2012).
Taniguchi, Y. et al. Quantifying E. coli proteome and transcriptome with single-molecule sensitivity in single cells. Science 329, 533–538 (2010). This report presents a genome-wide screen of phenotypic heterogeneity in E. coli.
Lehner, B. Selection to minimise noise in living systems and its implications for the evolution of gene expression. Mol. Syst. Biol. 4, 170 (2008). This paper describes an analysis of the action of natural selection on phenotypic heterogeneity in the expression of different genes.
Wang, Z. & Zhang, J. Impact of gene expression noise on organismal fitness and the efficacy of natural selection. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, E67–E76 (2011).
Becskei, A. & Serrano, L. Engineering stability in gene networks by autoregulation. Nature 405, 590–593 (2000).
Lehner, B. Conflict between noise and plasticity in yeast. PLoS Genet. 6, e1001185 (2010).
Spudich, J. & Koshland, D. E. Jr. Non-genetic individuality: chance in the single cell. Nature 262, 467–471 (1976). This is one of the first reports on phenotypic heterogeneity in bacteria.
Locke, J. C. W. & Elowitz, M. B. Using movies to analyse gene circuit dynamics in single cells. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 7, 383–392 (2009).
Pedraza, J. M. & van Oudenaarden, A. Noise propagation in gene networks. Science 307, 1965–1969 (2005). This investigation demonstrates how gene expression noise propagates through gene-regulatory networks.
Sorek, R. & Cossart, P. Prokaryotic transcriptomics: a new view on regulation, physiology and pathogenicity. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11, 9–16 (2010).
Heinemann, M. & Zenobi, R. Single cell metabolomics. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 22, 26–31 (2011).
Pernthaler, A. & Amann, R. Simultaneous fluorescence in situ hybridization of mRNA and rRNA in environmental bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70, 5426–5433 (2004).
Hatzenpichler, R. et al. In situ visualization of newly synthesized proteins in environmental microbes using amino acid tagging and click chemistry. Environ. Microbiol. 16, 2568–2590 (2014).
Wagner, M. Single-cell ecophysiology of microbes as revealed by Raman microspectroscopy or secondary ion mass spectrometry imaging. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 63, 411–429 (2009).
Musat, N., Foster, R., Vagner, T., Adam, B. & Kuypers, M. M. M. Detecting metabolic activities in single cells, with emphasis on nanoSIMS. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 36, 486–511 (2012).
Orphan, V. J., House, C. H., Hinrichs, K. U., McKeegan, K. D. & DeLong, E. F. Methane-consuming archaea revealed by directly coupled isotopic and phylogenetic analysis. Science 293, 484–487 (2001). This report describes an early analysis of phenotypic traits at the single-cell level using samples from natural environments.
Musat, N. et al. A single-cell view on the ecophysiology of anaerobic phototrophic bacteria. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 17861–17866 (2008).
Zimmermann, M. et al. Phenotypic heterogeneity in metabolic traits among single cells of a rare bacterial species in its natural environment quantified with a combination of flow cell sorting and NanoSIMS. Front. Microbiol. 6, 243 (2015).
Elkins, J. et al. Cultivating the uncultured. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 15681–15686 (2002).
Remus-Emsermann, M. N. P. & Leveau, J. H. J. Linking environmental heterogeneity and reproductive success at single-cell resolution. ISME J. 4, 215–222 (2010).
Wintermute, E. H. & Silver, P. A. Emergent cooperation in microbial metabolism. Mol. Syst. Biol. 6, 407 (2010).
Pande, S. et al. Fitness and stability of obligate cross-feeding interactions that emerge upon gene loss in bacteria. ISME J. 8, 953–962 (2014).
Mee, M. T., Collins, J. J., Church, G. M. & Wang, H. H. Syntrophic exchange in synthetic microbial communities. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, E2149–E2156 (2014).
Bernstein, H. C., Paulson, S. D. & Carlson, R. P. Synthetic Escherichia coli consortia engineered for syntrophy demonstrate enhanced biomass productivity. J. Biotechnol. 157, 159–166 (2012).
Müller, J., Hense, B. A., Marozava, S., Kuttler, C. & Meckenstock, R. U. Model selection for microbial nutrient uptake using a cost-benefit approach. Math. Biosci. 255, 52–70 (2014).
Tzamali, E., Poirazi, P., Tollis, I. G. & Reczko, M. A computational exploration of bacterial metabolic diversity identifying metabolic interactions and growth-efficient strain communities. BMC Syst. Biol. 5, 167 (2011).
Labhsetwar, P., Cole, J. A., Roberts, E., Price, N. D. & Luthey-Schulten, Z. A. Heterogeneity in protein expression induces metabolic variability in a modeled Escherichia coli population. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 14006–14011 (2013).
Harvey, E., Heys, J. & Gedeon, T. Quantifying the effects of the division of labor in metabolic pathways. J. Theor. Biol. 360, 222–242 (2014).
Nikolic, N., Barner, T. & Ackermann, M. Analysis of fluorescent reporters indicates heterogeneity in glucose uptake and utilization in clonal bacterial populations. BMC Microbiol. 13, 258 (2013).
Silva-Rocha, R. & de Lorenzo, V. Stochasticity of TOL plasmid catabolic promoters sets a bimodal expression regime in Pseudomonas putida mt-2 exposed to m-xylene. Mol. Microbiol. 86, 199–211 (2012).
Healey, D. & Gore, J. Phenotypic heterogeneity implements a game theoretic mixed strategy in a clonal microbial population. BioRxiv http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/011049 (2014).
Mohr, W., Vagner, T., Kuypers, M. M., Ackermann, M. & LaRoche, J. Resolution of conflicting signals at the single-cell level in the regulation of cyanobacterial photosynthesis and nitrogen fixation. PLoS One 8, e66060 (2013).
Kopf, S. H. et al. Heavy water and 15N labeling with NanoSIMS analysis reveals growth-rate dependent metabolic heterogeneity in chemostats. Environ. Microbiol. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.12752 (2015).
Mouslim, C. & Hughes, K. T. The effect of cell growth phase on the regulatory cross-talk between flagellar and Spi1 virulence gene expression. PLoS Pathog. 10, e1003987 (2014).
Acknowledgements
The author gratefully acknowledges fruitful collaborations and important discussions with current and former members of the research group, and with a number of colleagues (in particular W.-D. Hardt and M. Doebeli). The author also thanks the referees and S. van Vliet for helpful comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation, the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich (ETH Zürich), the Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (Eawag) and the Marie Curie Program of the European Commission.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declares no competing financial interests.
Glossary
- Quantitative biology
-
The use of mathematical tools and principles to analyse experimental data in order to test existing theories and develop new theories.
- Division of labour
-
The division of a biological task into several different subtasks that are each executed by specialized individuals.
- Gene amplification
-
The generation of multiple copies of a genetic region, resulting from a duplication event and subsequent homologous recombination of the duplicated region.
- Stochastic gene expression
-
Fluctuations in the rate of mRNA and/or protein production over time. These fluctuations are a consequence of the low copy numbers of molecules in microbial cells and the burst-like nature of transcription.
- Periodic oscillations
-
Changes in phenotypic traits that occur at regular time intervals.
- Cellular age
-
The age of a cell as measured by the time since synthesis of particular subcellular structures. During cell division, these structures can be asymmetrically segregated into the daughter cells, resulting in two cells of different cellular ages.
- Quorum sensing
-
The regulation of gene expression in response to changes in bacterial population density. Quorum sensing is mediated by intercellular chemical signalling.
- Persisters
-
Cells that are phenotypically tolerant to antibiotics without being genetically resistant.
- HipA
-
An intracellular bacterial toxin that is part of the toxin–antitoxin module hipBA.
- Metabolic flux
-
The rate at which molecules flow through a metabolic pathway.
- Type three secretion system 1
-
(ttss-1). The genetic locus encoding a multiprotein secretion apparatus that some Gram-negative bacteria use to translocate effector proteins into host cells.
- Cheaters
-
Individuals that contribute less than others to a collectively produced public good but still benefit from that good.
- Biofilms
-
Microbial communities that are attached to surfaces. Biofilms provide spatial structure by limiting the movement of microorganisms and the diffusion of molecules.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ackermann, M. A functional perspective on phenotypic heterogeneity in microorganisms. Nat Rev Microbiol 13, 497–508 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro3491
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro3491
This article is cited by
-
Bet hedging in a unicellular microalga
Nature Communications (2024)
-
Responses of plants to temporally heterogeneous water conditions in species from different ranges of habitats
Tropical Ecology (2024)
-
Characterization of individual spores of two biological insecticides, Bacillus thuringiensis and Lysinibacillus sphaericus, in response to glutaraldehyde using single-cell optical approaches
Archives of Microbiology (2024)
-
Emerging tools for uncovering genetic and transcriptomic heterogeneities in bacteria
Biophysical Reviews (2024)
-
Estimating the Morphological and Physiological Plasticity of Ligustrum obtusifolium Seedlings in Response to Drought Stress and Subsequent Rewatering
Journal of Plant Growth Regulation (2024)