A recent study using claims data to compare open retropubic with minimally invasive prostatectomy has revealed higher rates of genitourinary complications, incontinence and erectile dysfunction after the laparoscopic procedure. However, there are a number of inherent problems associated with the use of claims-based diagnoses for the evaluation of surgical techniques.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Walsh, P. C. 2008 Whitmore Lecture: Radical prostatectomy—where we were and where we are going. Urol. Oncol. 27, 246–250 (2009).
Montie, J. E. & Smith, J. A. Whitmoreisms: memorable quotes from Willet F. Whitmore, Jr, M. D. Urology 63, 207–209 (2004).
Walsh, P. C. Anatomic radical prostatectomy: evolution of the surgical technique. J. Urol. 160, 2418–2424 (1998).
Abbou, C. C. et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with a remote controlled robot. J. Urol. 165, 1964–1966 (2001).
Ficarra, V. et al. Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. Eur. Urol. 55, 1037–1063 (2009).
Cropper, C. M. The robot is in—and ready to operate. Business Week 110–112 (14 Mar 2005).
Box, G. N. & Ahlering, T. E. Robotic radical prostatectomy: long-term outcomes. Curr. Opin. Urol. 18, 173–179 (2008).
Hu, J. C., Wang, Q., Pashos, C. L., Lipsitz, S. R. & Keating, N. L. Utilization and outcomes of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy. J. Clin. Oncol. 26, 2278–2284 (2008).
Hu, J. C. et al. Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive vs open radical prostatectomy. JAMA 302, 1557–1564 (2009).
Savage, C. J. & Vickers, A. J. Low annual caseloads of United States surgeons conducting radical prostatectomy. J. Urol. 182, 2677–2679 (2009).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chamie, K., Litwin, M. The challenge of comparing open and laparoscopic surgery. Nat Rev Urol 7, 121–122 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2010.21
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2010.21