Main

Transplacental passage of small numbers of maternal and fetal nucleated cells, including hematopoietic stem cells, is a common occurrence that often results in persistent fetal or maternal microchimerism—the presence of small numbers of fetal or maternal cells in mothers or their progeny, respectively (13). This raises the possibility that maternal and fetal microchimerism may play a role in such clinically important phenomena as immune ontogeny, vertical transmission of infections, and tissue repair and regeneration by transdifferentiated stem cells. Particular interest has focused on the possibility that chimeric maternal and fetal alloreactive lymphocytes may play a role in autoimmunity (46). Although an increasing number of clinical studies have addressed this question, there has been a paucity of information concerning the factors that regulate the presence and levels of naturally occurring maternal and fetal chimeric cells.

Among the possible regulatory factors that might be involved, maternal-fetal histocompatibility seems to be a prime candidate in view of the importance of histocompatibility in regulating hematopoietic chimerism in both adult and fetal recipients of adult bone marrow. In this study, we directly tested for the first time the influence of maternal-fetal histocompatibility and specific HLA alleles on both the presence and level of maternal microchimerism in the fetus. The results strongly suggest that maternal microchimerism in fetal blood is associated with maternal compatibility at the class II DRB1 and/or DQB1 HLA loci and is likely also associated with the maternal HLA-DQB1*0301 allele.

METHODS

Study subjects.

Paired whole-blood samples were obtained from 120 maternal-fetal pairs who underwent fetal blood sampling for a variety of medical indications, including red cell or platelet alloimmunization, and the need for rapid karyotyping mandated by an ultrasound diagnosis of fetal anomalies. The gestational age at fetal blood sampling ranged from 18.3 wk to 38 wk (mean, 27.2 wk; median, 26.5 wk). We excluded from the study fetuses who had received intrauterine blood or platelet transfusions before the cordocentesis procedure and fetuses with placental abruption. Maternal consent was obtained for storage of the excess specimens for research purposes under a protocol approved by the Wayne State University Institutional Review Board. The current study was separately approved by the same committee. Cordocentesis and venipuncture were used to obtain 1 to 6 mL of fetal blood and 1 to 10 mL of maternal blood, respectively. The method of cordocentesis has been previously described (7).

Preparation of genomic DNA.

Genomic DNA was prepared from each whole-blood specimen using the QIAamp DNA Extraction Kit for PCR (QIAGEN, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada) according to the manufacturer's directions. All DNA samples were stored frozen at −70°C.

Real-time quantitative PCR assays for chimeric maternal cells.

We took advantage of two different polymorphic loci—the deletion polymorphism of the glutathione S-transferase M1 (GSTM1) gene and the insertion/deletion polymorphisms of intron 16 of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) gene—to apply three different quantitative PCR (QPCR) assays for detection and quantification of noninherited maternal alleles (NIMAs) as markers of maternal cells in fetal blood. Informative maternal-fetal pairs are those in which the mother possesses an allele not present in the fetus. The GSTM1 locus is deleted in roughly half of the population, which permits detection of NIMA when the mother is GSTM1 positive and the fetus is GSTM1 negative. Genotyping of GSTM1 was performed as previously described by Lo et al. (8,9) using primers GSTM1E4 (CTGCCCTACTTGATTGATGGG) and GSTM1E5 (CTGGATTGTAGCA GATCATGC) in 30 cycles of PCR (94°C 1 min, 59°C 1 min, and 72°C for 1 min; Mg2+ concentration 1.5 mM). Amplification of DNA from GSTM1-positive individuals produces a 273-bp product. ACE polymorphism is characterized by insertion or deletion of a 287-bp fragment in intron 16 of the ACE gene. NIMA can be detected when the mother is heterozygous for the insertion and deletion alleles and the fetus is homozygous for either allele. The insertion and deletion alleles yield 479-bp and 191-bp products, respectively. Genotyping of ACE was performed using primers ACE-P1 (CTGGAGACCACTCCCATCCTTTCT) and ACE-P2 (GATGTGGCCATCACATTCGTCAGA) using 30 cycles of PCR (94°C 1 min, 58°C 1 min, and 72°C 1 min; Mg2+ concentration of 3 mM).

The Taqman QPCR assay used in these studies is based on continuous monitoring of the accumulation of a fluorescent product released during each PCR cycle of a PCR amplification reaction when the 5′ to 3′ exonuclease activity of Taq polymerase cleaves it from an oligonucleotide probe hybridizing to the PCR product. In the experiments reported here, the fluorescent signals were detected in real time using an ABI Bio-systems 7700 Sequence Detector (ABI Biosystems, Foster City, CA 94404).

For detecting and quantifying NIMAs in fetal DNA samples, four QPCR assay systems were used exactly as described by Lo et al. (9): one for the GSTM1 gene, one for the ACE insertion allele, one for the ACE deletion allele, and one for the β-globin gene. The last was used in combination with each of the other assays as a positive template control for each QPCR reaction and to calculate the fractional concentration of the noninherited allele. A normal diploid cell was defined as possessing one genome equivalent of the β-globin sequence. Each assay was carried out in duplicate using 500 ng of template per reaction with the mean results used for further analysis. For controlling for possible inhibition of QPCR amplification reactions by excess template, reactions were also carried out with 250 ng of template, and in almost all instances, the results obtained were identical at the two different template doses.

In ACE assays for the insertion (I) or deletion (D) alleles, a standard curve was constructed using as a positive control genomic DNA from a human subject who was known to be heterozygous ID. Negative control DNA was derived from established cell lines that are known to lack either the insertion allele (cell line Detroit 1564; Cell Culture Laboratory, Detroit, MI, U.S.A.) or the deletion allele (cell line CEPH; ABI Bio-systems). In the GSTM1 assay, the positive and negative controls were human genomic DNA samples that were known to be either GSTM1 positive or GSTM1 null. In each assay, two standard curves were constructed: one standard curve for the test allele and one standard curve for the universally present β-globin gene as a reference standard for the amount of genomic DNA in the test template. For purposes of calculating fractional concentrations of NIMAs on the basis of the standard curves, a single cell was considered to contain 6.6 pg of DNA equal to one genome equivalent of the respective allele. Thus, the fractional concentration of NIMAs present in each 500-ng sample of fetal genomic DNA used as template was calculated as genome equivalents of NIMA/genome equivalents β-globin. Each sample of 500 ng of genomic DNA contained 83,000 genome equivalents of β-globin, and on the basis of their standard curves, the β-globin, GSTM1, and ACE systems each were able to detect as few as one to three genome equivalents. However, direct comparison of the three QPCR assays showed that the QPCR assay for the ACE insertion allele was consistently less sensitive than the assays for either GSTM1 or ACE deletion polymorphisms. For this reason, we included in our analysis only maternal-fetal pairs informative at either the GSTM1 or ACE deletion polymorphisms. A representative standard curve for the GSTM1 allele is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1
figure 1

Real-time QPCR analysis of the GSTM1 gene. Plot of the threshold cycle (Ct, cycle at which signal above background is first detected) against the input target quantity (logarithmic scale).

HLA genotyping.

NIMA-informative maternal-fetal pairs were genotyped for alleles at the HLA-A, B, C, DRB1, and DQB1 loci by intermediate resolution DNA-based typing using PCR amplification and reverse sequence-specific oligonucleotide probe kits (Dynal RELI SSO HLA Tests; Dynal Biotech, Oslo, Norway). High-resolution typing for DRB1 or DQB1 alleles was initially performed by DNA sequencing in those cases in which results of intermediate resolution typing were ambiguous. Additional samples underwent allele-specific high-resolution typing of the DQB1*03xx and DQB1*06xx allele families.

Statistical analysis.

Odds ratios were calculated as the ratios of the proportions of maternal-fetal pairs with a given pattern of maternal-fetal compatibility with detectable chimeric maternal cells to the proportion of those pairs without detectable chimeric maternal cells. On the basis of their HLA genotypes, we assigned each mother or fetus as “compatible” or “incompatible” from the perspective of the alloreactive T cells or natural killer (NK) cells of the opposite member of the pair. Maternal compatibility from the perspective of fetal alloreactive T cells was considered to exist when none of the maternal alleles differed from those detected in the fetus. Similarly, fetal compatibility from the perspective of the mother's alloreactive T cells was considered to exist when none of the fetal alleles differed from those detected in the mother. Using the algorithm described by Ruggeri et al. (10), maternal compatibility from the perspective of fetal NK cells was considered to exist when the mother lacked none of the class I allele group(s) recognized by killer inhibitory receptors (KIRs) of her fetus, and fetal compatibility from the perspective of maternal NK cells was considered to exist when the fetus lacked none of the class I allele group(s) recognized by KIRs of its mother. (The currently identified class I allele KIR ligand-defining groups are HLA-Cw2,4,5,6, and related alleles; HLA-Cw1, 3,7,8 and related alleles; HLA-Bw4 alleles; and HLA-A3/A11.)

Exact methods were used to calculate 95% confidence intervals and two-sided p values associated with the ratios. Between-group differences in levels of maternal microchimerism were compared by the Mann-Whitney log-rank test. Statistical significance was set at p ≤0.05.

RESULTS

Prevalence and levels of maternal microchimerism in fetal blood.

Genotyping of 120 maternal-fetal DNA sample pairs at the GSTM1 and ACE loci revealed that 30 fetal samples were informative for detection of maternal microchimerism by QPCR detection of the noninherited maternal GSTM1 or ACE deletion allele 21 at the GSTM1 locus (mother GSTM1 positive/fetus GSTM1 null) and 9 at the ACE locus (mother heterozygous for the ACE insertion and deletion alleles, and fetus homozygous for the ACE insertion allele).

The results of testing the 30 informative maternal-fetal pairs for maternal microchimerism are shown together with selected clinical parameters in Table 1. Maternal genomic DNA was detectable by QPCR in the blood of 16 of the 30 informative fetuses. No attempt was made to separate cells from plasma before whole-blood DNA extraction. However, because 99% of DNA in whole blood is associated with intact cells (9), the fraction of maternal DNA detected in these assays almost entirely reflects the relative fraction of maternal cells to fetal cells. The fractional concentration of maternal cells in fetal blood ranged from 1 × 10−5 to 687 × 10−5, with a median fractional concentration of 13 × 10−5 and a mean fractional concentration of 89 × 10−5. Odds ratio analysis and nonparametric log-rank tests revealed no statistically significant relationships between the presence or level of maternal microchimerism and average gestational age at blood sampling, maternal gravidity, maternal parity, maternal age, or use of a transplacental as opposed to a transamniotic echo-visualized approach to cordocentesis. (This last finding is evidence that the blood sampling procedure did not enhance maternal cell passage into the fetal circulation.) We also observed no association between the presence or levels of detectable maternal cells and the indication for cordocentesis including the presence of fetal anatomical anomalies, infection, or antibody-induced abnormalities of red cells or platelets. One of the fetuses who had been karyotyped because of a possible anatomical anomaly (7) and five of the fetuses who had been considered potential targets for maternal alloimmunization (9, 19, 22, 32, and 109) subsequently turned out to be “normal” by virtue of a normal karyotype and normal anatomy at birth, absence of detectable maternal antibody to fetal erythrocytes, or normal platelet count. The proportion of these “normal” fetuses with chimeric maternal cells (3 of 6) was similar to the proportion of “abnormal” fetuses with such cells (13 of 24).

Table 1 Presence and levels of maternal cells in fetal blood

Influence of maternal-fetal HLA compatibility on the presence and levels of maternal microchimerism.

For examining the possible relationship between maternal-fetal histocompatibility and maternal microchimerism, maternal-fetal pairs that had been tested by QPCR for maternal microchimerism were genotyped at three HLA class I loci—HLA-A, B, C—and two HLA class II loci—DRB1 and DQB1. After HLA genotyping had been completed on 18 maternal-fetal pairs, preliminary analysis of the results indicated that histocompatibility at any of the class I HLA-A, B, and C loci had little if any apparent influence on either the presence or level of maternal microchimerism, but it raised the possibility of an association with maternal-fetal compatibility at the class II HLA-DRB1 and DQB1 loci. With that in mind, we limited HLA genotyping to the DRB1 and DQB1 class II loci on the remaining 10 informative maternal-fetal pairs for which sufficient DNA was available. Because the resulting cumulative data pointed to the possible importance of maternal-fetal histocompatibility at the DQB1*03xx and DQB1*06xx families of alleles, we subsequently carried out further high-resolution genotyping for specific DQB1*03xx and DQB1*06xx alleles on all available DNA samples from each of the 30 maternal-fetal pairs that possessed one or more of those particular alleles. Table 2 presents the final tabulation of the completed HLA typing data on all maternal-fetal pairs so tested together with their levels of maternal microchimerism.

Table 2 Relationship between maternal and fetal HLA genotypes and presence and levels of maternal microchimerism

Analysis of this complete data set (Table 3) revealed a positive association between maternal compatibility from the fetal perspective at HLA-DQB1 and DRB1 and the presence of maternal microchimerism in the fetal circulation. The data showed that 5 of the 28 tested fetuses had HLA-DQB1-compatible mothers, and in 2 of these 5 fetuses, the mothers were also HLA-DRB1 compatible. All five of the fetuses with DQB1-compatible mothers including the two with DRB1-compatible mothers contained chimeric maternal cells. By contrast, only 9 of the 23 fetuses with DQB1 and DRB1-incompatible mothers contained such cells (odds ratio, infinity; p = 0.04). This strongly suggests that maternal histocompatibility at HLA-DRB1 and/or HLA-DQB1 favors but is not required for the occurrence of maternal microchimerism in the fetus. Fetuses with DQB1-compatible mothers also tended to have higher mean fractional levels of maternal microchimerism (8.8 × 10E-4) than the latter group (1.3 × 10E-4; p = 0.09 by the Mann-Whitney test.) By contrast, fetal histocompatibility at either DBQ1 or DRB1 from the perspective of the mother showed no relationship to either the presence or level of maternal microchimerism.

Table 3 Influence of HLA-class II histocompatibility and DQB1 alleles on maternal microchimerism

We then analyzed the data for possible associations between specific DQB1*03xx and DQB1*06xx alleles and maternal microchimerism. This revealed a likely association between the presence of maternal microchimerism in the fetus and maternal DQB1*0301, a weaker possible association with fetal DQB1*0301, and an intermediate strength association with combined maternal and fetal DQB1*0301. By contrast, as illustrated by the results of analysis of another common DQB1 allele, DQB1*0602, we detected no apparent associations between other maternal or fetal class II alleles and the presence or levels of maternal microchimerism in the fetal blood.

DISCUSSION

Our results strongly suggest that maternal microchimerism in the fetal circulation is associated with maternal compatibility from the fetal perspective at HLA-DQB1 and, possibly, at HLA-DRB1. These findings are consistent with previous data suggesting that class II compatibility may influence donor cell chimerism. Thus, Tajik et al. (11) previously documented an association between the degree of donor class II HLA compatibility from the recipient's perspective and post–organ transplant donor cell microchimerism, and Nelson et al. (12) reported that women with scleroderma have a higher level of male cell (presumably fetal) microchimerism than control women and are more likely to have class II HLA-compatible sons than class II HLA-incompatible sons. Taken together, these findings suggest that absence of fetal alloimmune recognition of maternal class II HLA antigens favors maternal microchimerism.

Our data further suggest that maternal microchimerism is favored by the presence of maternal DQB1*O301 and, possibly, sharing of DQB1*0301 by both mother and fetus. This fits with previous findings indicating that DQB1*0301 is associated with scleroderma (13), a condition associated with microchimerism, as described above. How the presence of maternal DQB1*0301 might influence maternal microchimerism is a matter for speculation. One testable possibility is that fetal recognition of this particular allele on maternal cells somehow results in primary stimulation of T cells with suppressor activity for T cell reactivity to other maternal alloantigens.

We made no attempt in this study to determine the nature of the maternal cells found in fetal blood or whether they are retained until birth and beyond. However, others have shown that chimeric maternal cells in newborn cord blood include CD34 progenitor cells (14) as well as mature polymorphonuclear cells (15). Thus, it seems that chimeric maternal cells comprise, at the very least, maternal hematopoietic stem cells and their progeny. This conclusion, together with growing evidence that at least some transplanted adult multipotent bone marrow stem cells can differentiate into mature nonhematopoietic cells, particularly in injured tissues (16,17), raises the intriguing possibility that before and after birth, chimeric maternal stem cells could play a beneficial physiologic role in tissue repair and regeneration. Further efforts to address these and other potentially clinically relevant effects of maternal microchimerism would be greatly facilitated by more detailed understanding of the mechanisms of in vivo regulation of this phenomenon. The influence of maternal class II HLA compatibility on maternal microchimerism demonstrated here strongly suggests that one important regulatory mechanism involves the fetal immune system's interaction with maternal class II HLA antigens. We are currently using a mouse model of maternal microchimerism to test this hypothesis more directly.