Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Modeling consumer exposure to spray products: an evaluation of the ConsExpo Web and ConsExpo nano models with experimental data

Abstract

To ensure safe use of chemical substances in consumer products, the exposure of consumers to these substances needs to be evaluated. For this purpose, generally consumer exposure modeling tools are used. To build confidence in such tools, evaluation of their performance with experimental data is indispensable. This work describes the evaluation of two consumer exposure modeling tools: ConsExpo Web and ConsExpo nano. Both models contain a module to estimate exposure of substances released as an aerosol during the use of spray products. This particular model was tested by comparing measured exposure data with model simulations. Experimental data were obtained from the public literature. These typically provide measured air concentrations under simulated use conditions of spray products. ConsExpo Web and ConsExpo nano were used to simulate experimental settings of the different studies. The resulting simulated air concentrations were compared with the reported ones. Overall, good agreement between modeled and measured data was observed. However, a significant proportion of the studies considered, did not provide sufficient detail in the specification of the experimental conditions to make them suitable for model evaluation. Critical information that was often lacking was on product composition, the mass sprayed during usage, and the generated aerosol size distribution.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Comparison of simulations using ConsExpo with measured data from Berger-Preiss et al. [23].
Fig. 2: Comparison of ConsExpo simulations with data from Chen et al.
Fig. 3: Comparison of ConsExpo simulations with data from DEPA.
Fig. 4: Comparison of ConsExpo simulations with data from Park et al. [25].
Fig. 5: Comparison of ConsExpo simulations with data from Delmaar and Bremmer [5].
Fig. 6: An illustration of the dependency of estimated air concentrations on the specification of the particle size (diameter) distribution.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. RIVM. ConsExpo Web. 2016. www.consexpoweb.nl. Accessed 30 Oct 2019.

  2. US EPA. Consumer exposure model (CEM) user guide. 2019. www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2019-06/documents/cem_2.1_user_guide.pdf. Accessed 11 Dec 2019.

  3. ECETOC European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals. ECETOC TRA version 3: background and Rationale for the Improvements. Report No. 114, ECETOC - Brussels; 2012.

  4. Delmaar JE, Schuur AG. ConsExpo Web. Consumer exposure models—model documentation: update for ConsExpo Web 1.0.2. RIVM report 2017-0197. https://doi.org/10.21945/RIVM-2017-0197.

  5. Delmaar JE, Bremmer HJ. The ConsExpo spray model—modelling and experimental validation of the inhalation exposure of consumers to aerosols from spray cans and trigger sprays. RIVM rapport 320104005, RIVM - Bilthoven; 2009.

  6. RIVM. ConsExpo Nano tool. 2007. www.consexponano.nl. Accessed 30 Dec 2019.

  7. Bremmer HJ, Blom WM, van Hoeven-Arentzen PH, Prud’homme de Lodder LCH, van Raaij MTM, Straetmans EHFM, et al. Pest control products fact sheet. Updated version for ConsExpo 4. RIVM report 320005002/2006, RIVM - Bilthoven; 2006.

  8. Bremmer HJ, van Engelen JGM. Paint Products Fact Sheet To assess the risks for the consumer. Updated version for ConsExpo 4. RIVM report 320104008/2007, RIVM - Bilthoven; 2007.

  9. te Biesebeek JD, Nijkamp MM, Bokkers BGH, Wijnhoven SWP. General fact sheet—updated version 2014. RIVM report 090013003/2014, RIVM - Bilthoven; 2014.

  10. Meesters J, Nijkamp M, Schuur AG and v.d. Broek I. Cleaning products fact sheet: default parameters for estimating consumer exposure—updated version 2018, RIVM report 2016-0179, RIVM - Bilthoven; 2018.

  11. Adawi HI, Newbold MA, Reed JM, Vance ME, Feitshans IL, Bickford LR, et al. Nano-enabled personal care products: current developments in consumer safety. NanoImpact. 2018;11:170–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Asgharian B, Hofmann W, Miller FJ. Dosimetry of particles in humans: from children to adults. In: Gardner DE, ed. Toxicology of the lung. 4th ed. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis; 2006. p. 151–94.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Braakhuis HM, Park MV, Gosens I, De Jong WH, Cassee FR. Physicochemical characteristics of nanomaterials that affect pulmonary inflammation. Part Fibre Toxicol. 2014;11:18 https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-8977-11-18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Kuhlbusch TAJ, Asbach C, Fissan H, Göhler D, Stintz M. Nanoparticle exposure at nanotechnology workplaces: a review. Part Fibre Toxicol. 2011;8:22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Quadros ME, Marr LC. Silver nanoparticles and total aerosols emitted by nanotechnology-related consumer spray products. Environ Sci Technol. 2011;45:10713–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Nazarenko Y, Han TW, Lioy PJ, Mainelis G. Potential for exposure to engineered nanoparticles from nanotechnology-based consumer spray products. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2011;21:515.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen BT, Afshari A, Stone S, Jackson M, Schwegler-Berry D, Frazer DG, et al. Nanoparticles-containing spray can aerosol: characterization, exposure assessment, and generator design. Inhal Toxicol. 2010;22:1072–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Park J, Ham S, Jang M, Lee J, Kim S, Kim S, et al. Spatial-temporal dispersion of aerosolized nanoparticles during the use of consumer spray products and estimates of inhalation exposure. Environ Sci Technol. 2017;51:7624–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Nazarenko Y, Zhen H, Han T, Lioy PJ, Mainelis G. Nanomaterial inhalation exposure from nanotechnology based cosmetic powders: a quantitative assessment. J Nanopart Res. 2012; 14, art. no. 1229.

  20. ICRP Human respiratory tract model for radiological protection. A report of a Task Group of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann ICRP. 1994;24:1–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gregoratto D, Bailey MR, Marsh JW. Modelling particle retention in the alveolar-interstitial region of the human lungs. J Radiol Prot. 2010;30:491–512.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Gregoratto D, Bailey MR, Marsh JW. Particle clearance in the alveolar-interstitial region of the human lungs: model validation. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2011;144:353–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Berger-Preiß E, Koch W, Gerling S, Kock H, Appel KE. Use of biocidal products(insect sprays and electro-vaporizer)in indoor areas—exposure scenarios and exposure modeling. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2009;212:505–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. DEPA, Biocides in Spray Products. Pesticide research no. 179; 2018. www2.mst.dk/Udgiv/publications/2018/11/978-87-7038-011-9.pdf.

  25. Park J, Yoon C, Lee K. Comparison of modeled estimates of inhalation exposure to aerosols during use of consumer spray products. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2018;221:941–50.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant no. 686239 (caLIBRAte). We thank Susan Dekkers and Martine Bakker for their help and valuable comments on this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christiaan Delmaar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of this article.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Delmaar, C., Meesters, J. Modeling consumer exposure to spray products: an evaluation of the ConsExpo Web and ConsExpo nano models with experimental data. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 30, 878–887 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-020-0239-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-020-0239-x

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links