Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Immediate Communication
  • Published:

Deep brain stimulation of the nucleus accumbens in the treatment of severe alcohol use disorder: a phase I pilot trial

Abstract

Alcohol use disorder (AUD) is a highly prevalent, often refractory, medical illness. The symptoms of AUD are driven by dysfunction in several neurocircuits centered on the nucleus accumbens (NAc). Case reports and animal studies suggest NAc-DBS may be an effective harm-reduction treatment in severe AUD. Six patients with severe, refractory AUD underwent NAc-DBS. Safety metrics and clinical outcomes were recorded. Positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) was used to measure glucose metabolism in the NAc at baseline and 6 months. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used to characterize postoperative changes in NAc functional connectivity to the rest of the brain, as well as NAc and dorsal striatal reactivity to alcoholic visual cues. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03660124. All patients experienced a reduction in craving. There was a significant reduction in alcohol consumption, alcohol-related compulsivity, and anxiety at 12 months. There was no significant change in depression. FDG-PET analysis demonstrated reduced NAc metabolism by 6 months, which correlated with improvements in compulsive drinking behaviors. Clinical improvement correlated with reduced functional connectivity between the NAc and the visual association cortex. Active DBS was associated with reduced activation of the dorsal striatum during passive viewing of alcohol-containing pictures. NAc-DBS is feasible and safe in patients with severe, otherwise refractory AUD. It is associated with a reduction in cravings and addictive behavior. A potential mechanism underlying this process is a down-regulation of the NAc, a disruption of its functional connectivity to the visual association cortex, and interference of cue-elicited dorsal striatum reactivity. Trial Registration NCT03660124 (www.clinicaltrials.gov).

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Summary of electrode locations and clinical outcomes.
Fig. 2: Mean liver function tests preoperatively and at the last available followup.
Fig. 3: Boxplots displaying change in glucose metabolism (SUVR) within the nucleus accumbens.
Fig. 4: Reduced functional connectivity between the nucleus accumbens and the visual association area correlates with improvement in alcohol-related compulsivity (measured with the OCDS).
Fig. 5: Boxplots displaying BOLD activation (measured as a z-statistic) within the dorsal striatum while subjects viewed pictures of alcohol compared to viewing neutral pictures.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data presented in this article will be available to other researchers upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.

References

  1. Schuckit MA. Remarkable increases in alcohol use disorders. JAMA Psychiatry. 2017;74:869–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rehm J, Gnam W, Popova S, Baliunas D, Brochu S, Fischer B, et al. The costs of alcohol, illegal drugs, and tobacco in Canada, 2002. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2007;68:886–95.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Grant BF, Goldstein RB, Saha TD, Chou SP, Jung J, Zhang H, et al. Epidemiology of DSM-5 alcohol use disorder: results from the national epidemiologic survey on alcohol and related conditions III. JAMA Psychiatry. 2015;72:757–66.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. George TP. Alcohol use and misuse. CMAJ. 2007;176:621–2.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Poznyak V, Rekve D. Global status report on alcohol and health 2014. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014.

  6. Westman J, Wahlbeck K, Laursen TM, Gissler M, Nordentoft M, Hallgren J, et al. Mortality and life expectancy of people with alcohol use disorder in Denmark, Finland and Sweden. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2015;131:297–306.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schwarzinger M, Thiebaut SP, Baillot S, Mallet V, Rehm J. Alcohol use disorders and associated chronic disease—a national retrospective cohort study from France. BMC Public Health. 2017;18:43.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. World Health Organization. WHO global status report on alcohol 2004. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2004.

  9. Koob GF, Le Moal M. Addiction and the brain antireward system. Annu Rev Psychol. 2008;59:29–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Koob GF, Volkow ND. Neurobiology of addiction: a neurocircuitry analysis. Lancet Psychiatry. 2016;3:760–73.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Sesack SR, Grace AA. Cortico-Basal Ganglia reward network: microcircuitry. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2010;35:27–47.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Park YS, Sammartino F, Young NA, Corrigan J, Krishna V, Rezai AR. Anatomic review of the ventral capsule/ventral striatum and the nucleus accumbens to guide target selection for deep brain stimulation for obsessive-compulsive disorder. World Neurosurg. 2019;126:1–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Denys D, Graat I, Mocking R, de Koning P, Vulink N, Figee M, et al. Efficacy of deep brain stimulation of the ventral anterior limb of the internal capsule for refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder: a clinical cohort of 70 patients. Am J Psychiatry. 2020;177:265–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bewernick BH, Kayser S, Sturm V, Schlaepfer TE. Long-term effects of nucleus accumbens deep brain stimulation in treatment-resistant depression: evidence for sustained efficacy. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2012;37:1975–85.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Lozano AM, Lipsman N. Probing and regulating dysfunctional circuits using deep brain stimulation. Neuron. 2013;77:406–24.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lozano AM, Lipsman N, Bergman H, Brown P, Chabardes S, Chang JW, et al. Deep brain stimulation: current challenges and future directions. Nat Rev Neurol. 2019;15:148–60.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Mayberg HS, Riva-Posse P, Crowell AL. Deep brain stimulation for depression: keeping an eye on a moving target. JAMA Psychiatry. 2016;73:439–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kuhn J, Lenartz D, Huff W, Lee S, Koulousakis A, Klosterkoetter J, et al. Remission of alcohol dependency following deep brain stimulation of the nucleus accumbens: valuable therapeutic implications? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007;78:1152–3.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Muller UJ, Sturm V, Voges J, Heinze HJ, Galazky I, Buntjen L, et al. Nucleus accumbens deep brain stimulation for alcohol addiction—safety and clinical long-term results of a pilot trial. Pharmacopsychiatry. 2016;49:170–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hassan O, Phan S, Wiecks N, Joaquin C, Bondarenko V. Outcomes of deep brain stimulation surgery for substance use disorder: a systematic review. Neurosurg Rev. 2021;44:1967–76.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. wennberg P. The timeline follow back technique: psychometric properties of a 28-day timeline for measuring alcohol consumption. Ger J Psychiatry. 1998;2:62–8.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Volk RJ, Steinbauer JR, Cantor SB, Holzer CE 3rd. The alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT) as a screen for at-risk drinking in primary care patients of different racial/ethnic backgrounds. Addiction. 1997;92:197–206.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Anton RF, Moak DH, Latham P. The obsessive compulsive drinking scale: a self-rated instrument for the quantification of thoughts about alcohol and drinking behavior. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1995;19:92–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bohn MJ, Krahn DD, Staehler BA. Development and initial validation of a measure of drinking urges in abstinent alcoholics. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1995;19:600–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Skinner HA, Allen BA. Alcohol dependence syndrome: measurement and validation. J Abnorm Psychol. 1982;91:199–209.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hamilton M. Standardised assessment and recording of depressive symptoms. Psychiatr Neurol Neurochir. 1969;72:201–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Beck AT, Epstein N, Brown G, Steer RA. An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: psychometric properties. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1988;56:893–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Beck AT, Steer RA. Internal consistencies of the original and revised beck depression inventory. J Clin Psychol. 1984;40:1365–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Jenkinson M, Beckmann CF, Behrens TE, Woolrich MW, Smith SM. FSL. Neuroimage. 2012;62:782–90.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Davidson B, Tam F, Yang B, Meng Y, Hamani C, Graham SJ, et al. Three-tesla magnetic resonance imaging of patients with deep brain stimulators: results from a phantom study and a pilot study in patients. Neurosurgery. 2020;88:349–55.

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Whitfield-Gabrieli S, Nieto-Castanon A. Conn: a functional connectivity toolbox for correlated and anticorrelated brain networks. Brain Connect. 2012;2:125–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Vollstadt-Klein S, Wichert S, Rabinstein J, Buhler M, Klein O, Ende G, et al. Initial, habitual and compulsive alcohol use is characterized by a shift of cue processing from ventral to dorsal striatum. Addiction. 2010;105:1741–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Woolrich MW, Ripley BD, Brady M, Smith SM. Temporal autocorrelation in univariate linear modeling of FMRI data. Neuroimage. 2001;14:1370–86.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Spies C, Tonnesen H, Andreasson S, Helander A, Conigrave K. Perioperative morbidity and mortality in chronic alcoholic patients. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2001;25:164S–70S.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Voges J, Muller U, Bogerts B, Munte T, Heinze HJ. Deep brain stimulation surgery for alcohol addiction. World Neurosurg. 2013;80:S28.e1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Muller UJ, Sturm V, Voges J, Heinze HJ, Galazky I, Heldmann M, et al. Successful treatment of chronic resistant alcoholism by deep brain stimulation of nucleus accumbens: first experience with three cases. Pharmacopsychiatry. 2009;42:288–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Buchsbaum MS, Bralet M. FDG-PET scans in patients with alcohol use disorder. Lisbon: WCP-2019; 2019.

  38. Kohno M, Dennis LE, McCready H, Hoffman WF. Executive control and striatal resting-state network interact with risk factors to influence treatment outcomes in alcohol-use disorder. Front Psychiatry. 2017;8:182.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Bach P, Reinhard I, Buhler S, Vollstadt-Klein S, Kiefer F, Koopmann A. Oxytocin modulates alcohol-cue induced functional connectivity in the nucleus accumbens of social drinkers. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2019;109:104385.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Ito R, Dalley JW, Robbins TW, Everitt BJ. Dopamine release in the dorsal striatum during cocaine-seeking behavior under the control of a drug-associated cue. J Neurosci. 2002;22:6247–53.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Vanderschuren LJ, Di Ciano P, Everitt BJ. Involvement of the dorsal striatum in cue-controlled cocaine seeking. J Neurosci. 2005;25:8665–70.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Pool JL. Psychosurgery in older people. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1954;2:456–66.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Cheung SW, Racine CA, Henderson-Sabes J, Demopoulos C, Molinaro AM, Heath S, et al. Phase I trial of caudate deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant tinnitus. J Neurosurg. 2019:1–10. Online ahead of print.

  44. Mayberg HS, Lozano AM, Voon V, McNeely HE, Seminowicz D, Hamani C, et al. Deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression. Neuron. 2005;45:651–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Nuttin B, Cosyns P, Demeulemeester H, Gybels J, Meyerson B. Electrical stimulation in anterior limbs of internal capsules in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder. Lancet. 1999;354:1526.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Lipsman N, Woodside DB, Giacobbe P, Hamani C, Carter JC, Norwood SJ, et al. Subcallosal cingulate deep brain stimulation for treatment-refractory anorexia nervosa: a phase 1 pilot trial. Lancet. 2013;381:1361–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Davidson B, Hamani C, Rabin JS, Goubran M, Meng Y, Huang Y, et al. Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound capsulotomy for refractory obsessive compulsive disorder and major depressive disorder: clinical and imaging results from two phase I trials. Mol Psychiatry. 2020;25:1946–57.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Mantione M, Nieman DH, Figee M, Denys D. Cognitive-behavioural therapy augments the effects of deep brain stimulation in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Psychol Med. 2014;44:3515–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Dr. Josee Lynch made important contributions during early stages of project conception. Dr. Sabine Vollstädt-Klein generously shared the alcohol visual-cue dataset used in the fMRI portion of the study.

Funding

Funding was supplied by internal research funds, as well as support from the Harquail Centre for Neuromodulation, and philanthropic support to the Sunnybrook Foundation—none of whom played any role in the collection or interpretation of data, writing of the manuscript, or the decision to publish.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

BD made significant contributions to conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, methodology, validation, visualization, writing (original draft) and writing (review/editing). He verified the underlying data. PG and TPG made significant contributions to conceptualization, funding acquisition, methodology, project administration, resources, supervision, and writing (review/editing). SMN made significant contributions to data curation, methodology, project administration, resources, validation, and writing (review/editing). JSR made significant contributions to data curation, formal analysis, methodology, project administration, resources, supervision, validation, writing (original draft) and writing (review/editing). AJN made significant contributions to data curation, formal analysis, project administration, resources, software, writing (original draft), and writing (review/editing). MG made significant contributions to formal analysis, methodology, project administration, resources, software, supervision, visualization, writing (original draft), and writing (review/editing). AB made significant contributions to conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, funding acquisition, methodology, project administration, resources, software, supervision, validation, visualization, writing (original draft) and writing (review/editing). She verified the underlying data. YM made significant contributions to conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, project administration, resources, software, validation, writing (original draft), and writing (review/editing). CBP made significant contributions to data curation, formal analysis project administration, resources, software, validation, and writing (review/editing). SJG made significant contributions to conceptualization, data curation, funding acquisition, methodology, project administration, resources, software, supervision, and writing (review/editing). FT made significant contributions to conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, methodology, resources, software, validation, and writing (review/editing). CH made significant contributions to conceptualization, funding acquisition, methodology, project administration, resources, software, supervision, validation, visualization, writing (original draft) and writing (review/editing). He verified the underlying data. NL made significant contributions to conceptualization, funding acquisition, methodology, project administration, resources, software, supervision, validation, visualization, writing (original draft) and writing (review/editing). He verified the underlying data.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Benjamin Davidson or Nir Lipsman.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Davidson, B., Giacobbe, P., George, T.P. et al. Deep brain stimulation of the nucleus accumbens in the treatment of severe alcohol use disorder: a phase I pilot trial. Mol Psychiatry 27, 3992–4000 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-022-01677-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-022-01677-6

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links