Table 2 Relative risk of incident hypertension for the highest compared with the lowest category of calcium intake

From: Dietary calcium intake and hypertension risk: a dose–response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies

  

n

RR (95%CI)

I2(%), Pheterogeneitya

P between b

All studies

 

8

0.89 (0.86–0.93)

0%, 0.53

Source of intake

     

Dietary calcium

 

7

0.89 (0.86–0.93)

0%, 0.43

0.70

Total calcium (diet + supplement)

 

1

0.85 (0.63–1.07)

Dietary source of calcium

     

Dairy calcium

 

2

0.87 (0.83–0.92)

0%, 0.54

Nondairy calcium

 

2

0.92 (0.72–1.11)

78.8%, 0.03

Sex

     

Men

 

1

0.85 (0.76–1.10)

0.38

Women

 

2

0.87 (0.81–0.92)

0%, 0.70

Both

 

5

0.92 (0.87–0.97)

0.9%, 0.40

Geographical region

     

US

 

4

0.89 (0.84–0.93)

0%, 0.50

0.17

Europe

 

3

1.00 (0.88–1.12)

0%, 0.90

Asia

 

1

0.87 (0.80–0.94)

Dietary assessment method

     

FFQ

 

6

0.88 (0.84–0.92)

0%, 0.85

0.06

Dietary record

 

1

1.01 (0.88–1.14)

Median intake

     

<700 mg/day

 

2

0.86 (0.80–0.93)

0%, 0.71

≥700 mg/day

 

4

0.92 (0.85–0.98)

36%, 0.19

Follow-up duration

     

<5 years

 

5

0.92 (0.84–1.00)

0%, 0.47

0.47

≥5 years

 

3

0.89 (0.85–0.93)

1%, 0.36

Number of cases

     

<3000

 

5

0.95 (0.88–1.02)

0%, 0.78

0.04

>3000

 

3

0.87 (0.82–0.92)

0%, 0.92

Adjustment for confounders

     

Alcohol consumption

Yes

7

0.89 (0.86–0.93)

1%, 0.42

0.88

No

1

0.92 (0.63–1.36)

Physical activity

Yes

5

0.89 (0.84–0.93)

2%, 0.39

0.48

No

3

0.91 (0.84–0.99)

0%, 0.62

Smoking

Yes

4

0.89 (0.84–0.94)

26%, 0.25

0.69

No

4

0.91 (0.84–0.99)

0%, 0.68

Sodium intake

Yes

3

0.87 (0.82–0.91)

0%, 0.98

0.09

No

5

0.94 (0.87–1.00)

0%, 0.54

Magnesium intake

Yes

3

0.86 (0.80–0.92)

0%, 0.92

0.24

No

5

0.91 (0.86–0.97)

12%, 0.34

Potassium intake

Yes

3

0.86 (0.80–0.92)

0%, 0.92

0.24

No

5

0.91 (0.86–0.97)

12%, 0.34

  1. FFQ food frequency questionnaire, RR relative risk
  2. aP-heterogeneity within subgroups with the use of a random-effects model
  3. bP-heterogeneity between subgroups with the use of a fixed-effects model