Table 1 Meta-analytic effect size estimates of differences in reproductive success between wild-born and captive-born animals in captive environments
From: A meta-analysis of birth-origin effects on reproduction in diverse captive environments
| Â | Posterior mode (lnOR) [95% HPD CI] | % odds of captive-born reproductive success | % odds of wild-born reproductive success | N |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Overall model* | −0.56 [−1.01, −0.10] | −42.3% | +74.2% | 115 |
Overall model +  phylogeny | −0.65 [−1.45, 0.04] | −47.7% | +91.3% | 115 |
Captive environment | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Aquaculture* | −1.45 [−2.46, −0.56] | −76.7% | +328.7% | 23 |
Conservation | −0.38 [−1.06, 0.30] | −31.8% | +46.6% | 51 |
Research | −0.34 [−1.08, 0.35] | −29.0% | +40.8% | 40 |
Other | 1.84 [−0.98, 4.49] | +527.6% | −84.1% | 1 |
Trait type | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Fertility and hatchability | −0.38 [−0.94, 0.15] | −31.5% | +45.9% | 30 |
 Reproductive yield | −0.52 [−1.06, 0.05] | −40.6% | +68.4% | 28 |
 Offspring quality* | −1.22 [−2.01, −0.46] | −70.5% | +238.8% | 8 |
 Offspring survival* | −1.26 [−1.85, −0.65] | −71.5% | +250.9% | 33 |
 Reproductive phenology | −0.04 [−0.69, 0.57] | −3.5% | +3.6% | 16 |
