A protein tertiary structure mimetic modulator of the Hippo signalling pathway

Adihou, Hélène; Gopalakrishnan, Ranganath; Förster, Tim; Guéret, Stéphanie M.; Gasper, Raphael; Geschwindner, Stefan; Carrillo García, Carmen; Karatas, Hacer; Pobbati, Ajaybabu V.; Vazquez‐Chantada, Mercedes; Davey, Paul; Wassvik, Carola M.; Pang, Jeremy Kah Sheng; Soh, Boon Seng; Hong, Wanjin; Chiarparin, Elisabetta; Schade, Dennis; Plowright, Alleyn T.; Valeur, Eric; Lemurell, Malin; Grossmann, Tom N.; Waldmann, Herbert

doi:10.1038/s41467-020-19224-8

Download PDF

Article
Open access
Published: 27 October 2020

A protein tertiary structure mimetic modulator of the Hippo signalling pathway

Nature Communications volume 11, Article number: 5425 (2020) Cite this article

6165 Accesses
35 Citations
21 Altmetric
Metrics details

Subjects

Abstract

Transcription factors are key protein effectors in the regulation of gene transcription, and in many cases their activity is regulated via a complex network of protein–protein interactions (PPI). The chemical modulation of transcription factor activity is a long-standing goal in drug discovery but hampered by the difficulties associated with the targeting of PPIs, in particular when extended and flat protein interfaces are involved. Peptidomimetics have been applied to inhibit PPIs, however with variable success, as for certain interfaces the mimicry of a single secondary structure element is insufficient to obtain high binding affinities. Here, we describe the design and characterization of a stabilized protein tertiary structure that acts as an inhibitor of the interaction between the transcription factor TEAD and its co-repressor VGL4, both playing a central role in the Hippo signalling pathway. Modification of the inhibitor with a cell-penetrating entity yielded a cell-permeable proteomimetic that activates cell proliferation via regulation of the Hippo pathway, highlighting the potential of protein tertiary structure mimetics as an emerging class of PPI modulators.

Solution structure of the Hop TPR2A domain and investigation of target druggability by NMR, biochemical and in silico approaches

Article Open access 29 September 2020

Rational peptide design for inhibition of the KIX–MLL interaction

Article Open access 18 April 2023

Development of an interfering peptide M1-20 with potent anti-cancer effects by targeting FOXM1

Article Open access 19 August 2023

Introduction

In biomolecular assemblies, proteins adopt defined but flexible three-dimensional structures which are governed by numerous inter- and intramolecular amino acid contacts. The underlying protein–protein interactions (PPIs) critically depend on certain amino acids, so-called hotspots, which are usually presented by an arrangement of secondary structures at the surface of each binding partner¹. Such binding epitopes have inspired the design of molecules that mimic protein secondary structures to reproduce the projection of hotspot amino acids^2,3. To date, peptidomimetic approaches focus on the mimicry of β-hairpins⁴, isolated loop structures⁵, and α-helices^6,7 and have led to a number of bioactive inhibitors for biological targets non-addressable with small molecules. Noteworthy, there are proteins that resemble particularly challenging targets and show low targetability with peptidomimetic molecules. In these cases, more complex protein mimetics would be required to facilitate the spatial arrangement of multiple secondary structures. The feasibility of stabilizing such complex folds has been shown for multi-helix arrangements which required the use of multiple tailor-made intra-helical crosslinks, but those entities have not been used for the targeting of proteins so far^8,9,10,11.

Transcription factors represent an important class of particularly challenging protein targets as they are often embedded in complex regulatory PPI networks and lack defined binding pockets that would be suitable for small molecule targeting¹². A prime example are the members of the transcriptional enhanced associate domain (TEAD) family which are downstream effectors of the Hippo signalling pathway and crucially involved in tissue homeostasis, cell proliferation, and organ growth control, such as in the heart¹³. This protein family is an attractive therapeutic target since promotion of TEAD activity and translation of downstream target genes were reported to stimulate regenerative processes^13,14. One of TEAD’s interaction partners is the co-repressor protein named transcription cofactor vestigial-like protein 4 (VGL4), which binds TEAD at a conserved site and inhibits its translational activity^15,16. In biological experiments, it was shown that inhibition of the interaction between TEAD and VGL4 can initiate tissue repair and cardiac regeneration rendering an inhibitor of this interaction attractive for regenerative medicine¹⁷. Importantly, there are no inhibitors of this PPI available which prevents an exploration of this targeting strategy.

Here, we report the development of a proteomimetic molecule that stabilizes a two-helix arrangement derived from VGL4 designed to bind TEAD and to inhibit its interaction with VGL4. The inhibitor complex with TEAD was characterized using surface plasmon resonance (SPR) measurements and X-ray crystallography verifying the anticipated binding mode. Modification of this proteomimetic with a cell-penetrating entity yielded a bioactive inhibitor with robust cellular uptake and sufficient protease stability to perform cell-based experiments. Proximity ligation assays (PLAs), the analysis of target gene levels, and cell cycle alteration of cardiomyocytes verify TEAD engagement and the modulation of the Hippo pathway.

Results

Stabilized macrocyclic two-helix motif

The TEAD protein is composed of two functional domains, a transcriptional enhancer factor domain to bind the target DNA and a transactivation domain which interacts with co-repressor VGL4 (ref. ¹⁸) or co-activators such as the yes-associated protein (YAP) and the transcriptional co-activator with PDZ-binding motif (TAZ)¹⁹. For mouse TEAD4 (mTEAD4), a crystal structure has been reported in complex with the co-repressor VGL4(203–256) (1, Fig. 1a, PDB: 4LN0)¹⁸. mTEAD4 is highly homologous to human TEAD1 (hTEAD1, Supplementary Fig. 1), and mouse and human VGL4 have an identical TEAD binding sequence (Supplementary Fig. 2). This renders the mTEAD4–VGL4 crystal structure an excellent starting point for the design of ligands targeting hTEAD1.

**Fig. 1: Structure-based design was applied to stabilize a two-helix motif.**

The TEAD binding sequence of VGL4 can be divided into three fragments involving an N-terminal α-helix (2, helix α1, green) and a C-terminal two-helix motif (4, helices α2/α3, blue, Fig. 1a). Both sequences bind to the same area of two different TEAD transactivation domains (monomers A and B: dark and light grey, respectively). Peptide sequences 2 and 4 are connected by an extended stretch (3, yellow), which shows contacts with TEAD monomer A (light grey, Fig. 1a). The full-length VGL4-derived binding sequence 1 and the three isolated peptide motifs 2–4 were synthesized and their affinity for mTEAD4 and GST-hTEAD1 was determined by means of SPR measurements (Fig. 1b). Among the four peptides, full binding sequence 1 shows the highest affinity for both TEAD variants (K_d = 2.0/1.4 µM, mTEAD4/hTEAD1). Intervening peptide 3 exhibits very low affinity (K_d > 100 µM), which is in line with previously reported mutational studies indicating the lack of hotspot amino acids in this region¹⁸. Single-helix motif 2 (K_d = 21.8/19.4 µM, mTEAD4/hTEAD1) shows moderate affinity while two-helix motif 4 (K_d = 3.1/4.3 µM, mTEAD4/hTEAD1) is the highest affinity fragment in this panel (Fig. 1b). Sequence 4 was also reported to be essential for VGL4 binding to TEAD¹⁸. Notably, the isolated helices 5 and 6 derived from the two-helix motif 4 show low affinities for both TEAD proteins (K_d > 100 µM, Fig. 1b). Two-helix motif 4 was therefore selected as the starting point for structure-based design of a proteomimetic TEAD ligand.

When inspecting the structure of 4 bound to TEAD, we identified a salt bridge between K250 and D235 (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. 3) that connects helices α2 and α3 and thus appears to stabilize the tertiary structure of 4 in its bound form. A variation of K250 to alanine results in tenfold reduced affinity (K_d = 12/17 µM, mTEAD4/hTEAD1, Supplementary Table 1) indicating a contribution of the salt bridge to TEAD binding affinity. We reasoned that the replacement of this salt bridge by a covalent crosslink could pre-organize the bioactive conformation of the two-helix motif in solution and thereby increase the binding affinity for TEAD. For this purpose, different lactam bridges were incorporated ranging from five to eight crosslinking atoms (Fig. 1c). Macrocyclization via amide bond formation was performed on solid support after the full peptide sequence had been assembled via solid-phase peptide synthesis. The two amino acids for crosslinking were introduced with protecting groups cleavable under mild acidic conditions: carboxyl group (position X) with a 2-phenylisopropyl group and the primary amine (position Z) with a 4-methyltrityl substituent. After side chain deprotection, lactam formation was performed applying a double coupling with PyBOP and HOAt first for 3 h and then overnight. All macrocyclic peptides were obtained in good yields and purity. The two peptides with the shortest crosslink (4A and 4B, 5 and 6 crosslinking atoms, respectively) show lower affinities than linear peptide 4. For seven-atom crosslinks (4C and 4D), moderate to good affinities were observed, depending on the location of the amide bond. For the longest crosslink (4E), highest affinities were obtained for both TEAD proteins (K_d = 1.2 and 0.7 µM mTEAD4/hTEAD1) exceeding linear precursor 4 and the full-length VGL4 epitope 1 (Fig. 1c). Notably, the corresponding open versions of these macrocyclic peptides exhibit affinities in the range of peptide 4 (Supplementary Table 1).

Structural characterization of stabilized two-helix motif 4E

To understand the effects of macrocyclization in more detail, we investigated the secondary structure of the unbound peptides using circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy. The CD spectrum of linear two-helix motif 4 indicates a relatively unstructured peptide with a helical content of only 10% (solid blue line, Fig. 2a). Notably, the two isolated helices (5 and 6) exhibit even lower helicity (both <5%, dashed lines). For macrocyclic peptide 4E (orange), we observed considerably increased helicity (23%) indicating that macrocyclization and the resulting hairpin-like structure support helix formation.

**Fig. 2: Structural characterization of the stabilized two-helix motif was performed.**

To elucidate the binding mode of 4E with mTEAD4, we pursued the crystallization of this complex resulting in crystals (space group P 2₁2₁2₁) that provided a high-resolution crystal structure (1.3 Å, PDB: 6SBA). The overall structure of the complex between 4E (orange) and mTEAD4 (grey) is very similar to the two-helix motif (blue) of VGL4 in its bound form (Fig. 2b) with the structures of mTEAD4 in both complexes superimposing closely (RMSD = 0.949 Å, Supplementary Fig. 4). The electron density for 4E (Fig. 2c) is well defined, clearly revealing the backbone conformation and orientation of the side chains. Notably, we also observed a defined electron density for the crosslink (Fig. 2c and Supplementary Fig. 5). 4E (orange) targets the same binding site on TEAD as its unconstrained counterpart in VGL4 (blue, Fig. 2b). Also, both peptides exhibit a similar overall conformation (RMSD: 0.56 Å, Fig. 2d) thereby presenting analogous side chains towards the shallow hydrophobic groove on mTEAD4. This involves amino acids H237, F328, and L242 on helix α2 and T245, W246, and I249 on helix α3. The only noticeable difference between VGL4 and 4E is a slightly larger angle between the two helices resulting in a minimal dislocation of the C-terminal part of helix α3 (max Δl = 1.5 Å). The orientation and contacts of the other side chains in 4E are comparable to analogous residues in VGL4 (Fig. 2d). To elucidate the contribution of all amino acid side chains of 4E to TEAD binding, an alanine scan was performed using SPR and a fluorescence polarization (FP) competition assay as readouts (Supplementary Table 3). Positions in which variation to alanine resulted in a considerable drop in affinity (fivefold increased K_d value) are considered hotspot residues and are highlighted (red, Fig. 2e). Consistent with the crystal structure, we identified interface residues H237, F238, L242, W246, and I249. Surprisingly, the hotspot amino acid T245 is not located in the interface with mTEAD4 and variation to alanine may therefore influence the overall conformation of the free ligand.

Cell-permeability and protease-stability of TEAD binding macrocycles

Due to the intracellular localization of the TEAD–VGL4 complex, a potential inhibitor is required to penetrate cells efficiently. Cellular uptake of peptides was investigated using HeLa cells and flow cytometry as readout (c(peptide) = 5 µM, Supplementary Figs. 6 and 7). To minimize the load of extracellularly bound peptides, we applied a stringent washing protocol including tryptic digestion²⁰. The cell-penetrating Tat peptide was used as reference^21,22 providing considerably increased fluorescence intensities (FI = 930) over background (FI = 95). However, peptides 4E and 4 (FI = 228 and 245, respectively) show relatively low uptake, which we accounted to their negative overall charge (−1). Since it is known that negatively charged amino acids hamper cellular uptake and that overall positively charged peptides are more likely to penetrate cells^23,24, we considered the introduction of arginine residues and designed a set of peptides with increased overall charges (of up to +2, Supplementary Table 4). However, these modifications were not sufficient to promote meaningful uptake in HeLa cells as only small enhancements were observed (Supplementary Fig. 6). Therefore, N-terminal modification with the cell-penetrating Tat peptide was pursued providing peptide 7 (Fig. 3a), which shows unchanged affinity for both TEAD proteins (Supplementary Table 5) but very good cellular uptake by HeLa cells (FI = 18.300). Similar trends were also observed at 15 µM concentration (Supplementary Fig. 7).

**Fig. 3: Cell permeability, protease stability, and PPI inhibition of modified peptides were investigated.**

With peptide 7 as a potential candidate for cell-based assays, we were interested to determine the stability and cell-permeability of its unlabelled analogue. Initially, the proteolytic stability in cell culture media containing foetal bovine serum (FBS) was investigated using HPLC/MS as readout. Importantly, about 80% of 7 (red) was intact after 24 h, indicating sufficient stability for cell-based assays. Notably, mass spectrometry analysis reveals that the degradation products harbour an intact macrocyclic core after 48 h (Supplementary Fig. 9). Along those lines, 4E lacking the additional Tat sequence showed similar stability. Notably, a linear version of 4E (4E(open)) exhibited about 60% degradation after 24 h (Fig. 3b) highlighting the protective effect that results from macrocyclization. To assess the cell penetration properties of unlabelled analogues, we determined their cytoplasmic and nuclear concentrations using a mass spectrometry-based methodology^25,26,27 and the Tat peptide as reference. RKO cells were incubated (c(peptide) = 25 µM) for 90 min and 24 h, then the cells were lysed and fractionated to isolate cytoplasmic and nuclear contents for subsequent UPLC-MS analysis. Linear peptide 4 and cyclized peptide 4E accumulated in the cellular membrane (Supplementary Tables 10 and 11) and were not detected in subcellular fractions, unlike peptide 7 which was found in both compartments. We observed similar concentrations of 7 in the cytosol and nucleus after 90 min (Fig. 3c). After 24 h, we observed high intracellular concentrations suggesting sufficient biostability of peptide 7 for cell-based activity tests (Supplementary Fig. 12 and Supplementary Table 13). For the Tat peptide alone, overall higher uptake is observed with more pronounced accumulation in the nucleus indicating that the peptide cargo interferes with Tat cell penetration and distribution properties (Fig. 3c).

Next, the ability of the peptides in our panel to inhibit the TEAD–VGL4 interaction was investigated. For this purpose, a competition pull-down experiment was performed using biotinylated VGL4(203–256) (b-1) as the bait for GST-tagged hTEAD1. b-1 was immobilized on streptavidin magnetic beads and hTEAD1 pull-down was detected using gel electrophoresis (Fig. 3d). As expected, peptides 4, 7, and 4E compete with TEAD–VGL4 complex formation while cell-penetrating peptide Tat alone does not show activity. Besides the repressor VGL4, co-activator YAP also binds to TEAD. To evaluate how inhibitor binding discriminates between these two binding partners, we performed a competitive binding assay based on FP. For that purpose, hTEAD1 was preincubated with fluorescently labelled versions of VGL4(203–256) or YAP(50–100). The concentration-dependent displacement of both binders by peptide 7 was then assessed and the half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC₅₀) values determined (Supplementary Fig. 15 and Supplementary Table 7). We observed a 16-fold lower IC₅₀ value for VGL4 (IC₅₀ = 5.46 µM) than for YAP displacement (IC₅₀ = 87.7 µM), indicating that peptide 7 exhibits a clear preference for a competition with VGL4. Notably, required concentrations of peptide 7 for VGL4 competition are higher in the pull-down assay (ca. 100 µM, Fig. 3d) than in the homogeneous FP-based competition assay (ca. 10 µM). This discrepancy between pull-down and homogeneous assay formats was already observed before²⁰ and presumably owes to the high local concentrations of immobilized bait protein (here, VGL4) in the pull-down assay which results in reduced target (here, hTEAD1) off-rates. Therefore, in the pull-down experiment, higher competitor concentrations are needed than in a homogeneous assay format.

Inhibition of the VGL4–TEAD interaction in cell-based assays

The Hippo signalling pathway controls several genes involved in cell growth, migration, and proliferation^28,29. Expression of Hippo target genes is activated after complex formation between TEAD and a co-activator (e.g., YAP) resulting in the assembly of the full transcriptional activator complex (Fig. 4a)¹⁹. Co-activators are regulated by phosphorylation-dependent degradation controlled via Hippo pathway effectors (e.g., SAV1, MST1/2, or LATS2)^30,31. VGL4 on the other hand forms a repressor complex with TEAD blocking the transcription of Hippo target genes (Fig. 4a). Initially, we tested the influence of 7 on the YAP–TEAD interaction in a cellular context using a PLA in RKO cells. After 24 h incubation with 7, PLA experiments show an increase in YAP–TEAD complexes, which is in line with an inhibition of the VGL4–TEAD interaction (Fig. 4b). Peptide 4E, exhibiting lower cellular uptake, only shows a small change in PLA events while Tat has no significant effect. Increased YAP–TEAD complex formation and subsequent activation of Hippo target genes can be expected to induce cell migration and proliferation. For this reason, we performed a wound closure assay using RKO cells (Fig. 4c), which demonstrated no effect for 4E and the Tat peptide while 7 shows considerably increased wound closure in a dose-dependent manner (Supplementary Fig. 16).

**Fig. 4: Cellular activity of 7 in RKO cells and in primary juvenile cardiomyocytes was investigated.**

The proliferation promoting effects of the Hippo signalling pathway are crucial for heart muscle regeneration. Hippo pathway activity suppresses mitosis, and its inhibition reactivates cell cycle activity in cardiomyocytes in vitro and in vivo^17,32,33,34. Given the ability of 7 to inhibit the formation of the VGL4–TEAD repressor complex, we tested its effect on cell cycle activity in postnatal rat cardiomyocytes. Therefore, we employed primary juvenile rat heart cells at postnatal days 5–6 (P5–P6) as these cells are on the verge of losing their proliferative capacity, entering a post-mitotic state³⁵. Initially, cell permeability of 4E and 7 was tested using flow cytometry, confirming robust cellular uptake of 7 in these primary heart-derived cells (Supplementary Fig. 17). In line with the MS-based cellular uptake experiments (Fig. 3c), we do not observe nuclear accumulation of peptide 7 being consistent with the low concentration of the nuclear target protein TEAD^36,37, which cannot be expected to alter the overall cellular distribution of peptide 7. We then investigated the effects on the sub-cellular distribution of YAP in response to peptide treatment. Cardiomyocytes were treated with 7 for 4 h, and YAP localization analysed using YAP-specific antibodies and followed by fluorescent readout. Compared to the vehicle control, treatment with peptide 7 resulted in increased nuclear accumulation of YAP (Fig. 4d and Supplementary Fig. 18). A similar trend, though not as pronounced, was observed after 8 and 24 h (Supplementary Fig. 19). Having confirmed the nuclear localization of YAP, we then characterized the influence of 7 on the expression of TEAD target genes. Incubation of cardiomyocytes with 7 (c = 30 µM, t = 18 h) resulted in increased levels of the cell cycle genes CYR61, CTGF, ANKRD1, and SEPINE1 (Fig. 4e and Supplementary Table 15) confirming the activation of these Hippo-associated genes. Notably, a cell cycle gene CCNA2, which has been shown to be insensitive to VGL4 levels, does not respond to peptide treatment. Also, the Tat control peptide does not show an effect in this assay (Fig. 4e). Functional efficacy of 4E and 7 was measured as cardiomyocyte cell cycle activity after 4-days incubation in P5–P6 rat heart cells (Fig. 4f). The number of cycling cardiomyocytes was identified with an automated high-content imaging assay by means of Ki67/αActinin double-positive cells. Non-permeable peptide 4E has no effect while 7 stimulates cell cycle activity to the same extent as positive controls SB (SB203580, p38MAPK inhibitor) and CHIR (CHIR99021, GSK3β inhibitor)^38,39,40,41. This effect was further substantiated by a dose-dependent profile (Fig. 4g).

Discussion

We report the structure-based design of a cell-permeable, macrocyclic proteomimetic that is derived from a two-helix motif originating from the transcriptional co-repressor VGL4 and was designed to bind the TEAD transcription factor. An X-ray crystal structure verifies that the proteomimetic binds TEAD in the anticipated manner, thereby having the potential to inhibit the TEAD–VGL4 interaction. Prior to cell-based assays, we confirmed efficient cellular uptake for the Tat-labelled proteomimetic (7) as well as sufficient stability in cell culture medium. We observed that incubation with compound 7 promotes the interaction between YAP and TEAD supporting the targeting of the TEAD repressor complex in RKO cells. In the same cell line, we also detected proproliferative effects of 7 confirming the expected activation of cell cycle activity. Also, proteomimetic 7 stimulates the expression of TEAD target genes in human cardiomyocytes as well as YAP nuclear translocation and cell cycle activity in primary juvenile rat heart cells which is a central feature required for cardiomyocyte proliferation. This proteomimetic is a rare example of a PPI inhibitor capable of activating transcription factor-mediated cellular events, and it highlights the potential of protein tertiary structure mimetics as an emerging class of bioactive modalities.

Methods

General methods for peptides preparation

Chemicals, including protected amino acids, were purchased from Merck, Roth, or Sigma-Aldrich and used without further purification. Solvents were purchased from Roth, Acros Organics, or VWR and used without further purification. The crude peptides were purified using Prep RP-HPLC (Agilent 1290 infinity hyphenated with 6120 quadrupole Mass spectrometer) using Machrey Nagel C18 gravity, 5 μm, 125 mm/10 mm column. The purification was done with a flow rate of 20 mL min⁻¹, in a gradient of 10% B to 100% B in 45 min (buffer A: H₂O + 0.1% TFA, B: MeCN + 0.1% TFA, detection at λ = 214, 220, 254, and 280 nm and MS detection). The purity of the peptide was checked by analytical RP-HPLC (Agilent 1290/1260 infinity HPLC) using Machrey Nagel column. The analysis was done at 1 mL min⁻¹, in a gradient of 5% B, 1% C to 65% B, 1% C in 30 min (A: H₂O, B: MeCN, C: H₂0 90% / 10% TFA, detection at λ = 214, 220, 254 nm). HPLC-MS spectra were recorded on a LCQ Fleet from Thermo Ultimate 3000 series using a column a 50/2 Nucleodur C18 Gravity 1.8 μm with a flow rate of 0.4 mL min⁻¹ in a gradient of 0% B to 100% B in 10 min (A: H₂O + 0.1% HCOOH, B: MeCN + 0.1% HCOOH). High-resolution mass spectra were recorded on a QLT Orbitrap mass spectrometer (with an electrospray ionization method) coupled to an Acceka HPLC using a Hypersyl GOLD. Peptide stock solutions were prepared in DMSO. For the acetylated peptide, concentration was determined using nanodrop with an extinction coefficient of 5690 M^–1 cm^–1. FITC-labelled peptides were measured at λ = 495 nm in 100 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 8.5) and calculated with an extinction coefficient of 77.000 M⁻¹ cm⁻¹ in JASCO V-550.

Peptide synthesis

Peptides were synthesized on a Syro I peptide synthesizer (Multisyntech) following standard Fmoc-protocols for solid-phase peptide synthesis. Peptide synthesis was performed on Rink amide LL AM/MBHA resin (Merck, 0.28 mmol g⁻¹, 0.05 mmol). To prepare the solutions, the amino acids were dissolved in a solution of oxyma pur 0.5 M in DMF, to obtain a final concentration of 0.5 M, HATU was dissolved in DMF to get a concentration of 0.5 M, DIPEA was dissolved in NMP to get a concentration of 2 M, piperidine was dissolved in DMF with a concentration of 25% and acetic anhydride was dissolved in NMP with a concentration of 10%. For the coupling, 400 µL of amino acids solution (0.2 mmol, 4 eq.) was mixed with 400 µL of HATU solution (0.2 mmol, 4 eq.) and 200 µL of DIPEA solution (0.4 mmol, 8 eq.) and added to the resin for 40 min. The amino acid couplings were followed by a capping of the remaining free amino groups with 800 µL of Ac₂O solution in presence of 200 µL of DIPEA solution for 2 min. Fmoc-deprotection was performed with 25% piperidine in DMF for 10 min. The subsequent aspartic acid and threonine residues in the sequence were introduced as a pseudoproline building block (Cas no. 920519-32-0). The resulting peptide resin was washed six times with 2 mL of DMF between each step. Each amino acid was coupled twice or thrice.

Cyclization

Aspartic acid and lysine were introduced, respectively, with 2-phenylisopropyl group and Mtt group as side chain protection. The 2-phenylisopropyl group and the Mtt group were removed by treating the resin with DCM/2% TFA/3% TIPS for 2 min (9 × 6 mL). The peptide resin was then washed with DCM (3 × 6 mL), 5% DIPEA in DCM (2 × 8 mL), NMP (3 × 6 mL), and DCM (3 × 6 mL). Then, 104 mg of PyBop (0.2 mmol, 4 eq.) and 28 mg of HOAt (0.2 mmol, 4 eq.) were dissolved in 3 mL of 1:1 NMP/DCM, 70 µL of DIPEA (0.4 mmol, 8 eq.) was then added. The mixture was added to the peptide resin and stirred for 3 h at room temperature, followed by a second coupling overnight. The peptide resin was washed with NMP (3 × 6 mL) and DCM (3 × 6 mL).

Acetylation

The peptide resin was deprotected using 2 mL of 25% piperidine in DMF (3 × 5 min) and then washed with DMF (3 × 6 mL) and DCM (3 × 6 mL). Then 134 µL of DIPEA and 120 µL of Ac₂O were dissolved in NMP, and the mixture was then added to the peptide resin. The suspension was stirred for 2 min at room temperature. The peptide resin was washed with DMF (3 × 6 mL) and DCM (3 × 6 mL).

FITC labelling

The N-terminal Fmoc group was deprotected using 2 mL of 25% piperidine in DMF (3 × 5 min) followed by washes with DMF (3 × 6 mL) and DCM (3 × 6 mL). Then 76 mg of Fmoc-O₂Oc-OH (0.2 mmol, 4 eq.), 76 mg of HATU (0.2 mmol, 4 eq.) were dissolved in 400 µL of DMF, followed by 70 µL of DIPEA (0.4 mmol, 8 eq.). The mixture was then added to the resin and stirred for 2 h. The peptide resin was washed with DMF (3 × 6 mL) and DCM (3 × 6 mL). The N-terminal Fmoc group was deprotected using 2 mL of 25% piperidine in DMF (3 × 5 min) followed by washes with DMF (3 × 6 mL) and DCM (3 × 6 mL). A solution of 0.10 g 5-Isothiocyanatofluorescein (0.250 mmol, 5 eq.) and 90 µL of DIPEA (0.5 mmol, 10 eq) in 800 µL DMF was prepared. The reaction mixture was shaken in the dark at room temperature for 3 h. The resin was washed with DMF (3 × 6 mL) and DCM (3 × 6 mL). The coupling procedure was repeated an additional time and this time shaken in the dark at room temperature for 16 h. The resulting bright yellow resin was washed with DMF (3 × 6 mL), DCM (3 × 6 mL) and dried under vacuum filtration.

Tat/NLS labelling

The N-terminal Fmoc group was deprotected using 2 mL of 25% piperidine in DMF (3 × 5 min) followed by washes with DMF (3 × 6 mL) and DCM (3 × 6 mL). Then 76 mg of Fmoc-O₂Oc-OH (0.2 mmol, 4 eq.), 76 mg of HATU (0.2 mmol, 4 eq.) were dissolved in 400 µL of DMF, followed by 70 µL of DIPEA (0.4 mmol, 8 eq.). The mixture was then added to the resin and stirred for 2 h. The peptide resin was washed with DMF (3 × 6 mL) and DCM (3 × 6 mL). The N-terminal Fmoc group was deprotected using 2 mL of 25% piperidine in DMF (3 × 5 min) followed by washes with DMF (3 × 6 mL) and DCM (3 × 6 mL). For coupling, amino acids (0.5 mmol, 10 eq.), 214 mg of COMU (0.5 mmol, 10 eq.), and 71 mg of Oxyma (0.5 mmol, 10 eq.) were dissolved in 1 mL of DMF. After the addition of 173 µL of DIPEA (1 mmol, 20 eq.), the solution was added to the peptide resin and the reaction mixture was shaken at room temperature for 20 min. The resin was washed with DMF (3 × 6 mL) and DCM (3 × 6 mL). For deprotection, the N-terminal Fmoc group was deprotected using 2 mL of 25% piperidine in DMF (3 × 5 min) followed by washes with DMF (3 × 6 mL), DCM (3 × 6 mL) and dried under vacuum filtration.

Peptide cleavage and purification

The peptidyl resin (0.05 mmol, 1 eq.) was cleaved with 1 mL of cleavage solution (triisopropylsilane 2.5%, water 2.5% in TFA) for 3 h at room temperature. The peptide was precipited in 40 mL of cold diethyl ether/petroleum ether 1:1 after 10 min of centrifugation. The pellet was washed twice with 40 mL of diethyl ether. The residue was dried over vacuum, dissolved in water and lyophilized. The residue was dissolved in 1 mL of DMSO. The peptide was purified by reverse phase HPLC.

Protein expression and purification

CDNA of hTEAD1(209–426) fused with an N-terminal GST tag completed by a 6x His-tag and a 3C protease cleavage site was subcloned into pOPIN S (OPPF, University of Oxford, UK) vector. The resulting plasmid was transformed in Escherichia coli strain BL21 DE3 RIL(K+) (Agilent, Product #230280, Lot #0006370343) and the cells were grown in TB medium at 37 °C until the OD reached 0.6, then protein expression was induced using 400 µM of IPTG for 16 h at 18 °C. Bacteria were centrifugated and the pellet was resuspended in lysis buffer. Cell lysis was performed with a microfluidizer. After ultracentrifugation, the lysate was collected and subjected to purification on an ÄktaXpress system performing first an affinity chromatography separation on His Trap FF crude (GE Healthcare, USA) followed by size exclusion chromatography on SD75 26/60 (GE Healthcare, USA) using 20 mM HEPES, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM TCEP, 2 mM MgCl₂, and 5% glycerol, pH 8. The purified protein was concentrated using Amicon Ultra Centrifugal Filters, 10K (Merck, Germany), aliquots were snap frozen and stored at −80 °C.

Mouse TEAD4(210–427) cDNA fused with a 6x His-tag and a 3C protease cleavage site was subcloned into pOPIN S (OPPF, University of Oxford, UK) vector. Plasmid was transformed in E. coli strain BL21 DE3 RIL(K+) (Agilent, Product #230280, Lot #0006370343) and the cells were grown at 37 °C in TB medium completed with lactose until the OD reached 0.6. Then the cells were incubated at 18 °C for 16 h. Bacteria were centrifugated and the pellet was resuspended in lysis buffer. Cell lysis was performed with a microfluidizer. After ultracentrifugation, the lysate was collected and subjected to purification on an ÄktaXpress system performing first an affinity chromatography separation on His Trap FF crude (GE Healthcare, USA) followed by size exclusion chromatography on SD75 26/60 (GE Healthcare, USA) using 25 mM HEPES, 150 mM NaCl, and 1 mM TCEP, pH 7.2. The purified protein was concentrated using Amicon Ultra Centrifugal Filters, 10K (Merck, Germany), aliquots were snap frozen and stored at −80 °C.

Surface plasmon resonance

The SPR experiments were either performed on a Biacore S200 optical biosensor unit or a Biacore 8K optical biosensor unit (GE Healthcare). Sensor chips Series S CM5 (Research grade) were obtained from GE Healthcare. Prior to use, the sensor chips were equilibrated at room temperature for 15 min to prevent water condensation on the detector side of the sensor chip surface. A running buffer was prepared composed of 10 mM HEPES, 150 mM NaCl, and 0.05% (w/v) Tween-20, pH 7.4, and the system was equilibrated at 20 °C using a flow rate of 30 µL min⁻¹ after docking of the sensor chip. Ligand binding experiments have been performed applying the concept of multi-cycle kinetics. A contact time of 45 s was selected, followed by a 6-min dissociation phase to allow for complete dissociation of the analyte prior to the next cycle. The peptides have been dissolved in DMSO to a stock concentration of 10 mM. A digital dispenser (HP D300, Tecan) was used to dispense varying concentration of the ligands into running buffer provided in a standard 384-well plate and normalized with DMSO to 0.3% (v/v). Typically, seven concentrations of the analytes have been examined applying a threefold dilution pattern with 30 µM as top concentration. For the analysis, five running buffer blanks were injected to equilibrate the instrument. The data collection rate was set to 10 Hz, and all experiments have been repeated at least three times to allow for error estimations. The data have been analysed using Genedata Screener for SPR using the implemented steady-state data fitting routines and by applying a 1:1 binding model for the estimation of peptide affinities. Surface tethering of GST-hTEAD1 and mTEAD4 for SPR—for the covalent tethering of both GST–hTEAD1 and mTEAD4 onto the CM5 biosensor chip, running buffer at a flow-rate of 10 µL min⁻¹ was used. The carboxyl-dextran surface was activated for 7 min with 0.05 M NHS and 0.2 M EDC, followed by an injection of the proteins in 10 mM MES pH 6.4 at a concentration of 30–50 µg mL⁻¹. Contact times of 2–3 min were sufficient to achieve the desired densities of 2000–3000 RU. This was followed by a deactivation of the residual esters by injecting a solution of 0.5 M ethanolamine pH 8.0 for 7 min before engaging in ligand binding experiments. Reference surfaces were prepared accordingly, omitting the injection of protein over the activated reference surface.

Circular dichroism

Peptides were dissolved in 10 mM sodium phosphate pH 7.4 for a final concentration of 75 µM to 10 µM, depending on the peptide solubility. The spectra were obtained using a Jasco J-715 and a cuvette 0.1 mm. Represented CD spectra are an average of five measurements done between λ = 190 and 300 nm with a continuous scan mode, 50 nm min⁻¹ scan speed and data point every 1 nm. The α-helicity was calculated using CDNN software using the PEPFIT mode⁴².

Complexation of mTEAD4 with 4E and tag cleavage of mTEAD4

mTEAD4 (4.5 g L⁻¹) was incubated with 4E (2 eq.), then 3C protease was added and incubated over night at 4 °C. The cleaved protein complexed with Horseshoe was purified by size exclusion chromatography on SD75 26/60 (GE Healthcare, USA). The complex was concentrated using amicon ultra filter (Merck, Germany) to obtain a 1/1 mixture at 13 g L⁻¹.

Crystallization of 4E/mTEAD4

The purified complex was crystallized in a hanging drop vapour diffusion setup using 100 nL of complex (13 g L⁻¹) mixed with 100 nL of reservoir solution (0.1 M HEPES pH 7, 15% w/v PEG4000). Crystals appeared after 14 days and were harvested after 3 days. An initial dataset was taken in house on a Bruker Microstar generator with marDTB and mar345 image plate. The structure was solved using Phaser with chain A of PDB: 4LN0 as template. Iteration of manual model building with Coot and refinement with phenix.refine (including TLS refinement) improved the model to Rwork/Rfree of 20.4/23.6%. A second dataset taken at the Suisse Light Source X10SA beamline improved the resolution significantly. Rfree flags were transferred from the initial dataset using phenix and extended to 1.3 Å. Refinement was performed by phenix.refine.

Fluorescence polarization

Direct FP: the corresponding FITC-labelled peptide in DMSO was diluted with FP buffer (10 mM HEPES, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% Tween-20, pH 7.4) to obtain a final concentration of 60 nM. mTEAD4/hTEAD1 was diluted with FP buffer in a twofold serial dilution in a 384-well plate. To 12.5 μL of the protein solution, 2.5 μL of the 60 nM peptide stock was added (final peptide concentration, 10 nM). After 1 h, FP was measured (λ(ex) = 485 nm; λ(em) = 525 nm). The dissociation constant (K_d) was determined from the binding curve with GraphPad from Prism.

Competition FP: N-terminally acetylated peptides were diluted 1:1 in a 384-well plate (5 μL, 75 μM−9 pM). Ten microlitres of a mixture (1:1) of mTEAD4 and FITC-labelled peptide was added (final concentrations: acetylated peptides = 50 μM−6 pM; mTEAD4 protein = 400 nM; FITC-labelled tracer peptide = 10 nM). After 1 h, FP was measured (λ(ex) = 530 nm; λ(em) = 585 nm). IC₅₀ was determined from the binding curve with GraphPad from Prism.

HeLa cell culture for flow cytometry assay

HeLa cells (DSMZ, #ACC-57) were purchased from DSMZ GmbH (Germany). HeLa cells were cultured at 37 °C with 5% CO₂ using DMEM (#P04-03500, PAN Biotech), supplemented with 10% (v/v) FBS, 1 mM sodium pyruvate (#P04-43100, PAN Biotech), 1% (v/v) non-essential amino acids (#P08-32100, PAN Biotech), 100 U mL⁻¹ penicillin, and 100 µg mL⁻¹ streptomycin (#P06-07100, PAN Biotech).

Flow cytometry assay in HeLa cells

Using 12-well plates, HeLa cells (1 × 10⁵ cells/well) were plated and allowed to grow in a growth medium for 24 h at 37 °C under humidified atmosphere with 5% CO₂. The cells were then treated with 5 μM and 15 μM final concentration of peptide in growth medium and a maximum of 0.5% DMSO. After 90 min of incubation at 37 °C under humidified atmosphere with 5% CO₂, the cells were washed with PBS three times. A solution of 0.05% trypsin and 0.02% EDTA in PBS (PAN Biotech) was added and the cells were incubated for 5 min at 37 °C under humidified atmosphere with 5% CO₂. Growth medium was used to stop the dissociation reaction and centrifugation (1.1 r.c.f., 3 min) allowed to harvest the cells. The cells were consecutively washed two times with PBS, suspended in 400–600 μL of PBS and transferred to a 5-mL Polystyrene round-bottom tube with cell-strainer cap (Falcon®, Corning Inc.). The analysis of the sample was recorded using a LSRII flow cytometer with forward and side scattered light to establish a gate for intact, live and non-aggregated cells. For each sample, a minimum of 10,000 events were collected in order to achieve a statistically relevant population. The fluorescence was set at 530 nm (filter: 530/30, mirror: 502 LP) to be in the wavelength excitation range of the FITC fluorophore (gating strategy is shown in Supplementary Fig. 8). The raw data were processed using FlowJo software (FlowJo version 10.1; source: Treestar, Inc.; http://docs.flowjo.com/d2/faq/general-faq/tree-star-flowjo/) and the results were shown as relative fluorescence intensities at 530 nm compared to DMSO-treated control and geometric means of fluorescence collected at 530 nm.

Total intracellular and sub cellular peptide concentrations

Peptides were incubated in RKO cells (ATCC, #CRL-2577) as follows: Experiment 1: RKO cells were incubated in 25 µM compound for 90 min and 24 h. Experiment 2: RKO cells were incubated in 25 µM for 30 min or 72 h. Following peptide incubation, the cells were washed twice with PBS, trypsinized and pelleted. The pellets were lysed in RIPA buffer (Perkin Elmer) for total lysis, or CelLytic NuCLEAR Extraction Kit (SIGMA) for subcellular fractionation. Total protein quantification BCA (Pierce) was performed prior to MS analysis to normalize sample data. Total and fractionated cell lysates were analysed by quantitative UPLC-MS utilizing a Waters Xevo TQ-XS (WBA0259) and an Acquity UPLC system from Waters consisting of Sample Manager (M16UFL953M), Acquity PDA (F17UPD457A), Column Oven (E17CMP703G) and Binary Solvent Manager (E17BUR621G). The Waters TQ-XS was operated in +ve ion Electrospray (ESI) mode with the optimized transitions for peptides 4, 4E, 7, and TAT. The chromatograms at each transition were extracted, smoothed, and integrated to give the standard curve. Chromatograms of the samples were treated similarly, and by linear regression (1/x) an in-cell concentration was established in the re-suspended cell lysate using the Waters MassLynx TargetLynx^TM product.

Peptide stability in cell culture media

A total of 30 µM of the peptide was incubated in MEM media supplemented with 10% FBS at 37 °C. At the indicated time point, 25 µL of the sample was withdrawn, mixed with an equal volume of the internal standard solution (6 µM Fmoc-Arg(Pbf)-OH), kept on ice for 15 min followed by centrifugation (16×g) at 4 °C for 5 min. The supernatant was analysed with LC-MS (UltiMate 3000 UHPLC Systems) using C18 reverse phase column (Nucleodur, 1.8 µm C18 gravity, 2 mm) and Thermo Orbitrap Velos Pro ETD. The peptide absorbance (λ = 280 nm) or the mass spectrometry peak intensity relative to that of the internal standard peak intensity was graphed. The stability experiments were performed in duplicates.

Competition pull-down assay

Synthetic biotinylated VGL4 was immobilized on 25 µL of streptavidin magnetic beads (#1420, New England Biolabs) for 1 h at room temperature. Beads were then extensively washed with the incubation buffer (300 mM NaCl, 25 mM Tris (pH 8.8), 2 mM DTT, 2% glycerol). Purified GST-hTEAD1 (1 µM) was incubated with the required amount of peptide (50 and 200 µM) in incubation buffer for 30 min at room temperature; then immobilized VGL4 was added to the protein/peptide complex (final volume 200 µL) and incubated for 2.5 h at room temperature. Beads were then extensively washed with the incubation buffer followed by protein elution after boiling the beads at 95 °C for 10 min in 25 µL of SDS loading buffer. SDS PAGE was performed using standard methods and the gel was visualized after Coomassie staining with a Li-COR Fc Imager.

Primary culture of rodent newborn heart cells

After dissociation, cardiac cells were homogeneously suspended in a medium and 4000 cells per well were seeded on a 0.1% gelatin-coated 384-well microclear plate (Greiner). Cells were incubated at 37 °C and 5% CO₂ in IMDM media supplemented with 50 µg mL⁻¹ penicillin/streptomycin, 0.1 mM non-essential amino acids, 0.1 mM β-mercaptoethanol (all from Gibco), and 2% FBS (Pan Biotech) for 6 days at 37 °C and 5% CO₂ (ref. ⁴³), unless otherwise was noted.

Cell culture

Rat experiments were approved by the local animal protection agency. Wistar rats were sacrificed on day 5–6 after birth (due to the low age of the rats, sex was not determined). The heart tissue was first minced and then gently dissociated by slowly pipetting up and down in the enzymatic solution provided in the dissociation kit (#130-098-373, Miltenyi Biotec). After three steps of mechanical dissociation, the cardiac cells were passed through a strainer to remove larger particles and the single-cell suspension was centrifuged (500 r.p.m., 15 min) and resuspended in growth media. The cells were then ready for the different applications.

RKO (ATCC, #CRL-2577) cells were purchased from ATCC (USA), HeLa cells were purchased from DSMZ GmbH (Germany). RKO cells were cultured at 37 °C with 5% CO₂ using Eagle’s MEM (#P04-08500, PAN Biotech) containing 10% FBS (#10500-084, Invitrogen). HeLa cells were cultured at 37 °C with 5% CO₂ using DMEM (#P04-03500, PAN Biotech), supplemented with 10% (v/v) FBS, 1 mM sodium pyruvate (#P04-43100, PAN Biotech), 1% (v/v) non-essential amino acids (#P08-32100, PAN Biotech), 100 U mL⁻¹ penicillin, and 100 µg mL⁻¹ streptomycin (#P06-07100, PAN Biotech). Rat primary cardiomyocytes were incubated at 37 °C and 5% CO₂ in IMDM media supplemented with 50 µg mL⁻¹ penicillin/streptomycin, 0.1 mM non-essential amino acids, 0.1 mM β-mercaptoethanol (all from Gibco), and 2% FBS (Pan Biotech). The cells were regularly assayed for mycoplasma contamination using MycoAlert™ Mycoplasma Detection Kit (#LT07, Lonza) according to manufacturer’s instructions.

Proximity ligation assay

Ca. 5000 RKO cells were seeded per well in black 96-well plates with glass bottom (#5241-20, MoBiTec) and treated with the peptides or DMSO as vehicle control. After 24 h, the cells were fixed for 10 min using 4% paraformaldehyde (#UN2209, AppliChem) in PBS prior to permeabilization with 0.1% Triton X-100 (#39795.02, Serva) in PBS for 10 min. Blocking was performed using 2% BSA (#11945.03, Serva) in PBS with 0.1% Tween-20 (#P2287, Sigma-Aldrich) for 1 h prior to incubation with the primary antibodies (mouse anti-YAP, #sc-101199, Santa Cruz, 1:100; rabbit anti-panTEAD, #13295, Cell Signalling, 1:1000) overnight. The cells were treated with the corresponding PLA probes (donkey anti-rabbit PLUS, #DUO92002, dilution 1:5; donkey anti-mouse MINUS, #DUO92004, dilution 1:5, Sigma-Aldrich) and with the Duolink In Situ Detection Orange Kit (#DUO92007, Sigma-Aldrich) for ligation and amplification according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Finally, the cells were treated with 1 µg mL⁻¹ DAPI (#D9542, Sigma-Aldrich) to stain nuclei for further microscopy analysis. Images were acquired using a Zeiss Observer Z1 microscope with an 63× oil objective. Picture data were analysed by the ImageJ “analyze particles” macro to count PLA spots per cell. Ten pictures were counted for each condition per experiment. Statistical analysis was performed using Student’s paired t test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant (p < 0.05 = *; p < 0,01 = **; p < 0.001 = ***; p < 0.0001 = ****).

Wound closure assay

Ca. 100,000 RKO cells were seeded per well in a transparent ImageLock 96-well plate (#4379, Essen Bioscience) and treated with the samples the next day. Wound Healing Assay was performed using the IncuCyte® ZOOM system and the WoundMaker™ device (both Essen Bioscience). The scratch was performed according to manufacturer’s protocol and images were acquired every 2 h. Image-based analysis of wound closure was conducted using the IncuCyte ZOOM 2016B software (Essen Bioscience). Confluency within the wound area was normalized to the confluency at the time of scratch preparation and plotted using GraphPad Prism 6.

Quantitative PCR

Cardiomyocytes were generated from human ES cell line (H7, #WA07, WiCell) through GiWi differentiation protocol⁴⁴. At day 7, the medium was replaced with RPMI/B27 medium, supplemented with insulin (Miltenyi Biotec) for maturation and refreshed every 2 days. At day 15, the glucose level in the medium was slowly reduced to 0% and the cells were grown until day 21 to facilitate the selection of more matured cardiomyocytes that rely on β-oxidation. Tat or peptide 7 (30 μM) was added to cardiomyocytes and the cells were incubated with the peptides for 18 h. Total RNA was extracted using the Quick-RNA miniprep kit (Zymo Research) and its quality was assessed using the A₂₆₀/A₂₈₀ and A₂₆₀/A₂₃₀ ratios. cDNA synthesis was carried out using the high-capacity cDNA reverse transcription kit (Applied Biosystems) as per manufacturer’s guidelines. Equal amounts of cDNA were used in the TaqMan gene expression assays to estimate the levels of YAP target genes, ANKRD1 (Assay ID: Hs00173317_m1), CTGF (Assay ID: Hs00170014_m1), CYR61 (Assay ID: Hs00155479_m1), and SERPINE1 (Assay ID: – Hs00126604_m1) by qPCR. GAPDH (Assay ID: Hs02758991 _g1) was used as internal control. In the graph, the RQ Min and the RQ Max values of the technical triplicates are plotted. The experiment was done twice independently, and the results were consistent. Statistical significances were determined by Student’s unpaired t test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant (p < 0.05 = *; p < 0,01 = **; p < 0.001 = ***).

YAP localization assay in juvenile rat cardiomyocytes

We analysed the YAP sub-cellular distribution in cardiomyocytes by means of fluorescence intensity after immunocytochemistry. After 3 days in culture, the cardiac cells were treated and fixed 4, 8, and 24 h after treatment. The cells were stained using primary antibodies against αActinin (A-7811, dilution 1:300, Sigma) and YAP (#14074, dilution 1:500, Cell Signalling). Secondary antibodies were used to detect the primary antibodies (goat anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 568, A-11004, dilution 1:1000 and goat anti-rabbit AlexaFluor 488, A-11008, dilution 1:1000, both from Thermo Fisher Scientific) and nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (2-(4-amidinophenyl)-1H-indole-6-carboxamidine, dilution 1:1000, Roth). The samples were then imaged and analysed on an ImageXpress XL automated microscope (Molecular Devices). Fluorescence integrated intensity of YAP in the nuclei and cytoplasm of cardiomyocytes was assessed and the ratios calculated. Data are depicted as means ± SEM. Statistical significances were determined by Student’s paired t test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant (p < 0.05 = *; p < 0,01 = **; p < 0.001 = ***).

Cell cycle activity assay in juvenile rat cardiomyocytes

Ca. 4000 cells were seeded per well on a 0.1% gelatin- (#P06-20410, Pan Biotech) coated 384-well µClear microtiter plate (#781906, Greiner). One day after seeding, the cells were treated with test compounds of interest. Treatments were applied with an ECHO 520 acoustic dispenser (Labcyte) and medium was added to the wells. Four days after treatment, the cells were fixed with 4% formaldehyde (Roth) and immunostained in 0.2% Triton-X100 (Roth) in PBS (Gibco) supplemented with 5% FBS. The cells were stained using primary antibodies against αActinin (dilution 1:300), a cardiomyocyte marker (Sigma, A-7811) and Ki67 (dilution 1:250), a cell cycle marker (abcam, ab16667). Secondary antibodies were used to detect the primary antibodies (goat anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 568, A-11004, dilution 1:1000, and goat anti-rabbit AlexaFluor 488, A-11008, dilution 1:1000, both from Thermo Fisher Scientific) and nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (2-(4-amidinophenyl)-1H-indole-6-carboxamidine, dilution 1:1000, Roth). Samples were then imaged and analysed on an ImageXpress XL automated microscope (Molecular Devices). Data are depicted as means ± SEM. Statistical significances were determined by Student’s paired t test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant (p < 0.05 = *; p < 0,01 = **; p < 0.001 = ***).

Flow cytometry in juvenile rat cardiomyocytes

For flow cytometric analyses, ca. 20,000 cells were seeded per well on a 0.1% gelatin- (Pan Biotech) coated 96-well plate (Sarstedt). The cells were incubated in the already described media at 37 °C and 5% CO₂. One day after seeding, the cells were manually treated once with the peptides of interest previously labelled with FITC. After 90 min treatment, the cells were trypsinized (trypsin 0.25%, Sigma) and thoroughly washed before the peptide uptake was analysed by FACS to avoid unspecific cell surface binding. Peptide incorporation in live cells was measured as means of FITC fluorescence intensity. Data are depicted as means ± SEM. Statistical significances were determined by Student’s paired t test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant (p < 0.05 = *; p < 0,01 = **; p < 0.001 = ***).

Animal experiments statement

All experiments were approved by the official State animal care and use committee (LANUV, Recklinghausen, Germany AZ 84_02.04.2014.A333) The mice are housed under specific-pathogen-free conditions according to the guidelines of the Federation for Laboratory Animal Science Associations (FELASA). All experiments were conducted in accordance with the German federal law regarding the protection of animals and ‘Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals’ (National Institutes of Health publication 8^th Edition, 2011).

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

The materials and data reported in this study are available upon request from H.W. The crystal structure of the E4/mTEAD4 complex is available under PDB 6SBA. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

Keskin, O., Gursoy, A., Ma, B. & Nussinov, R. Principles of protein−protein interactions: what are the preferred ways for proteins to interact? Chem. Rev. 108, 1225–1244 (2008).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Pelay-Gimeno, M., Glas, A., Koch, O. & Grossmann, T. N. Structure-based design of inhibitors of protein–protein interactions: mimicking peptide binding epitopes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 54, 8896–8927 (2015).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Valeur, E. et al. New modalities for challenging targets in drug discovery. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56, 10294–10323 (2017).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Robinson, J. A. β-Hairpin peptidomimetics: design, structures and biological activities. Acc. Chem. Res. 41, 1278–1288 (2008).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Gavenonis, J., Sheneman, B. A., Siegert, T. R., Eshelman, M. R. & Kritzer, J. A. Comprehensive analysis of loops at protein-protein interfaces for macrocycle design. Nat. Chem. Biol. 10, 716–722 (2014).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Schafmeister, C. E., Po, J. & Verdine, G. L. An all-hydrocarbon cross-linking system for enhancing the helicity and metabolic stability of peptides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122, 5891–5892 (2000).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Cromm, P. M., Spiegel, J. & Grossmann, T. N. Hydrocarbon stapled peptides as modulators of biological function. ACS Chem. Biol. 10, 1362–1375 (2015).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Wuo, M. G., Hong, S. H., Singh, A. & Arora, P. S. Synthetic control of tertiary helical structures in short peptides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 16284–16290 (2018).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Watkins, A. M., Wuo, M. G. & Arora, P. S. Protein–protein interactions mediated by helical tertiary structure motifs. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 11622–11630 (2015).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Wang, C. et al. Site-specific isopeptide bridge tethering of chimeric gp41 N-terminal heptad repeat helical trimers for the treatment of HIV-1 infection. Sci. Rep. 6, 32161 (2016).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Horne, W. S. & Grossmann, T. N. Proteomimetics as protein-inspired scaffolds with defined tertiary folding patterns. Nat. Chem. 12, 331–337 (2020).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Wiedemann, B., Weisner, J. & Rauh, D. Chemical modulation of transcription factors. Med. Chem. Commun. 9, 1249–1272 (2018).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Moya, I. M. & Halder, G. The Hippo pathway in cellular reprogramming and regeneration of different organs. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 43, 62–68 (2016).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Wang, Y., Yu, A. & Yu, F.-X. The Hippo pathway in tissue homeostasis and regeneration. Protein Cell 8, 349–359 (2017).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Pobbati, A. V. & Hong, W. Emerging roles of TEAD transcription factors and its coactivators in cancers. Cancer Biol. Ther. 14, 390–398 (2013).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Chen, H.-H., Mullett, S. J. & Stewart, A. F. R. Vgl-4, a novel member of the vestigial-like family of transcription cofactors, regulates α1-adrenergic activation of gene expression in cardiac myocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 30800–30806 (2004).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Lin, Z. et al. Acetylation of VGLL4 regulates Hippo-YAP signaling and postnatal cardiac growth. Dev. Cell 39, 466–479 (2016).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Jiao, S. et al. A peptide mimicking VGLL4 function acts as a YAP antagonist therapy against gastric cancer. Cancer Cell 25, 166–180 (2014).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Vassilev, A., Kaneko, K. J., Shu, H., Zhao, Y. & DePamphilis, M. L. TEAD/TEF transcription factors utilize the activation domain of YAP65, a Src/Yes-associated protein localized in the cytoplasm. Genes Dev. 15, 1229–1241 (2001).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Dietrich, L. et al. Cell permeable stapled peptide inhibitor of Wnt signaling that targets β-catenin protein-protein interactions. Cell Chem. Biol. 24, 958–968.e5 (2017).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Green, M. & Loewenstein, P. M. Autonomous functional domains of chemically synthesized human immunodeficiency virus tat trans-activator protein. Cell 55, 1179–1188 (1988).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Vivès, E., Brodin, P. & Lebleu, B. A truncated HIV-1 Tat protein basic domain rapidly translocates through the plasma membrane and accumulates in the cell nucleus. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 16010–16017 (1997).
Article Google Scholar
Grossmann, T. N. et al. Inhibition of oncogenic Wnt signaling through direct targeting of β-catenin. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 17942–17947 (2012).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Chu, Q. et al. Towards understanding cell penetration by stapled peptides. Med. Chem. Commun. 6, 111–119 (2015).
Article CAS Google Scholar
McCoull, W. et al. Development of a novel B-cell lymphoma 6 (BCL6) PROTAC to provide insight into small molecule targeting of BCL6. ACS Chem. Biol. 13, 3131–3141 (2018).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Linnane, E. et al. Differential uptake, kinetics and mechanisms of intracellular trafficking of next-generation antisense oligonucleotides across human cancer cell lines. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, 4375–4392 (2019).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Cromm, P. M. et al. Lipidated stapled peptides targeting the acyl binding protein UNC119. ChemBioChem 20, 2987–2990 (2019).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Edgar, B. A. From cell structure to transcription: Hippo forges a new path. Cell 124, 267–273 (2006).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Zhao, B., Tumaneng, K. & Guan, K.-L. The Hippo pathway in organ size control, tissue regeneration and stem cell self-renewal. Nat. Cell Biol. 13, 877–883 (2011).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Heallen, T. et al. Hippo signaling impedes adult heart regeneration. Development 140, 4683–4690 (2013).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Heallen, T. et al. Hippo pathway inhibits Wnt signaling to restrain cardiomyocyte proliferation and heart size. Science 332, 458–461 (2011).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Gise, A. von et al. YAP1, the nuclear target of Hippo signaling, stimulates heart growth through cardiomyocyte proliferation but not hypertrophy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 2394–2399 (2012).
Article ADS Google Scholar
Yu, F.-X. & Guan, K.-L. The Hippo pathway: regulators and regulations. Genes Dev. 27, 355–371 (2013).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Xin, M. et al. Hippo pathway effector Yap promotes cardiac regeneration. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 13839–13844 (2013).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Li, F., Wang, X., Capasso, J. M. & Gerdes, A. M. Rapid transition of cardiac myocytes from hyperplasia to hypertrophy during postnatal development. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 28, 1737–1746 (1996).
Article CAS Google Scholar
The Human Protein Atlas. Tissue expression of VGLL4—staining in heart muscle. https://www.proteinatlas.org/ENSG00000144560-VGLL4/tissue/heart+muscle (2015).
The Human Protein Atlas. Tissue expression of TEAD4—staining in heart muscle. https://www.proteinatlas.org/ENSG00000197905-TEAD4/tissue/heart+muscle (2015).
Engel, F. B., Hsieh, P. C. H., Lee, R. T. & Keating, M. T. FGF1/p38 MAP kinase inhibitor therapy induces cardiomyocyte mitosis, reduces scarring, and rescues function after myocardial infarction. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 15546–15551 (2006).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Tseng, A.-S., Engel, F. B. & Keating, M. T. The GSK-3 inhibitor BIO promotes proliferation in mammalian cardiomyocytes. Chem. Biol. 13, 957–963 (2006).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Uosaki, H. et al. Identification of chemicals inducing cardiomyocyte proliferation in developmental stage-specific manner with pluripotent stem cells. Circ. Cardiovasc. Genet. 6, 624–633 (2013).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Engel, F. B. et al. p38 MAP kinase inhibition enables proliferation of adult mammalian cardiomyocytes. Genes Dev. 19, 1175–1187 (2005).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Poschner, B. C., Reed, J., Langosch, D. & Hofmann, M. W. An automated application for deconvolution of circular dichroism spectra of small peptides. Anal. Biochem. 363, 306–308 (2007).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Raulf, A. et al. Transgenic systems for unequivocal identification of cardiac myocyte nuclei and analysis of cardiomyocyte cell cycle status. Basic Res. Cardiol. 110, 33 (2015).
Lian, X. et al. Directed cardiomyocyte differentiation from human pluripotent stem cells by modulating Wnt/β-catenin signaling under fully defined conditions. Nat. Protoc. 8, 162–175 (2013).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Dortmund Protein facility for the assistance with protein expression and purification. We thank Sasikala Thavam (MPI Dortmund) for the scale-up and resynthesis of some peptides. We are grateful to Michael Schulz (MPI Dortmund) for his help with flow cytometry. We thank Loana Arns and Roland Roland Winter (TU Dortmund) for the help with circular dichroism experiments. We thank the beamline staff of S10XA at the SLS, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland, for their assistance and support. We thank Jan G. Hengstler and Georgia Günther (IfADo, Dortmund) for providing the animals used in this experiment. T.N.G. is grateful for support by the European Research Council (ERC; ERC starting grant, no. 678623).

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Medicinal Chemistry, Research and Early Development Cardiovascular, Renal and Metabolism, BioPharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Gothenburg, Sweden
Hélène Adihou, Ranganath Gopalakrishnan, Stéphanie M. Guéret, Carola M. Wassvik, Alleyn T. Plowright, Eric Valeur & Malin Lemurell
AstraZeneca-MPI Satellite Unit, Dortmund, Germany
Hélène Adihou, Ranganath Gopalakrishnan, Tim Förster & Stéphanie M. Guéret
Max Planck Institute for Molecular Physiology, Dortmund, Germany
Raphael Gasper, Hacer Karatas & Herbert Waldmann
Structure & Biophysics, Discovery Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Gothenburg, Sweden
Stefan Geschwindner
Department of Pharmaceutical and Medicinal Chemistry, Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany
Carmen Carrillo García & Dennis Schade
Department of Multi-Modal Molecular (M3) Biology, A*STAR Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Singapore, Singapore
Ajaybabu V. Pobbati & Wanjin Hong
Mechanistic Biology & Profiling, BioPharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
Mercedes Vazquez‐Chantada
Medicinal Chemistry, Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
Paul Davey & Elisabetta Chiarparin
Disease Modelling and Therapeutics Laboratory, A*STAR Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Singapore, Singapore
Jeremy Kah Sheng Pang & Boon Seng Soh
Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
Jeremy Kah Sheng Pang & Boon Seng Soh
Key Laboratory for Major Obstetric Diseases of Guangdong Province, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
Boon Seng Soh
Department of Chemistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Tom N. Grossmann
Amsterdam Institute of Molecular and Life Sciences (AIMMS), VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Tom N. Grossmann
Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Technical University Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
Herbert Waldmann

Authors

Hélène Adihou
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Ranganath Gopalakrishnan
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Tim Förster
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Stéphanie M. Guéret
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Raphael Gasper
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Stefan Geschwindner
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Carmen Carrillo García
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Hacer Karatas
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Ajaybabu V. Pobbati
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Mercedes Vazquez‐Chantada
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Paul Davey
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Carola M. Wassvik
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Jeremy Kah Sheng Pang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Boon Seng Soh
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Wanjin Hong
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Elisabetta Chiarparin
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Dennis Schade
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Alleyn T. Plowright
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Eric Valeur
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Malin Lemurell
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Tom N. Grossmann
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Herbert Waldmann
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

H.W., T.N.G., E.V., A.T.P., M.L., H.A., R.Go., and S.M.G. conceived and designed the project. H.A., R.Go., S.M.G., and H.K. performed the chemical synthesis. T.F., H.A., R.Go., and H.K. performed the biochemical experiments. T.F., R.Go., S.M.G., A.V.P., M.V.C., P.D., J.K.S.P., B.S.S., and C.C.G. performed the biological experiments. R.Ga., H.A., and S.G. performed the biophysical experiments. All the authors analysed the results. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript. H.W., T.N.G. and H.A. prepared the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Tom N. Grossmann or Herbert Waldmann.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Zhaocai Zhou and the other, anonymous, reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Peer Review File

Reporting Summary

Source data

Source Data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Adihou, H., Gopalakrishnan, R., Förster, T. et al. A protein tertiary structure mimetic modulator of the Hippo signalling pathway. Nat Commun 11, 5425 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19224-8

Download citation

Received: 02 September 2019
Accepted: 28 September 2020
Published: 27 October 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19224-8

This article is cited by

A dimeric proteomimetic prevents SARS-CoV-2 infection by dimerizing the spike protein
- Bhavesh Khatri
- Ishika Pramanick
- Jayanta Chatterjee
Nature Chemical Biology (2022)

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.