Correction to: Nature Communications https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-30342-3, published online 13 May 2022.

The original version of this Article contained an error in the ‘De novo proteome-based subtypes’ section of the Results, which incorrectly read ‘s3 and s11 cell lines had consistent negative correlations in contrast to the other subtypes (Fig. 4d). This observation indicated that s3 and s11 cell lines (and, by extension, their tumor counterparts) tended to express essential genes highly (Fig. 4e).’ The correct version states ‘s10’ in place of ‘s11’.

The legend of Figure 4 originally read, ‘c, Pearson correlation between differential protein expression patterns versus gene effect scores based on Cancer Dependency Map (DepMap) CRISPR assays (with low scores denoting essential genes), whereby s3 and s11 cell lines tend to have high expression of essential genes. e For s3 and s11 cell lines, associated patterns for the sets of genes having both high expression and low gene effect scores across cell lines (with at least half of cell lines having normalized expression >0.5 SD from the median and gene effect scores <−0.5).’ The correct version states ‘s10’ in place of ‘s11’.

These errors have now been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.