Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

Gamma-ray haloes around pulsars as the key to understanding cosmic-ray transport in the Galaxy

Nature Astronomy volume 6, pages 199–206 (2022)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Pulsars are factories of relativistic electrons and positrons that propagate away from the pulsar, eventually permeating our Galaxy. The acceleration and propagation of these cosmic particles are a matter of intense debate. In the last few years, we have had the opportunity to directly observe the injection of these particles into the interstellar medium through the discovery of gamma-ray haloes around pulsars. This new type of gamma-ray source is produced by electrons and positrons diffusing out of the pulsar wind nebula and scattering ambient photon fields to produce gamma rays. This correspondingly new field of study comes with a number of observations and constraints at different wavelengths and a variety of theoretical models that can explain the properties of these haloes. We examine the characteristics of the propagation of cosmic rays inferred from the observations of gamma-ray haloes and their local and global implications for particle transport within the Galaxy. We also discuss the prospects for observations of these sources with facilities such as the Large High Altitude Air Shower Observatory, the Cherenkov Telescope Array or the Southern Wide-field Gamma-ray Observatory in the near future.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Evolutionary stages in the life of a PWN.
Fig. 2: Map of the sky region around the HAWC detection of Geminga.
Fig. 3: Local all-electron spectrum.
Fig. 4: Local positron spectrum.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Weekes, T. C. et al. Observation of TeV gamma rays from the Crab nebula using the atmospheric Cerenkov imaging technique. Astrophys. J. 342, 379–395 (1989).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hester, J. J. The Crab nebula: an astrophysical chimera. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 46, 127–155 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bühler, R. & Blandford, R. The surprising Crab pulsar and its nebula: a review. Rep. Prog. Phys. 77, 066901 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gaensler, B. M. & Slane, P. O. The evolution and structure of pulsar wind nebulae. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 44, 17–47 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Porth, O., Komissarov, S. S. & Keppens, R. Solution to the sigma problem of pulsar wind nebulae. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 431, L48–L52 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Reynolds, S. P. Magnetohydrodynamic models for the structure of pulsar-wind nebulae. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0308483 (2003).

  7. Del Zanna, L. & Olmi, B. in Modelling Pulsar Wind Nebulae (ed. Torres, D.) 215 (Astrophysics and Space Science Library Vol. 446, Springer, 2017).

  8. Porth, O., Vorster, M. J., Lyutikov, M. & Engelbrecht, N. E. Diffusion in pulsar wind nebulae: an investigation using magnetohydrodynamic and particle transport models. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 460, 4135–4149 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Abeysekara, A. U. et al. Extended gamma-ray sources around pulsars constrain the origin of the positron flux at Earth. Science 358, 911–914 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Berezinskii, V. S., Bulanov, S. V., Dogiel, V. A. & Ptuskin, V. S. Astrophysics of Cosmic Rays (North Holland, 1990).

  11. Trotta, R. et al. Constraints on cosmic-ray propagation models from a global Bayesian analysis. Astrophys. J. 729, 106 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Aharonian, F. et al. A new population of very high energy gamma-ray sources in the Milky Way. Science 307, 1938–1942 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Aharonian, F. et al. The H.E.S.S. survey of the Inner Galaxy in very high energy gamma rays. Astrophys. J. 636, 777–797 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. H.E.S.S. Collaboration et al. The H.E.S.S. Galactic plane survey. Astron. Astrophys. 612, A1 (2018).

  15. H.E.S.S. Collaboration et al. The population of TeV pulsar wind nebulae in the H.E.S.S. Galactic Plane Survey. Astron. Astrophys. 612, A2 (2018).

  16. Aharonian, F. A., Atoyan, A. M. & Kifune, T. Inverse Compton gamma radiation of faint synchrotron X-ray nebulae around pulsars. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 291, 162–176 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Aleksić, J. et al. Discovery of TeV γ-ray emission from the pulsar wind nebula 3C 58 by MAGIC. Astron. Astrophys. 567, L8 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Coerver, A. et al. Multiwavelength investigation of pulsar wind nebula DA 495 with HAWC, VERITAS, and NuSTAR. Astrophys. J. 878, 126 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. H.E.S.S. Collaboration, et al.An extreme particle accelerator in the Galactic plane: HESS J1826-130. Astron. Astrophys. 644, A112 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. H.E.S.S. Collaboration, et al.H.E.S.S. and Suzaku observations of the Vela X pulsar wind nebula. Astron. Astrophys. 627, A100 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. H.E.S.S. Collaboration, et al.Identification of HESS J1303-631 as a pulsar wind nebula through γ-ray, X-ray, and radio observations. Astron. Astrophys. 548, A46 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Principe, G. et al. Energy dependent morphology of the pulsar wind nebula HESS J1825-137 with Fermi-LAT. Astron. Astrophys. 640, A76 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Abdo, A. A. et al. TeV gamma-ray sources from a survey of the Galactic plane with Milagro. Astrophys. J. Lett. 664, L91–L94 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Albert, A. et al. 3HWC: The Third HAWC Catalog of Very-high-energy Gamma-Ray Sources. Astrophys. J. 905, 76 (2020).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Cao, Z. et al. Ultrahigh-energy photons up to 1.4 petaelectronvolts from 12 γ-ray Galactic sources. Nature 594, 33–36 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Abdollahi, S. et al. Fermi Large Area Telescope Fourth Source Catalog. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 247, 33 (2020).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Recchia, S. et al. Do the Geminga, Monogem and PSR J0622+3749 γ-ray halos imply slow diffusion around pulsars? Phys. Rev. D 104, 123017 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Giacinti, G. et al. Halo fraction in TeV-bright pulsar wind nebulae. Astron. Astrophys. 636, A113 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Linden, T. et al. Using HAWC to discover invisible pulsars. Phys. Rev. D 96, 103016 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. H.E.S.S. Collaboration, et al.Particle transport within the pulsar wind nebula HESS J1825-137. Astron. Astrophys. 621, A116 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Khangulyan, D., Koldoba, A. V., Ustyugova, G. V., Bogovalov, S. V. & Aharonian, F. On the anomalously large extension of the pulsar wind nebula HESS J1825-137. Astrophys. J. 860, 59 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. Rishbeth, H. Radio emission from the Vela–Puppis region. Aust. J. Phys. 11, 550–563 (1958).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. Aharonian, F. et al. First detection of a VHE gamma-ray spectral maximum from a cosmic source: HESS discovery of the Vela X nebula. Astron. Astrophys. 448, L43–L47 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. Tibaldo, L. et al. Disentangling multiple high-energy emission components in the Vela X pulsar wind nebula with the Fermi Large Area Telescope. Astron. Astrophys. 617, A78 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Grondin, M. H. et al. The Vela-X pulsar wind nebula revisited with four years of Fermi Large Area Telescope observations. Astrophys. J. 774, 110 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. Mitchell, A. (for the H.E.S.S. Collaboration) Search for Extended Gamma-ray Emission Around the Geminga Pulsar with H.E.S.S (2019).

  37. Flinders, A. VERITAS observations of the Geminga supernova remnant. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1509.04224 (2015).

  38. Ahnen, M. L. et al. Search for VHE gamma-ray emission from Geminga pulsar and nebula with the MAGIC telescopes. Astron. Astrophys. 591, A138 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Riviere, C., Fleischhack, H. & Sandoval, A. HAWC detection of TeV emission near PSR B0540+23. The Astronomer’s Telegram 10941 (2017).

  40. Brisbois, C., Riviere, C., Fleischhack, H. & Smith, A. HAWC detection of TeV source HAWC J0635+070. The Astronomer’s Telegram 12013 (2018).

  41. Smith, A. A systematic search for TeV halos associated with known pulsars. PoS ICRC2019, 797 (2019).

  42. Abeysekara, A. U. et al. Multiple Galactic sources with emission above 56 TeV detected by HAWC. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 021102 (2020).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  43. LHAASO Collaboration. Extended very-high-energy gamma-ray emission surrounding PSR J0622+3749 observed by LHAASO-KM2A. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 241103 (2021).

  44. Hooper, D. & Linden, T. Measuring the local diffusion coefficient with H.E.S.S. observations of very high-energy electrons. Phys. Rev. D 98, 083009 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  45. Di Mauro, M., Manconi, S. & Donato, F. Evidences of low-diffusion bubbles around Galactic pulsars. Phys. Rev. D 101, 103035 (2020).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  46. Chen, S. (for the LHAASO Collaboration) LHAASO Performance and First Results on Extended Emission from Known Halos (2020).

  47. Guo, Y. Observations of extended very-high-energy halos around Geminga and Monogem with the LHAAS0-KM2A. PoS ICRC2021, 964 (2021).

  48. Caraveo, P. A. et al. Geminga’s tails: a pulsar bow shock probing the interstellar medium. Science 301, 1345–1348 (2003).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  49. Posselt, B. et al. Geminga’s puzzling pulsar wind nebula. Astrophys. J. 835, 66 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  50. Di Mauro, M., Manconi, S. & Donato, F. Detection of a γ-ray halo around Geminga with the Fermi-LAT data and implications for the positron flux. Phys. Rev. D 100, 123015 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  51. Xi, S.-Q., Liu, R.-Y., Huang, Z.-Q., Fang, K. & Wang, X.-Y. GeV observations of the extended pulsar wind nebulae constrain the pulsar interpretations of the cosmic-ray positron excess. Astrophys. J. 878, 104 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  52. Johnson, S. P. & Wang, Q. D. The pulsar B2224+65 and its jets: a two epoch X-ray analysis. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 408, 1216–1224 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  53. Hui, C. Y. et al. XMM-Newton observation of PSR B2224+65 and its jet. Astrophys. J. 747, 74 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  54. Pavan, L. et al. The long helical jet of the Lighthouse nebula, IGR J11014-6103. Astron. Astrophys. 562, A122 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Liu, R.-Y., Ge, C., Sun, X.-N. & Wang, X.-Y. Constraining the magnetic field in the TeV halo of Geminga with X-ray observations. Astrophys. J. 875, 149 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  56. Goldreich, P. & Julian, W. H. Pulsar electrodynamics. Astrophys. J. 157, 869 (1969).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  57. Sironi, L., Keshet, U. & Lemoine, M. Relativistic shocks: particle acceleration and magnetization. Space Sci. Rev. 191, 519–544 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  58. Sironi, L. & Spitkovsky, A. Acceleration of particles at the termination shock of a relativistic striped wind. Astrophys. J. 741, 39 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  59. Hoshino, M., Arons, J., Gallant, Y. A. & Langdon, A. B. Relativistic magnetosonic shock waves in synchrotron sources: shock structure and nonthermal acceleration of positrons. Astrophys. J. 390, 454 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  60. Amato, E. & Arons, J. Heating and nonthermal particle acceleration in relativistic, transverse magnetosonic shock waves in proton–electron–positron plasmas. Astrophys. J. 653, 325–338 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  61. Amato, E. The theory of pulsar wind nebulae: recent progress. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.04442 (2020).

  62. Olmi, B., Del Zanna, L., Amato, E., Bucciantini, N. & Mignone, A. Multi-D magnetohydrodynamic modelling of pulsar wind nebulae: recent progress and open questions. J. Plasma Phys. 82, 635820601 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Olmi, B. & Bucciantini, N. Full-3D relativistic MHD simulations of bow shock pulsar wind nebulae: dynamics. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 484, 5755–5770 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  64. Olmi, B. & Bucciantini, N. On the origin of jet-like features in bow shock pulsar wind nebulae. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 490, 3608–3615 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  65. Kulsrud, R. & Pearce, W. P. The effect of wave–particle interactions on the propagation of cosmic rays. Astrophys. J. 156, 445–469 (1969).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  66. Evoli, C., Linden, T. & Morlino, G. Self-generated cosmic-ray confinement in TeV halos: implications for TeV γ-ray emission and the positron excess. Phys. Rev. D 98, 063017 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  67. Bell, A. R. Turbulent amplification of magnetic field and diffusive shock acceleration of cosmic rays. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 353, 550–558 (2004).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  68. López-Coto, R. & Giacinti, G. Constraining the properties of the magnetic turbulence in the Geminga region using HAWC γ-ray data. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 479, 4526–4534 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  69. Strong, A. W., Moskalenko, I. V. & Ptuskin, V. S. Cosmic-ray propagation and interactions in the galaxy. Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 57, 285–327 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  70. Grenier, I. A., Black, J. H. & Strong, A. W. The nine lives of cosmic rays in galaxies. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 53, 199–246 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  71. Sudoh, T., Linden, T. & Beacom, J. F. TeV halos are everywhere: prospects for new discoveries. Phys. Rev. D 100, 043016 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  72. Atoyan, A. M., Aharonian, F. A. & Völk, H. J. Electrons and positrons in the galactic cosmic rays. Phys. Rev. D 52, 3265–3275 (1995).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  73. Adriani, O. et al. An anomalous positron abundance in cosmic rays with energies 1.5–100 GeV. Nature 458, 607–609 (2009).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  74. Ackermann, M. et al. Measurement of separate cosmic-ray electron and positron spectra with the Fermi Large Area Telescope. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 011103 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  75. Aguilar, M. et al. First result from the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer on the International Space Station: precision measurement of the positron fraction in primary cosmic rays of 0.5–350 GeV. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 141102 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  76. Aharonian, F. A., Atoyan, A. M. & Voelk, H. J. High energy electrons and positrons in cosmic rays as an indicator of the existence of a nearby cosmic tevatron. Astron. Astrophys. 294, L41–L44 (1995).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  77. Yüksel, H., Kistler, M. D. & Stanev, T. TeV gamma rays from Geminga and the origin of the GeV positron excess. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 051101 (2009).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  78. Gupta, N. & Torres, D. F. pγ interactions in Galactic jets as a plausible origin of the positron excess. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 441, 3122–3126 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  79. Bergström, L., Bringmann, T. & Edsjö, J. New positron spectral features from supersymmetric dark matter: a way to explain the PAMELA data? Phys. Rev. D 78, 103520 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  80. Evoli, C., Amato, E., Blasi, P. & Aloisio, R. Galactic factories of cosmic-ray electrons and positrons. Phys. Rev. D 103, 083010 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  81. Lipari, P. Interpretation of the cosmic ray positron and antiproton fluxes. Phys. Rev. D 95, 063009 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  82. Lipari, P. Spectral shapes of the fluxes of electrons and positrons and the average residence time of cosmic rays in the Galaxy. Phys. Rev. D 99, 043005 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  83. Evoli, C., Blasi, P., Amato, E. & Aloisio, R. Signature of energy losses on the cosmic ray electron spectrum. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 051101 (2020).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  84. Evoli, C., Amato, E., Blasi, P. & Aloisio, R. Galactic factories of cosmic-ray electrons and positrons. Phys. Rev. D 103, 083010 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  85. Manconi, S., Di Mauro, M. & Donato, F. Contribution of pulsars to cosmic-ray positrons in light of recent observation of inverse-Compton halos. Phys. Rev. D 102, 023015 (2020).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  86. Jóhannesson, G., Porter, T. A. & Moskalenko, I. V. Cosmic-ray propagation in light of the recent observation of Geminga. Astrophys. J. 879, 91 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  87. Hooper, D., Cholis, I., Linden, T. & Fang, K. HAWC observations strongly favor pulsar interpretations of the cosmic-ray positron excess. Phys. Rev. D 96, 103013 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  88. Profumo, S., Reynoso-Cordova, J., Kaaz, N. & Silverman, M. Lessons from HAWC pulsar wind nebulae observations: the diffusion constant is not a constant; pulsars remain the likeliest sources of the anomalous positron fraction; cosmic rays are trapped for long periods of time in pockets of inefficient diffusion. Phys. Rev. D 97, 123008 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  89. Kerszberg, D. (for the H. E. S. S. Collaboration) The Cosmic-ray Electron Spectrum Measured with H.E.S.S (2017).

  90. DAMPE Collaboration et al. Direct detection of a break in the teraelectronvolt cosmic-ray spectrum of electrons and positrons. Nature 552, 63–66 (2017).

  91. Adriani, O. et al. Energy spectrum of cosmic-ray electron and positron from 10 GeV to 3 TeV observed with the Calorimetric Electron Telescope on the International Space Station. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 181101 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  92. Recchia, S., Gabici, S., Aharonian, F. A. & Vink, J. Local fading accelerator and the origin of TeV cosmic ray electrons. Phys. Rev. D 99, 103022 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  93. Fornieri, O., Gaggero, D. & Grasso, D. Features in cosmic-ray lepton data unveil the properties of nearby cosmic accelerators. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2020, 009 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Aguilar, M. et al. Towards understanding the origin of cosmic-ray electrons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 101101 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  95. López-Coto, R., Parsons, R. D., Hinton, J. A. & Giacinti, G. Undiscovered pulsar in the Local Bubble as an explanation of the local high energy cosmic ray all-electron spectrum. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 251106 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  96. Manconi, S., Di Mauro, M. & Donato, F. Dipole anisotropy in cosmic electrons and positrons: inspection on local sources. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 1, 006 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  97. Manconi, S., Di Mauro, M. & Donato, F. Multi-messenger constraints to the local emission of cosmic-ray electrons. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.01009 (2018).

  98. Ackermann, M. et al. A cocoon of freshly accelerated cosmic rays detected by Fermi in the Cygnus superbubble. Science 334, 1103 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  99. D’Angelo, M., Blasi, P. & Amato, E. Grammage of cosmic rays around Galactic supernova remnants. Phys. Rev. D 94, 083003 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  100. Strong, A. W. & Moskalenko, I. V. Propagation of cosmic-ray nucleons in the galaxy. Astrophys. J. 509, 212–228 (1998).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  101. Evoli, C. et al. Cosmic-ray propagation with DRAGON2: I. Numerical solver and astrophysical ingredients. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2017, 015 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Kissmann, R. PICARD: a novel code for the Galactic cosmic ray propagation problem. Astropart. Phys. 55, 37–50 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  103. Maurin, D., Donato, F., Taillet, R. & Salati, P. Cosmic rays below Z = 30 in a diffusion model: new constraints on propagation parameters. Astrophys. J. 555, 585–596 (2001).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  104. Bucciantini, N., Arons, J. & Amato, E. Modelling spectral evolution of pulsar wind nebulae inside supernova remnants. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 410, 381–398 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  105. Di Mauro, M., Manconi, S. & Donato, F. Prospects for the detection of synchrotron halos around middle-age pulsars. Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 51, 183 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  106. Bonnarel, F. et al. The ALADIN interactive sky atlas. A reference tool for identification of astronomical sources. Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. 143, 33–40 (2000).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  107. Abdollahi, S. et al. Cosmic-ray electron–positron spectrum from 7 GeV to 2 TeV with the Fermi Large Area Telescope. Phys. Rev. D 95, 082007 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  108. Aguilar, M. et al. Towards understanding the origin of cosmic-ray positrons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 041102 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  109. Adriani, O. et al. Cosmic-ray positron energy spectrum measured by PAMELA. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 081102 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This article is the result of fruitful discussions during the First Workshop on Gamma-ray Halos Around Pulsars (https://agenda.infn.it/e/GammaHalos). We first and foremost thank the Scientific Organizing Committee of the Workshop (A. Mitchell, S. Profumo, D. Torres, H. Zhou, R. Zanin), the Local Organizing Committee (M. I. Bernardos, A. de Angelis, A. Spolon) and all the participants (S. Abdollahi, A. Abdulrahman, F. Acero, F. Aharonian, A. Albert, E. Amato, M. Araya, T. Armstrong, V. Baghmanyan, C. Baheeja, A. Baktash, Y. Bao, M. Barnard, U. Barres de Almeida, I. Batkovic, M. Bernardos Martin, P. Blasi, P. Blay, M. Breuhaus, C. Brisbois, D. Burgess, S. Çabuk, F. Calore, T. Capistran Rojas, P. Caraveo, M. Cardillo, A. Carramiñana, M. Carreon Gonzalez, S. Casanova, F. Cassol, S. Chagren, P. Chambery, T. Chand, S. Chen, J.-G. Cheng, S. M. Colak, H. Costantini, R. Crocker, A. De Angelis, E. de la Fuente Acosta, E. de Oña Wilhelmi, A. De Sarkar, J. Devin, M. Di Mauro, B. Dingus, F. Donato, J. Eagle, C. Eckner, K. Egberts, G. Emery, A. Eungwanichayapant, C. Evoli, Y. Eweis, K. L. Fan, K. Fang, L. Fariña, Y. Feng, M. Fiori, H. Fleischhack, O. Fornieri, Y. Gallant, G. Giacinti, M. Gonzalez, E. Gotthelf, J. Goulart Coelho, D. Green, I. Grenier, P. Grespan, M.-H. Grondin, Y. Guo, N. Gupta, A. Hahn, H. Hamed, I. Herzog, J. Hinton, B. Hnatyk, W. Hofmann, B. Hona, D. Huang, Z. Huang, A. Jardin-Blicq, H. Jiachun, H. Jiankun, G. Johannesson, V. Joshi, F. Kamal Youssef, G. Kanbach, D. Khangulyan, B. Khelifi, S. Kisaka, T. Kleiner, J. Knödlseder, D. Kostunin, A. Kundu, M. Kuss, P. C. W. Lai, S. Lalkovski, F. Lavorenti, M. Lemoine-Goumard, F. Leone, M. Linares, T. Linden, R. Liu, S. Lloyd, R. López-Coto, I. Lypova, K. Malone, S. Manconi, V. Marandon, A. Marcowith, J. Martin, P. Martin, F. Massaro, R. Mirzoyan, A. Mitchell, K. Mori, G. Morlino, R. Mukherjee, K. Nakashima, L. Nava, A. Nayerhoda, M. Newbold, M. Nynka, B. Olmi, E. Orlando, Z. Ou, M. Pilia, F. Pintore, I. Plotnikov, T. Porter, R. R. Prado, E. Prandini, G. Principe, S. Profumo, H. Rahman K. K., B. Reville, C. Righi, G. Rodríguez Fernández, L. Romanato, B. Rudak, S. Safi-Harb, T. Saito, A. Sandoval, A. Scherer, P. Sharma, S. Silvestri, A. Sinha, H. Spackman, A. Spolon, G. Stratta, A. Strong, M. Strzys, T. Sudoh, X. Sun, P. H. T. Tam, S. Tanaka, F. Tavecchio, R. Terrier, L. Tibaldo, G. Tingting, D. Torres, R. Torres Escobedo, M. Tsirou, N. Tsuji, A. Tutone, A. J. van Marle, J. van Scherpenberg, G. Verna, J. Vink, E. Vurgun, S. M. Wagner, J. Wang, X. Wang, J. Xia, G. Zaharijas, S. Zane, R. Zanin, D. Zargaryan, D. Zaric, J. Zhang, Y. Zhang, Y. Zhang, H. Zhou).

R.L.-C. acknowledges the financial support of the European Union Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement 754496-FELLINI. R.L.-C. also acknowledges financial support from the State Agency for Research of the Spanish MCIU through the Centre of Excellence Severo Ochoa award to the Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía (SEV-2017-0709). E.A. acknowledges support from ASI-INAF under grant 2017-14-H.0) and from INAF under grants PRIN SKA-CTA, INAF Mainstream 2018 and PRIN-INAF 2019.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Padova, Padova, Italy

    Rubén López-Coto

  2. Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía, CSIC, Granada, Spain

    Rubén López-Coto

  3. DESY, Zeuthen, Germany

    Emma de Oña Wilhelmi

  4. Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik, Heidelberg, Germany

    Felix Aharonian & Jim Hinton

  5. Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies, Dublin, Ireland

    Felix Aharonian

  6. INAF, Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri, Firenze, Italy

    Elena Amato

  7. Università degli Studi di Firenze, Sesto Fiorentino (FI), Italy

    Elena Amato

Authors
  1. Rubén López-Coto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Emma de Oña Wilhelmi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Felix Aharonian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Elena Amato
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jim Hinton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

R.L.-C. and E.d.O.W. coordinated the manuscript writing. All authors meet the journal’s authorship criteria and have reviewed, discussed and commented on the content of the Review.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Rubén López-Coto or Emma de Oña Wilhelmi.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Astronomy thanks Mattia Di Mauro, Patrick Slane and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

López-Coto, R., de Oña Wilhelmi, E., Aharonian, F. et al. Gamma-ray haloes around pulsars as the key to understanding cosmic-ray transport in the Galaxy. Nat Astron 6, 199–206 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-021-01580-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-021-01580-0

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing