Abstract
A supersolid is a counterintuitive phase of matter that combines the global phase coherence of a superfluid with a crystal-like self-modulation in space. Recently, such states have been experimentally realized using dipolar quantum gases. Here we investigate the response of a dipolar supersolid to an interaction quench that shatters the global phase coherence. We identify a parameter regime in which this out-of-equilibrium state rephases, indicating superfluid flow across the sample as well as an efficient dissipation mechanism. We find a crossover to a regime where the tendency to rephase gradually decreases until the system relaxes into an incoherent droplet array. Although a dipolar supersolid is, by its nature, ‘soft’, we capture the essential behaviour of the de- and rephasing process within a rigid Josephson junction array model. Yet, both experiment and simulation indicate that the interaction quench causes substantial collective mode excitations that connect to phonons in solids and affect the phase dynamics.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Source data are available for this paper51. All other data that support the plots within this paper and other findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Cohen-Tannoudji, C. & Guéry-Odelin, D. Advances in Atomic Physics: An Overview (World Scientific, 2011).
Svistunov, B. V. et al. Superfluid States of Matter (CRC Press, 2015).
Eisert, J., Friesdorf, M. & Gogolin, C. Quantum many-body systems out of equilibrium. Nat. Phys. 11, 124–130 (2015).
Abanin, D. A., Altman, E., Bloch, I. & Serbyn, M. Colloquium: many-body localization, thermalization, and entanglement. Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 021001 (2019).
Langen, T., Geiger, R., Kuhnert, M., Rauer, B. & Schmiedmayer, J. Local emergence of thermal correlations in an isolated quantum many-body system. Nat. Phys. 9, 640–643 (2013).
Wright, E. M., Walls, D. F. & Garrison, J. C. Collapses and revivals of Bose–Einstein condensates formed in small atomic samples. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 2158–2161 (1996).
Greiner, M., Mandel, O., Hänsch, T. W. & Bloch, I. Collapse and revival of the matter wave field of a Bose–Einstein condensate. Nature 419, 51–54 (2002).
Scherer, D. R., Weiler, C. N., Neely, T. W. & Anderson, B. P. Vortex formation by merging of multiple trapped Bose–Einstein condensates. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 110402 (2007).
del Campo, A. & Zurek, W. H. Universality of phase transition dynamics: topological defects from symmetry breaking. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 29, 1430018 (2014).
Aidelsburger, M. et al. Relaxation dynamics in the merging of N independent condensates. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 190403 (2017).
Böttcher, F. et al. Transient supersolid properties in an array of dipolar quantum droplets. Phys. Rev. X 9, 011051 (2019).
Tanzi, L. et al. Observation of a dipolar quantum gas with metastable supersolid properties. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 130405 (2019).
Chomaz, L. et al. Long-lived and transient supersolid behaviors in dipolar quantum gases. Phys. Rev. X 9, 021012 (2019).
Cataliotti, F. S. et al. Josephson junction arrays with Bose–Einstein condensates. Science 293, 843–846 (2001).
Albiez, M. et al. Direct observation of tunneling and nonlinear self-trapping in a single bosonic Josephson junction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 010402 (2005).
Levy, S., Lahoud, E., Shomroni, I. & Steinhauer, J. The a.c. and d.c. Josephson effects in a Bose–Einstein condensate. Nature 449, 579–583 (2007).
Lu, Z.-K., Li, Y., Petrov, D. S. & Shlyapnikov, G. V. Stable dilute supersolid of two-dimensional dipolar bosons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 075303 (2015).
Cinti, F. & Boninsegni, M. Classical and quantum filaments in the ground state of trapped dipolar Bose gases. Phys. Rev. A 96, 013627 (2017).
Wenzel, M., Böttcher, F., Langen, T., Ferrier-Barbut, I. & Pfau, T. Striped states in a many-body system of tilted dipoles. Phys. Rev. A 96, 053630 (2017).
Baillie, D. & Blakie, P. B. Droplet crystal ground states of a dipolar Bose gas. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 195301 (2018).
Roccuzzo, S. M. & Ancilotto, F. Supersolid behavior of a dipolar Bose–Einstein condensate confined in a tube. Phys. Rev. A 99, 041601 (2019).
Kora, Y. & Boninsegni, M. Patterned supersolids in dipolar Bose systems. J. Low Temp. Phys. 197, 337–347 (2019).
Santos, L., Shlyapnikov, G. V. & Lewenstein, M. Roton-maxon spectrum and stability of trapped dipolar Bose–Einstein condensates. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 250403 (2003).
Chomaz, L. et al. Observation of roton mode population in a dipolar quantum gas. Nat. Phys. 14, 442–446 (2018).
Petter, D. et al. High-energy Bragg scattering measurements of a dipolar supersolid. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.02213 (2020).
Takeda, M., Ina, H. & Kobayashi, S. Fourier-transform method of fringe-pattern analysis for computer-based topography and interferometry. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 72, 156–160 (1982).
Hadzibabic, Z., Stock, S., Battelier, B., Bretin, V. & Dalibard, J. Interference of an array of independent Bose–Einstein condensates. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 180403 (2004).
Kohstall, C. et al. Observation of interference between two molecular Bose–Einstein condensates. New J. Phys. 13, 065027 (2011).
Chomaz, L. et al. Emergence of coherence via transverse condensation in a uniform quasi-two-dimensional Bose gas. Nat. Commun. 6, 6162 (2015).
Fisher, N. I. Statistical Analysis Of Circular Data (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1993).
Natale, G. et al. Excitation spectrum of a trapped dipolar supersolid and its experimental evidence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 050402 (2019).
Tanzi, L. et al. Supersolid symmetry breaking from compressional oscillations in a dipolar quantum gas. Nature 574, 382–385 (2019).
Hertkorn, J. et al. Fate of the amplitude mode in a trapped dipolar supersolid. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 193002 (2019).
Fazio, R. & van der Zant, H. Quantum phase transitions and vortex dynamics in superconducting networks. Phys. Rep. 355, 235 (2001).
Risken, H. The Fokker–Planck Equation (Springer, 1961).
Ambegaokar, V. & Halperin, B. I. Voltage due to thermal noise in the dc Josephson effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 22, 1364–1366 (1969).
Dalla Torre, E. G., Demler, E. & Polkovnikov, A. Universal rephasing dynamics after a quantum quench via sudden coupling of two initially independent condensates. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 090404 (2013).
Leggett, A. J. et al. Dynamics of the dissipative two-state system. Rev. Mod. Phys. 59, 1–85 (1987).
Efron, B. Better bootstrap confidence intervals. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 82, 171–185 (1987).
Ronen, S., Bortolotti, D. C. E. & Bohn, J. L. Bogoliubov modes of a dipolar condensate in a cylindrical trap. Phys. Rev. A 74, 013623 (2006).
Chomaz, L. et al. Quantum-fluctuation-driven crossover from a dilute Bose–Einstein condensate to a macrodroplet in a dipolar quantum fluid. Phys. Rev. X 6, 041039 (2016).
Wächtler, F. & Santos, L. Quantum filaments in dipolar Bose–Einstein condensates. Phys. Rev. A 93, 061603 (2016).
Wächtler, F. & Santos, L. Ground-state properties and elementary excitations of quantum droplets in dipolar Bose–Einstein condensates. Phys. Rev. A 94, 043618 (2016).
Ilzhöfer, P. et al. Two-species five-beam magneto-optical trap for erbium and dysprosium. Phys. Rev. A 97, 023633 (2018).
Trautmann, A. et al. Dipolar quantum mixtures of erbium and dysprosium atoms. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 213601 (2018).
Chin, C., Grimm, R., Julienne, P. S. & Tiesinga, E. Feshbach resonances in ultracold gases. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1225–1286 (2010).
Ferrier-Barbut, I. et al. Scissors mode of dipolar quantum droplets of dysprosium atoms. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 160402 (2018).
Maier, T. et al. Broad universal Feshbach resonances in the chaotic spectrum of dysprosium atoms. Phys. Rev. A 92, 060702 (2015).
Forbes, C., Evans, M., Hastings, N. & Peacock, B. Statistical Distributions 4th edn, Ch. 8, 55–61 (Wiley, 2010).
Blakie, P., Baillie, D., Chomaz, L. & Ferlaino, F. Supersolidity in an elongated dipolar condensate. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.12577 (2020).
Sohmen, M. Source Data—Ilzhofer et al.—Phase coherence in out-of-equilibrium supersolid states of ultracold dipolar atoms. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4050234 (2020).
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to S. Erne, J. Schmiedmayer and the ERBIUM team for insightful discussions and M. A. Norcia for careful reading the manuscript. We acknowledge R. M. W. van Bijnen for developing the code for our eGPE ground-state simulations. G.M. and T.G. thank N. Caballero for insightful discussions on the numerical solution of the Langevin equation. This work is financially supported through an ERC Consolidator grant (RARE, no. 681432), an NFRI grant (MIRARE, no. ÖAW0600) from the Austrian Academy of Science and DFG/FWF (FOR 2247/PI2790) and by the Swiss National Science Foundation under Division II. M.S. and G.D. acknowledge support by the Austrian Science Fund FWF within the DK-ALM (no. W1259-N27). A.T. acknowledges support by the Austrian Science Fund FWF within the Lise Meitner programme (no. M2683-N36). L.C. acknowledges support through the FWF Elise Richter Fellowship no. V792. We also acknowledge the Innsbruck Laser Core Facility, financed by the Austrian Federal Ministry of Science, Research and Economy. Part of the computational results presented have been achieved using the HPC infrastructure LEO at the University of Innsbruck.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
P.I., G.D. and A.T. conducted the experiment and collected the experimental data. M.S. and C.P. analysed the data. G.N., M.J.M., L.C., M.S. and C.P. performed and analysed the eGPE simulations. G.M. and T.G. developed the JJA model and performed the corresponding simulations. All the authors contributed to the writing of the paper. F.F. supervised the project.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Peer review information Nature Physics thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Extended data
Extended Data Fig. 1 Wavelength of the modulation and finite-sampling effect.
a, Difference between incoherent and coherent mean of the density profiles in the ID regime (1.65 G), peaking at the modulation wavelength d ≃ ± 2 μm (dashed lines). b, Histograms of 106 realisations (each) for calculations of ΔqΦ from uniformly random phases Φi, for q = 35 (green) and q = 100 (yellow) draws, respectively. The dashed vertical lines reflect the confidence interval enclosing 68.3 % (‘one σ’) of the calculated values. The solid lines depict a Beta distribution with same mean and variance as the drawn distribution of ΔqΦ (no free fit parameters).
Extended Data Fig. 2 Estimated scattering length.
Calculated B-to-as conversion for 164Dy. Red and blue shaded areas indicate the SSP and the ID region, respectively. The grey area indicates the BEC region, while the yellow areas indicate regions around the two narrow Feshbach resonances located at 2.174 G and 2.336 G where we observe increased atom loss. We estimate as,SSP = 88 a0 in the SSP at 2.43 G and as,ID = 76.9 a0 in the ID at 1.65 G.
Extended Data Fig. 3 Temporal evolution of the atom numbers and temperature in the ID regime and SSP.
a, Total atom number Ntotal, b, temperature T and atom numbers of c, the thermal and d, the coherent part, Nthermal and Ncoherent, as a function of the hold time th. The data sets at 1.65 G (blue) and 2.43 G (red) correspond to the ID regime and the SSP, respectively, whereas the one at 2 G (light blue) corresponds to the intermediate regime.
Extended Data Fig. 4 The global phase variation α from the RTE simulation of a scramble-and-rephase protocol.
a, Evolution of α over the hold time th. The solid orange line depicts an exponential fit to the data. In the inset, the integrated density n and the phase profile θ are exemplarily shown for t* = [3.5, 9.5, 60.5] ms (note the corresponding color filling of the plot markers). b, Residuals from the exponential fit to α.
Extended Data Fig. 5 Dependence of experimental rephasing dynamics on the density link strength \({\mathscr{L}}\).
a, Temporal evolution of ΔΦ (color map) at different \({\mathscr{L}}\) starting from phases scrambled in the ID regime. For each th we record q≥35 individual experimental realizations. For large \({\mathscr{L}}\) the system recovers its global phase coherence (ΔΦ ≃ 0), whereas for small \({\mathscr{L}}\) it does not (ΔΦ ≃ 1). b, AM (circles) and AΦ (diamonds) for the same data set at long hold time, th = 100 ms. The error bars (partly covered by plot markers) are statistical standard errors of AM and AΦ. The red filled pair of symbols corresponds to the data set presented in Fig. 3.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ilzhöfer, P., Sohmen, M., Durastante, G. et al. Phase coherence in out-of-equilibrium supersolid states of ultracold dipolar atoms. Nat. Phys. 17, 356–361 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-020-01100-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-020-01100-3