Chemistry degrees are often very broad. What might a degree look like if we covered fewer topics more deeply?
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Ramsden, P. Learning to Teach in Higher Education (Routledge, 2003).
Kaiser, N. Mimicry is not mastery. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2, 197–198 (2018).
Krathwohl, D. R. A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy: An Overview. Theory Pract. 41, 212–218 (2002).
Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H. & Krathwohl, D. R. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain (David McKay, 1956).
What do graduates do? 2021/22 (JISC/AGCAS, 2022); https://graduatemarkettrends.cdn.prismic.io/graduatemarkettrends/8d0f5a43-fe6e-4b78-b710-4c22baa1db5e_what-do-graduates-do-2021-22.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declares no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
O’Neill, M. Less breadth more depth. Nat Rev Chem 6, 444–445 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41570-022-00402-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41570-022-00402-9