Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Knowledge in youth is wisdom in age: involving young people in research

Nature Reviews Endocrinology volume 19, pages 125–126 (2023)Cite this article

Subjects

“Adults have really boring ideas” is what we repeatedly learn from our participatory research with young people. Nevertheless, it is common practice that adults design research, questionnaires and interventions for young people. Not surprisingly, many research initiatives, questionnaires and interventions are utterly boring and a bad fit for the intended population. Consequently, many research efforts go to waste.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Hidding, L. M., Chinapaw, M. J. M., Belmon, L. S. & Altenburg, T. M. Co-creating a 24-hour movement behavior tool together with 9-12-year-old children using mixed-methods: MyDailyMoves. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 17, 63 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Ozer, E. J. & Piatt, A. A. Adolescent Participation in Research: Innovation, Rationale and Next Steps https://www.unicef-irc.org/publications/879-adolescent-participation-in-research-innovation-rationale-and-next-steps.html (UNICEF Office of Research, 2017).

  3. Anselma, M., Chinapaw, M. & Altenburg, T. “Not only adults can make good decisions, we as children can do that as well” evaluating the process of the youth-led participatory action research ‘kids in action’. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 17, 625 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Anselma, M. et al. Co-designing obesity prevention interventions together with children: intervention mapping meets youth-led participatory action research. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 16, 130 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank our colleagues K. Goh, S. Rachdan, L. Hidding and M. Anselma for collaboration during the research mentioned in this Comment.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands

    Mai J. M. Chinapaw & Teatske M. Altenburg

Authors
  1. Mai J. M. Chinapaw
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Teatske M. Altenburg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mai J. M. Chinapaw.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chinapaw, M.J.M., Altenburg, T.M. Knowledge in youth is wisdom in age: involving young people in research. Nat Rev Endocrinol 19, 125–126 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41574-022-00796-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41574-022-00796-y

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing