Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Perspective
  • Published:

SCIENCE & SOCIETY

The role of neurologists in tackling the opioid epidemic

Abstract

The opioid crisis constitutes a public health challenge at the intersection of two interrelated medical problems — opioid addiction and chronic pain. Overlap of the reward and pain circuits in the brain underlies the frequent comorbidity of chronic pain and opioid addiction, whereas inadequate support, treatment and health-care reimbursement for both of these conditions are major contributors underlying the magnitude of the problem. Neurologists are uniquely positioned to help address the opioid crisis, not only through their involvement in the management of chronic pain conditions but also because they can screen for and manage opioid use disorders. The new NIH Helping to End Addiction Long-term (HEAL) Initiative will support research into pain and opioid use disorders to help address the opioid crisis. Neurologists’ involvement in basic, translational and clinical research is needed for the development of new pain therapeutics and biomarkers and interventions to prevent chronic pain and to prevent and treat opioid addiction.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dahlhamer, J. et al. Prevalence of chronic pain and high-impact chronic pain among adults — United States, 2016. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly Rep. 67, 1001–1006 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shupler, M. S., Kramer, J. K., Cragg, J. J., Jutzeler, C. R. & Whitehurst, D. G. T. Pan-Canadian estimates of chronic pain prevalence from 2000 to 2014: a repeated cross-sectional survey analysis. J. Pain. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2018.10.010 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Breivik, H., Collett, B., Ventafridda, V., Cohen, R. & Gallacher, D. Survey of chronic pain in Europe: prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment. Eur. J. Pain 10, 287–333 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jackson, T. et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the global burden of chronic pain without clear etiology in low- and middle-income countries: trends in heterogeneous data and a proposal for new assessment methods. Anesth. Analg. 123, 739–748 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Shipton, E. A., Shipton, E. E. & Shipton, A. J. A. Review of the opioid epidemic: what do we do about it? Pain Ther. 7, 23–36 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Clark, D. J. & Schumacher, M. A. America’s opioid epidemic: supply and demand considerations. Anesth. Analg. 125, 1667–1674 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lamvu, G., Feranec, J. & Blanton, E. Perioperative pain management: an update for obstetrician-gynecologists. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 218, 193–199 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Barratt, M. J., Latimer, J., Jauncey, M., Tay, E. & Nielsen, S. Urine drug screening for early detection of unwitting use of fentanyl and its analogues among people who inject heroin in Sydney, Australia. Drug Alcohol Rev. 37, 847–850 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pergolizzi, J. V. Jr., LeQuang, J. A., Berger, G. K. & Raffa, R. B. The basic pharmacology of opioids informs the opioid discourse about misuse and abuse: a review. Pain Ther. 6, 1–16 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chou, R. et al. The effectiveness and risks of long-term opioid treatment of chronic pain. Evid. Rep. Technol. Assess (Full Rep.). https://doi.org/10.23970/AHRQEPCERTA218 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yi, P. & Pryzbylkowski, P. Opioid induced hyperalgesia. Pain Med. 16 (Suppl. 1), S32–S36 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Volkow, N. D. & McLellan, A. T. Mitigation strategies for opioid abuse. N. Engl. J. Med. 375, 96 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jonnes, J. The rise of the modern addict. Am. J. Publ. Health 85, 1157–1162 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kandall, S. R. Women and drug addiction: a historical perspective. J. Addict. Dis. 29, 117–126 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Van Zee, A. The promotion and marketing of oxycontin: commercial triumph, public health tragedy. Am. J. Publ. Health 99, 221–227 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fauber, J. Painkiller boom fueled by networking: doctors, researchers with financial ties to drug makers set stage for surge in prescriptions. archive.jsonline http://archive.jsonline.com/watchdog/watchdogreports/painkiller-boom-fueled-by-networking-dp3p2rn-139609053.html (2012).

  17. Government Accounting Office. Prescription drugs: OxyContin abuse and diversion and efforts to address the problem. govinfo https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GAO-04-110 (2004).

  18. Mezei, L. & Murinson, B. B., Johns Hopkins Pain Curriculum Development Team. Pain education in North American medical schools. J. Pain 12, 1199–1208 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yanni, L. M. et al. Preparation, confidence, and attitudes about chronic noncancer pain in graduate medical education. J. Grad. Med. Educ. 2, 260–268 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Guy, G. P. Jr et al. Vital signs: changes in opioid prescribing in the United States, 2006–2015. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly Rep. 66, 697–704 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Synthetic opioid overdose data. CDC https://www.cdc.gov/drugoverdose/data/fentanyl.html (updated 19 Dec 2018).

  22. National Institutes of Health Interagency Pain Research Coordinating Committee. National pain strategy: a comprehensive population health-level strategy for pain. NIH https://iprcc.nih.gov/sites/default/files/HHSNational_Pain_Strategy_508C.pdf (2017).

  23. International Narcotics Control Board. Narcotic drugs. Report 2016: estimated world requirements for 2017 - statistics for 2015. INCB https://www.incb.org/incb/en/narcotic-drugs/Technical_Reports/2016/narcotic-drugs-technical-report-2016.html (2016).

  24. Fischer, B. & Rehm, J. Revisiting the ‘paradigm shift’ in opioid use: developments and implications 10 years later. Drug Alcohol Rev. 37 (Suppl. 1), S199–S202 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Volkow, N., Benveniste, H. & McLellan, A. T. Use and misuse of opioids in chronic pain. Annu. Rev. Med. 69, 451–465 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Krebs, E. E. et al. Effect of opioid versus nonopioid medications on pain-related function in patients with chronic back pain or hip or knee osteoarthritis pain: the SPACE randomized clinical trial. JAMA 319, 872–882 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Potter, J. S. et al. The multi-site prescription opioid addiction treatment study: 18-month outcomes. J. Subst. Abuse Treat. 48, 62–69 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Weiss, R. D. et al. Long-term outcomes from the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network prescription opioid addiction treatment study. Drug Alcohol Depend. 150, 112–119 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Dugosh, K. et al. A systematic review on the use of psychosocial interventions in conjunction with medications for the treatment of opioid addiction. J. Addict. Med. 10, 93–103 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. National Institutes of Health National Institute on Drug Abuse. Principles of drug addiction treatment: a research-based guide (third edition). drugabuse https://www.drugabuse.gov/publications/principles-drug-addiction-treatment-research-based-guide-third-edition/preface (2018).

  31. Department of Health and Human Services: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Treatment episode data set (TEDS) 2005–2015. National admissions to substance abuse treatment services. SAMHSA https://wwwdasis.samhsa.gov/dasis2/teds_pubs/2015_teds_rpt_natl.pdf (2017).

  32. Thomas, C. P. et al. Medication-assisted treatment with buprenorphine: assessing the evidence. Psychiatr. Serv. 65, 158–170 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Brooklyn, J. R. & Sigmon, S. C. Vermont Hub-and-Spoke model of care for opioid use disorder: development, implementation, and impact. J. Addict. Med. 11, 286–292 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wang, H. et al. Global, regional, and national life expectancy, all-cause mortality, and cause-specific mortality for 249 causes of death, 1980-2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet 388, 1459–1544 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Advancing Pain Research, Care, and Education. Relieving Pain in America: A Blueprint for Transforming Prevention, Care, Education, and Research (National Academies Press (US), 2011).

  36. Blackwell, D. L., Lucas, J. W. & Clarke, T. C. Summary Health Statistics for U.S. Adults: National Health Interview Survey, 2012. Vital and Health Statistics: Series 10, Number 260 (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2014).

  37. Blondell, R. D. et al. A clinical trial comparing tapering doses of buprenorphine with steady doses for chronic pain and co-existent opioid addiction. J. Addict. Med. 4, 140–146 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Neumann, A. M. et al. A preliminary study comparing methadone and buprenorphine in patients with chronic pain and coexistent opioid addiction. J. Addict. Dis. 32, 68–78 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Tsui, J. I., Herman, D. S., Kettavong, M., Anderson, B. J. & Stein, M. D. Escitalopram is associated with reductions in pain severity and pain interference in opioid dependent patients with depressive symptoms. Pain 152, 2640–2644 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Koroschetz, W. The NIH HEAL initiative and pain research. NIH https://www.ninds.nih.gov/News-Events/Directors-Messages/All-Directors-Messages/NIH-HEAL-Initiative-and-Pain-Research (updated 28 Aug 2018).

  41. National Institutes of Health. Brain Initiative https://www.braininitiative.nih.gov/ (2019).

  42. National Institutes of Health. Stimulating Peripheral Activity to Relieve Conditions (SPARC) https://commonfund.nih.gov/sparc (updated 15 Jan 2019).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank R. Baler and J. Ward for their valuable editorial help with the manuscript.

Reviewer information

Nature Reviews Neurology thanks G. Fischer and other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Both authors contributed equally to all aspects of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nora D. Volkow.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Volkow, N.D., Koroshetz, W.J. The role of neurologists in tackling the opioid epidemic. Nat Rev Neurol 15, 301–305 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41582-019-0146-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41582-019-0146-8

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing