Extended Data Fig. 2: Burst selectivity and model fitting.
a, Identified (left, p = 0.00021, two-sided Wilcoxon signed rank test) and putative (right, p = 0.0005, two-sided Wilcoxon signed rank test) Burst-BFCN-SBs exhibited similar burst selectivity. Solid lines, mean; shading, s.e.m.; bars, median. b, The same for Burst-BFCN-PLs (left, identified, p = 0.0084, two-sided Wilcoxon signed rank test; right, putative, p = 0.0078, two-sided Wilcoxon signed rank test). Solid lines, mean; shading, s.e.m.; bars, median. c, A mixture of Gaussian distributions from 1 to 5 modes were fitted on the logarithm of refractory period distribution. Refractory period of BFCNs (n = 78) showed bimodal distribution, confirmed by AIC (red) and BIC (blue) model selection measures (lowest value corresponds to best fit model).
