Table 6 Erectile function in the studies comparing intrafacial and interfacial nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy.

From: Intrafascial versus interfascial nerve sparing in radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Study

No. of cases, type

Method

Criterion

3 mo, %

6 mo, %

12 mo, %

Stolzenburg7

200 ITR-NS

IIEF and SEP

Erectile function sufficient for intercourse with or without the help of PDE-5 inhibitors

64.8

82.8

200 ITE-NS

51.4

64.8

Ko8

9 ITR-NS

Questionnaire

Erections adequate for vaginal penetration with satisfaction, with or without the use of a PDE-5 inhibitor

88.9

32ITE-NS

65.6

Zheng9

65 ITR-NS

SHIM

Total scores of ≥22 in the SHIM questionnaire

46.4

67.9

130 ITE-NS

24.8

42.7

Khoder10

203 ITR-NS

IIEF-5

Patients achievement of a composite score of 15 points or higher on the IIEF-5 questionnaire

47

80

163 ITE-NS

35

57

  1. ITR-NS = intrafacial nerve sparing; ITE-NS = interfacial nerve sparing; IEEF = International Index of Erectile Function; SEP = Sexual Encounter Profile diaries; SHIM = Sexual Health Inventory for Men questionnaire; PDE-5 = phosphodiesterase type 5.