Abstract
Biotic stress can induce plastic changes in fitness-relevant plant traits. Recently, it has been shown that such changes can be transmitted to subsequent generations. However, the occurrence and extent of transmission across different types of traits is still unexplored. Here, we assessed the emergence and transmission of herbivory-induced changes in Brassica rapa and their impact on interactions with insects. We analysed changes in morphology and reproductive traits as well as in flower and leaf volatile emission during two generations with leaf herbivory by Mamestra brassicae and Pieris brassicae and two subsequent generations without herbivory. Herbivory induced changes in all trait types, increasing attractiveness of the plants to the parasitoid wasp Cotesia glomerata and decreasing visitation by the pollinator Bombus terrestris, a potential trade-off. While changes in floral and leaf volatiles disappeared in the first generation after herbivory, some changes in morphology and reproductive traits were still measurable two generations after herbivory. However, neither parasitoids nor pollinators further discriminated between groups with different past treatments. Our results suggest that transmission of herbivore-induced changes occurs preferentially in resource-limited traits connected to plant growth and reproduction. The lack of alterations in plant-insect interactions was likely due to the transient nature of volatile changes.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
To maximize their fitness, sessile organisms such as plants need to quickly respond to environmental stresses by readjusting the appropriate phenotypic traits1,2,3,4. In most cases, these environmentally induced changes are either transient and disappear in the next unstressed generation or short-term and reset at the latest two generations after induction5,6. Nevertheless, there are a few studies where the transmission of individual trait changes has been tracked long-term over more than one generation after stress treatment7,8,9,10. Despite these findings, the occurrence and relative importance of transient, short-term and long-term effects has not yet been systematically tested across multiple traits.
Communication with insect visitors is one of the most specific plant-environment interactions. Processes such as the attraction of pollinators or the deterrence of herbivores are mediated by orchestrated signalling of different trait types, e.g. visual perception of morphological traits and olfactory recognition of leaf and flower volatiles11,12. Changes such as the appearance of a new herbivore can thus not only lead to simultaneous shifts in many somatic and reproductive trait types13,14,15, but also create fundamentally different patterns of trait changes depending on the type of herbivore (e.g. a generalist vs. specialist species)16. However, measuring such changes is not trivial. In natural populations, genetic, epigenetic and environmental variation can mask phenotypic effects of induced changes17,18. On the other hand, studies conducted with (epi-)genetically uniform plants under controlled conditions often focus on particular traits and fail to identify the overall ecological significance of the induced changes19.
One of the best studied plant-insect relationships are the natural interactions of the crop plant Brassica rapa L. with both mutualistic and antagonistic insect species: Typically, B. rapa deters herbivores via the production of constitutive and inducible glucosinolate defence compounds20, but several herbivores such as the specialist Pieris brassicae L. or the generalist Mamestra brassicae L. are able to detoxify or tolerate these compounds21,22. To reduce damage caused by these herbivores, B. rapa relies on the attraction of specialized natural enemies such as parasitoid wasps (e.g. Cotesia glomerata L.) via herbivore-induced volatile organic compounds (VOCs)23,24,25. Simultaneously, herbivory has indirect effects on plant morphology and floral VOC production, altering the attractiveness of the plant to pollinators (e.g. Bombus terrstris L.)26,27. B. rapa is thus an ideal system to study the effect of herbivory-induced trait changes on interactions with other insect visitors.
Here, we assessed transient, short-term and long-term changes in B. rapa subjected to leaf herbivory by the specialist P. brassicae and generalist M. brassicae. Employing a multi-generational approach with minimized standing (epi-)genetic variation and without selection, the objectives of our study were to: 1. measure the induction of trait changes in plant morphology, seed production and the emission of leaf and flower volatiles under one and two generations of herbivory, 2. determine whether and which of the induced changes are transient or retained one and two generations after herbivory and 3. assess the effects of these changes on indirect defence and pollinator attraction in bioassays with parasitoids (C. glomerata) and pollinators (B. terrestris).
Results
Induction and retention of phenotypic changes upon herbivory
Within the four plant generations, four different responses to herbivory were recorded across all twenty-two measured traits (Fig. 1a–d): While seven traits were invariable, herbivory by Pieris brassicae and Mamestra brassicae induced transient changes in six, short-term effects in three and long-term effects in five traits. One trait (the VOC methyl salicylate) showed an irregular pattern with only the first and last generation affected (see Table 1, Supplementary Table S1 and Supplementary Fig. S1).
Responses varied strongly between trait types: While transient effects were mostly present among leaf and flower VOCs, short and long-term effects were exclusively recorded among morphological and reproductive traits and completely absent among VOCs. Two generations of herbivory transiently increased mean emission of all three leaf VOCs between 35% and 202% (M. brassicae) and between 11% and 66% (P. brassicae). Simultaneously, mean emission of four flower VOCs was transiently decreased between 25% and 26% and between 21% and 38%. One generation after treatment, plants still had a 21% (M. brassicae) and 11% (P. brassicae) smaller petal area per flower, but M. brassicae-treated plants produced 25% more seeds. Two generations after treatment, plants had significantly fewer buds (M. brassicae: 13% and P. brassicae: 15%), fewer leaves (9% and 9%) and less nectar (33% and 33%). In addition, plants had significantly smaller seeds (7% and 6%), but an increased number of siliques (17% and 27%, see Table 1, Supplementary Table S1 and Supplementary Fig. S1). In plants from both treatment groups, significantly more flowers (open flowers + bud number) developed into siliques two generations after herbivory (two-way ANOVA, F (2,114) = 32.21, P < 0.001 and post hoc Tukey HSD, P (P. brassicae - control) <0.001, P (M. brassicae - control) <0.001, P (P. brassicae - M. brassicae) = 0.142).
In most cases, induction and direction of trait changes caused by the generalist herbivore M. brassicae did not differ from those caused by the specialist P. brassicae. However, in M. brassicae-treated plants, some morphological and reproductive traits were additionally affected in generation 2 (number of buds and seed viability) and 3 (number of buds, leaves, nectar and seeds, as well as seed weight). On the other hand, P. brassicae-treated plants showed an additional transient reduction of the two flower VOCs benzyl nitrile and (E)-α-farnesene. Although the background level of the control group was similar across generations for most traits, there were still some noticeable differences: Leaf VOC emission increased in the second treatment generation and petal size decreased within all four plant generations.
Linear discriminant analysis showed a significant separation of groups across generations and treatments (Wilks’ Λ (453,11): 0.242, F = 3.387, P < 2.2 × 10−16). Treatment and control groups were largely separated in the first two linear discriminant dimensions, which explained 44.0% and 23.3% of the observed group variance. However, while the phenotypes of M. brassicae and P. brassicae-treated plants were indistinct from each other during treatment generations 1 and 2, both variance and separation increased in all treatment groups after treatment in generations 3 and 4. (Fig. 2, Supplementary Table S2).
Attractiveness of herbivore-damaged plants to parasitoids and pollinators
The choices made by Cotesia glomerata parasitoids were examined with a four-arm olfactometer containing one plant from each treatment and one empty arm. Among plants from generation 1, parasitoids had a significant preference for plants damaged by P. brassicae, which is their natural host. Also, none of the wasps chose the empty arm (Fig. 3a). In contrast, no significant choice could be detected among plants from the first and second generation (generations 3 and 4) without treatment, using statistical models either including or excluding the empty arm (Fig. 3a, also see methods). In generations 3 and 4, fewer wasps remained undecided in the central chamber, but some wasps entered the empty arm, which is also an indicator for a lack of a clear signal from one of the arms. In the dual-choice assays, plants subjected to P. brassicae herbivory were significantly less attractive to the pollinator Bombus terrestris in the treatment generation, but this effect disappeared in the two generations after the treatment. Pollinators did not discriminate between plants subjected to M. brassicae herbivory and control plants in all three generations (Fig. 3b).
Discussion
Using a highly inbred Brassica rapa line, we investigated the induction and multigenerational transmission of herbivory-induced phenotypic changes, as well as their impact on plant-insect interactions. Under direct herbivory, changes among plant morphology and volatiles were clearly detectable, reduced pollinator attraction and induced attraction of parasitoids. After cessation of herbivory, some changes in plant morphology and reproductive traits were retained in one or even two following plant generations, supporting the presence of a trans-generational transmission of some environmentally induced changes. While the potential adaptive nature of these changes is not yet clear, the transient nature of the observed shifts in parasitoid- and pollinator attraction, likely mediated through volatiles, is expected to be advantageous: A retention of these signals would be maladaptive as they would give dishonest cues to parasitoids28 and maintain a trade-off unfavourable for pollinator attraction. We suggest that the action of natural selection on the transmission of induced changes results in a mosaic-like pattern of transient and retained phenotypic alterations.
Previous work has not only demonstrated that herbivory can alter pollinator-relevant traits of B. rapa and other plants, but also identified trade-offs between indirect defence and pollinator attraction26,29,30,31. Altogether, the phenotypic shifts observed in this study are consistent with such a trade-off: Nectar production and petal size, which were both decreased under herbivory treatment, are not only costly in their production32,33,34 but also have a great impact on pollinator attraction35,36. Also, petal size was previously found to be reduced in B. rapa under herbivore attack27. Simultaneously, herbivory increased the emission of all three measured leaf VOCs: 1-butene-4-isothiocyanate is a glucosinolate derivative well-known for its anti-herbivore properties37,38 and both benzyl nitrile and (E)-α-farnesene are reported to be inducible upon herbivory in B. rapa23. Studies have shown that 1-butene-4-isothiocyanate as well as benzyl nitrile are attractive to Cotesia parasitoids23,39, which may at least partly explain their preference for P. brassicae-damaged plants in the first generation of this study. In contrast, floral VOC emission was much less affected, which is congruent with findings of a previous study using another B. rapa inbred line (Kellenberger, et al.40, but see Schiestl, et al.26 using wild type B. rapa plants). However, the compound (E)-α-farnesene has been shown to be positively correlated with reward and elicits responses in B. terrestris olfactory neurons41. The observed reduction of this compound together with the smaller petal size may thus explain the reduced attractiveness of P. brassicae-infested plants to pollinators. Nevertheless, the general response of the B. rapa plants was similar for the specialist P. brassicae and the generalist M. brassicae, although it has been shown that caterpillar herbivores can elicit species-specific responses in host plants42,43.
So far, persistence of herbivore-induced phenotypic changes across generations has been documented mainly in the context of direct defence: It has been shown that herbivory can induce trans-generational changes in defensive plant traits such as trichomes44, cyanides45, glucosinolates8 and other phytochemicals46. However, systematic screens also including non-defensive traits and plant volatiles have hardly been conducted. Trans-generational effects observed in this study were restricted to morphological and seed traits, with most of them showing a reduced performance. As visible in different trait levels of the control group across generations, unknown physiological or environmental factors also led to inter-generational variation in the overall performance of the plants, which might have co-influenced the magnitude of trait changes. However, many of the affected traits can be considered rather costly and experiments with Pieris have shown a similar reduction in biomass8 and seed size47 among descendants of herbivory-damaged Brassicaceae plants. The observed reduction could thus be either a negative effect resulting from the inferior performance of the treated ancestral plants or an adaptive reallocation of resources48. While our study did not look at direct defence mechanisms, it is plausible that resources might also be reallocated to glucosinolate biosynthesis in the progeny. In the last years, molecular mechanisms have been described which could provide a framework for the inheritance of such induced changes, including maternal effects49,50,51 and epigenetic mechanisms such as DNA methylation, histone modifications or RNAi19,52,53.
In the generations after treatment, changes in plant volatiles, which are important signals for insect attraction, were not transmitted to offspring after treatment. Also, both parasitoids and pollinators did not discriminate among the progeny of the herbivore-treated plant groups. Since a constitutive attraction of parasitoids would be a dishonest “cry wolf “ signal28, it can be assumed that the plastic nature of signalling effective to parasitoids is adaptive. This may also be the case for the reduced attraction of pollinators, which should be reset as soon as trade-offs between defence and attraction are released. Although our study did not show whether any of the retained phenotypic changes have an adaptive value, it provides some hints on possible fitness-relevant properties: Unlike in control plants where later-developing flowers usually do not produce siliques anymore, seed production in progeny of herbivore-treated plants is distributed over the whole flowering time and among the majority of flowers. This interesting shift in resource allocation should be further evaluated in future studies.
Material and Methods
Plants and treatments
To minimize the presence of standing genetic and epigenetic variation that could mask de novo phenotypic changes, we used seeds from a single individual of the self-fertilizing inbred Brassica rapa line IMB 21154 for the first generation (Fig. 4, see Whittle et al.10 for a similar setup). Plants were grown in 7 × 7 cm pots with standardized soil (Einheitserde Werkverband e.V., Germany) and randomized daily in a climate chamber (24 h light, 21 °C, 65% relative humidity, daily watering). Fourteen days after germination, a total of 150 plants were randomly assigned either to a control, Mamestra brassicae or Pieris brassicae group (Fig. 4). Two first instar M. brassicae or P. brassicae larvae obtained from an in-house breeding were placed each on the newest (fourth) mature leaf of plants from the corresponding group and allowed to feed for seven days (ca. 1–2 days before anthesis; control plants were left untreated). Aiming at damage of ca. 25% of total leaf tissue per plant, inactive larvae and larvae reaching the third instar were replaced with new ones as needed. Plants with damaged reproductive parts (flower stalks and buds) were removed and the final sample size was balanced to 120 plants (40 plants per group, Fig. 4). Seven days after herbivore removal, all plants were transferred to a greenhouse table under an insect net and kept under the same conditions as above until seed ripening.
For the second generation, ten seeds from each of the 120 plants were sown, germination rate was recorded from these seeds and three seedlings per parent were chosen, resulting in a total of 360 plants (3 × 40 plants per group, Fig. 4). Plants received the same conditions and treatments as in generation 1. After herbivore removal, plants with damaged reproductive parts (flowers and stalks) were excluded and one of the remaining descendants per parent was randomly selected to again balance the sample size to 120 plants (40 plants per group). The other plants were used for pollinator bioassays (see below). After generation 2, herbivore treatment was ceased and the plants were grown for two more generations (generations 3 and 4) under the same environmental conditions and propagation regime (Fig. 4).
Morphological analysis
Phenotypic analysis was conducted at four different time points: 1. leaf VOCs were collected from 20 randomly selected plants per group 48 h after the onset of herbivory. 2. flower VOCs as well as all phenotypic measurements (except nectar and seed traits) were collected from all plants individually three days after anthesis. Plant height, mean petal surface of three flowers (4 petals × π × 0.5 petal width × 0.5 petal length) and number of leaves, buds and open flowers were recorded. 3. mean nectar production of three flowers was measured for all plants with 5 μl glass capillaries six days after anthesis. 4. number of siliques and mean seed weight of ten seeds were recorded from all plants after seed ripening. Total seed weight was further used to estimate the total amount of seeds per plant.
Volatile analysis
Volatiles were collected from leaves and inflorescences with non-destructive headspace sorption. Whole plants (leaf VOC) or inflorescences (flower VOC) were enclosed in Sigmacote-treated glass cylinders (Sigma Aldrich, Switzerland) and sealed with aluminium foil (leaf VOC) or Teflon plates around the peduncle (flower VOC). VOCs were sampled by simultaneously pushing clean air through active charcoal filters into the cylinders and sucking air out through glass tubes loaded with 20 mg Tenax TA (60/80 mesh) at a flow rate of 100 ml min−1 for 2 h. Background VOC levels were determined with samples from empty glass cylinders. Analysis of VOC samples was performed using gas chromatography with mass selective detection (GC-MSD) as described in Schiestl et al.26. Identification and quantification of compounds was achieved with a mass spectral library built on calibration curves using three to five different concentrations of authentic reference standards26. Non-identifiable VOC as well as VOC with an amount below the mean background level in >10% of samples were excluded from the dataset. VOC quantities were converted to pg flower−1 l−1 sampled air. All analyses were done using the Agilent MSD ChemStation program E. 02.02 (2011).
Bioassays with parasitoids
Between 24 and 48 h after the onset of herbivory treatment, five (in generations 1 and 4) or six plants (in generation 3) each from the control and treatment groups were randomly selected and brought to a laboratory at the University of Neuchâtel, Switzerland. Plants from generation 2 were mechanically damaged during transport and thus could not be used for this assay. The herbivores were removed and the soil was covered with aluminium foil around the hypocotyl. One plant per treatment group (=one set of three plants) was randomly placed in a clean four-arm olfactometer technically identical to the one described in Turlings et al.55, with a pot containing aluminium foil covered soil in the empty fourth arm. Clean air was pushed through each arm with a flow rate of 0.7 l min−1, converging in a central chamber, in which five mated female Cotesia glomerata parasitoid wasps were released. All wasps were obtained from an in-house breeding. After 30 min, the wasps were removed and their choice was recorded; wasps residing in the central chamber were counted as undecided. This procedure was repeated five times to a total of 5 × 5 wasps per plant set. Afterwards, the olfactometer was cleaned with acetone and pentane and a new plant set was installed.
Bioassays with pollinators
The attraction of pollinators to herbivory-treated plants was determined in dual-choice bioassays with bumblebees (Bombus terrestris, Andermatt Biocontrol, Andermatt, Switzerland). The assays were conducted with excess plants from generations 2, 3 and 4 (Fig. 4, see above) five days after onset of anthesis, corresponding to six to seven days after herbivore removal. Before the assay, the bees were allowed to forage on untreated B. rapa plants for 2 h. Subsequently, one pair consisting of a randomly chosen control and a either an M. brassicae or a P. brassicae-treated plant was placed with 20 cm distance in a flight cage (2.5 m length, 1.8 m width, 1.2 m height). Bees were released individually in the cage. After the first landing on a flower, the chosen plant was recorded and the bee was removed from the experiment. After a sequence of five visits, all bees were returned to their hive box, the plant pair was removed and a new pair was installed switching the position of control- and treated plant. A total of 15 plant pairs per herbivore group and generation were used in this experiment.
Plant trait statistics
Prior to the statistical analysis, all response variables were Box-Cox transformed56 and tested for normality and homoscedasticity with a Shapiro-Wilk test57 and Fligner-Killeen’s test58 respectively. Response variables were assigned to a morphological traits class, reproductive traits class, leaf VOC class and floral VOC class. Effects on trait classes were analysed for each plant generation individually with a two-way MANOVA with treatment and sampling day (resulting from time to anthesis) as explanatory variables. Treatment effects on traits within significant MANOVA classes were calculated using a two-way ANOVA with holm adjustment of all P-values within this plant generation and comparisons between treatments were performed with post hoc Tukey HSD tests. Finally, all response variables (except total petal area and leaf VOCs) were ranked within generation, z-transformed across all generations and overall treatment effects were assessed with linear discriminant analysis (LDA). For classification, both generation and treatment were combined in one grouping factor (4 × 3 = 12 classes) and the discriminatory power was tested using Wilks’ Λ. Statistical analyses were carried out in R v. 3.0.2 (R Development Core Team 2013) with the packages MASS v. 7.3–47 (Venables and Ripley 2002) and caret v. 6.0–76 (Kuhn 2008).
Bioassay statistics
As suggested by Turlings et al.55, we analysed preferences of C. glomerata wasps with a negative binomial mixed model adjusting for zero inflation and overdispersion. Treatment was included as fixed effect and the interaction between treatment and plant group as random effect. In generation 1, none of the wasps chose the empty arm, which lead to complete separation of the random term in the model. We thus restricted our analysis to the three arms containing control and treated plants to enable a comparison between plant generations. However, we additionally fitted models including all four arms for generations 3 and 4 to assess choice difference between all arms within those generations. For all models, comparisons between treatments were performed with post hoc Tukey HSD tests. The effects of P. brassicae and M. brassicae herbivory on pollinator attraction were calculated using a binomial test. Statistical analyses were carried out in R with the package glmmADMB v 0.8.3.3 (Bolker et al. 2012).
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available at https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-149519.
References
Franks, S. J. Plasticity and evolution in drought avoidance and escape in the annual plant Brassica rapa. New Phytologist 190, 249–257 (2011).
Munns, R. & Termaat, A. Whole-plant responses to salinity. Functional Plant Biology 13, 143–160 (1986).
Puijalon, S. et al. Phenotypic plasticity in response to mechanical stress: hydrodynamic performance and fitness of four aquatic plant species. New Phytologist 177, 907–917 (2008).
Lange, M. J. P. & Lange, T. Touch-induced changes in Arabidopsis morphology dependent on gibberellin breakdown. Nature Plants 1, 14025 (2015).
Suter, L. & Widmer, A. Environmental heat and salt stress induce transgenerational phenotypic changes in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS One 8, e60364 (2013).
Iwasaki, M. & Paszkowski, J. Identification of genes preventing transgenerational transmission of stress-induced epigenetic states. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111, 8547–8552 (2014).
Luna, E., Bruce, T. J., Roberts, M. R., Flors, V. & Ton, J. Next-generation systemic acquired resistance. Plant Physiology 158, 844–853 (2012).
Rasmann, S. et al. Herbivory in the previous generation primes plants for enhanced insect resistance. Plant Physiology 158, 854–863, https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.111.187831 (2012).
Kathiria, P. et al. Tobacco mosaic virus infection results in an increase in recombination frequency and resistance to viral, bacterial and fungal pathogens in the progeny of infected tobacco plants. Plant Physiology 153, 1859–1870 (2010).
Whittle, C., Otto, S., Johnston, M. O. & Krochko, J. Adaptive epigenetic memory of ancestral temperature regime in Arabidopsis thaliana. Botany 87, 650–657 (2009).
Junker, R. R. & Parachnowitsch, A. L. Working towards a holistic view on flower traits—how floral scents mediate plant–animal interactions in concert with other floral characters. Journal of the Indian Institute of Science 95, 43–68 (2015).
Schiestl, F. P. & Johnson, S. D. Pollinator-mediated evolution of floral signals. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 28, 307–315 (2013).
Agrawal, A. A. Induced responses to herbivory and increased plant performance. Science 279, 1201–1202 (1998).
Johnson, M. T., Campbell, S. A. & Barrett, S. C. Evolutionary interactions between plant reproduction and defense against herbivores. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 46, 191–213 (2015).
Agrawal, A. A., Hastings, A. P., Johnson, M. T., Maron, J. L. & Salminen, J.-P. Insect herbivores drive real-time ecological and evolutionary change in plant populations. Science 338, 113–116 (2012).
Ali, J. G. & Agrawal, A. A. Specialist versus generalist insect herbivores and plant defense. Trends in Plant Science 17, 293–302 (2012).
Johannes, F. et al. Assessing the impact of transgenerational epigenetic variation on complex traits. PLoS Genetics 5, e1000530–e1000530, https://doi.org/10.3410/f.1162970.623606 (2009).
Richards, E. J. Natural epigenetic variation in plant species: a view from the field. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 14, 204–209 (2011).
Bossdorf, O., Richards, C. L. & Pigliucci, M. Epigenetics for ecologists. Ecology Letters 11, 106–115 (2008).
Wiesner, M., Hanschen, F. S., Schreiner, M., Glatt, H. & Zrenner, R. Induced production of 1-methoxy-indol-3-ylmethyl glucosinolate by jasmonic acid and methyl jasmonate in sprouts and leaves of pak choi (Brassica rapa ssp. chinensis). International Journal of Molecular Sciences 14, 14996–15016, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms140714996 (2013).
Wittstock, U. et al. Successful herbivore attack due to metabolic diversion of a plant chemical defense. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101, 4859–4864, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0308007101 (2004).
Poelman, E. H., Galiart, R. J., Raaijmakers, C. E., Van Loon, J. J. & Van Dam, N. M. Performance of specialist and generalist herbivores feeding on cabbage cultivars is not explained by glucosinolate profiles. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 127, 218–228 (2008).
Kugimiya, S., Shimoda, T., Tabata, J. & Takabayashi, J. Present or past herbivory: a screening of volatiles released from Brassica rapa under caterpillar attacks as attractants for the solitary parasitoid, Cotesia vestalis. Journal of Chemical Ecology 36, 620–628, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-010-9802-6 (2010).
Pashalidou, F. G. et al. Early herbivore alert matters: plant‐mediated effects of egg deposition on higher trophic levels benefit plant fitness. Ecology Letters 18, 927–936 (2015).
Gols, R. et al. Fitness consequences of indirect plant defence in the annual weed. Sinapis arvensis. Functional Ecology 29, 1019–1025 (2015).
Schiestl, F. P., Kirk, H., Bigler, L., Cozzolino, S. & Desurmont, G. A. Herbivory and floral signaling: phenotypic plasticity and tradeoffs between reproduction and indirect defense. New Phytologist 203, 257–266, https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12783 (2014).
Strauss, S. Y., Siemens, D. H., Decher, M. B. & Mitchell-Olds, T. Ecological costs of plant resistance to herbivores in the currency of pollination. Evolution 1105–1113, https://doi.org/10.2307/2640815 (1999).
Shiojiri, K. et al. Herbivore-specific, density-dependent induction of plant volatiles: honest or “cry wolf” signals? PLoS One 5, e12161 (2010).
Strauss, S. Y. Floral characters link herbivores, pollinators and plant fitness. Ecology 78, 1640–1645, https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658 (1997).
Lucas-Barbosa, D., van Loon, J. J. & Dicke, M. The effects of herbivore-induced plant volatiles on interactions between plants and flower-visiting insects. Phytochemistry 72, 1647–1654, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2011.03.013 (2011).
Sletvold, N., Moritz, K. K. & Ågren, J. Additive effects of pollinators and herbivores result in both conflicting and reinforcing selection on floral traits. Ecology 96, 214–221, https://doi.org/10.1890/14-0119.1 (2015).
Pyke, G. H. What does it cost a plant to produce floral nectar? Nature 350, 58–59 (1991).
Galen, C. Why do flowers vary? The functional ecology of variation in flower size and form within natural plant populations. Bioscience 49, 631–640 (1999).
Galen, C., Sherry, R. A. & Carroll, A. B. Are flowers physiological sinks or faucets? Costs and correlates of water use by flowers of Polemonium viscosum. Oecologia 118, 461–470 (1999).
Kessler, D. et al. How scent and nectar influence floral antagonists and mutualists. eL ife 4, e07641 (2015).
Conner, J. K. & Rush, S. Effects of flower size and number on pollinator visitation to wild radish. Raphanus raphanistrum. Oecologia 105, 509–516 (1996).
Agrawal, A. A. & Kurashige, N. S. A role for isothiocyanates in plant resistance against the specialist herbivore Pieris rapae. Journal of Chemical Ecology 29, 1403–1415 (2003).
Bruce, T. Glucosinolates in oilseed rape: secondary metabolites that influence interactions with herbivores and their natural enemies. Annals of Applied Biology 164, 348–353 (2014).
Najar-Rodriguez, A. J., Friedli, M., Klaiber, J. & Dorn, S. Aphid-deprivation from Brassica plants results in increased isothiocyanate release and parasitoid attraction. Chemoecology 25, 303–311 (2015).
Kellenberger, R. T., Schlüter, P. M. & Schiestl, F. P. Herbivore-induced DNA demethylation changes floral signalling and attractiveness to pollinators in Brassica rapa. PLoS One 11, e0166646 (2016).
Knauer, A. & Schiestl, F. Bees use honest floral signals as indicators of reward when visiting flowers. Ecology Letters 18, 135–143 (2015).
Agrawal, A. A. Specificity of induced resistance in wild radish: causes and consequences for two specialist and two generalist caterpillars. Oikos 89, 493–500 (2000).
Mewis, I. et al. Gene expression and glucosinolate accumulation in Arabidopsis thaliana in response to generalist and specialist herbivores of different feeding guilds and the role of defense signaling pathways. Phytochemistry 67, 2450–2462 (2006).
Holeski, L. Within and between generation phenotypic plasticity in trichome density of Mimulus guttatus. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 20, 2092–2100 (2007).
Ballhorn, D. J., Kautz, S. & Laumann, J. M. Herbivore damage induces a transgenerational increase of cyanogenesis in wild lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus). Chemoecology 26, 1–5 (2016).
Holeski, L. M., Zinkgraf, M. S., Couture, J. J., Whitham, T. G. & Lindroth, R. L. Transgenerational effects of herbivory in a group of long-lived tree species: maternal damage reduces offspring allocation to resistance traits, but not growth. Journal of Ecology 101, 1062–1073, https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12110 (2013).
Agrawal, A. A. Herbivory and maternal effects: mechanisms and consequences of transgenerational induced plant resistance. Ecology 83, 3408–3415 (2002).
Herman, J. & Sultan, S. Adaptive transgenerational plasticity in plants: case studies, mechanisms and implications for natural populations. Frontiers in Plant Science 2, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2011.00102 (2011).
Roach, D. A. & Wulff, R. D. Maternal effects in plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 18, 209–235 (1987).
Wolf, J. B. & Wade, M. J. What are maternal effects (and what are they not)? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 364, 1107–1115 (2009).
Miao, S. L., Bazzaz, F. A. & Primack, R. B. Persistence of maternal nutrient effects in Plantago major: the third generation. Ecology 72, 1634–1642 (1991).
Holeski, L. M., Jander, G. & Agrawal, A. A. Transgenerational defense induction and epigenetic inheritance in plants. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 27, 618–626, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2012.07.011 (2012).
Hauser, M.-T., Aufsatz, W., Jonak, C. & Luschnig, C. Transgenerational epigenetic inheritance in plants. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Gene Regulatory Mechanisms 1809, 459–468, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagrm.2011.03.007 (2011).
Iñiguez-Luy, F. L., Sass, M. E., Jung, G., Johns, M. A. & Nienhuis, J. Development of robust SCAR markers that distinguish the six cultivated Brassica species and subspecies of the U-triangle. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 131, 424–432 (2006).
Turlings, T. C., Davison, A. & Tamò, C. A six-arm olfactometer permitting simultaneous observation of insect attraction and odour trapping. Physiological Entomology 29, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3032.2004.0362.x (2004).
Box, G. E. & Cox, D. R. An analysis of transformations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological) 211–252 (1964).
Shapiro, S. S. & Wilk, M. B. An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 591–611, https://doi.org/10.2307/2333709 (1965).
Conover, W. J. & Iman, R. L. Rank transformations as a bridge between parametric and nonparametric statistics. The American Statistician 35, 124–129, https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1981.10479327 (1981).
Acknowledgements
We thank Alice Balmer, Benjamin Kellenberger and Anja Wettstein for their help in data collection, Rayko Jonas and Markus Meierhofer for plant care and Tanja Christoffel for insect rearing. Franz Huber helped with the volatile collection and analysis and Kelsey Byers provided helpful comments on earlier versions of this manuscript. We would also like to thank Ted Turlings for providing us access to the olfactometers in his laboratory. The seeds of the B. rapa IMB 211 line were kindly provided by Dr. Federico Iñiguez-Luy. This study was funded by the university research priority program (URPP) “Evolution in Action” of the University of Zurich.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization, R.T.K., G.A.D., P.M.S. and F.P.S.; Methodology, R.T.K. and G.A.D.; Formal analysis, R.T.K.; Investigation, R.T.K.; Resources, G.A.D., P.M.S. and F.P.S; Writing – Original Draft, R.T.K.; Writing – Review & Editing, R.T.K., G.A.D., P.M.S. and F.P.S.; Funding Acquisition, F.P.S.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Kellenberger, R.T., Desurmont, G.A., Schlüter, P.M. et al. Trans-generational inheritance of herbivory-induced phenotypic changes in Brassica rapa. Sci Rep 8, 3536 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-21880-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-21880-2
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.