Abstract
Quantum coherence control is reinvestigated for a new physical insight in quantum nonlinear optics and applied for a wavelength-convertible quantum memory in a solid ensemble whose spin states are inhomogeneously broadened. Unlike typical atomic media whose spin decays are homogeneous, a spin inhomogeneously broadened solid ensemble requires a counter-intuitive quantum coherence control to avoid spontaneous emission-caused quantum noises. Such a quantum coherence control in a solid ensemble satisfying both near perfect retrieval efficiency and ultralong photon storage offers a solid framework to quantum repeaters, scalable qubit generations, quantum cryptography, and highly sensitive magnetometry. Here, the basic physics of the counter-intuitive quantum coherence control is presented not only for a fundamental understanding of collective ensemble phase control but also for a coherence conversion mechanism between optical and spin states involving Raman rephasing.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Quantum coherence control in a lambda-type three-level optical ensemble has drawn much attention for various applications of quantum nonlinear optics over the last several decades, ranging from Kerr nonlinearity to quantum information, where a controlled coherence conversion (CCC) between optical and spin states plays a key role. Of them are electromagnetically induced transparency1,2,3, nondegenerate four-wave mixing (NDFWM)4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11, resonant Raman echoes6, ultraslow and stopped lights7,8,9,10, stationary lights11,12, Schrodinger’s cats13,14, entangled photon-pair generations15,16,17,18,19, quantum cryptography20, and photon echo-based quantum memories21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33. An essential requirement for the Raman-type nonlinear quantum optics is a long coherence time between two-ground (or spin) states3. In the study of photon echo-based quantum memories, CCC has been intensively studied recently to investigate the physical mechanism of collective phase manipulations of an ensemble21,22,23,29,30. The multimode storage capability is an intrinsic property of photon echoes and advantageous for mass information processing compared with single mode property in cavity quantum electrodynamics34, off-resonant Raman scattering15,16,17,18,19,20, single color center diamonds35,36,37, and even stopped lights7,8,9,10,11,12.
Since the first modified photon echo protocol was proposed for quantum memories in a spin homogeneous Doppler medium21, several methods have followed in the name of atomic frequency comb echoes24,25, gradient echoes26, and controlled double rephasing (CDR) echoes22,23,29 mostly in solid media. In quantum memories, both near perfect retrieval efficiency and ultralong storage time are the most important properties to be satisfied for recursive operations such as in circuit-based quantum computing38 and quantum repeaters for long-distance quantum communications39. The ultralong coherence time40,41,42 is also essential in magnetometry for ultrahigh sensitivity43,44. Although the CDR echo protocol satisfies both high retrieval efficiency and ultralong storage time, the optical pulse scheme is rather complex22,23,29. Moreover, CCC has never been discussed for a spin inhomogeneity in an optical ensemble, where most solid media are belong to this category. Although, CCC in a Doppler medium has opened a door to practical quantum optical memories with near perfect retrieval efficiency and longer storage time21, the same method cannot be applied to a non-Doppler solid ensemble24 simply because there is no π phase cancellation6,22,23,29,30, unless Raman rephasing is applied9, resulting in an absorptive coherence on the output photons. So far, there is no observation of quantum memory satisfying both near perfect retrieval efficiency and spin coherence-limited storage time, yet.
Unlike vastly studied alkali atoms for quantum nonlinear optics1,3,4,7,8,10,11,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,32,40,42, solid media such as rare-earth doped crystals2,5,6,9,13,14,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,41,45,46,47,48,49 and color center diamonds33,35,36,37,43,44 have an intrinsic property of spin inhomogeneity. In general, the spin inhomogeneity deteriorates optical nonlinear efficiency due to coherence dephasing9,24,30, so that such a solid ensemble has been strictly prevented from time-delayed operations such as photon storage unless rephrasing is involved9. Here, the so-called controlled echo is proposed, analyzed, and discussed for CCC in a spin inhomogeneously broadened solid ensemble for the first time. The controlled echo is also presented for a wavelength-convertible quantum memory satisfying both ultralong storage time and near perfect retrieval efficiency, where its retrieval mechanism is new with a succinct pulse scheme. Surprisingly the theoretical investigation of the present controlled echo-based quantum memory reveals that our conventional understanding on quantum coherence control is actually a special case, and thus it has misled quantum optics community working on solid media so far24,27,33. For this, a simple lambda-type three-level optical system is first investigated to derive the basic physics of quantum coherence control for the controlled echo in Figs 1 and 2. Then, a wavelength-convertible quantum memory is presented in a double-lambda-type four-level system in Fig. 3.
Figure 1a shows the energy level diagram of a typical lambda-type three-level optical medium, but the access of the control pulse C is counter-intuitive for the present controlled echo-based quantum memory, where the data pulse A is to be stored. This counter-intuitive control access is the essence of the controlled echo, where its physics investigation is the key task of the present paper. Figure 1b is the pulse sequence for Fig. 1a, and the Raman rephasing pulse R is composed of a balanced Raman pulse for \(|1\rangle -|3\rangle -|2\rangle \) transition for the control of spin coherent transients. The NDFWM signal e in Fig. 1c results from the light-matter interactions among optical pulses A, B, and C, where Raman rephasing by R play a key role. In spin homogeneous media such as alkali atoms4,7,8,10,11,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,32,40,42, however, the control pulse C must be the same as B, if they are collinear, for the transition \(|2\rangle -|3\rangle \) without R7,8,10,11,21, resulting in NDFWM signal e’ in the same frequency as A (see Fig. 1e).
To describe the basic physics of the controlled echo, first, analytic discussions are performed and then numerical demonstrations follow to prove them. According to the CDR theory22,23,29, the function of CCC is for the coherence conversion between optical and spin states by the control pulse B acting on the data pulse-excited population ρ33 on the excited state \(|3\rangle \):
where ρ33 is completely transferred onto an auxiliary ground state \(|2\rangle \) by B: \({\rho }_{33}\mathop{\longrightarrow }\limits^{B(\pi )}{\rho }_{22}\). Here, B(π) stands for a π pulse area of B. The successive CCC by the second control pulse C results in coherence inversion:
where C is identical to B for the same transition. Equation (2) represents a correct understanding of conventional NDFWM process without rephrasing7,8. As a result, there is a π phase shift between the input and output21,22,23,29,30. Because the input pulse A must induce absorptive coherence ρ13(tA) via absorption process, the π-phase shift in equation (2) to the output represents emissive coherence. Thus, the output coherence either from a rephasing system applied by an identical control pulse set24 or from a doubly rephrased system27,33 must be also absorptive29 (see the Supplementary Information Fig. S1).
In a solid ensemble whose spin transition is inhomogeneous, however, the Raman rephasing by R is required as shown in Fig. 1b, otherwise the system is quickly dephased within spin T2*9,24,30. Here, I introduce new physics of controlled echo in Kerr nonlinear optics. By using equation (1) and the following Raman rephrasing by R [\({\rho }_{21}({t}_{C})={\rho }_{12}^{\ast }({t}_{B})]\), the NDFWM signal e at t = te in Fig. 1a is expressed by:
where the control access of C must be counter-intuitive for the transition \(|1\rangle -|3\rangle \) to work with the same transferred atom (ion) by B, satisfying no spontaneous emission-caused quantum noise. Here, equation (4) is the same as the conventional case in equation (2). Thus, the present controlled echo in Fig. 1 works for the quantum memory with emissive coherence under no population inversion via unitary transformation of Raman rephasing. By the way, if C is identical to B for the same transition9, the NDFWM signal e’ at t = te becomes:
where \({\rho }_{33}({t}_{e})\gg {\rho }_{22}({t}_{e})\), causing spontaneous emission noise (see Fig. 1e).
The controlled echo in equation (4) is now discussed in more detail for the coherent transients. By the first control pulse B, the transferred coherence ρ12 in equation (3) begins to evolve due to the spin inhomogeneity:
where \({\delta }_{j}\) is the detuning of the jth spin from the two-photon line center, and tk is the ending time of pulse k. Here, the pulses A and B must be consecutive to neglect optical dephasing regardless of the optical inhomogeneity. By the Raman rephasing pulse R at t = tR, the completely dephased spin coherence ρ12(tR) starts to rephase:
where \({\rm{T}}\equiv ({t}_{R}-{t}_{B})=({t}_{C}-{t}_{R})\) and \(t^{\prime} =(t-{t}_{B})-T\). Therefore, at \({\rm{t}}={t}_{B}+2{\rm{T}}\), the rephrased spin coherence reaches at maximum value (spin echo) with a π/2 phase shift:
where \({t}_{C^{\prime} }\) is the arrival time of the pulse C. If the second control pulse C follows the conventional NDFWM process as in equation (2), the output e’ becomes:
where \(\,t^{\prime\prime} =t-{t}_{C}\). The term \({e}^{-\frac{{t}^{^{\prime\prime} }}{{T}_{2}}}\) is due to optical dephasing, where T2 is replaced by the laser jitter-induced \({T}_{2}^{\ast }(\,\ll \,{T}_{2})\) in rare earth doped solids2,5,6,9,24,25,26,30. In equation (9), the output e’ is obviously violates quantum memory due to population inversion (\({\rho }_{33}\gg {\rho }_{11}\)). If there is no Raman rephasing as in ref.24, then, the output e’ still becomes absorptive due to the intrinsic optical rephrasing property25,31, which again violates the quantum memory (will be discussed elsewhere).
On the contrary, for the case of controlled echo in Fig. 1a, the final coherence for the NDFWM signal e becomes:
where \({{\rm{\rho }}}_{21}={\rho }_{12}^{\ast }\) and \({\rho }_{33}({t}_{C})={\rho }_{33}({t}_{A})\). Thus, the NDFWM signal e at t = te is described as:
where \({\rho }_{33}({t}_{e})\ll {\rho }_{22}({t}_{e})\) due to the Raman rephrasing by R at t = tR. In equations (9) and (10), both NDFWM signals, e’ and e, represent the same emissive coherence, because all real components are zero at t = te (see the Supplemental Information Fig. S2). Thus, the present controlled echo in Fig. 1a is now analytically proved for a quantum memory protocol in a spin inhomogeneously broadened solid ensemble.
Figure 1c–f represent numerical results for the controlled echo in Fig. 1a: see Methods for details. Figure 1c is the numerical result of the controlled echo, where the control pulse access is counter-intuitive with respect to conventional one (see Fig. 1e). In Fig. 1c, the data pulse-excited coherence ρ13(tA) is transferred into spin coherence ρ12(tB) by the first control pulse B as discussed in equation (6) (see the inset in Fig. 1e). The maximally rephased coherence (ρ12*) by R is again coherently transferred by the second control pulse C, resulting in the emissive NDFWM signal e [Imρ23(te)] (see the red curve) under no population inversion, as discussed in equation (11).
The magnitude of e \((Im{\rho }_{23}\,(t\ge {t}_{e}))\) in Fig. 1c should decay down exponentially as a function of time by optical phase relaxation rate γ23 (1/T2). This decay is of course accelerated by optical inhomogeneous broadening. The excited state population ρ33 (see the dotted line) for e at t = te is exactly the same as that for A at t = tA (see the dotted line and the inset in Fig. 1d), resulting in no spontaneous emission-caused quantum noise. Figure 1d shows population evolutions for Fig. 1c, where the data A-excited population ρ33 (dotted curve/line) is fully transferred into state \(|2\rangle \) by B at t = 1.2. The function of R at t = tR is to swap the population between two ground states \(|1\rangle \) and \(|2\rangle \), resulting in spin rephasing5,6,9,48: \({\rho }_{11}\mathop{\longleftrightarrow }\limits^{R(2\pi )}{\rho }_{22}\) and \(\,{\rho }_{12}\mathop{\longrightarrow }\limits^{R(2\pi )}{\rho }_{12}^{\ast }\); For the physics of 2π pulse area of R, refer to refs6,48.
In contrast to Fig. 1c, Fig. 1e is for the conventional control pulse access to the transition \(|2\rangle -|3\rangle \), resulting in an emissive e’ output (Imρ13) at the same frequency as A for the transition \(|1\rangle -|3\rangle \)7,8,9,10. The emissive NDFWM signal e’ at \({\rm{t}}\ge {t}_{e}\) is, however, under population inversion as shown in Fig. 1e: ρ33 ≫ ρ11. Figure 1f shows the relation between equations (9) and (11). Thus, the present controlled echo theory is numerically proved for quantum memories.
Figure 2 represents numerical calculations for the case of resonant Raman data pulse D, where the optical pulses A and B in Fig. 1b are simultaneous5,6,48. The pulse area of A is kept the same as Fig. 1 for the consistency. For maximum coherence excitation, the Raman data pulse area should be ΦD = π, where \({{\rm{\Omega }}}_{D}=\sqrt{{{\rm{\Omega }}}_{A}^{2}+{{\rm{\Omega }}}_{B}^{2}}\) and \({{\rm{\Omega }}}_{A}\ll {{\rm{\Omega }}}_{B}\). Except for the Raman data D, all others are the same as in Fig. 1b. As shown in Fig. 2a, the controlled echo still works for the resonant Raman data for quantum memories. However, the excited population by the data pulse A is half-shelved in the excited state \(|3\rangle \), where ρ22 = ρ33 (see Fig. 2b). Because the coherence is induced by the population difference, e.g., \({\rho }_{12}\propto {\rho }_{22}-{\rho }_{11}\), the spin coherence reduction in the resonant Raman case is ~67% (see Fig. 2c and d). Although the reduced coherence itself by the atom shelving has nothing to with quantum fidelity, the shelved population on \(|3\rangle \) may deteriorate the read-out conversion efficiency by C. To avoid this matter, a double lambda-type four-level system may be used as in Fig. 3a, so that C pulse can circumvent the shelved population. The optical locking technique also gives a solution to avoid the shelving problem even for ultralong quantum memories48. In ref.48, quantum decoherence by spontaneous emission decay is negligible due to \({T}_{1}^{spin}\gg {T}_{1}^{optical}\), where the photon storage time is extended up to spin population decay time.
The Raman gradient-echo protocol based on off-resonant interactions may be free from the population shelving or population decay-caused quantum noises discussed in Fig. 232. Instead of the direct Raman rephasing, an oppositely polarized gradient electric field applied to the C transition functions the Raman rephrasing without population control32. For the case of multiple data pulses (As), however, the mandatory use of a long, single control pulse C induces at least 50% coherence loss due to unwanted coherence read-out for ‘OFF’ data pulse timing. Moreover, such a Raman gradient technique can never be applied to a solid ensemble due to the intrinsic spin inhomogeneity.
Figure 3 is an application of the present controlled echo for a wavelength-convertible quantum memory in a double lambda-type four-level solid medium whose spin transition is inhomogeneouly broadened. For this, an extra state \(|4\rangle \) is simply added in Fig. 1a. Unlike Fig. 1, the resonant Raman rephasing pulse R composed of balanced C and D is applied for the transition \(|1\rangle -|4\rangle -|2\rangle \), so that any potential defect by the shelved atoms on state \(|3\rangle \) can be removed on the coherence recovery process. The frequency difference between A and e is the origin of the frequency up- or down-conversion. The control pulse (Cn) access is for the transition \(|1\rangle -|4\rangle \) and results in the photon signal e, resonant between states \(|2\rangle \) and \(|4\rangle \). Here it should be noted that the control pulse Cn must be resonant to maximize the coherence conversion process as shown in most quantum memory cases7,8,9,10,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,28,29,30, where preliminary NDFWM generation in a double-Λ solid medium of Fig. 3 has been observed in a cw scheme49. The Rabi frequency ΩA of the data pulse A in Fig. 3 is decreased by a factor of \(\sqrt{2}\) for the purpose of comparison with Fig. 1. As a direct result, the coherence excitation by A is also decreased by \(\sqrt{2}\) as shown in Fig. 3c (see also the inset in Fig. 3d). Either for \(|3\rangle \) or \(|4\rangle \), a resonant Raman pulse deals only with two-photon coherence between the two ground states \(|1\rangle \) and \(|2\rangle \), resulting in the same spin rephasing result. The retrieved photon signal e must satisfy Kerr nonlinear optics among pulses A, B, and Cn, resulting in up- or down-conversion depending on the relative energy level of \(|2\rangle \).
In contrast to Fig. 3c, the control pulse (Cn) access is applied for the transition \(|2\rangle -|4\rangle \) in Fig. 3d, which is conventional as in Fig. 1e. The resultant coherence of the NDFWM signal e’ is, however, under population inversion (ρ44 ~ 1 at t = te′). Even if such an inverted echo signal may be useful for classical applications of associative memories50, the potential quantum noise from ρ44 should prevent Fig. 3d from quantum memories. The relation between equations (9) and (11) is also numerically demonstrated in Fig. 3e and f for the signals e’ and e in Figs. 3c and d, respectively. This proves again a clear distinction between rephasing-based quantum memories and the present controlled echo: ρ* vs. −ρ. Thus, the present wavelength-convertible quantum memory protocol in a resonant four-level solid system can be used for multimode quantum wavelength conversion, which is essential for future spectral division multiplexing in quantum networks.
For the near perfect retrieval efficiency in the present controlled echo quantum memory, the control pulse propagation directions must be opposite each other21,30, so that a backward echo signal e can be generated by the following phase matching conditions:
where \({\omega }_{j}\) (kj) is the angular frequency (wave vector) of pulse j, and the subscript ‘e’ stands for the controlled echo. Although a perfect collinear scheme between A and e cannot be satisfied due to \({{\boldsymbol{k}}}_{B}+{{\boldsymbol{k}}}_{Cn}\ne 0\)30, the wavelength deviation among them is negligibly small at 10−8 for most rare-earth doped solids46. Thus, the refractive index-dependent phase walk-off is also negligibly small at far less than π as experimentally demonstrated5,6,9,30. This flexible NDFWM offers a great advantage in echo-based quantum memories for spatial multiplexing. According to the theory21 and experimental observations30, a near perfect retrieval efficiency ηe can be achieved for the backward controlled echo scheme even for an optically thick ensemble45: \({\eta }_{e}={(1-{e}^{-\alpha l})}^{2}\). Here, the higher optical depth (αl) is actually necessary for the single write- and read-out process, otherwise an optical cavity is needed sacrificing bandwidth. The above phase matching conditions can also be expanded for light polarizations.
In conclusion, a wavelength-convertible quantum memory protocol based on controlled echo was introduced, analyzed, and discussed for a spin inhomongeneously broadened double lambda-type four-level optical ensemble. Unlike alkali atoms whose spin transitions are homogeneous, the control pulse access in a spin inhomogeneous solid ensemble must be counter-intuitive to avoid spontaneous emission-caused quantum noises. In the present study, quantum coherence control in a spin inhomogeneously broadened solid ensemble was explicitly analyzed and discussed to elucidate the basic but novel physics of ensemble phase control for both quantum coherence conversion and Raman rephasing, resulting in near perfect, ultralong, and emissive photon echoes without quantum noises. With a backward control pulse set and balanced Raman rephasing, the retrieval efficiency can be near perfect due to the absence of echo reabsorption, and the photon storage time can be extended up to the spin homogeneous decay time. Here, the spin homogeneous decay time can be as long as minutes or even hours in rare-earth doped solids under external magnetic fields41. Moreover, the present controlled echo scheme is simple in configuration and applicable to spectral and spatial multiplexing in all-optical quantum information processing in the future quantum networks. In magnetometry, sensing ability increases by a factor of T2/T2* 44, where T2 can be extended by several orders of magnitude in the present controlled echo. The present research sheds light on potential quantum memory applications in various quantum information areas such as scalable qubit generations, recursive operations, sensing, and quantum repeaters for long-distance quantum communications.
Methods
For the numerical calculations, total sixteen time-dependent density matrix equations are solved for a four-level ensemble medium in an interacting Heisenberg picture under rotating wave approximations51: \(\frac{d\rho }{dt}=\frac{i}{\hslash }[H,\rho ]-\frac{1}{2}\{{\rm{\gamma }},\rho \}\), where ρ is a density matrix element, H is Hamiltonian, and γ is a decay parameter. In the calculations, 99.55% of the Gaussian distribution is taken for total 201 distributed spin groups at 2 kHz spacing, where the spectral spin inhomogeneous width (FWHM) is set at 170 kHz. Here, the exaggerated spin bandwidth (x30) is only to save computer calculation time. Those 201 spectral groups are calculated for the time domain and summed up for all spectral groups. For the optical transition, optical inhomogeneity is neglected because it does not violate physics of Raman coherence nor affect the result, unless optical pulse delay between A and B is given. The following equations are for the coherence terms of \({\dot{\rho }}_{ij}\) in a four-level system interacting with three resonant optical fields:
where the interaction Hamiltonian matrix H is given by:
here Ω1 (Ω3) is the Rabi frequency of the optical field between the ground state \(|1\rangle \) and the excited state \(|3\rangle \) (\(|4\rangle \)), and Ω2 (Ω4) is the Rabi frequency of the optical field between the ground state \(|2\rangle \) and the excited state \(|3\rangle \) (\(|4\rangle \)). The δ1, δ2, and δ3 are the atom detuning from the resonance frequency for Ω1, Ω2, and Ω3 (Ω4), respectively. For visualization purpose and simplification, all decay terms are neglected except for the optical phase relaxation rates γij.
The optical pulse duration is set at 0.1 μs, otherwise specified. The time increment in the calculations is 0.01 μs. Initially all atoms are in the ground state \(|1\rangle \) (\({\rho }_{11}(0)=1\)), and thus all initial coherence is \({\rho }_{ij}(0)=0\), where i (j) = 1, 2, 3, 4. The program used for the numerical calculations is time-interval independent, so that there is no accumulated error depending on the time interval settings. The corresponding Rabi frequency is set at \(\frac{100}{\sqrt{2}}\) MHz for the pulse duration of 0.01 μs to satisfy a 2π pulse area.
References
Harris, S. E. Electromagnetically induced transparency. Phys. Today 50(7), 36–42 (1997).
Ham, B. S., Hemmer, P. R. & Shahriar, M. S. Efficient electromagnetically induced transparency in a rare-earth doped crystal. Opt. Commun. 144, 227–230 (1997).
Fleischhauer, M. & Lukin, M. D. Dark-state polaritons in electromagnetically induced transparency. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5094–5097 (2000).
Li, Y. Q. & Xiao, M. Enhancement of nondegenerate four-wave mixing based on electromagnetically induced transparency in rubidium atoms. Opt. Lett. 21, 1064–1066 (1996).
Ham, B. S., Shahriar, M. S. & Hemmer, P. R. Enhanced nondegenerate four-wave mixing owing to electromagnetically induced transparency in a spectral hole-burning crystal. Opt. Lett. 22, 1138–1140 (1997).
Ham, B. S., Shahriar, M. S., Kim, M. K. & Hemmer, P. R. Spin coherence excitation and rephasing with optically shelved atoms. Phys. Rev. B 58, R11825–R11828 (1998).
Liu, C., Dutton, Z., Behroozi, C. H. & Hau, L. V. Observation of coherent optical information storage in an atomic medium using halted light pulses. Nature 409, 490–493 (2001).
Choi, K. S., Deng, H., Laurat, J. & Kimble, H. J. Mapping photonic entanglement into and out of quantum memory. Nature 452, 67–71 (2008).
Turukhin, A. V. et al. Observation of ultraslow and stored light pulses in a solid. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 023602 (2002).
Hsiao, Y.-F. et al. Highly efficient coherent optical memory based on electromagnetically induced transparency. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 183602 (2018).
Moiseev, S. A. & Ham, B. S. Quantum manipulation of two-color stationary light: Quantum wavelength conversion. Phys. Rev. A 73, 033812 (2006).
Everett, J. L. et al. Dynamical observations of self-stabilizing stationary light. Nature Phys. 13, 68–73 (2017).
Petrosyan, D. & Kurizki, G. Symmetric photon-photon coupling by atoms with Zeeman-split sublevels. Phys. Rev. A 65, 033833 (2002).
Peternostro, M., Kim, M. S. & Ham, B. S. Generation of entangled coherent states via cross-phase-modulation in a double electromagnetically induced transparency regime. Phys. Rev. A 67, 023811 (2003).
van der Wal, C. H. et al. Atomic memory for correlated photon states. Science 301, 196–200 (2003).
Balic´, V., Braje, D. A., Kolchin, P., Yin, G. Y. & Harris, S. E. Generation of Paired Photons with Controllable Waveforms. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 183601 (2005).
Julsgaard, B., Sherson, J., Cirac, J. I., Fiurášek, J. & Polzik, E. S. Experimental demonstration of quantum memory for light. Nature 432, 482–486 (2004).
Ding, D.-S. et al. Raman quantum memory of photonic polarized entanglement. Nature Photon. 9, 332–338 (2015).
Parniak, M. et al. Wavevector multiplexed atomic quantum memory via spatially-resolved single-photon detection. Nature Communi. 8, 2140 (2017).
Zhang, W. et al. Quantum secure direct communication with quantum memory. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 220501 (2017).
Moiseev, S. A. & Kröll, S. Complete reconstruction of the quantum state of a single-photon wave packet absorbed by a Doppler-broadened transition. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 173601 (2001).
Ham, B. S. Coherent control of collective atom phase for ultralong, inversion-free photon echoes. Phys. Rev. A 85, 031402(R) (2012); ibid, Phys. Rev. A 94, 049905(E) (2016).
Ham, B. S. A controlled ac Stark echo for quantum memories. Sci. Rep. 7, 7655 (2017).
Afzelius, M. et al. Demonstration of atomic frequency comb memory for light with spin-wave storage. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 040503 (2010).
de Riedmatten, H., Afzelius, M., Staudt, M. U., Simon, C. & Gisin, N. A solid-state light–matter interface at the single-photon level. Nature 456, 773–777 (2008).
Hetet, G., Longdell, J. J., Alexander, A. L., Lam, P. K. & Sellars, M. J. Electro-Optic Quantum Memory for Light Using Two-Level Atoms. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 023601 (2008).
Damon, V., Bonarota, M., Louchet-Chauvet, A., Chanelière, T. & Le Gouët, J.-L. Revival of silenced echo and quantum memory for light. New. J. Phys. 13, 093031 (2011).
Lvovsky, A. I., Sanders, B. C. & Tittlel, W. Optical quantum memory. Nature Photon. 3, 706–714 (2009).
Ham, B. S. Control Rabi flopping applied to photon echoes for quantum memories. Adv. Appl. Sci. Res. 9, 32–46 (2018).
Hahn, J. & Ham, B. S. Rephasing halted photon echoes using controlled optical deshelving. New J. Phys. 13, 093011 (2011).
Usmani, I., Afzelius, M., de Riedmatten, H. & Gisin, N. Mapping multiple photonics qubits into and out of one solid-state atomic ensemble. Nature Communi. 1, 12 (2010).
Hosseini, M., Sparkes, B. M., Campbell, G., Lam, P. K. & Buchler, B. C. High efficiency coherent optical memory with warm rubidium vapour. Nature Communi. 2, 174 (2011).
Julsgaard, B., Grezes, C., Bertet, P. & Mølmer, K. Quantum memory for microwave photons in an inhomogeneously broadened spin ensemble. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 250503 (2013).
Maıˆtre, X. et al. Quantum Memory with a Single Photon in a Cavity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 769–772 (1997).
Togan, E. et al. Quantum entanglement between an optical photon and a solid-state spin qubit. Nature 466, 730–734 (2010).
Fuchs, G. D., Burkard, G., Klimov, P. V. & Awschalom, D. D. A quantum memory intrinsic to single nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond. Nature Phys. 7, 789–793 (2011).
England, D. G. et al. Storage and retrieval of THz-bandwidth single photons using a room-temperature diamond quantum memory. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 053602 (2015).
Steane, A. M. Efficient fault-tolerant quantum computing. Nature 399, 124–126 (1999).
Duan, L.-M., Lukin, M. D., Cirac, J. I. & Zoller, P. Long-distance quantum communication with atomic ensembles and linear optics. Nature 414, 413–418 (2001).
Langer, C. et al. Long-Lived Qubit Memory Using Atomic Ions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 060502 (2005).
Zhong, M. et al. Optically addressable nuclear spins in a solid with a six-hour coherence time. Nature 517, 177–181 (2015).
Bao, X.-H. et al. Efficient and long-lived quantum memory with cold atoms inside a ring cavity. Nature Phys. 8, 517–521 (2012).
Zaiser, S. et al. Enhancing quantum sensing sensitivity by a quantum memory. Nature Communi. 7, 12279 (2016).
Taylor, J. M. et al. High-sensitivity diamond magnetometer with nanoscale resolution. Nature Phys. 4, 810–816 (2008).
Sangouard, N., Simon, C., Afzelius, M. & Gisin, N. Analysis of a quantum memory for photons based on controlled reversible inhomogeneous broadening. Phys. Rev. A 75, 032327 (2007).
MacFarlane, R. M. & Shelby, R. M. Coherent Transients and Holeburning Spectroscopy of Rare Earth Solids, Spectroscopy of Solids Containing Rare Earth Ions, edited by Kaplyanskii, A. A. & MacFarlane, R. M., Chap. 3. (Elsevier Science Publishers, New York, 1987).
Mitsunaga, M. cw photon echo: Theory and observation. Phys. Rev. A 42, 1617–1629 (1990).
Ham, B. S. Ultralong quantum optical data storage using an optical locking technique. Nature Photon. 3, 518–522 (2009).
Ham, B. S., Shahriar, M. S. & Hemmer, P. R. Enhancement of four-wave mixing and line narrowing by use of quantum coherence in an optically dense double-lambda solid. Opt. Lett. 24, 86–88 (1999).
Kohonen, T. Self-organization and associative memory, 3rd ed., Springer-Verlag (1987).
Sargent, M. III, Scully, M. O. & Lamb, W. E. Jr., Laser Physics, Addison-Wesley (1974).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the ICT R&D program of MSIT/IITP (1711073835: Reliable crypto-system standards and core technology development for secure quantum key distribution network). The author thanks M.O. Scully (Texas A&M University, USA) for helpful discussions in QNO2018 conference held in Malaysia.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
B.S.H. solely wrote the manuscript text and prepared all figures.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The author declares no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Ham, B.S. A wavelength-convertible quantum memory: Controlled echo. Sci Rep 8, 10675 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28776-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28776-1
This article is cited by
-
Experimental demonstrations of unconditional security in a purely classical regime
Scientific Reports (2021)
-
Unconditionally secured classical cryptography using quantum superposition and unitary transformation
Scientific Reports (2020)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.