Table 2 MANCOVA results for switching trials.

From: Distinct online and offline effects of alpha and beta transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) on continuous bimanual performance and task-set switching

Multivariate Effects

Pillai’s trace

Approx F (df, Error df)

Pr(>F)

COORDINATION PATTERN

0.0289

17.53 (2, 1180)

0.00000003***

STIMULATION FREQUENCY

0.0096

5.72 (2, 1180)

0.003**

STIMULATION CONDITION

0.0049

2.92 (2, 1180)

0.05*

TIME centred

0.0045

2.65 (2, 1180)

0.07

TARGET FREQUENCY centred

0.0226

13.66 (2, 1180)

0.000001***

COORDINATION PATTERN*STIMULATION FREQUENCY

0.0004

0.21 (2, 1180)

0.8

COORDINATION PATTERN*STIMULATION CONDITION

0.0031

1.81 (2, 1180)

0.2

STIMULATION FREQUENCY*STIMULATION CONDITION

0.0009

0.55 (2, 1180)

0.6

COORDINATION PATTERN*TIME centred

0.0039

2.31 (2, 1180)

0.1

STIMULATION FREQUENCY*TIME centred

0.0024

1.46 (2, 1180)

0.2

STIMULATION CONDITION*TIME centred

0.0003

0.21 (2, 1180)

0.8

COORDINATION PATTERN*STIMULATION FREQUENCY*STIMULATION CONDITION

0.0003

0.16 (2, 1180)

0.9

COORDINATION PATTERN*STIMULATION FREQUENCY*TIME centred

0.0001

0.03 (2, 1180)

0.9

COORDINATION PATTERN* STIMULATION CONDITION*TIME centred

0.0001

0.07 (2, 1180)

0.9

STIMULATION FREQUENCY*STIMULATION CONDITION*TIME centred

0.0010

0.61 (2, 1180)

0.5

COORDINATION PATTERN*STIMULATION FREQUENCY*STIMULATION CONDITION*TIME centred

0.0046

2.73 (2, 1180)

0.07

Residuals

1181

 

Residual standard errors

128.209

4.33

Error: subject level

Pillai’s trace

approx F (df, Error df)

 

TARGET FREQUENCY centred

0.1447

1.35 (2, 16)

 

Residuals

17

 
  1. Type I sums of squares given. Asterisks indicate level of significance at ***p < 0.0001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05.