Molecular model of a sensor of two-component signaling system

Ryzhykau, Yury L.; Orekhov, Philipp S.; Rulev, Maksim I.; Vlasov, Alexey V.; Melnikov, Igor A.; Volkov, Dmytro A.; Nikolaev, Mikhail Yu.; Zabelskii, Dmitrii V.; Murugova, Tatiana N.; Chupin, Vladimir V.; Rogachev, Andrey V.; Gruzinov, Andrey Yu.; Svergun, Dmitri I.; Brennich, Martha E.; Gushchin, Ivan Yu.; Soler-Lopez, Montserrat; Bothe, Arne; Büldt, Georg; Leonard, Gordon; Engelhard, Martin; Kuklin, Alexander I.; Gordeliy, Valentin I.

doi:10.1038/s41598-021-89613-6

Download PDF

Article
Open access
Published: 24 May 2021

Molecular model of a sensor of two-component signaling system

Scientific Reports volume 11, Article number: 10774 (2021) Cite this article

3822 Accesses
14 Citations
1 Altmetric
Metrics details

Subjects

Abstract

Two-component systems (TCS) are widespread signaling systems present in all domains of life. TCS typically consist of a signal receptor/transducer and a response regulator. The receptors (histidine kinases, chemoreceptors and photoreceptors) are often embedded in the membrane and have a similar modular structure. Chemoreceptors were shown to function in highly ordered arrays, with trimers of dimers being the smallest functional unit. However, much less is known about photoreceptors. Here, we use small-angle scattering (SAS) to show that detergent-solubilized sensory rhodopsin II in complex with its cognate transducer forms dimers at low salt concentration, which associate into trimers of dimers at higher buffer molarities. We then fit an atomistic model of the whole complex into the SAS data. The obtained results suggest that the trimer of dimers is "tripod"-shaped and that the contacts between the dimers occur only through their cytoplasmic regions, whereas the transmembrane regions remain unconnected.

Mechanism of sensitivity modulation in the calcium-sensing receptor via electrostatic tuning

Article Open access 22 April 2022

The SensorOverlord predicts the accuracy of measurements with ratiometric biosensors

Article Open access 08 October 2020

Structure and dynamics of the E. coli chemotaxis core signaling complex by cryo-electron tomography and molecular simulations

Article Open access 10 January 2020

Introduction

Two-component systems (TCS) are present in all domains of Life. They are the most common signaling systems in prokaryotes but are absent in mammals, making them potential antimicrobial drug targets¹. A recent work indicated that TCS networks expressed in mammalian cells might pave the way for orthogonal signaling². However, this will require more atomic level detail concerning their structure/function relationships. In this regard, detailed information has been obtained for chemotaxis and photoreceptor TCS of motile enteric bacteria and archaea, respectively^3,4. This family of TCS consist of a transmembrane receptor, which interacts with a His-kinase (CheA) and adaptor proteins (CheW) attached at their cytoplasmic tips. The response regulators CheY and CheB are phosphorylated by CheA and function either as a switch factor for the flagellar motor (CheY) or as an adaptation component (CheB)⁵ (Fig. 1A). Chemotaxis receptors of motile bacteria form homodimers comprised of extracellular sensor domain and transmembrane regions, and a long rod-shaped cytoplasmic domain. For photoreceptors, the sensor domain constitutes a microbial rhodopsin which forms a 2:2 complex with its cognate transducer (Htr). Transducers have a long cytoplasmic domain, similarly to chemoreceptors, with which they share a high level of homology^4,6 (Fig. 1B). In literature, the term "sensor" usually means the first component of the two-component system. In the case of chemotaxis, it is a chemoreceptor, which has the so-called sensory domain. In the case of a photoreceptor, the sensory domain is represented by a sensory rhodopsin. Thus, the complex of a sensory rhodopsin with the transducer plays the role of a sensor of TCS. We use the term "sensor" in our work meaning that it is the first part of the phototaxis TCS.

The cytoplasmic domain of Htr has a modular design comprising a transmembrane region, two HAMP domains (connected by a helical inter-HAMP region⁷) and an extended adaptation module bearing reversible methylation sites and containing a Gly-hinge. The adjacent signaling region harbors the binding sites for the adaptor protein CheW and the histidine kinase CheA. Interestingly, chemoreceptors from enteric bacteria possess only one HAMP-domain⁸ in contrast to archaeal transducers⁹.

Despite a wealth of biochemical data, the molecular mechanism of the signal transduction by TCSs is still to be fully revealed. A common understanding concerns the alternating dynamics of the cytoplasmic domains. Both chemoreceptors and Htrs display different dynamics in adjoining modules, which has been correlated with the signal transfer along the cytoplasmic rod^5,10. A possible role of hinges between the modules could be the steric accommodation of the dimers into trimers of dimers and oligomers of higher order^11,12. These trimers of dimers constitute the functional unit capable of activating CheA¹³. Together with CheA and CheW, trimers form the core unit of the extended signaling arrays¹⁴, compact membrane-attached assemblages of signaling units responsible for amplification of the incoming stimulus^15,16,17.

An important sine qua non of a full understanding the mechanism of signal transfer along the trimers of dimers is a high-resolution structural information for a full-length TCS sensor. However, three-dimensional, near atomic-resolution X-ray structures have only been published for fragments of histidine kinases^9,18,19,20 and chemoreceptors^21,22,23, and for a truncated phototaxis-transducer complex from N. pharaonis²⁴. For this latter, NMR data are also available²⁵. Also, several atomistic models of E. coli chemoreceptors were built based on low-resolution EM data, particularly, the homodimer of the aspartate receptor Tar¹¹, the trimers-of-dimers of the cytoplasmic domains of serine chemoreceptors in different signaling states²⁶, and the chemosensory array core signaling unit formed by a mixture of receptors with different adaptational modifications²⁷. This insufficiency of high-resolution descriptions of the structures of full-length TCS sensors is probably due to the inherent flexibility of their cytoplasmic domains^5,10,11. However, small-angle scattering (SAS) is a low-resolution method, which can be highly efficient when combined with available high-resolution structures of protein fragments using computer modeling^28,29. An important advantage of SAS is that structural data can be collected for solubilized protein complexes in conditions close to their native environment.

NpSRII/NpHtrII mediates negative phototaxis in halobacterial N. pharaonis and represents a model TCS sensor and, similarly to chemoreceptors³⁰, the NpSRII/NpHtrII complex forms trimers of dimers in the N. pharaonis membrane³¹. N. pharaonis grows optimally at 3.5 M NaCl³². It has been shown that structure and oligomerization state of the NpSRII/NpHtrII strongly depend on salt concentration³³. Here, we describe the full-length structure of a sensory rhodopsin II/transducer complex (NpSRII/NpHtrII) by integrating published high-resolution structural data with SAS measurements. Structural information was gained for NpSRII in complex with the transmembrane domain of NpHtrII, which show a dimeric organization in different activated states^24,34,35. For the rest of the NpHtrII, homologues were chosen including the HAMP domains of Aer2 cytoplasmic sensor²³ and for the hypothetical transmembrane receptor AF1503³⁶, sensor histidine kinase NarQ^18,19,20,37, kinase control modules including the methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein I (Tsr) from E. coli²² and the chemotaxis protein from Thermatoga maritima^38,39. Our work both confirms the dependence of oligomeric state on ionic strength and provides molecular models of the dimeric and "trimer of dimers" forms of the full-length complex. In our manuscript, we used the term "molecular model" meaning a model, which is constructed by molecular modeling with the high-resolution structures of the fragments of full-length protein (transmembrane domain, HAMP1 and HAMP2 domains and Kinase control module) under low resolution SAS constraints and verified with available biochemical and biophysical literature data. The results obtained allow us to suggest a "tripod"-shaped model for the full-length NpSRII/NpHtrII trimer of dimers in which the dimers associate solely through contacts between their cytoplasmic domains.

Ionic strength dependence of the oligomerization state of the NpSRII/NpHtrII complex

In order to investigate conditions, under which trimers of dimers are formed, we performed SAXS (small angle X-ray scattering), SANS (small angle neutron scattering) and CD (circular dichroism) experiments (Fig. S1) at different salt concentrations on solutions of detergent solubilized [n-dodecyl-β-d-maltopyranoside (DDM)] full-length NpSRII/NpHtrII as well as with truncated NpSRII/NpHtrII₁₃₇. NpHtrII₁₃₇ comprises the transmembrane region (1–83 a. a.) and the HAMP1 domain (84–136 a. a.) of NpHtrII.

At low salt conditions SAXS scattering curves for the truncated complex were fitted well (χ² = 1.5) using a model of a dimer of NpSRII/NpHtrII₁₃₇ surrounded by a detergent belt (see “Methods” for the details) (Fig. 2A, middle, Table S1), strongly suggesting that, under the conditions employed, interactions between the membrane and/or HAMP1 domains of NpHtrII₁₃₇ are sufficient to induce dimerization.

A fit based on an optimized dimer model (see “Methods” for the modeling details) containing a "straight" adaptational domain (Fig. 2A, bottom) showed reasonable (χ² = 0.7) agreement with experimental low salt condition SANS data (this also applies to the matching of the distance distribution functions, see Fig. 2D). Hovewer, complementary SAXS experiments, performed as for NpSRII/NpHtrII₁₃₇ at a synchrotron source, suggested that the optimized model featuring the "straight" adaptation domain does not fully describe the overall structure of a full-length NpSRII/NpHtrII dimer. Here, a fit between the experimental scattering curve and that calculated from the "straight transducer" model yields χ² = 5.1. This can be improved (χ² = 3.4) using a calculated scattering curve obtained by combining a series of models in which bends of between − 90° and 90° (with the step of 30°) were induced in the HAMP1-, HAMP2- and Gly-regions (see “Methods”, Fig. 2, Fig. S2 and Supplementary Text document S1 for details). This procedure produced a noticeably improved fit of the distance distribution functions calculated from the experimental and theoretical scattering curves, particularly in the 160–370 Å region (Fig. 2C). This range of distances corresponds in reciprocal space to the range of q < 0.04 Å⁻¹, in which there is a significant improvement in agreement with experimental SAXS data when the flexible hinges model is used (see Fig. 2B). This observation suggests presence of multiple conformational states of full-length NpSRII/NpHtrII dimers that can be described as structural polydispersity of the model that is in line with EM studies¹¹ showing that bending of Tar chemoreceptor dimers occurs at flexible HAMP and/or Gly hinges. Moreover, it has also been suggested that this bending may play a crucial role in the formation of the hexagonal arrays of membrane receptors in complex with kinases CheA and CheW¹². Nevertheless, we cannot rule out that such conformational flexibility may be a result of low ionic strength in which the transducer domain is partially disordered. Indeed, in line with the results of other studies^33,40, CD-spectra of the full-length NpSRII/NpHtrII complex under different salt conditions (Fig. S1) suggest partial disordering of NpSRII/NpHtrII dimers.

While both SAXS and SANS experiments clearly suggest that NpSRII/NpHtrII mainly forms dimers at low ionic strength, this is not the case at increasing salt concentrations. Figure 3A shows the SANS scattering curve for the full-length NpSRII/NpHtrII measured in a buffer containing 4.0 M NaCl. This cannot be satisfactorily matched by a theoretical curve calculated from the polydisperse dimers described above and to obtain a reasonable fit it was necessary to calculate a theoretical scattering curve based upon a mixture NpSRII/NpHtrII dimers and trimers of dimers. Two different forms of trimers of dimers were constructed for use in our calculations. Firstly, similar to a previously proposed model of the trimer of dimers⁵, the direction of bending angles at the HAMP and Gly hinges was such that inter-dimer contacts are induced both between the transmembrane regions of dimers and their cytoplasmic tips (see Fig. 4A, Fig. S3). For the second model, the direction of bending angles at the HAMP and Gly hinges was introduced such that the transmembrane regions at the base of the trimer of dimers adopt a tripod-type disposition and inter-dimer contacts are formed only between the tips of the cytoplasmic domains of each dimer (Fig. 4B). In both cases, the detergent belt was applied as described for the SANS analysis at the low salt (see above, Fig. 2A, bottom). Fitting the experimental SANS curve obtained for NpSRII/NpHtrII at 4.0 M NaCl to a theoretical curve based on a mixture of NpSRII/NpHtrII dimers and trimers of dimers, inter-dimer contacts in which are induced both between the transmembrane regions of dimers and their cytoplasmic tips (Fig. 4A), resulted in χ² = 5.4 (Fig. 3A). In contrast, fitting the same SANS curve to a theoretical curve based on a mixture of NpSRII/NpHtrII dimers and "tripod"-shaped trimers of dimers (Fig. 4B) resulted in χ² = 1.3 (Fig. 3B). Pair distance distribution function calculated from experimental SANS data obtained at 4.0 M NaCl has two peaks (see Fig. 3C). The position of the first peak (r ~ 30 Å) allows one to interpret it as a peak from dimers, while the position of the second peak (r ~ 100 Å) is in a good agreement with the position of the peak corresponding to the "tripod"-shaped model of the trimer of dimers (see Fig. 3C). The conformation of trimer of dimers of the NpSRII/NpHtrII SANS experiments at NaCl concentrations 1.4 M and 2.8 M (Fig. S4) produced similar results but indicated an increasing fraction of tripod-style trimers of dimers with increasing salt concentration. Resulting weight fractions of "tripod"-shaped trimers of dimers are 18 ± 3%, 28 ± 2% and 36 ± 2% for 1.4 M, 2.8 M and 4.0 M, respectively (Fig. S5, Table S2). These results support that the formation of NpSRII/NpHtrII trimers of dimers at high salt concentration is likely to occur through the contacts of the cytoplasmic tips of dimers with their transmembrane parts remaining unconnected (Fig. 4B).

A molecular model of the full-length NpSRII/NpHtrII complex

The tripod-like model of the structure of the NpSRII/NpHtrII trimer of dimers (Fig. 4B) which provides the best fit to the experimental SANS scattering curve obtained at 4.0 M NaCl (Fig. 3B) was constructed based on the high-resolution structures of individual fragments of the TCSs sensors from E. coli, N. pharaonis, and T. maritima^{18,22,24,34,35,37,38,39}. The initial model obtained was further optimized using molecular dynamics simulations (see “Methods”). In the resulting model, the transmembrane domains of individual dimers are separated but their cytoplasmic tips form a tight interface. As expected, given that modelling of the cytoplasmic domain was based on the X-ray structure of the highly conserved interface of E.coli Tsr²², dimer-dimer interactions (Fig. 4D) are mediated by a number of inter-residue contacts involving amino acids conserved across homologs of NpHtrII (see logo plot in Fig. 4G). For example, E355 of one dimer forms a salt bridge with R358' of a neighboring dimer (Fig. 4E); a compact hydrophobic patch is formed by L348, I354' and L350', hydrogen bonds are formed between Q344 and K374' (Fig. 4F). In addition, stacking between the aromatic rings of F366-F366' stabilizes the intra-dimer interface similar to bacterial chemoreceptors⁴¹ (Fig. 4E).

Discussion

In present study, the combination of SAS and molecular modeling has allowed us to propose a molecular model of the full-length phototaxis complex from the halophilic archaeon N. pharaonis and to reveal the effect of salt concentration on its oligomeric state and dynamics.

We verified our molecular model with available biochemical and biophysical literature data. The monomer–monomer interactions between transducers are in accordance with the following high-resolution structural data. The dimer of the transmembrane domain is based on its available structure (PDB code 1h2s²⁴). Dimers of HAMP1 and HAMP2 domains are constructed according to homology with HAMP domain of NarQ from E.coli (PDB code 5jeq¹⁸). The cytoplasmic domain (kinase control module) is presented by the coiled-coil of two antiparallel helices connected by a "U-turn", as it was shown for cytoplasmic domains of TsrQ from E.coli (PDB code 1qu7²²), MCP from Termatoga maritima (PDB code 2ch7³⁸), etc. In these cases, coiled-coil structure stabilized by interactions between the extended interfaces consisting of hydrophobic amino acids, mainly leucines. Dimer–dimer interactions (Fig. 4D) are mediated by a number of inter-residue contacts involving amino acids conserved across homologs of NpHtrII (see logo plot, Fig. 4G).

Positions of highly conservative residues 345–355 in the cytoplasmic tip domain of NpHtrII in our molecular model of the NpSRII/NpHtrII trimer of dimers are in a good agreement with the EPR studies by Orban-Glaß et al.⁴³. In that work, the dynamic and structural properties of the cytoplasmic tip domain of NpHtrII were investigated using site-directed spin labeling electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy. Distance distributions obtained by double electron–electron resonance typically have three peaks, which can be interpreted as three characteristic inter-spin distances that correspond to three groups of inter-residue distances (see Fig. S6A,B). This finding supports the fact that archaeal photoreceptor/transducer complexes form trimers of dimers analogous to methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins at high salt concentrations. Comparison of the distance between the residues labeled with a spin label showed that the distance between the nearest isoleucines I347 decreases with an increase in the salt concentration from 500 mM to 2 M NaCl (Fig. S6C). This rearrangement indicates that a trimer of dimers is formed with I347 facing inside the resulting structure (see Fig. 4F, Fig. S6A), playing an important role in the formation of inter-dimer contact due to hydrophobic interaction.

At low ionic strength (150 mM NaCl), our SAS data are most compatible with a dimeric conformation for both the truncated NpSRII/NpHtrII₁₃₇ and for full-length NpSRII/NpHtrII. In the latter, the very long cytoplasmic domain of the dimeric NpHtrII transducer appear to be highly flexible, corroborating the intrinsically dynamic nature of chemo- and photoreceptors described in some recent publications (e.g.^10,40,44). Coupled with the conclusions of a previous study that the cytoplasmic domain of NpHtrII's (pHtrII-cyt) does not form dimers at low ionic strength³³, our results imply that only the transmembrane region is required for dimerization of NpSRII/NpHtrII. However, this observation is in contrast to that obtained for a similar construct (NpSRII/NpHtrII₁₅₇ containing HAMP1 and inter-HAMP (137–156 a. a.) domains). This might be due to a lower detergent concentration used in the current experiments.

While the minimum construct required for NpSRII/NpHtrII to form dimers may still be a matter for debate, our SAS data obtained at low ionic strength clearly suggest that full-length NpSRII/NpHtrII forms dimers under such conditions (see Fig. 2A). In order to improve the agreement between theoretical and experimental scattering curves data, we generated models of different possible conformations of the NpSRII/NpHtrII dimers which, while maintaining an elongated shape for the NpHtrII dimers, considered both bending at its flexible hinges¹¹ and partial unfolding^33,40 of this domain at low salt conditions. Our results confirm a highly dynamic nature of the transducer dimer at low salt: the root mean square deviations of bending angles from the zero value are in the range from 50° to 60° for all the three HAMP1-, HAMP2-, and Gly- hinges (see Fig. S2).

For the cytoplasmic domain of the NpHtrII (234–504 a. a.), Budyak et al.³³ also observed a partial random coil configuration at low salt concentrations. Due to the difficulty to unequivocally determine the amount of random coil structures, these authors argued in light of their SANS in favor a highly dynamic helical rod at low salt conditions. This finding has been confirmed by subsequent results published in the work⁴⁰, according to which pHtrII-cyt has a strong propensity for helix. Firstly, pHtrII-cyt has a high helix propensity inferred from the sequence; pHtrII-cyt is predicted to be a helical coiled-coil based on a homology to the Tst-cyt²². Secondly, despite that at low ionic strength deconvolution of CD-spectra the secondary structure values are 77% unstructured, 20% turns and β-sheets, and only 3% α-helices, it was also shown by control experiments with helix-inducing solvent 2,2,2-trifluoroethanol (TFE) that a gradual rise in negative ellipticity at 222 nm occurs with increasing amounts of TFE. Thus, despite "random-coil" spectroscopic features, pHtrII-cyt can exist as a highly flexible, loosely packed but folded helical coiled-coil. The results of the comparison of CD spectra from the work⁴⁰ with and without TFE suggest that, despite the presence of β-sheets in the deconvolution of CD spectra (see Fig. S1B), β-sheets do not necessarily have to be present in the final molecular model. Moreover, numerous algorithms for the estimation of the secondary structure composition from the CD spectra often fail to provide acceptable results on α/β-mixed or β-structure-rich proteins due to spectral variety and lower spectral amplitudes of the β-structures^45,46. For these reasons, the secondary structure of the molecular model proposed in our work is predominantly α-helical.

Despite the fact that isolated pHtrII-cyt is in monomeric form under conditions of low salt concentration³³, this domain forms dimers under these conditions when the NpSRII/NpHtrII complex is full length. The coiled-coil does not disappear, which is confirmed by the results of work⁴³, where the distances between residues for the cytoplasmic tip of the full-length NpSRII/NpHtrII studied by the EPR method at low salt concentration are the same as they should be in a dimer (see Fig. S6C). These are the reasons why we used the model where the protein fragments between the flexible hinges present elongated (not globular) structures. Additionally far-UV CD data (Fig. S1) obtained in our work under low salt conditions showed conformational disordering of NpSRII/NpHtrII. The Kratky plots (Fig. S7) also confirm this: the obtained curves have maximum values at q R_G ~ 4 to 7, which are higher than expected for globular particles and are typical for elongated and/or flexible proteins^47,48. After the maximum, the curves show a tendency to decrease to zero, which excludes complete unfolding of proteins⁴⁹.

It has been shown that the chimeric proteins NpSRII-NpHtrII-Tar and NpSRII-NpHtrII-Tsr, which contain the transmembrane region and a truncated HAMP1 domain (a. a. 1–125) of the NpSRII/NpHtrII complex and the cytoplasmic domain of either StTar or EcTsr, can mediate phototaxis in E. coli⁵⁰. This suggests that both chimeric complexes are able to transduce signal at low salt conditions. This, taken together with our results, implies that destabilization of the remaining fragments of the cytoplasmic domains of which are not included in these chimera is the main reason for blocking the formation of the trimers of dimers of native NpSRII/NpHtrII at low ionic strength. It also suggests that at high salt concentration corresponding to the physiological range of halophilic archaea, a reordering of the cytoplasmic domains takes place and this allows the dimers to assemble into trimers of dimers, implying that the transmembrane region of NpSRII/NpHtrII complex either is not sufficient to mediate formation of trimers-of-dimers or, consistent with our "tripod"-shaped model, is not involved into in the trimerization of dimers.

The observed salt concentration-induced structural changes of the NpSRII/NpHtrII system may have two possible biological 'roles'. As pointed above, haloarchaeon N. pharaonis lives in the highly saline environment and the complex must be optimized to these conditions. If the phototaxis system would remain functional under the low salt conditions, it could drive the microorganisms to regions with optimal insolation regardless of the salt concentration that would ultimately lead to their death. On the other hand, we cannot also completely exclude that disordering (i.e. decreasing of secondary structure elements and increasing of conformational flexibility) of the complex may generate signal allowing the archaea to move towards higher salt concentration and avoid environments with low salinity. The salt-driven equilibrium between dynamic and compact conformations, which was observed for the NpHtrII HAMP1 domain by EPR⁴⁴, supports this idea.

SANS scattering curves at higher salt concentrations (Fig. 3) clearly indicate the formation of a trimer of dimers, the fraction of which increases as does the ionic strength. Moreover, the best fit to the SANS data at higher ionic strength (Fig. 3B) is obtained by modelling a tripod-like shape, in which only the cytoplasmic tips of NpHtrII dimers are involved in inter-dimer contacts (Fig. 4B). This is in agreement with previous EPR studies suggesting that NpSRII/NpHtrII dimers may form oligomers of higher order (e.g., trimers of dimers) due to interactions between the transducer tips alone⁴³. In our model, inter-dimer separations in the regions containing putative sites (Fig. 4C) of methylation/demethylation (determined by homology with HsHtrII of Halobacterium salinarum⁷, see alignment in Text document S2) vary between 30 and 40 Å (Fig. S8). Thus, they are all potentially accessible to modifications by the chemotaxis methyltransferase CheR and methylesterase CheB (the radii of gyration calculated for CheR and CheB from Salmonella typhimurium (PDB IDs 1AF7 and 1A2O) being approximately 21 Å and 20 Å, respectively).

To the date, there is very little structural information available for full-length E. coli Tar/Tsr chemoreceptors or other chemoreceptors in either their demethylated (OFF) or methylated (ON) states. Our experiments provide a complete description of the demethylated complex (OFF) while a recent study by Burt et al.²⁷ describes a model based on a mixture of receptors with a wide range of adaptational modifications. In the later study, the authors were able to obtain the 3D cryo-ET map of the full-length E. coli chemoreceptor array together with the CheW/CheA baseplate in micelles with the local resolution varying between ~ 15 and 30 Å. They further constructed all-atom models of the E. coli CheA.P3.P4.P5 dimer, CheW monomer, and membrane-bound, full-length Tsr homodimer using coordinates from existing high-resolution crystallographic structures where available. The two models, share remarkable similarity in the tip region, where a number of key interactions appear concurrent despite the fact that they apparently correspond to different signaling states. This is very likely due to inherent bias of the both models towards the 1QU7 structure²², which was obtained for the QQQQ Tsr analogue (and thus it likely corresponds to the ON-state) which was used to model the trimeric contacts of the cytoplasmic tips of dimers in both studies. On the other hand, it stems from the high structural conservation of cytoplasmic receptor arrays between Bacteria and Archaea⁵¹. However, the lower local resolution of the periplasmic and transmembrane regions of the model report in²⁷ (apparently due to the large separation between the well-resolved cytoplasmic regions of the Tsr/Tar array and its periplasmic ligand-binding domains, combined with the relative flexibility of the cytoplasmic methylation helix bundle of the receptors) and the lack of homology between these fragments of bacterial chemoreceptors and the NpSRII/NpHtrII restrains further comparison of our results with the model of Burt et al.

Trimers of dimers are essential for the formation of large membrane signaling arrays of both photo- and chemoreceptors¹⁴. The absence of CheA/CheW in our experiments does not allow us to identify oligomers larger than trimers of dimers; however, our structure provides potential routes for the formation of the membrane arrays from the "tripod"-shaped trimers of dimers. One of the possibilities is that the transmembrane sensory domains of dimers within each trimer of dimers are able to form a trimeric contact in a native environment and are further packed with the neighboring trimers of dimers³¹. On the other hand, the "tripod"-shaped model for the trimer of dimers is also compatible with lattice models suggesting that trimeric contacts at the cytoplasmic part do not match trimeric contacts between the transmembrane domains (Fig. 5). Both scenarios seem feasible, taking into account the plasticity of dimers at the three flexible hinges discussed above, though the summae of evidences existing to the date supports the latter one. Further investigations should shed light on structural organization of photoreceptor arrays.

Here a combination of SAXS and SANS allowed us to study conditions of the trimer-of-dimers formation from the individual NpSRII/NpHtrII dimers. SANS experiments allowed us to propose a "tripod"-shaped structural model for trimers of dimers of full-length NpSRII/NpHtrII in which contacts between dimers occur only at the tips of the cytoplasmic regions, leaving the membrane domains unhinged. In the case of SAXS the change of the salt concentration corresponds to a wide range of the scattering length density (SLD) of the buffer, which would result in a contrast variation simultaneously with the changes of the oligomeric state. Such data would be difficult to treat, also because of a detergent belt for which the contrast variation is a big challenge itself. An electron density of a buffer varies in a range from 0.334 e/Å³ (pure H₂O or D₂O) to ~ 0.37 e/A³ (4 M NaCl in H₂O), that means the changes of about ~ 11%; electron densities in a protein/detergent system are ~ 0.42, 0.275 and 0.515 e/Å³ for a protein, hydrophobic and hydrophilic parts of a detergent belt, respectively. It means that ΔSLD values for different components of detergent/protein complexes have different sign and their ratio critically depends on SLD of the buffer, i.e. on salt concentration. This leads to changes in SAXS I(q) profiles caused by this salt concentration changes. In contrast to SAXS data, in the case of SANS the SLD of the solvent is slightly changed with the increase of the salt concentration [see Table S2a). SLD of a D₂O buffer changes from 6.404 × 10^–6 Å⁻² to 6.187 × 10^–6 Å⁻² at the increase of salinity from zero to 4 M (see the section (a) of the Table S2)], that means about 3%. The SLDs of a protein and the hydrophobic and hydrophilic parts of a detergent belt are about 2.1 × 10^–6 Å⁻², − 0.4 × 10^–6 Å⁻² and 3.9 × 10^–6 Å⁻², respectively, i.e. all ΔSLD < 0 and have the same sign. It allows treating SANS data with focusing on a detailed distribution of oligomeric state, which has a more significant influence on a SANS 1D scattering profile than the changes in SLD contrasts at different salt concentrations have.

Our small angle scattering experiments open up prospects for further successful use of this technique for studies of the TCS sensors. Some studies report huge conformational changes of the tertiary structure of the transducer after activation of the photosensor. They are manifested by a change of the diffusion coefficient (and, consequently, of the Stokes radius) of the protein complex and can be explained by unfolding of HAMP domains during signal transfer^52,53. The changes in the Stokes radius, as well as in the radius of gyration, could be easily detected and characterized using SAS (direct measurements by SAXS). Furthermore, small-angle scattering experiments could provide detailed information about the shape of the molecule, including those arising from changes in tertiary and quaternary structure and/or conformational rearrangements. These changes could, for example, be monitored/characterized via standard SAS experiments with a continuously light-irradiated sample⁵⁴, or using time-resolved SAXS technique^55,56 applied for the protein solution after the short flash of light. For the particular case studied here there are known mutations of the NpSRII (D75N) and in the NpHtrII (G83F), which can be used for this purpose⁵⁷ and such experiments may help to obtain detailed structural information concerning the mechanism of activation of NpSRII/NpHtrII trimer of dimers.

Methods

Cloning

NpSRII (UniProt ID P42196) and NpHtrII (UniProt ID P42259) genes were optimized for expression in Escherichia coli using GeneArt services⁵⁸. The Strep-tag II (WSHPQFEK with ENS-linker) and 6xHis-tag (with ENS-linker as well) were added to C-termini of the NpSRII and NpHtrII respectively. The modified NpSRII and NpHtrII genes were cloned into pSCodon1.2 vector using NheI-AccIII and NdeI-NheI restriction enzymes (FastDigest series, ThermoFisher, Massachusetts, USA), respectively. The gene of the truncated transducer NpHtrII₁₃₇ was obtained from NpHtrII by PCR. Positive clones were identified by restriction analysis and confirmed by sequencing. NpSRII and NpHtrII (or NpHtrII₁₃₇) genes were then cloned in tandem into the co-expression vector pET27bmod⁵⁹ via BglII-NotI and NotI-BlpI restriction sites. E. coli strain Top10 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) was used throughout.

Co-expression of NpSRII and NpHtrII₁₃₇

The non-fused protein complex was co-expressed in E. coli cells, strain BL21(DE3) (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA, USA). Briefly, the culture was grown at 37 ℃ in Terrific Broth (TB) media with 100 mM of Na/K-Pi (pH 6.7), 25 mM of ammonium sulfate and 100 mg/L of kanamycin. Expression was induced with 1 mM isopropyl-β-d-galactopyranoside (IPTG), at OD₆₀₀ = 1.6–2.0. Simultaneously, a concentrated solution of all-trans retinal in ethanol was added to a final concentration 10 µM retinal. Cells were further cultivated for 4 h at 37 °C.

Co-expression of NpSRII and full-length NpHtrII

For SAXS measurements, the non-fused protein complex was co-expressed in E. coli strain BL21-AI (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). The culture was grown at 37℃ in TB media with 70 mM of Na/K-Pi (pH 6.7) and 50 mg/L of kanamycin. Expression was induced with the mixture of 0.1% arabinose and 2 mM IPTG, at OD₆₀₀ = 1.6–2.0. Simultaneously, all-trans retinal solution in ethanol was added to a final concentration 10 µM, and cells were further cultivated 4 h at 37 °C. For SANS measurements, the non-fused protein complex was co-expressed in E. coli strain BL21(DE3). The culture was grown in TB-5052 media⁶⁰ with 100 mM of Na/K-Pi (pH 6.7), 25 mM of ammonium sulfate and 100 mg/L of kanamycin. The cells were incubated at 37 °C until OD₆₀₀ reached 1.0–1.2, when all-trans retinal solution in ethanol was added to final concentration 10 µM, and cells were further cultivated overnight at 20 °C as was described in⁶¹ for expression of the NpSRII.

Co-purification of NpSRII and full-length NpHtrII (or NpHtrII₁₃₇)

After expression, cells were pelleted in 25 mM Na/Na-Pi buffer (pH 8.0) containing 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM PMSF and cOmplete protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche, Switzerland) and lysed using Microfluidizer M-110P (Microfluidics, Massachusetts, USA). After centrifugation, the pellet was solubilized in 1% of n-dodecyl-β-d-maltopyranoside (DDM). The solubilized protein mixture was then purified via Ni-NTA (HisTrap HP 5 ml column, GE Healthcare, Illinois, USA) and size-exclusion chromatography (Superose 6 10/300 GL column 24 ml, GE Healthcare, USA). A typical gel-filtration profile is shown in Fig. S9A. Laemmli 12% SDS-PAGE of purified NpSRII/NpHtrII is shown in Fig. S10 (PageRuler Plus Prestained Protein Ladder (Thermo Scientific, Catalog #26619) was used as a molecular weight standard). The protocols for co-expression and co-purification were based on procedures used in^62,63. The procedure yielded about 5 mg and 1.5 mg per 1 L of cell culture for NpSRII/NpHtrII₁₃₇ and NpSRII/NpHtrII, respectively.

Small-angle X-ray scattering measurements

The majority of SAXS measurements were carried on BM29 beamline (ESRF, Grenoble, France)⁶⁴. All measurements were performed with 100% of beam intensity at a wavelength of 0.9918 Å (12.5 keV). Initial data processing was performed automatically using the EDNA pipeline^65,66. Additional SAXS experiments were done on the BioSAXS beamline P12 (PETRA III, DESY, Hamburg, Germany)⁶⁷.

For the full-length NpSRII/NpHtrII and for the truncated complex NpSRII/NpHtrII₁₃₇, SAXS profiles were obtained for the samples with protein concentrations of 0.57 and 0.78 mg/ml, correspondingly; exposure time was 7 and 10 s, respectively. For all SAXS measurements, peak fractions after gel-filtration were used⁶⁸. See Table S1 for other details of SAXS measurements.

Small-angle neutron scattering measurements

SANS measurements were performed on the YuMO spectrometer (IBR-2, Dubna, Russia) with two-detector system^69,70. Raw data were processed with program SAS⁷¹.

For SANS measurements, NpSRII/NpHtrII sample was divided after gel filtration into two parts (sample A and B). For each part, gel-filtration was used to replace H₂O with D₂O (Fig. S9A). The buffer for sample A contained 150 mM NaCl, 25 mM Na/Na-Pi (pD⁺ = 8.0)⁷², 1 mM EDTA, 0.05% DDM. Sample B was dissolved in 4.0 M NaCl, 100 mM Na/Na-Pi (pD⁺ = 8.0), 1 mM EDTA, 0.05% DDM.

67.5% (v/v) of the stock, containing protein in 150 mM NaCl and 32.5% (v/v) of the stock, containing protein in 4.0 M NaCl were taken to prepare the sample with the NpSRII/NpHtrII in 1400 mM NaCl; 31.2% (v/v) of the stock, containing protein in 150 mM NaCl and 68.8% (v/v) of the stock, containing protein in 4.0 M NaCl were taken to prepare the sample with the NpSRII/NpHtrII in 2800 mM NaCl.

The concentrations of the NpSRII/NpHtrII for the SANS measurements were 0.51, 0.33, 0.31, and 0.40 mg/ml in the buffers containing 150, 1400, 2800, and 4000 mM NaCl, correspondingly. Total exposure time was 2 h for heavy water solutions of the NpSRII/NpHtrII complex at 150 and 4000 mM NaCl and 3.5 h for solutions at 1400 and 2800 mM NaCl. See Table S2 for other details of SANS measurements.

Molecular modeling

Initial model of the full-length NpSRII/NpHtrII dimer was generated from the existing high resolution crystal structures of T. maritima MCP, PDB code 2ch7³⁸, E. coli NarQ receptor, PDB code 5jeq¹⁸ and truncated N. pharaonis NpSRII/NpHtrII complex, PDB code 1h2s²⁴ for the cytoplasmic domain, HAMP domains and transmembrane region, respectively, using template-based homology modeling in SWISS-MODEL⁷³. The missing fragments (primarily, the inter-HAMP region, which was predicted to be an α-helix⁷⁴) were modeled ab initio as ideal helices.

The obtained all-atom model of the full-length NpSRII/NpHtrII dimer was a subject for further optimization by MD simulation during 100 ns with a number of constraints applied. The regions homological to those resolved by X-ray crystallography were guided towards the initial coordinates by means of harmonic steering forces (k_constr = 150 kcal/mol/Å²). At each timestep, the RMS distance between the current coordinates and the target structure were computed after aligning the target structure to the current coordinates. The alignment and evaluation of the steering forces was independently done for the transmembrane region, HAMP domains and the cytoplasmic domain. In addition, the inter-HAMP region and the short fragments connecting the TM2 of NpHtrII and HAMP1 and AS2 of HAMP2 and the cytoplasmic domain were restrained in α-helical conformation by means of harmonic dihedral restraints.

The initial model for trimer-of-dimers was built by aligning the optimized dimer model to the model of trimeric oligomer of the transmembrane region of NpSRII/NpHtrII predicted by the SymDock protein–protein docking web-service with the C3 symmetry constraints⁷⁵. This model was further optimized using a 100 ns long MD simulation with the transmembrane region restrained at its initial coordinates and the cytoplasmic domain steered (k_steer = 200 kcal/mol/Å²) to the homology model of the highly conserved trimeric interface of E.coli Tsr receptor resolved by X-ray crystallography, PDB code 1qu7²².

Finally, in order to obtain the "tripod"-shaped conformation of the trimer-of-dimer we run another round of steered MD, in which the cytoplasmic tip of the complex was constrained to the crystallographic contacts similar to the previous simulation while the transmembrane regions of individual dimers were gradually repulsed from their joint center-of-masses using the colvar feature of NAMD (k_spring = 200 kcal/mol/Å²). The simulation time of this run was also 100 ns.

All all-atom MD simulations were carried out using NAMD 2.9⁷⁶ and CHARMM27 force field⁷⁷. The simulations were run in NVT ensemble (maintained by the Langevin thermostat, T = 303.15 K) using Generalized Born implicit solvent model (GBIS). The ionic strength in the simulations were set to 4.0 M. The timestep of 2 fs was used. The production simulations were prefaced by energy minimization using the steepest descent (5000 steps). In all simulations of the trimer-of-dimers, the three-fold symmetry was maintained by the symmetry constraint as realized in NAMD 2.9.

SAS data processing

SAXS and SANS profiles I(q) were processed using ATSAS⁷⁸ and BioXTAS RAW⁷⁹ software suites. The protein concentrations were small, consequently the structural factor influence to scattering curves was negligible^80,81. For calculation of values of ε, molecular mass, \(\overline{\nu }\) and SLD from sequence, programs ProtParam⁸², Peptide Property Calculator⁸³ and SLD calculator web (https://sld-calculator.appspot.com/) were used (see Tables S1, S2). Distance distribution functions P(r) and regularized I(q) were obtained using GNOM program, which realizes the method of Indirect-Fourier Transform (IFT)⁸⁴. Values of R_G and I(0) (Tables S1, S2) were calculated from P(r) and using Guinier approximations (see Fig. S11). CRYSOL and CRYSON programs were used for evaluating the solution scattering from macromolecules and fitting it to experimental small-angle scattering curves^85,86. OLIGOMER program⁸⁷ from ATSAS software suite was used for a set of curves calculated for dimers and trimers of dimers using CRYSON to fit an experimental scattering curve from a two-component mixture of dimers and trimers of dimers of the NpSRII/NpHtrII to validate different variants of their molecular models and to find the volume fractions of each component in the mixture. MEMPROT software⁸⁸ was used to generate pseudo-atomic model of the detergent belt of the transmembrane part of the protein and to fit experimental SAXS curves using a model combined from the detergent belt pseudo-atomic model and protein atomic model. Before MEMPROT running, the center of the transmembrane part of the protein was placed at the origin (zero) and direction of the normal vector to the membrane plane was set along the z-axis using PPM web server⁸⁹. The MEMPROT settings included CRYSOL3 option and protein surface algorithm 2. See Supplementary Information (Tables S1, S2) for other details of SAS data treatment⁹⁰.

Pseudo-atomic model of the detergent belt

Pseudo-atoms CH₃ и NH₃ generated by MEMPROT software simulate 9/97 of the X-ray scattering length of hydrophobic tail (C₁₂H₂₅) and 10/181 of the X-ray scattering length of hydrophilic head (C₁₂H₂₁O₁₁) of DDM molecule correspondingly, proportionally to their numbers of electrons. To calculate theoretical SANS curves of the protein with the DDM belt, pseudo-atoms NH₃ generated by MEMPROT were renamed to CH₃, and perdeuturation parameter in CRYSON settings were set to 0.1058 and 0.3903 for chains corresponding to hydrophobic and hydrophilic parts of the DDM belt respectively. Described procedure provides neutron scattering lengths − 1.27 fm (9/97 of C₁₂H₂₅) and 7.62 fm (10/181 of C₁₂H₁₄D₇O₁₁) for pseudo-atoms related to hydrophobic and hydrophilic parts of the detergent belt respectively, which corresponds to the same scattering length fractions as they are in case of X-ray scattering length. Here, it is taken into account that the DDM head has seven hydrogens exchanging to deuterium in D₂O. These procedure provides neutron SLD values of − 0.388 × 10^–6 Å⁻² and 3.92 × 10^–6 Å⁻² for the hydrophobic core and hydrophilic face of the detergent belt, respectively.

Fitting of the SAXS profile of the full-length complex using the model of the flexible hinges

Firstly, SAXS data for the full-length complex NpSRII/NpHtrII (Fig. 2A, top) were approximated with the solution scattering evaluated from the atomistic model of the "straight" NpSRII/NpHtrII dimer with pseudo-atomic model of the detergent belt generated by MEMPROT software⁸⁸, and χ² of the fit was 5.1. Secondly, we generated modified atomic models of the NpSRII/NpHtrII dimer with the bends at the HAMP1-, HAMP2- and Gly- hinges from − 90° to 90° each (with the step of 30°), and add pseudo-atoms imitating detergent belt obtained on previous step to them. Thirdly, we evaluated theoretical SAXS profiles from the modified NpSRII/NpHtrII dimer models with the detergent belt using CRYSOL3 software⁷⁸. Fourthly, we approximated experimental SAXS profile for the full-length NpSRII/NpHtrII as a combination of the scattering profiles from the modified NpSRII/NpHtrII dimer models with the detergent belt using Tikhonov regularization method (see Text document S1 for the details). For fitting of this data, Wolfram Mathematica software⁹¹ was used. Analogous analysis of the protein polydispersity based on SAS data was realized in works^92,93. SAXS could be used in studying of highly polydisperse macromolecules, making it possible to obtain data that are in good agreement with other structural methods such as electron microscopy⁹⁴.

UV–VIS spectroscopy

Absorption spectra for the protein solutions were acquired by using a UV-2450 UV–VIS Spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). Protein solutions were placed in a 1 mm quartz cell (Weiju, Lianyungang, China). To estimate concentration of the photoactive complex, the value ε^498nm = 45,500 M⁻¹ cm⁻¹ of the NpSRII extinction coefficient was used, and the sensory rhodopsin and its transducer were assumed to be equimolar. Absorption spectrum of the sample of the full-length NpSRII/NpHtrII complex in D₂O buffer with 150 mM NaCl is shown in Fig. S9B.

CD spectroscopy

CD spectra were acquired by using a J-1100 CD Spectrometer (Jasco, Easton, MD, USA). For CD measurements, the same samples were used as for SANS measurements. Protein solutions were placed in a 1 mm quartz cell (Weiju, Lianyungang, China). All spectra were recorded with a bandwidth of 1.0 nm, scan speed of 50 nm/min, and digital integration time of 1.0 s. For the protein at 150 and 4000 mM NaCl, five accumulations were averaged for each spectrum, for 1400 and 2800 mM of NaCl, averaging of eight accumulations was done. The quantification of secondary structures was analyzed by Dichroweb^95,96 using K2D program⁹⁷.

Data availability

The SAS data were deposited with SASBDB (http://sasbdb.org). SAXS data deposited with accession codes SASDKZ6 and SASDK27 for the NpSRII/NpHtrII₁₃₇ and the full-length NpSRII/NpHtrII at 150 mM NaCl, correspondingly. SANS data deposited with accession codes SASDK37, SASDK47, SASDK57, and SASDK67 for the full-length NpSRII/NpHtrII at 0.15 M, 1.4 M, 2.8 M and 4.0 M, respectively. Detailed data validation metrics related to SASBDB depositions are placed in the Table S3. PBD files for molecular models of NpSRII/NpHtrII₁₃₇ dimer and full-length NpSRII/NpHtrII dimer and trimer of dimers are available in the SASBDB depositions SASDKZ6, SASDK27, and SASDK67, respectively. Other data supporting the findings of this manuscript are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

Bem, A. E. et al. Bacterial histidine kinases as novel antibacterial drug targets. ACS Chem. Biol. 10, 213–224 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Mazé, A. & Benenson, Y. Artificial signaling in mammalian cells enabled by prokaryotic two-component system. Nat. Chem. Biol. 16, 179–187 (2020).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Hazelbauer, G. L., Falke, J. J. & Parkinson, J. S. Bacterial chemoreceptors: High-performance signaling in networked arrays. Trends Biochem. Sci. 33, 9–19 (2008).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Klare, J. P., Chizhov, I. & Engelhard, M. Microbial rhodopsins: Scaffolds for ion pumps, channels, and sensors. Results Probl. Cell Differ. 45, 73–122 (2008).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Orekhov, P. S. et al. Signaling and adaptation modulate the dynamics of the photosensoric complex of Natronomonas pharaonis. PLoS Comput. Biol. 11, e1004561 (2015).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Hoff, W. D., Jung, K. H. & Spudich, J. L. Molecular mechanism of photosignaling by archaeal sensory rhodopsins. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 26, 223–258 (1997).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Koch, M. K., Staudinger, W. F., Siedler, F. & Oesterhelt, D. Physiological sites of deamidation and methyl esterification in sensory transducers of Halobacterium salinarum. J. Mol. Biol 380, 285–302 (2008).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Aravind, L. & Ponting, C. P. The cytoplasmic helical linker domain of receptor histidine kinase and methyl-accepting proteins is common to many prokaryotic signalling proteins. FEMS Microbiol. Lett 176, 111–116 (1999).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Gushchin, I. & Gordeliy, V. Transmembrane signal transduction in two-component systems: Piston, scissoring, or helical rotation?. BioEssays 40, 1700197 (2018).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Bartelli, N. L. & Hazelbauer, G. L. Differential backbone dynamics of companion helices in the extended helical coiled-coil domain of a bacterial chemoreceptor. Protein Sci 24, 1764–1776 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Akkaladevi, N., Bunyak, F., Stalla, D., White, T. A. & Hazelbauer, G. L. Flexible hinges in bacterial chemoreceptors. J. Bacteriol. 200(200), e00593-e617 (2018).
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Stalla, D., Akkaladevi, N., White, T. A. & Hazelbauer, G. L. Spatial restrictions in chemotaxis signaling arrays: A role for chemoreceptor flexible hinges across bacterial diversity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20, 2989 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed Central Google Scholar
Li, M., Khursigara, C. M., Subramaniam, S. & Hazelbauer, G. L. Chemotaxis kinase CheA is activated by three neighbouring chemoreceptor dimers as effectively as by receptor clusters. Mol. Microbiol. 79, 677–685 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Li, M. & Hazelbauer, G. L. Core unit of chemotaxis signaling complexes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 9390–9395 (2011).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Parkinson, J. S., Hazelbauer, G. L. & Falke, J. J. Signaling and sensory adaptation in Escherichia coli chemoreceptors: 2015 update. Trends Microbiol. 23, 257–266 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sourjik, V. & Armitage, J. P. Spatial organization in bacterial chemotaxis. EMBO J. 29, 2724–2733 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Bray, D., Levin, M. D. & Morton-Firth, C. J. Receptor clustering as a cellular mechanism to control sensitivity. Nature 393, 85–88 (1998).
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Gushchin, I. et al. Mechanism of transmembrane signaling by sensor histidine kinases. Science (80–) 356, 20 (2017).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Gushchin, I., Melnikov, I., Polovinkin, V., Ishchenko, A. & Gordeliy, V. Crystal structure of a proteolytic fragment of the sensor histidine kinase NarQ. Curr. Comput. Aided Drug Des. 10, 149 (2020).
CAS Google Scholar
Gushchin, I. et al. Sensor histidine kinase NarQ activates via helical rotation, diagonal scissoring, and eventually piston-like shifts. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 3110 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed Central Google Scholar
Milburn, M. V. et al. Three-dimensional structures of the ligand-binding domain of the bacterial aspartate receptor with and without a ligand. Science (80–) 254, 1342–1347 (1991).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Kim, K. K., Yokota, H. & Kim, S. H. Four-helical-bundle structure of the cytoplasmic domain of a serine chemotaxis receptor. Nature 400, 787–792 (1999).
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Airola, M. V., Watts, K. J., Bilwes, A. M. & Crane, B. R. Structure of concatenated HAMP domains provides a mechanism for signal transduction. Structure 18, 436–448 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Gordeliy, V. I. et al. Molecular basis of transmembrane signalling by sensory rhodopsin II-transducer complex. Nature 419, 484–487 (2002).
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Etzkorn, M. et al. Complex formation and light activation in membrane-embedded sensory Rhodopsin II as seen by solid-state NMR spectroscopy. Structure 18, 293–300 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Yang, W. et al. In situ conformational changes of the Escherichia coli serine chemoreceptor in different signaling states. MBio 10, e00973-e1019 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Burt, A. et al. Complete structure of the chemosensory array core signalling unit in an E. coli minicell strain. Nat. Commun. 11, 1–9 (2020).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Putnam, C. D., Hammel, M., Hura, G. L. & Tainer, J. A. X-ray solution scattering (SAXS) combined with crystallography and computation: Defining accurate macromolecular structures, conformations and assemblies in solution. Q. Rev. Biophys. 40, 191–285 (2007).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Tria, G., Mertens, H. D. T., Kachala, M. & Svergun, D. I. Advanced ensemble modelling of flexible macromolecules using X-ray solution scattering. IUCrJ 2, 207–217 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhang, P., Khursigara, C. M., Hartnell, L. M. & Subramaniam, S. Direct visualization of Escherichia coli chemotaxis receptor arrays using cryo-electron microscopy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 3777–3781 (2007).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Orekhov, P. et al. Sensory Rhodopsin I and sensory Rhodopsin II form trimers of dimers in complex with their cognate transducers. Photochem. Photobiol. 93, 796–804 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Falb, M. et al. Living with two extremes: Conclusions from the genome sequence of Natronomonas pharaonis. Genome Res. 15, 1336–1343 (2005).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Budyak, I. L. et al. Shape and oligomerization state of the cytoplasmic domain of the phototaxis transducer II from Natronobacterium pharaonis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 15428–15433 (2006).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Moukhametzianov, R. et al. Development of the signal in sensory rhodopsin and its transfer to the cognate transducer. Nature 440, 115–119 (2006).
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ishchenko, A. et al. New insights on signal propagation by sensory Rhodopsin II/transducer complex. Sci. Rep. 7, 41811 (2017).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ferris, H. U. et al. The mechanisms of HAMP-mediated signaling in transmembrane receptors. Structure 19, 378–385 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Melnikov, I. et al. Fast iodide-SAD phasing for high-throughput membrane protein structure determination. Sci. Adv. 3, e1602952 (2017).
Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Li, X. et al. The 3.2 Å resolution structure of a receptor: CheA:CheW signaling complex defines overlapping binding sites and key residue interactions within bacterial chemosensory arrays. Biochemistry 52, 3852–3865 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Cassidy, C. K. et al. CryoEM and computer simulations reveal a novel kinase conformational switch in bacterial chemotaxis signaling. Elife 4, e08419 (2015).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Budyak, I. L. et al. Flexibility of the cytoplasmic domain of the phototaxis transducer II from Natronomonas pharaonis. J. Biophys. 2008, 1–11 (2008).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Ortega, D. R. et al. A phenylalanine rotameric switch for signal-state control in bacterial chemoreceptors. Nat. Commun. 4, 1–8 (2013).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Gao, Q., Cheng, A. & Parkinson, J. S. Conformational shifts in a chemoreceptor helical hairpin control kinase signaling in Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116, 15651–15660 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Orban-Glaß, I. et al. Clustering and dynamics of phototransducer signaling domains revealed by site-directed spin labeling electron paramagnetic resonance on SRII/HtrII in membranes and nanodiscs. Biochemistry 54, 349–362 (2015).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Doebber, M. et al. Salt-driven equilibrium between two conformations in the HAMP domain from Natronomonas pharaonis: The language of signal transfer?. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 28691–28701 (2008).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Greenfield, N. J. Using circular dichroism spectra to estimate protein secondary structure. Nat. Protoc. 1, 2876–2890 (2007).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Micsonai, A. et al. Accurate secondary structure prediction and fold recognition for circular dichroism spectroscopy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112, E3095–E3103 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Rambo, R. P. & Tainer, J. A. Characterizing flexible and intrinsically unstructured biological macromolecules by SAS using the Porod–Debye law. Biopolymers 95, 559–571 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Hammel, M. Validation of macromolecular flexibility in solution by small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS). Eur. Biophys. J. 41, 789–799 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Brennich, M., Pernot, P. & Round, A. How to analyze and present SAS data for publication. In Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, Vol 1009 47–64 (Springer, 2017).
Google Scholar
Jung, K. H., Spudich, E. N., Trivedi, V. D. & Spudich, J. L. An archaeal photosignal-transducing module mediates phototaxis in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 183, 6365–6371 (2001).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Briegel, A. et al. Structural conservation of chemotaxis machinery across Archaea and Bacteria. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 7, 414–419 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Inoue, K., Sasaki, J., Spudich, J. L. & Terazima, M. Laser-induced transient grating analysis of dynamics of interaction between sensory rhodopsin II D75N and the HtrII transducer. Biophys. J. 92, 2028–2040 (2007).
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Klose, D. et al. Light-induced switching of HAMP domain conformation and dynamics revealed by time-resolved EPR spectroscopy. FEBS Lett. 588, 3970–3976 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Gapchenko, A. A. et al. Light-induced structure changes in Bacteriorhodopsin D96N by SAXS. J. Bioenerg. Biomembr. 50, 540–540 (2018).
Google Scholar
Cammarata, M. et al. Tracking the structural dynamics of proteins in solution using time-resolved wide-angle X-ray scattering. Nat. Methods 5, 881–886 (2008).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Gustavsen, R. L. et al. Time resolved small angle X-ray scattering experiments performed on detonating explosives at the advanced photon source: Calculation of the time and distance between the detonation front and the X-ray beam. J. Appl. Phys. 121, 105902 (2017).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Yang, C. S. & Spudich, J. L. Light-induced structural changes occur in the transmembrane helices of the Natronobacterium pharaonis HtrII transducer. Biochemistry 40, 14207–14214 (2001).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Raab, D., Graf, M., Notka, F., Schödl, T. & Wagner, R. The GeneOptimizer algorithm: Using a sliding window approach to cope with the vast sequence space in multiparameter DNA sequence optimization. Syst. Synth. Biol. 4, 215–225 (2010).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Klostermeier, D., Seidel, R. & Reinstein, J. Functional properties of the molecular chaperone DnaK from Thermus thermophilus. J. Mol. Biol. 279, 841–853 (1998).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Studier, F. W. Protein production by auto-induction in high density shaking cultures. Protein Expr. Purif. 41, 207–234 (2005).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Bratanov, D. et al. An approach to heterologous expression of membrane proteins. The case of bacteriorhodopsin. PLoS One 10, e0128390 (2015).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Ryzhykau, Y. L. et al. Trimers of dimers of SRII/HtrII full complex. Small angle scattering structural investigation. FEBS J. 284, 154 (2017).
Google Scholar
Ryzhykau, Y. L. et al. Small angle scattering structural study of the NpSRII/HtrII complex. J. Bioenerg. Biomembr. 50, 577–578 (2018).
Google Scholar
Pernot, P. et al. Upgraded ESRF BM29 beamline for SAXS on macromolecules in solution. J. Synchrotron Rad. 20, 660–664 (2013).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Brennich, M. E. et al. Online data analysis at the ESRF bioSAXS beamline, BM29. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 49, 203–212 (2016).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Incardona, M. F. et al. EDNA: A framework for plugin-based applications applied to X-ray experiment online data analysis. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 16, 872–879 (2009).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Blanchet, C. E. et al. Versatile sample environments and automation for biological solution X-ray scattering experiments at the P12 beamline (PETRA III, DESY). J. Appl. Crystallogr. 48, 431–443 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zabelskii, D. V. et al. Ambiguities and completeness of SAS data analysis: Investigations of apoferritin by SAXS/SANS EID and SEC-SAXS methods. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 994, 20 (2018).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Kuklin, A. I., Islamov, A. K. & Gordeliy, V. I. Scientific reviews: Two-detector system for small-angle neutron scattering instrument. Neutron News 16, 16–18 (2005).
Article Google Scholar
Kuklin, A. I. et al. New opportunities provided by modernized small-angle neutron scattering two-detector system instrument (YuMO). J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 291, 012013 (2011).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Soloviev, A. G. et al. SAS program for two-detector system: Seamless curve from both detectors. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 848, 012020 (2017).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Covington, A. K., Paabo, M., Robinson, R. A. & Bates, R. G. Use of the glass electrode in deuterium oxide and the relation between the standardized pD (paD) scale and the operational pH in heavy water. Anal. Chem. 40, 700–706 (1968).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Waterhouse, A. et al. SWISS-MODEL: Homology modelling of protein structures and complexes. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, W296–W303 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Hayashi, K. et al. Structural analysis of the phototactic transducer protein HtrII linker region from Natronomonas pharaonis^†,‡. Biochemistry 46, 14380–14390 (2007).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Schneidman-Duhovny, D., Inbar, Y., Nussinov, R. & Wolfson, H. J. PatchDock and SymmDock: Servers for rigid and symmetric docking. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, W363–W367 (2005).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Phillips, J. C. et al. Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD. J. Comput. Chem. 26, 1781–1802 (2005).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
MacKerell, A. D. et al. All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. J. Phys. Chem. B 102, 3586–3616 (1998).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Franke, D. et al. ATSAS 2.8: A comprehensive data analysis suite for small-angle scattering from macromolecular solutions. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 50, 1212–1225 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Hopkins, J. B., Gillilan, R. E. & Skou, S. BioXTAS RAW: Improvements to a free open-source program for small-angle X-ray scattering data reduction and analysis. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 50, 1545–1553 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Murugova, T. N. et al. Low resolution structural studies of apoferritin via SANS and SAXS: The effect of concentration. J. Optoelectron. Adv. Mater. 17, 1397–1402 (2015).
CAS Google Scholar
Vlasov, A. et al. Protein structure and structural ordering versus concentration dependence. FEBS J. 281, 593–593 (2014).
CAS Google Scholar
Gasteiger, E. et al. Protein identification and analysis tools on the ExPASy server. In The Proteomics Protocols Handbook 571–607 (Humana Press, 2005).
Chapter Google Scholar
Kibbe, W. A. OligoCalc: An online oligonucleotide properties calculator. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, 20 (2007).
Article Google Scholar
Svergun, D. I. Mathematical methods in small-angle scattering data analysis. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 24, 485–492 (1991).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Svergun, D., Barberato, C. & Koch, M. H. CRYSOL—a program to evaluate X-ray solution scattering of biological macromolecules from atomic coordinates. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 28, 768–773 (1995).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Svergun, D. I. et al. Protein hydration in solution: Experimental observation by X-ray and neutron scattering. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 2267–2272 (1998).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Konarev, P. V., Volkov, V. V., Sokolova, A. V., Koch, M. H. J. & Svergun, D. I. PRIMUS: A windows PC-based system for small-angle scattering data analysis. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 36, 1277–1282 (2003).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Pérez, J. & Koutsioubas, A. Memprot: A program to model the detergent corona around a membrane protein based on SEC-SAXS data. Acta Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 71, 86–93 (2015).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Lomize, M. A., Pogozheva, I. D., Joo, H., Mosberg, H. I. & Lomize, A. L. OPM database and PPM web server: Resources for positioning of proteins in membranes. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, D370–D376 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Trewhella, J. et al. 2017 publication guidelines for structural modelling of small-angle scattering data from biomolecules in solution: An update. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Struct. Biol. 73, 710–728 (2017).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Wolfram Research, I. Mathematica, Version 12.0.
Mulato, M. & Chambouleyron, I. Small-angle X-ray and neutron scattering of polydisperse systems: Determination of the scattering-particle-size distribution. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 29, 29–36 (1996).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Antonov, L. D., Olsson, S., Boomsma, W. & Hamelryck, T. Bayesian inference of protein ensembles from SAXS data. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18, 5832–5838 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Selivanova, O. M. et al. To be fibrils or to be nanofilms? Oligomers are building blocks for fibril and nanofilm formation of fragments of Aβ peptide. Langmuir 34, 2332–2343 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Whitmore, L. & Wallace, B. A. DICHROWEB, an online server for protein secondary structure analyses from circular dichroism spectroscopic data. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, W668–W673 (2004).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Whitmore, L. & Wallace, B. A. Protein secondary structure analyses from circular dichroism spectroscopy: Methods and reference databases. Biopolymers 89, 392–400 (2008).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Andrade, M. A., Chacón, P., Merelo, J. J. & Morán, F. Evaluation of secondary structure of proteins from UV circular dichroism spectra using an unsupervised learning neural network. Protein Eng. Des. Sel. 6, 383–390 (1993).
Article CAS Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge European Synchrotron Radiation Facility at Grenoble (France) for granting access to the synchrotron BM29 Bio-SAXS beamline. We acknowledge Frank Laboratory of Neutron Physics (FLNP), JINR at Dubna (Russia) for granting access to the small-angle neutron scattering spectrometer YuMO (IBR-2). We acknowledge DESY (Hamburg, Germany), a member of the Helmholtz Association HGF, for the provision of experimental facilities. Parts of this research were carried out at the EMBL PETRA III P12 BioSAXS beamline. We thank Anatoly Mikhailov and Pavel Kuzmichev for their help in measuring CD spectroscopy. We acknowledge Ivan Okhrimenko, Vitaliy Shevchenko, Taras Balandin, Andrii Ishchenko and Dmitriy Bratanov for fruitful discussions. We thank Alexander Kazantsev for the help with fitting of the SAXS experimental data and Dmitry Verteletskiy for the help with preparing the figures.

Funding

The reported study was funded by Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project no. 20-54-12027) and Deutsche Forshungsgemeinschaft (project no. 430170559). A.V.R. acknowledges the support from the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (agreement # 075-00337-20-03, project FSMG-2020-0003). Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Author information

These authors contributed equally: Yury L. Ryzhykau, Philipp S. Orekhov and Maksim I. Rulev.

Authors and Affiliations

Research Center for Molecular Mechanisms of Aging and Age-Related Diseases, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, 141700, Dolgoprudny, Russia
Yury L. Ryzhykau, Philipp S. Orekhov, Alexey V. Vlasov, Mikhail Yu. Nikolaev, Dmitrii V. Zabelskii, Tatiana N. Murugova, Vladimir V. Chupin, Andrey V. Rogachev, Ivan Yu. Gushchin, Georg Büldt, Alexander I. Kuklin & Valentin I. Gordeliy
Structural Biology Group, European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, 71 Avenue des Martyrs, 38000, Grenoble, France
Maksim I. Rulev, Igor A. Melnikov, Montserrat Soler-Lopez & Gordon Leonard
Institute of Biological Information Processing (IBI-7: Structural Biochemistry), Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425, Jülich, Germany
Maksim I. Rulev, Dmytro A. Volkov, Mikhail Yu. Nikolaev, Dmitrii V. Zabelskii & Valentin I. Gordeliy
JuStruct: Jülich Center for Structural Biology, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52428, Jülich, Germany
Maksim I. Rulev, Dmytro A. Volkov, Dmitrii V. Zabelskii & Valentin I. Gordeliy
Institute of Crystallography, University of Aachen (RWTH), Jaegerstrasse 17-19, 52056, Aachen, Germany
Alexey V. Vlasov
Frank Laboratory of Neutron Physics, Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, 141980, Dubna, Russia
Tatiana N. Murugova, Andrey V. Rogachev & Alexander I. Kuklin
European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Hamburg Outstation, 22607, Hamburg, Germany
Andrey Yu. Gruzinov & Dmitri I. Svergun
Synchrotron Crystallography Team, EMBL Grenoble Outstation, 71 Avenue des Martyrs, 38042, Grenoble, France
Martha E. Brennich
Department Structural Biochemistry, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Physiology, 44227, Dortmund, Germany
Arne Bothe & Martin Engelhard
Institut de Biologie Structurale Jean-Pierre Ebel, Université Grenoble Alpes-Commissariat à l’Energie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives-CNRS, 38027, Grenoble, France
Valentin I. Gordeliy

Authors

Yury L. Ryzhykau
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Philipp S. Orekhov
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Maksim I. Rulev
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Alexey V. Vlasov
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Igor A. Melnikov
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Dmytro A. Volkov
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Mikhail Yu. Nikolaev
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Dmitrii V. Zabelskii
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Tatiana N. Murugova
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Vladimir V. Chupin
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Andrey V. Rogachev
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Andrey Yu. Gruzinov
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Dmitri I. Svergun
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Martha E. Brennich
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Ivan Yu. Gushchin
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Montserrat Soler-Lopez
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Arne Bothe
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Georg Büldt
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Gordon Leonard
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Martin Engelhard
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Alexander I. Kuklin
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Valentin I. Gordeliy
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

V.I.G. designed and supervised the project, wrote the manuscript with strong contribution of Y.L.R., P.S.O., M.E., A.I.K., G.L. and also with the help of the others, analyzed the results. A.I.K. designed and supervised the project, made a considerable contribution to the writing of the manuscript, supervised SAXS and SANS experiments, analyzed the results and proposed "tripod"-shaped model of the trimer of dimers of the NpSRII/NpHtrII. Y.L.R. made a significant contribution to the writing of the manuscript, prepared the samples and participated in SAXS and SANS experiments, treated and analyzed the data. P.S.O. made a considerable contribution to the writing of the manuscript, produced MD simulations and computed atomic models of the dimer and trimer of dimers of the NpSRII/NpHtrII complex. M.I.R. optimized the protocol of protein co-expression, participated in SAXS experiments, and performed negative stained EM experiments to check the quality of the samples. A.V.R. wrote proposals and participated in SAXS experiments. I.A.M. performed experiments of checking the quality of the protein with negative stained electron microscopy. D.A.V. cloned the genes of NpSRII and NpHtrII optimized for expression in E. coli to a co-expression plasmid. M.Y.N. contributed to providing purified protein, participated in SAXS experiments and data treatment. A.V.V. contributed to writing the manuscript and participated in SAXS experiments. D.V.Z. contributed to providing purified protein and revised the manuscript. T.N.M. participated in SANS experiments and data treatment. V.V.C. contributed to analysis of CD spectra. A.Y.G. performed SAXS experiments at the EMBL PETRA III P12 BioSAXS beamline. D.I.S. supervised SAXS experiments at the EMBL PETRA III P12 BioSAXS beamline. M.E.B. performed SAXS experiments at the ESRF BM29 Bio-SAXS beamline. I.Yu.G. contributed to writing the manuscript. M.S.-L. supervised experiments on protein expression and purification and revised the manuscript. A.B. developed a plasmid for co-expression of NpSRII and NpHtrII in E. coli. G.B. contributed to data analysis. G.L. made a considerable contribution to the writing of the manuscript. M.E. made a significant contribution to the writing of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Alexander I. Kuklin or Valentin I. Gordeliy.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information 1.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ryzhykau, Y.L., Orekhov, P.S., Rulev, M.I. et al. Molecular model of a sensor of two-component signaling system. Sci Rep 11, 10774 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89613-6

Download citation

Received: 12 September 2020
Accepted: 21 April 2021
Published: 24 May 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89613-6

This article is cited by

Mirror proteorhodopsins
- Ivan S. Okhrimenko
- Kirill Kovalev
- Valentin I. Gordeliy
Communications Chemistry (2023)
Mechanisms of membrane protein crystallization in ‘bicelles’
- Tatiana N. Murugova
- Oleksandr I. Ivankov
- Valentin I. Gordeliy
Scientific Reports (2022)
Integrated genomics and proteomics analysis of Paenibacillus peoriae IBSD35 and insights into its antimicrobial characteristics
- Ng Ngashangva
- Pulok K. Mukherjee
- Indira Sarangthem
Scientific Reports (2022)

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.