Correction to: Scientific Reports https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13266-2, published online 07 June 2022


The original version of this Article contained an error in Table 4, where the asterisks were omitted for ”Years of experience”. The correct and incorrect value appears below.


Incorrect:

Years of experience

− 0.111

p = 0.100

− 0.079

p = 0.241


Correct:

Years of experience****

− 0.111

p = 0.100

− 0.079

p = 0.241


The original Article has been corrected.