Abstract
This research analyzes the three-dimensional magneto hydrodynamic nanofluid flow through chemical reaction and thermal radiation above the dual stretching surface in the presence of an inclined magnetic field. Different rotational nanofluid and hybrid nanofluids with constant angular velocity \({\upomega }^{*}\) for this comparative study are considered. The constitutive relations are used to gain the equations of motion, energy, and concentration. This flow governing extremely non-linear equations cannot be handled by an analytical solution. So, these equations are transformed into ordinary differential equalities by using the similarity transformation and then handled in MATLAB by applying the boundary values problem practice. The outcomes for the considered problem are accessed through tables and graphs for different parameters. A maximum heat transfer amount is observed in the absence of thermal radiation and when the inclined magnetic field and axis of rotation are parallel.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Nanofluid was first devised by Choi and Eastman1 in the last decade of the 20th century. They revealed that when a nanoparticle having good thermal conductivity is dispersed into a base fluid, the thermal conductivity of the formed solution exceptionally increases. They remarked that pumping power for heat transport in a heat exchanger considerably declines when the nanofluid is utilized as an working fluid in a heat exchanger instead of conventional working fluids like water, oils, and ethylene glycol. Further, when two nanoparticles of nano-meter are distributed into a host fluid, the formed mixture is known as a hybrid nanofluid2. Hayat and Nadeem3 elaborated on the hybrid nanofluid for heat transfer improvement for rotating flow using silver and copper oxide nanoparticles. Shah and Ali4 provided a comprehensive review of hybrid nanofluids and their applications which involve industrial applications, like wire drawing, coolant in engines of automobiles, nuclear reactors, micro-chips in computers, hot rolling, cancer therapeutics, glass fiber production, as a detergent, etc. Yasmin et al.5 experimentally explored hybrid nanofluids for solar and thermal energy storage uses. Maddammasetty and Sireesha6 used thermal systems to elaborate the heat transport applications of hybrid nanofluids. Numerous researchers have investigated the application of nano and hybrid nanoliquids in recent years. Some of the recently studied nano and hybrid nanofluids are given for knowledge gains7,8,9,10,11,12. There is vast room for research in this regard.
Ghasemi et al.13 studied nanofluid flow over the stretched surface with radiation and magnetic field effect using a novel spectral relaxation method. They remarked that high levels of magnetic field dramatically affect temperature and concentration profile. Sharma et al.14 analyzed graphene Maxwell nanofluid past stretching surface. Viscous dissipation and unsteadiness reduce heat transfer rates. Hussain et al.15 studied three-dimensional nanofluid flow with a magneto effect. Zinc nano-particle embedded nanofluid displayed a higher rate of heat transmission with an increment in magnetization force. Arshad and Hassan16 explored hybrid nanofluids between rotating systems. They discovered that when two nanoparticles are present in a host fluid, the amount of heat transfer enhances. Hassan et al.17 explored hybrid nanofluid for prescribed wall temperature cases with thermal radiation. Reduced drag and lift coefficients are obtained when the silver nanoparticle is used with a single-wall carbon nanotube. Hady et al.18 elaborated on the radiation's influence on heat transfer in viscous movement across a stretching surface. TiO2-embedded nanofluids have higher cooling power as compared to other examined nanofluids. Ali et al.19 studied electro-magneto-hydrodynamic nanofluid flow with variable heat fluxes. They remarked that the electric field directly influences the temperature profile. In recent years, Hassan20, Hussain21, Sheikholeslami22, Masood and Farooq23 and Masood24 have explored hybrid nanofluid in the presence of different body forces.
There are two types of chemical reactions specifically, irreversible, and reversible chemical reactions. Irreversible chemical reactions are chemical reactions that can not return to their initial stage. Whereas the reversible chemical reaction can return to its initial stage in the presence of a catalyst25. Recently, different-order chemical reactions are explored by researchers to investigate their impact on flow regimes. Anjum et al.26 investigated binary chemical reaction effect fluid flow with double stratification impacts. They found out that skin friction enhanced with an augmentation in magnetizing force. Abbas et al.27 explained the influence of chemical reactions on heat transmission in third-grade fluid over an exponential stretching surface. Temperature enhances with a rise in the level of chemical response they remarked. Elattar et al.28 investigated the hybrid nanoliquid movement with hall current and chemical reaction effects. Species transportation enhanced with increment in chemical reaction they noted. Krisna et al.29 explained the chemical consequence and radiation effect on convective stream with sucking and heat-making effects. The amount of heat transfer is highly influenced by the chemical reaction and magnetic force. Recently, second-order and higher-order chemical reactions have been investigated by numerous researchers30,31,32.
In the 20th span, Prandtl33 pioneered the idea of boundary layer flow in fluid dynamics. The boundary layer is the layer of the fluid that forms in the surrounding area of the surface bounding the fluid. Most common examples of boundary layer flows include, near the earth's surface, the interior of water pipes, and inside the blood vessels34. Khan and Pop35 investigated the boundary layer flow past a stretching surface. They remarked that the Nusselt number is minimizing the phenomenon of thermophoresis, Brownian, Prandtl, and Lewis numbers. Crane et al.36 analyzed flow past the stretching surface, Bongar37 examined nanofluid flow past the stretching surface, Erickson38 explored heat and mass transmission with suction effect on a continuous level plate, and Sakiadis39 investigated axisymmetric flow in two-dimensional form for boundary layer flow behavior.
Chen and Stroble40 explored the Buoyancy force on the boundary layer flow on an continuously moving plate. Takhar and Nath41 discussed three-dimensional flow due to stretching surfaces. Wang et al.42 examined viscous flow above a stretchable surface together with slip and suction effects. They stated that the width of the boundary layer enhanced with minimal mass suction effect Mehmood and Ali43 explored analytical solutions of viscous flow with heat transfer. Shahzad et al.44 examined heat transfer due to stretching surfaces using nanoparticles with the MHD effect. They remarked that rotation enhances the skin friction of rotating nanofluids. Hassan et al.45 studied linear and nonlinear radiation effects on heat and mass transmission in a hybrid nanoliquid due to a stretchable surface. Hussain et al.46 discussed the magnetic and nonlinear thermal radiative effects on three-dimensional movement due to stretching surfaces. Arshad et al.47 examined magneto-hydrodynamic flow with chemical effect above the exponential stretching surface. Khan et al.48 studied heat and mass transmission in Burger's nanofluid with magnetization and chemical reaction over an exponential stretchable surface. Numerous researchers have explored stretching surfaces for heat transfer and analysis of fluid flow49,50,51,52,53.
The above-conducted literature review suggests that numerous researchers have investigated the flow past the stretching surface. Arshad53 explored the thermophoresis and Brownian motion with thermal radiative effect and uniform magnetic field. Arshad47 investigated the chemical reaction effect over an exponential stretching surface. The novelty of this paper is to investigate the comparative dynamics of rotating water-based nano and hybrid nanofluids over dual stretching surfaces implanted in a permeable medium with radiative heat and mass transfer. Arshad47,53 examined a uniform magnetic field, whereas in this study we have incorporated an inclined magnetic field with a chemical reaction. The prevailing equations are changed into the ordinary differential equation by employing a similarity transformation and attempted MATLAB by utilizing the boundary value problem method. The tolerance is set to be \({10}^{-6}\) for obtained solutions. The flow behavior and characteristics of magneto hydrodynamic nanofluid and hybrid nanofluid are comparatively presented through tables and graphs for different parameters. By increasing parameters, the skin friction, Nusselt number, and Sherwood number are evaluated. This relative study helps to answer the following main research questions.
-
1.
What is the influence of rotation parameters on velocity, temperature, and concentration profiles?
-
2.
How does the increasing behavior of the magnetic force and porous medium parameter affect the primary and secondary velocity profile?
-
3.
Do the increasing behavior of the radiation parameter and Prandtl number give the increased heat transmission rate and minimum skin friction?
-
4.
How does chemical reaction, Lewis number change the temperature and concentration profiles?
-
5.
What is the changing behavior on skin frictions along the \(x-axis\), \(y-axis,\) Nusselt number as well as the Sherwood number of different parameters?
Basic equations
The basic flow governing equations for viscid incompressible liquid over the permeable surface in the existence of Rosseland radiation, and chemical reaction.
Continuity equation:
Momentum equation:
Energy equation:
Concentration equation:
Mathematical formulation of problem
Consider an incompressible, steady, three-dimensional water-based nanofluid flowing above a porous stretchable sheet. A cartesian coordinate system \(\left(x,y,z\right)\) is considered to discuss the problem physically. The x-axis is taken in the horizontal direction, the z-axis is upward and the y-axis is perpendicular to both other axes. An inclined magnetic field \({B}_{0}\) in the z-axis direction with angle \(\alpha\) is acting. The nanofluid is rotating at a constant speed with \({\upomega }^{*}\) along the z-axis, chemical reaction and, thermal radiation are considered. The flow is induced by a stretching sheet with speeds \({U}_{w}=ax\) and \({V}_{w}=by\) in the x-direction and the y-direction (see Fig. 1). Nanofluid and hybrid nanofluid are considered for this comparative study. The governing equation along with these considerations takes the following form53:
Equation of continuity53:
Momentum equations along the \({\varvec{x}}\) and \({\varvec{y}}\) axis53:
Energy equation without \({{\varvec{q}}}_{{\varvec{r}}}\) relation53:
Concentration equation53:
Here \(u,v\), and \(w\) are velocity components in the \(x,y\), and \(z\) directions respectively. \(T\) and \(C\) are temperature and concentration.\({k}_{0}, {q}_{r},{g}^{*}, {B}_{0}, and {K}_{r}\) is the porosity, radiation, gravitational acceleration, magnetic field, and chemical reaction respectively.\({\rho }_{hnf},{\mu }_{hnf}, {\mathrm{\alpha }}_{1}\) is the density, viscosity, and thermal diffusivity of hybrid nanofluid. By applying the Rosseland approximation, the radiative heat flux \({q}_{r}\) is defined by53:
Here \({\sigma }^{*}\) is the Stefan-Boltzmann coefficient and \({k}_{1}\) is the mean absorption constant. Assuming that there is not much of a temperature differential within the flow, the expression of the term \({T}^{4}\) by using Taylor series expansion is expanded as follows:
Consequently, by ignoring higher order terms above the first order in \(\left(T-{T}_{\infty }\right)\), we get.
Therefore, the energy equation takes the form.
The corresponding boundary conditions are:
Similarity transformation
We define the following similarity transformation to transform the equation which are tackled numerically.
Here differential is w.r.t \(\eta\). By using this similarity transformation Eq. (16), the Eq. (5) is satisfied. Equations (6), (7), (9) and Eq. (14) takes the following transformed form for hybrid nanofluid.
The non-dimensional quantities \({B}_{1},{ B}_{2}, {B}_{3},{ B}_{4}\) and \({K}_{2},\) are double nanoparticle relations (defined in Table 1), and \(\lambda , \, \delta , \, Z, \, \epsilon , \, M, \, Pr, \, \pi , \, Le, \, {N}_{t}, \, \tau , \, {N}_{b},\) and \({K}_{c}\) are defined as
Here \({\mathrm{Gr}}_{x}=\frac{{g}^{*}{\left(\rho {B}_{t}\right)}_{hnf}}{{{v}_{f}}^{2}}\left(T-{T}_{\infty }\right) {x}^{3}, {Re}_{x}=\frac{{u}_{w}\left(x\right)}{{v}_{f}}\)and \({\mathrm{Gr}}_{y}=\frac{{g}^{*}{\left(\rho {B}_{t}\right)}_{hnf}}{{{v}_{f}}^{2}}\left(T-{T}_{\infty }\right) {y}^{3}, {Re}_{y}=\frac{{v}_{w}(y)}{{v}_{f}}\)
The modified boundary conditions are as follows:
Here \(\gamma =\frac{b}{a}\) is the dimensionless stretching ratio.
Physical quantities of interest
The most significant physical quantities of importance from an engineering perspective are the skin friction coefficients \({Cf}_{x}\), \({Cf}_{y}\), and Nusselt number \(Nu\), which are defined as follows:
Here \({\tau }_{zx}\) and \({\tau }_{zy}\) denote the shear stress along the stretched wall along the x-axis and y-axis and are defined as
The dimensionless form of Eq. (18) is:
By using the temperature field to define the thermal diffusion rate as a Nusselt number:
Or
By using the concentration field to define the mass transmission rate as Sherwood number:
By applying the resemblance transformation Eq. (16), the non-dimensional form of the Sherwood number takes the form:
The following Tables 1 and 2 show the thermophysical relations and values for the formulation of nanofluid and hybrid nanofluid.
Spherical-shaped nanoparticles are used having the shape effect \(3\). Additionally, the volumetric concentration of the nanoparticle used is about 0.005% for each nanoparticle.
Numerical scheme and validation
The boundary value problem technique is used. Highly accurate and effective numeric outcomes are obtained (Table 3) when we use this technique. Equations (17)–(20) which are highly non-linear are changed to first-order ODEs by using a new set of variables defined as follows.
The equation \({{y}_{3}}^{^{\prime}}, {{y}_{6}}^{^{\prime}},{{y}_{8}}^{^{\prime}}\) and \({{y}_{10}}^{^{\prime}}\) takes the following form:
The transformed boundary conditions changed into the subsequent form:
The skin friction, Nusselt, and Sherwood numbers changed into the following form:
Results and discussion
The interpretation of the problem introduced in the preceding section is hybrid nanofluid. The outputs of the present problem are obtained separately for each nanofluid i.e., copper–water nanofluid, copper/aluminum oxide–water based hybrid nanofluid. The obtained effects of different parameters by utilizing the boundary value problem technique at MATLAB are described in this segment.
Effect of rotation and stretching ratio parameter
The effect of rotation constraint on velocity constituents \({p}^{^{\prime}}\left(\eta \right),{q}^{^{\prime}}\left(\eta \right)\), temperature \(r \left(\eta \right)\), and concentration \(s\left(\eta \right)\) is presented in the following Fig. 2a–d respectively. The velocity profiles \({p}^{^{\prime}}\left(\eta \right)\) and \({q}^{^{\prime}}\left(\eta \right)\) are evident from the graph that it decays when rotation parameter \(\lambda\) increases for nanofluid and hybrid nanofluid. At the start when \(\lambda =0\) and \(\lambda =1\), there is a minimum change in velocity profiles. When rotation increases by \(\lambda =2\) and \(\lambda =3,\) these profiles decay rapidly. The specific reason for the occurrence of this event is that rotation is a direct function of the angular velocity. Additionally, the minimum resistive Lorentz force is present when the rotation is increased. This effect expands the momentum layer in the primary direction whereas it is reduced in the secondary direction. An opposite behavior is noted for the impact of rotation constraint on temperature profile \(r\left(\eta \right)\) and concentration profile \(s\left(\eta \right)\) respectively. Temperature and concentration profiles increase when the rotation parameter increases. Here least rise is noted for the concentration profile as compared to the temperature profile. It is worth mentioning here that when rotation is enhanced the associated thermal boundary layer contracts for both nanofluid and hybrid nanofluids. Additionally, the presence of thermal radiation has a direct impact on the temperature profile. Moreover, it declines when the rotation and magnetization force is high. It is noted that under the high influence of rotation, the concentration profile declines rapidly. Chemical reactions aid the smooth movement of the concentration of nano-particles when the rotational motion of the fluid is augmented.
Figure 2e–h show the effect of stretching ratio constraints on velocities, temperature, and concentration profiles, respectively. When the stretching is enhanced velocity in the x-direction decline. Additionally, when stretching is enhanced the momentum layer associated with secondary velocity expands. Stretching has the opposite effect on the primary and secondary velocity profile. A slight difference has been observed in the dynamics of nano and hybrid nanoparticles. The temperature and concentration of both profiles show decreasing behavior for rising the stretching ratio parameter. It is fascinating to note that a high-temperature profile can be observed for a hybrid nanofluid, and a high-concentration profile can be observed for a single nanoparticle nanofluid. Additionally, the temperature boundary layer has contracted under the high increment of stretching ratio. Concentration profile decline with increment in the stretching ratio and the associated concentration layer contract due to the influence of chemical reaction.
Effect of magnetic force and porosity
The following Figs. 3a–c present the effect of magnetic force \(M\) on velocity profile \({p}^{^{\prime}}\left(\eta \right), {q}^{^{\prime}}(\eta )\), and temperature profile \(r(\eta )\), respectively. In the non-existence of a magnetic force \((M=0),\) the fluid flow very smoothly, and when the magnetic field begins to work the fluid velocity profiles decays rapidly. This is owing to the Lorentz force acting on fluid which restricts the fluid to move and causes endurance and as a result, the velocity profiles decay under the rising behavior of the magnetic field constraint. Higher momentum border layer wideness is seen for hybrid nanoliquid in the non-existence of a magnetic force. An opposite behavior is presented for magnetic field constraint on temperature profile \(r\left(\eta \right).\) The temperature profile has a direct relation with magnetic field constraint. As the magnetic force parameter grows, the temperature profile increases in the same manner and higher thermal frontier layer wideness is detected for hybrid nanofluid. The reason is that the Lorentz force restricts the flow which allows the fluid to transfer a higher amount of heat transmission. The change of porous medium parameter \(Z\) on velocity profiles \({p}^{^{\prime}}(\eta )\), \({q}^{^{\prime}}(\eta )\), and temperature profile \(r(\eta )\) is represented in Figs. 3d–f. The momentum boundary layer thickness has an inverse relation with the porous medium parameter. Both the velocity profiles \({p}^{^{\prime}}(\eta )\) and \({q}^{^{\prime}}(\eta )\) decreases when the permeability of the medium increases because the velocity is dependent on the porosity of the surface. There is an inverse relation between the permeability parameter and temperature profile \(r(\eta )\). When the porosity of the surface increases the thermal boundary layer expands as an outcome the fluids conduct more heat. In both cases, greater momentum and thermal boundary layer are noted for the hybrid nanofluid as associated with the nanofluid. This shows the high performance of hybrid nanoparticles nanofluid.
Effect of mixed convection and inclined magnetic field
The following Figs. 4a–d shows the change of mixed convection constraint \(\epsilon\) on velocity, temperature, and concentration profiles \({p}^{^{\prime}}\left(\eta \right), {q}^{^{\prime}}\left(\eta \right), r(\eta )\) and \(s(\eta )\) respectively. Both velocities profiles \({p}^{^{\prime}}\left(\eta \right)\) and \({q}^{^{\prime}}\left(\eta \right)\) has a linear relationship with mixed convection constraint. In the non-existence of mixed convection, the nanofluid and hybrid nanofluid move very smoothly. When the mixed convection parameter upsurges to a non-zero value the velocities profiles increase in the same way. Since mixed convection magnifies the buoyancy force and as a result, the velocity profiles increase. The higher momentum boundary layer is noted for nanofluid due to the presence of only a single nanoparticle in a base fluid. Due to the lower density of single nanoparticle nanofluid, it can move easily as compared to hybrid nanoparticle nanofluid. While inverse conduct is noted for temperature profile \(r(\eta )\) and concentration profile \(s(\eta )\) for the increasing estimates of mixed convection constraint. The temperature and concentration of both profiles decay by strengthening the mixed convection constraint. The buoyancy forces dominate the inertial forces, as a result, the temperature and concentration profile reduce. Moreover, it is interesting to note down in the temperature profile, a wider thermal boundary layer is detected for hybrid nanoparticle nanofluid as associated to the single nanoparticle nanofluid. Figure 4e shows the influence of the angle of inclination of the magnetic field acting on the rotational nanofluid and hybrid nanofluid. This provides a magnificent consequence of velocity profile \({p}^{^{\prime}}(\eta )\). There is a trigonometric "sin" function that is involved in magnetic field strength. As the angle of the inclined magnetic field increases from \({0}^{0}\to {90}^{0},\) the inclined magnetic field strength terms get increasing values and as a result, it helps the nanofluid to reduce the speed because the magnitude of resistive force increases.
Effect of different constraints on temperature and concentration:
Figure 5a shows the impression of chemical reaction on the concentration profile. In the absence of chemical response, the highest concentration border layer is noted for hybrid nanofluid. When the chemical reaction constraint begins to rise, the concentration profiles start to decay because when the chemical reaction rate increases, a higher volume fraction of nanoparticles undergoes the chemical reaction. A maximum decay is observed for the single-particle nanofluid. So, a consistent mass transfer rate is examined for the hybrid nanoliquid. Figure 5b indicates the change in Prandtl number on the temperature profile. As the significance of the Prandtl number boosts the temperature boundary layer declines since the thermal diffusivity decreases with a rise in the Prandtl number. A higher temperature boundary layer is observed for hybrid nanofluid as associated with nanofluid. Figure 5c shows the influence of Lewis number on the concentration profile. It is defined as the proportion of thermal diffusivity to mass diffusivity. So, the concentration profile decreases once the Lewis number rises. The most important factor of this research is the thermal radiation constraint whose influence on the temperature profile is indicated in Fig. 5d. In the absence of thermal radiation, maximum thermal boundary layer wideness is notable for hybrid nanoliquids over the permeable stretchable surface. When the value of the thermal radiation parameter \(\pi\) increases, a sudden fall in the thermal boundary layer is seen for a single nanoparticle nanofluid as compared to the hybrid nanofluid. This shows the efficiency of the hybrid nanofluid for a higher heat transfer amount and reduced skin friction. Figure 5e describes the influence of the thermophoresis parameter \(Nt\) on the concentration profile. When the thermophoresis parameter \(Nt\) increases, the concentration profile decays due to the inverse relation of \(Nt\) with the concentration profile. Inconsistent behavior can be seen for nanofluid and consistency for hybrid nanofluid which shows the efficiency of hybrid nanofluid as associated with the single nanoparticle nanofluid.
Numerical outcomes for skin frictions, Nusselt, and Sherwood number
In this section, numerical outputs for skin frictions \({Cf}_{x}\), \({Cf}_{y}\), Nusselt, and Sherwood number \(s\) are presented. Tables 4 and 5 indicate the numerical outcomes of nanofluid and hybrid nanofluid for different values of parameters. Reduced skin friction and increasing behavior of Nusselt and Sherwood numbers are noted for escalating values of the stretching ratio parameter. Minimum skin friction and the highest Nusselt number are noted in the absence of rotation while it decreases when the rotation of fluid increases. Nusselt number increases when the porosity increases. The angle of the inclined magnetic field has a converse relation with the Nusselt number and the extreme value of the Nusselt number is detected when the axis of rotation and magnetic field are parallel. When the radiation constraint and Prandtl number increases, the Nusselt and Sherwood number both increase. Lewis number, thermophoresis, chemical reaction, and Brownian motion constraint have a negligible effect on skin frictions and Nusselt number but have increasing relation with Sherwood number. Higher Nusselt number and Sherwood number for hybrid nanofluid under the increasing values of thermal radiation.
Conclusions
The current research investigates three-dimensional, rotating, incompressible, nanofluid, and hybrid nanofluid flow above the permeable stretchable surface for the heat and mass transmission rate. The governing equations are tackled at MATLAB through the bvp-4c algorithm after employing the similarity transformation. The major outcomes of the present study are stated below:
-
1.
The velocity profiles decline with a rise in rotation, magnetic field, porosity, and increasing angle between the axis of rotation and the horizontal axis while increasing for mixed convection and stretching ratio parameter.
-
2.
Prandtl number and thermal radiation, thermal slip, and stretching ratio parameters have decreasing effects on the temperature profile.
-
3.
The concentration profile decreases under the increasing influence of thermophoresis and but has an increasing relation with the rotation parameter when it increases.
-
4.
A maximum Nusselt and Sherwood number is noted in the absence of rotation and porosity of the medium.
-
5.
The highest heat and mass transfer rate is noted when the inclined magnetic field and axis rotation are parallel to each other.
-
6.
Thermophoresis and chemical reaction parameters increase the mass transfer rate when it increases.
-
7.
Thermal radiation rapidly increases the heat and mass transmission when it increases.
-
8.
Higher heat transfer rates and reduced skin friction are noted for hybrid nanofluid.
Data availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
Abbreviations
- \({\omega }^{*}\) :
-
Angular velocity
- \({C}_{p}\) :
-
Specific heat
- \({\phi }_{1},{\phi }_{2}\) :
-
Volume fraction for nanoparticles
- \({A}_{1}, {A}_{2},{A}_{3}, {A}_{4}\) :
-
Constants for single nanoparticle nanofluid
- \(T,C\) :
-
Temperature and concentration
- \(Z\) :
-
Porosity parameter
- \(a,b\) :
-
Stretching rate along x and y axis
- \(Pr\) :
-
Prandtl number
- \(\pi\) :
-
Thermal radiation parameter
- \(\alpha\) :
-
Inclination angle
- \({B}_{0}\) :
-
Magnetic field
- \({N}_{t}, {N}_{b}\) :
-
Thermophoresis and Brownian motion parameter
- \({q}_{w}\) :
-
Heat flux
- R :
-
Reynolds number
- Kc :
-
Chemical reaction
- \({g}^{*}\) :
-
Gravitational acceleration
- \(\gamma\) :
-
Stretching ratio parameter
- \(k\) :
-
Thermal conductivity
- \({Nu}_{x}\) :
-
Nusselt number coefficient
- \(\eta\) :
-
Similarity variable
- \(u,v\) , w :
-
Velocity components in \(\mathrm{x},\mathrm{y},\mathrm{z}\) direction
- \({Cf}_{x}, {Cf}_{y}\) :
-
Skin frictions
- \({p}^{^{\prime}}, {q}^{^{\prime}}\) :
-
Dimensionless velocity
- \({B}_{1}, {B}_{2},{B}_{3}, {B}_{4}\) :
-
Constants for double nanoparticle nanofluid
- Le :
-
Lewis number
- \({D}_{B}\) :
-
Brownian motion
- V :
-
Velocity field
- \({\beta }_{t}\) :
-
Thermal volumetric coefficient
- \({v}_{f}\) :
-
Kinematic viscosity
- \({\mu }_{f}\) :
-
Dynamic viscosity
- \(r,s\) :
-
Temperature and concentration profile
- 3D :
-
Three dimensional
- \({\alpha }_{1}\) :
-
Temperature diffusivity
- \(\uplambda\) :
-
Rotational velocity
- \(\rho\) :
-
Density
- \(\sigma\) :
-
Electrical conductivity
- \({\tau }_{w}\) :
-
Shear stress
- \(\epsilon\) :
-
Mixed convection parameter
References:
Choi, S. U., & Eastman, J. A. (1995). Enhancing thermal conductivity of fluids with nanoparticles (No. ANL/MSD/CP-84938; CONF-951135-29). (Argonne National Lab, 1995).
Hayat, T. & Nadeem, S. Heat transfer enhancement with Ag–CuO/water hybrid nanofluid. Results Phys. 7, 2317–2324 (2017).
Hayat, T. & Nadeem, S. An improvement in heat transfer for rotating flow of hybrid nanofluid: A numerical study. Can. J. Phys. 96(12), 1420–1430 (2018).
Wong, K. V. & De Leon, O. Applications of nanofluids: Current and future. Adv. Mech. Eng. 2, 519659 (2010).
Shah, T. R. & Ali, H. M. Applications of hybrid nanofluids in solar energy, practical limitations and challenges: A critical review. Sol. Energy 183, 173–203 (2019).
Yasmin, H., Giwa, S. O., Noor, S. & Sharifpur, M. Experimental exploration of hybrid nanofluids as energy-efficient fluids in solar and thermal energy storage applications. Nanomaterials 13(2), 278 (2023).
Maddammasetty, A., & Sireesha, V. (2023). Heat transfer applications of hybrid nanofluids in machining and thermal systems. In Materials for Advanced Heat Transfer Systems (pp. 175–198). Woodhead Publishing.
Dubey, V., & Sharma, A. K. (2022). A short review on hybrid nanofluids in machining processes. Advances in Materials and Processing Technologies, 1: 1–14.
Masood, S., Farooq, M., Ahmad, S., Anjum, A. & Mir, N. A. Investigation of viscous dissipation in the nanofluid flow with a Forchheimer porous medium: Modern transportation of heat and mass. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 134(4), 178 (2019).
Farooq, M., Anjum, A. & Masood, S. Dissipative effects in hydromagnetic nanomaterial flow with variable fluid characteristics: modern diffusion analysis. Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transfer 127, 105503 (2021).
Mehmood, R., Nadeem, S. & Masood, S. Effects of transverse magnetic field on a rotating micropolar fluid between parallel plates with heat transfer. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 401, 1006–1014 (2016).
Nadeem, S., Masood, S., Mehmood, R. & Sadiq, M. A. Optimal and numerical solutions for an MHD micropolar nanofluid between rotating horizontal parallel plates. PLoS ONE 10(6), e0124016 (2015).
Ghasemi, S. E., Mohsenian, S., Gouran, S. & Zolfagharian, A. A novel spectral relaxation approach for nanofluid flow past a stretching surface in presence of magnetic field and nonlinear radiation. Results Phys. 32, 105141 (2022).
Sharma, R., Hussain, S. M., Raju, C. S. K., Seth, G. S. & Chamkha, A. J. Study of graphene Maxwell nanofluid flow past a linearly stretched sheet: A numerical and statistical approach. Chin. J. Phys. 68, 671–683 (2020).
Hussain, A. et al. Three-dimensional water-based magneto-hydrodynamic rotating nanofluid flow over a linear extending sheet and heat transport analysis: A numerical approach. Energies 14(16), 5133 (2021).
Arshad, M. & Hassan, A. A numerical study on the hybrid nanofluid flow between a permeable rotating system. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 137(10), 1126 (2022).
Hassan, A., Hussain, A., Arshad, M., Alanazi, M. M. & Zahran, H. Y. Numerical and thermal investigation of magneto-hydrodynamic hybrid nanoparticles (SWCNT-Ag) under Rosseland radiation: A prescribed wall temperature case. Nanomaterials 12(6), 891 (2022).
Hady, F. M., Ibrahim, F. S., Abdel-Gaied, S. M. & Eid, M. R. Radiation effect on viscous flow of a nanofluid and heat transfer over a nonlinearly stretching sheet. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 7, 1–13 (2012).
Ali, A., Khan, H. S., Saleem, S. & Hussan, M. EMHD nanofluid flow with radiation and variable heat flux effects along a slandering stretching sheet. Nanomaterials 12(21), 3872 (2022).
Hassan, A. et al. Heat transport investigation of hybrid nanofluid (Ag-CuO) porous medium flow: under magnetic field and Rosseland radiation. Ain Shams Eng. J. 13(5), 101667 (2022).
Hussain, A. et al. Heat transport investigation of magneto-hydrodynamics (SWCNT-MWCNT) hybrid nanofluid under the thermal radiation regime. Case Stud. Therm. Eng. 27, 101244 (2021).
Sheikholeslami, M. Numerical investigation of solar system equipped with innovative turbulator and hybrid nanofluid. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 243, 111786 (2022).
Masood, S. & Farooq, M. Influence of thermal stratification and thermal radiation on graphene oxide-Ag/H2O hybrid nanofluid. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 143, 1361–1370 (2021).
Masood, S., Farooq, M. & Anjum, A. Influence of heat generation/absorption and stagnation point on polystyrene–TiO2/H2O hybrid nanofluid flow. Sci. Rep. 11(1), 22381 (2021).
Hassan, A., Hussain, A., Arshad, M., Gouadria, S., Awrejcewicz, J., Galal, A. M., & Eswaramoorthi, S. (2022). Insight into the significance of viscous dissipation and heat generation/absorption in magneto-hydrodynamic radiative casson fluid flow with first-order chemical reaction. Frontiers in Physics, 605: 90375.
Anjum, A., Masood, S., Farooq, M., Rafiq, N. & Malik, M. Y. Investigation of binary chemical reaction in magnetohydrodynamic nanofluid flow with double stratification. Adv. Mech. Eng. 13(5), 16878140211016264 (2021).
Abbas, A., Shafqat, R., Jeelani, M. B. & Alharthi, N. H. Significance of chemical reaction and Lorentz force on third-grade fluid flow and heat transfer with Darcy–Forchheimer law over an inclined exponentially stretching sheet embedded in a porous medium. Symmetry 14(4), 779 (2022).
Elattar, S. et al. Computational assessment of hybrid nanofluid flow with the influence of hall current and chemical reaction over a slender stretching surface. Alex. Eng. J. 61(12), 10319–10331 (2022).
Krisna, P. M., Sandeep, N. & Sugunamma, V. Effects of radiation and chemical reaction on MHD convective flow over a permeable stretching surface with suction and heat generation. Walailak J. Sci. Technol. (WJST) 12(9), 831–847 (2015).
Joshi, N., Pandey, A. K., Upreti, H. & Kumar, M. Mixed convection flow of magnetic hybrid nanofluid over a bidirectional porous surface with internal heat generation and a higher-order chemical reaction. Heat Transf. 50(4), 3661–3682 (2021).
Rahman, M. M. & Al-Lawatia, M. Effects of higher order chemical reaction on micropolar fluid flow on a power law permeable stretched sheet with variable concentration in a porous medium. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 88(1), 23–32 (2010).
Acharya, N., Bag, R. & Kundu, P. K. Unsteady bioconvective squeezing flow with higher-order chemical reaction and second-order slip effects. Heat Transf. 50(6), 5538–5562 (2021).
Prandtl, L. (1905). Uber Flussigkeitsbewegung bei sehr kleiner Reibung. Verhandl. 3rd Int. Math. Kongr. Heidelberg (1904), Leipzig.
Pantokratoras, A. A common error made in investigation of boundary layer flows. Appl. Math. Model. 33(1), 413–422 (2009).
Khan, W. A. & Pop, I. Boundary-layer flow of a nanofluid past a stretching sheet. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 53(11–12), 2477–2483 (2010).
Crane, L. J. Flow past a stretching plate. Z. Angew. Math. Phys. ZAMP 21, 645–647 (1970).
Bognár, G., Klazly, M. & Hriczó, K. Nanofluid flow past a stretching plate. Processes 8(7), 827 (2020).
Erickson, L. E., Fan, L. T. & Fox, V. G. Heat and mass transfer on moving continuous flat plate with suction or injection. Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam. 5(1), 19–25 (1966).
Sakiadis, B. C. (1961). Boundary‐layer behavior on continuous solid surfaces: I. Boundary‐layer equations for two‐dimensional and axisymmetric flow. AIChE Journal, 7(1), 26–28.
Chen, T. S. & Strobel, F. A. Buoyancy effects in boundary layer adjacent to a continuous, moving horizontal flat plate. ASME J. Heat Transf. 102, 170–172 (1980).
Takhar, H. S. & Nath, G. Unsteady three-dimensional flow due to a stretching flat surface. Mech. Res. Commun. 23(3), 325–333 (1996).
Wang, C. Y. Analysis of viscous flow due to a stretching sheet with surface slip and suction. Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl. 10(1), 375–380 (2009).
Mehmood, A., & Ali, A. (2008). Analytic solution of three-dimensional viscous flow and heat transfer over a stretching flat surface by homotopy analysis method. Journal of Heat Transfer, 130(12): 753.
Shahzad, F., Jamshed, W., Sajid, T., Nisar, K. S. & Eid, M. R. Heat transfer analysis of MHD rotating flow of Fe3O4 nanoparticles through a stretchable surface. Commun. Theor. Phys. 73(7), 075004 (2021).
Hassan, A. et al. Heat and mass transport analysis of MHD rotating hybrid nanofluids conveying silver and molybdenum di-sulfide nano-particles under effect of linear and non-linear radiation. Energies 15(17), 6269 (2022).
Hussain, A. et al. Computational investigation of the combined impact of nonlinear radiation and magnetic field on three-dimensional rotational nanofluid flow across a stretchy surface. Processes 9(8), 1453 (2021).
Arshad, M., Hussain, A., Elfasakhany, A., Gouadria, S., Awrejcewicz, J., Pawłowski, W., & M. Alharbi, F. (2022). Magneto-hydrodynamic flow above exponentially stretchable surface with chemical reaction. Symmetry, 14(8), 1688.
Khan, M. N., Nadeem, S., Abbas, N. & Zidan, A. M. Heat and mass transfer investigation of a chemically reactive Burgers nanofluid with an induced magnetic field over an exponentially stretching surface. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. E 235(6), 2189–2200 (2021).
Dadheech, P. K., Agrawal, P., Sharma, A., Nisar, K. S., & Purohit, S. D. (2021). Transportation of Al2O3-SiO2-TiO2 modified nanofluid over an exponentially stretching surface with inclined magnetohydrodynamic. Therm. Sci., 25(2), 279–285.
Kumar, N. et al. Radiation and slip effects on MHD point flow of nanofluid towards a stretching sheet with melting heat transfer. Heat Transf. 51(4), 3018–3034 (2022).
Dadheech, P. K., Agrawal, P., Purohit, S. D. & Kumar, D. Study of flow and heat transfer of CuO−Ag/C2H6O2 hybrid nanofluid over a stretching surface with porous media and MHD effect. Sci. Technol. Asia 1, 174–181 (2021).
Gupta, R., Gaur, M., Dadheech, P. K. & Agrawal, P. Numerical study of marangoni convection flow of GO-nanofluid with H2O–EG hybrid base fluid with non-linear thermal radiation. J. Nanofluids 11(2), 245–250 (2022).
Arshad, M. et al. Rotating hybrid nanofluid flow with chemical reaction and thermal radiation between parallel plates. Nanomaterials 12(23), 4177 (2022).
Wang, C. Y. Stretching a surface in a rotating fluid. Z. Angew. Math. Phys. ZAMP 39(2), 177–185 (1988).
Nazar, R., Amin, N. & Pop, I. Unsteady boundary layer flow due to a stretching surface in a rotating fluid. Mech. Res. Commun. 31(1), 121–128 (2004).
Acknowledgements
Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University Researchers Supporting Project number (PNURSP2023R443), Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The authors express their gratitude to the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Khalid University for funding this work through the Large Research Group Project under grant number RGP.2-122-43.The authors would like to thank the Deanship of Scientific Research at Umm Al-Qura University for supporting this work by Grant Code: (23UQU4419009DSR001). This study is supported via funding from Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University project number (PSAU/2023/R/1444).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
M.A. devised the project, the main conceptual ideas and proof outline. A.H and Q.H. worked out almost all of the technical details and performed the numerical calculations for the suggested experiment. F.M.A. and A.A. worked out the bound for quantum mechanics, with help from S.M.E. and A.M.G. verified the numerical results by an independent implementation. F.M.A., Q.H. and Z.A. proposed the model experiment in discussions with all authors and M.A. and A.H. wrote the manuscript. Additionally, M.A., A.H. and L.A.A. validated the numerical results and revised the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Arshad, M., Alharbi, F.M., Hassan, A. et al. Effect of inclined magnetic field on radiative heat and mass transfer in chemically reactive hybrid nanofluid flow due to dual stretching. Sci Rep 13, 7828 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-34871-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-34871-9
This article is cited by
-
Numerical investigation of heat and mass transfer in three-dimensional MHD nanoliquid flow with inclined magnetization
Scientific Reports (2024)
-
Statistical computation for heat and mass transfers of water-based nanofluids containing Cu, Al2O3, and TiO2 nanoparticles over a curved surface
Scientific Reports (2024)
-
Comparative dynamics of mixed convection heat transfer under thermal radiation effect with porous medium flow over dual stretched surface
Scientific Reports (2023)
-
Numerical simulations of heat generation, thermal radiation and thermal transport in water-based nanoparticles: OHAM study
Scientific Reports (2023)
-
Significance of Interfacial Nanolayer and Mixed Convection in Radiative Casson Hybrid Nanofluid Flow by Permeable Rotating Cone
BioNanoScience (2023)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.