Table 3 Number of apps with positive claims, supporting statements, and disclaimers in their app store descriptions

From: Using science to sell apps: Evaluation of mental health app store quality claims

Coding element

n (%) of apps

§3. Positive claims

59 (81)

§3.a. Claims of effectiveness

47 (64)

§3.a.i. Detection or diagnosis

7 (10)

§3.a.ii. Improvement in symptoms or mood

22 (30)

§3.a.iii. Improvement in self-management

26 (36)

§3.b. Claims of acceptability

33 (45)

§4. Supporting statements

47 (64)

§4.a. Scientific language

32 (44)

§4.a.i. Specific technique described

24 (33)

§4.a.ii. Evidence from study using app

2 (2.7)

§4.a.iii. Citation to scientific literature

1 (1.4)

§4.b. Technical expertise

23 (32)

§4.b.i. Certification or accreditation

0

§4.b.ii. Prizes or awards

2 (2.7)

§4.b.iii. Credible developers

18 (25)

§4.b.iv. Credible endorsements

3 (4.1)

§4.c. Lived experience design

10 (14)

§4.c.i. Lived experience involvement

6 (8.2)

§4.c.ii. Lived experience developer

5 (6.8)

§4.d. “Wisdom of the crowd”

14 (19)

§4.d.i. Download, usage or popularity statistics

11 (15)

§4.d.ii. User testimonials

8 (11)

§4.d.iii. Press endorsements

6 (8.2)

§5. Negative claims

22 (30)

§5.a. Medical disclaimer

20 (27)

§5.b. Legal disclaimer

8 (11)

  1. All percentages are reported based on n = 73