Genomic evolution towards azole resistance in Candida glabrata clinical isolates unveils the importance of CgHxt4/6/7 in azole accumulation

Galocha, Mónica; Viana, Romeu; Pais, Pedro; Silva-Dias, Ana; Cavalheiro, Mafalda; Miranda, Isabel M.; Van Ende, Mieke; Souza, Caio S.; Costa, Catarina; Branco, Joana; Soares, Cláudio M.; Van Dijck, Patrick; Rodrigues, Acácio G.; Teixeira, Miguel C.

doi:10.1038/s42003-022-04087-0

Download PDF

Article
Open access
Published: 21 October 2022

Genomic evolution towards azole resistance in Candida glabrata clinical isolates unveils the importance of CgHxt4/6/7 in azole accumulation

Communications Biology volume 5, Article number: 1118 (2022) Cite this article

1981 Accesses
2 Citations
11 Altmetric
Metrics details

Subjects

Abstract

The increasing prevalence of candidosis caused by Candida glabrata is related to its ability to acquire azole resistance. Although azole resistance mechanisms are well known, the mechanisms for azole import into fungal cells have remained obscure. In this work, we have characterized two hexose transporters in C. glabrata and further investigate their role as potential azole importers. Three azole susceptible C. glabrata clinical isolates were evolved towards azole resistance and the acquired resistance phenotype was found to be independent of CgPDR1 or CgERG11 mutations. Through whole-genome sequencing, CgHXT4/6/7 was found to be mutated in the three evolved strains, when compared to their susceptible parents. CgHxt4/6/7 and the 96% identical CgHxt6/7 were found to confer azole susceptibility and increase azole accumulation in C. glabrata cells, strikingly rescuing the susceptibility phenotype imposed by CgPDR1 deletion, while the identified loss-of-function mutation in CgHXT4/6/7, leads to increased azole resistance. In silico docking analysis shows that azoles display a strong predicted affinity for the glucose binding site of CgHxt4/6/7. Altogether, we hypothesize that hexose transporters, such as CgHxt4/6/7 and CgHxt6/7, may constitute a family of azole importers, involved in clinical drug resistance in fungal pathogens, and constituting promising targets for improved antifungal therapy.

A novel antibiotic class targeting the lipopolysaccharide transporter

Article Open access 03 January 2024

Molecular mechanisms of antibiotic resistance revisited

Article 21 November 2022

Pseudomonas aeruginosa: pathogenesis, virulence factors, antibiotic resistance, interaction with host, technology advances and emerging therapeutics

Article Open access 25 June 2022

Introduction

Candida species are one of the most common cause of fungemia in humans, responsible for >400,000 life-threatening infections yearly worldwide with an associated 46–75% mortality rate¹. Clinical isolates resistant to all three classes of antifungals available have been found in hospitalized patients². C. glabrata, particularly, is a prominent cause of invasive candidosis, best known for its ability to overcome azole antifungal therapy^3,4,5,6.

Azoles act by inhibiting the 14α-demethylase Erg11 in the ergosterol biosynthesis pathway, causing the accumulation of a toxic sterol that permeabilizes the plasma membrane⁷. These drugs have been used for decades as the standard treatment against candidosis and are still the only oral treatment option. Instead of developing new drugs to overcome antifungal resistance, a process which is both very costly and time-consuming, therapeutic strategies can be improved by enhancing the efficacy of existing drugs, such as azoles. Therefore, it is worth identifying the genes and cellular pathways involved in the development of drug resistance⁸.

The main mechanism of acquired azole resistance is the up-regulation of ABC (ATP-binding Cassette) drug transporters, mainly CgCdr1^9,10,11, and, to a lower extent, of the major facilitator superfamily (MFS) drug:H + antiporters^{12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19}, which catalyse the efflux of azoles preventing their intracellular accumulation. Generally, the constitutive up-regulation of the ABC efflux pumps is due to the emergence of gain-of-function (GOF) mutations in the CgPDR1 gene, encoding the key regulator of multidrug resistance in C. glabrata^{4, 20}. In contrast to what is observed in C. albicans, several studies suggest that mutations in CgERG11 is not a relevant mechanism of acquired azole resistance in C. glabrata clinical isolates^{5, 9, 21}. Although CgPDR1 GOF mutations are considered the major mechanism of clinical acquisition of azole resistance, several resistant clinical isolates do not to display any of the known mechanisms of resistance^{22, 23}, suggesting the presence of yet unknown alternative paths to acquired azole resistance in C. glabrata.

In this study, prolonged exposure to posaconazole was used to induce in vitro C. glabrata azole susceptible clinical isolates to acquire azole resistance. The underlying molecular mechanisms were evaluated through whole-genome sequencing. Genes found to exhibit non-synonymous single-nucleotide polymorphisms (nsSNPs) in the resistant strains, when compared to their susceptible counterparts, were identified and evaluated for a possible role in azole resistance. The putative hexose transporter CgHXT4/6/7 (ORF CAGL0A02233g) stood out in the analysis, being hypothesized to work as an azole importer. Although little is known about how these drugs enter pathogenic fungal cells to exert their antifungal action²⁴, it was demonstrated that azoles are imported by facilitated diffusion rather than passive diffusion or ATP-dependent import²⁵. Moreover, fluconazole import differs among C. albicans resistant clinical isolates, which suggests that altered facilitated diffusion is possibly a previously uncharacterized mechanism of resistance to azole drugs²⁵.

In this context, the role of CgHxt4/6/7 and of the 96% identical CgHxt6/7 (ORF CAGL0A02211g)²⁶ as hexose transporters was confirmed, while their role as potential azole importers was further explored leading to the characterization of an alternative mechanism of acquired azole drug resistance in C. glabrata.

Results

In vitro evolution towards posaconazole resistance in C. glabrata clinical isolates

Four isolates, previously found to display azole susceptibility²⁷, the CBS138 reference strain and three clinical isolates (040, 044 and OL152), were subjected to an in vitro directed evolution approach, to generate azole-resistant populations. After prolonged exposure to a therapeutic plasma concentration of the triazole posaconazole (1 mg L⁻¹), the CBS138, 040 and OL152 isolates evolved towards posaconazole, fluconazole and clotrimazole resistance following 10 days of incubation, while the 044 isolate acquired resistance to clotrimazole, fluconazole, voriconazole and posaconazole after 25 days of incubation (Supplementary Table 1). Interestingly, MIC₅₀ levels for voriconazole never reached resistance levels for CBS138, 040 and OL152 isolates (Supplementary Table 1). The evolved multiazole-resistant strains were denominated CBS138_Psc, 040_Psc, 044_Psc and OL152_Psc. The resistance pattern remained stable in all the evolved resistant isolates following sub-culture in drug-free medium for up to 30 days.

Acquisition of azole resistance can be independent of mutations in CgPDR1 or CgERG11

To understand whether the evolved resistance phenotype relied on the major mechanism of acquired azole resistance, the acquisition of Pdr1 GOF mutations, the transcription factor encoding gene CgPDR1 was sequenced in the four evolved resistant strains (CBS138_Psc, 040_Psc, 044_Psc and OL152_Psc). Remarkably, no sequence changes were detected in 040_Psc, 044_Psc or OL152_Psc and so the molecular basis underlying the development of azole resistance on these three evolved strains remained to be clarified. In the azole-resistant strain derived from the CBS138 strain, CBS138_Psc, a mutation in the CgPDR1 gene sequence was found. In this single case, indeed a non-synonymous mutation leading to a Trp297Leu substitution was observed, which corresponds to a previously characterized GOF mutation in CgPDR1²³. This mutation is likely underlying the observed resistance phenotype in the evolved strain, which was therefore excluded from further analysis. Furthermore, no changes in the sequence or expression (Supplementary Fig. 1) of the drug target, CgErg11, were found in the four evolved strains, reinforcing the assumption that alteration of the drug target is not a usual mechanism of acquired azole resistance in C. glabrata clinical isolates. Potential resistance-related mutations in the promoter regions of both CgPDR1 and CgERG11 were also not found (Supplementary Data 1).

Identification of nsSNPs acquired during posaconazole exposure

In the search for insights into the mechanism(s) underlying the development of azole resistance in the evolved strains 040_Psc, 044_Psc and OL152_Psc, their genomes were sequenced and compared to that of the corresponding susceptible parents 040, 044 and OL152, respectively (Supplementary Data 2; Supplementary Data 3). 40, 70 and 103 nsSNPs were registered for the 040_Psc, 044_Psc and OL152_Psc strains, respectively, when compared to the susceptible parents (Supplementary Fig. 2a). These nsSNPs were found to affect 19, 22 and 28 genes in 040_Psc, 044_Psc and OL152_Psc, respectively (Supplementary Fig. 2b), which were grouped based on their biological function (Supplementary Table 2). Most of the mutated genes were found to encode adhesins or adhesin-like proteins, specifically 70%, 92% and 70% of the mutated genes in the 040_Psc, 044_Psc and OL152_Psc strains, respectively. This is likely a direct consequence of adhesin encoding genes being mostly located in sub-telomeric regions and including tandem-repeat regions, which favours increased random mutation rates. Nonetheless, it is interesting to point out that at least the CgEPA3 adhesin has been implicated in azole resistance²⁸.

Despite no common nsSNPs selected during prolonged posaconazole exposure among the 040_Psc, 044_Psc and OL152_Psc strains (Supplementary Fig. 2a) were registered, 5 genes were found to display non-synonymous mutations in the three resistant strains, when compared to the susceptible counterparts. These genes included 4 adhesin-like proteins, including CgEPA3, plus the putative hexose transporter CgHXT4/6/7 (Supplementary Fig. 2b), which was selected for further analysis.

CgHxt4/6/7 and CgHxt6/7 are plasma membrane hexose transporters

The subcellular localization of CgHxt4/6/7 and of the 96% identical CgHxt6/7 was inspected by fluorescence microscopy in both C. glabrata and S. cerevisiae cells. As expected, the CgHxt4/6/7_GFP and the CgHxt6/7_GFP fusion proteins were found to be predominantly localized to the cell periphery, which is consistent with its predicted plasma membrane localization and transporter function, in both C. glabrata and S. cerevisiae cells (Fig. 1a).

The ability of the putative hexose transporters CgHxt4/6/7 and CgHxt6/7 to import the hexoses glucose, mannose, fructose and galactose into yeast cells was assessed using the hexose transporter-null S. cerevisiae strain (Schxt⁰), which grows normally on maltose as carbon source²⁹. The Schxt⁰ strain is unable to grow on glucose, mannose or fructose as sole carbon sources and grows very poorly on galactose²⁹. Results demonstrate that Schxt⁰ cells expressing either CgHxt4/6/7 or CgHxt6/7 were able to grow on glucose and mannose and slightly on fructose as carbon sources, while cells harbouring the cloning vector were not (Fig. 1b). Together, these results demonstrate that CgHxt4/6/7 and CgHxt6/7 are plasma membrane hexose transporters, which was expected considering the role of their S. cerevisiae orthologues ScHxt6 and ScHxt7, respectively³⁰.

CgHXT4/6/7 and CgHXT6/7 promote azole drug susceptibility in C. glabrata, probably by facilitating azole entrance into fungal cells

Since the so far uncharacterized hexose transporter encoding gene CgHXT4/6/7 stood out in the genome-wide analysis of the evolved resistant strains 040_Psc, 044_Psc and OL152_Psc, the potential impact of this transporter in C. glabrata tolerance to azoles was further evaluated, along with its close homologue CgHXT6/7. By comparing the susceptibility of wild-type, single deletion strains (Δcghxt4/6/7 and Δcghxt6/7) and double deletion strain (Δcghxt4/6/7Δcghxt6/7), the absence of either HXT gene was found to increase C. glabrata resistance towards fluconazole and posaconazole (Fig. 2a). Accordingly, MIC₅₀ values for fluconazole and posaconazole were found to be lower for the wild-type strain (16 and 0.5 mg L⁻¹, respectively) when compared to the single deletion strains Δcghxt4/6/7 (32 and 1 mg L⁻¹, respectively) or Δcghxt6/7 (32 and 1 mg L⁻¹, respectively), and to the double deletion strain Δcghxt4/6/7Δcghxt6/7 (64 and 2 mg L⁻¹, respectively).

**Fig. 2: CgHxt4/6/7 and CgHxt6/7 promote azole susceptibility in *C. glabrata*.**

The results obtained for either CgHxt4/6/7 or CgHxt6/7 are consistent, but moderate, likely because 10 other hexose transporters are predicted to be encoded by the C. glabrata genome, potentially displaying functional overlap. In fact, the double deletion strain Δcghxt4/6/7Δcghxt6/7 was found to display a fourfold increase in the MIC₅₀ for both fluconazole and posaconazole, comparing to the wild-type. To assess the concept of functional overlap, the hexose transporter-null Schxt⁰ mutant was compared with the corresponding parental strain in terms of azole susceptibility. Hexose transporter-null Schxt⁰ cells are indeed less susceptible to the azoles tested (Fig. 3). Although this finding needs to be further assessed in C. glabrata, this result strongly supports the hypothesis that several of the HXT transporters might play a key role as azole importers, therefore contributing to azole susceptibility in fungal cells. Accordingly, the accumulation of [³H]-labelled fluconazole was evaluated in the single deletion strain ∆cghxt4/6/7 comparing to the wild-type. Under these conditions, cells lacking CgHXT4/6/7 accumulate significantly less fluconazole than the parental wild-type cells (Fig. 2b). Moreover, the same effect was observed when measuring the accumulation of the [³H]-labelled imidazole clotrimazole in cells lacking CgHXT4/6/7, comparing to wild-type cells (Supplementary Fig. 3), further supporting the hypothesis that CgHxt4/6/7 affects azole uptake in C. glabrata.

**Fig. 3: *HXT* genes play a role in yeast susceptibility towards azole antifungals.**

Deletion of CgHXT4/6/7 in the 040 susceptible clinical isolate promotes azole resistance

The relevance of CgHxt4/6/7 in the azole resistance phenotype developed by the 040 clinical isolate when exposed to posaconazole was further evaluated. Susceptibility testing demonstrates that the deletion of CgHXT4/6/7 in the 040 isolate decreases its susceptibility towards posaconazole and fluconazole (Fig. 4a). MIC₅₀ values of fluconazole and posaconazole were found to be lower for the azole susceptible isolate 040 (16 and 0.125 mg L⁻¹, respectively) when compared to the derived mutant strain 040_∆cghxt4/6/7 (32 and 2 mg L⁻¹, respectively), while for the evolved 040_Psc resistant strain the values were even higher (≥64 and ≥8 mg L⁻¹, respectively). Accordingly, the accumulation of [³H]-labelled fluconazole was shown to be significantly lower in the 040_∆cghxt4/6/7 strain when comparing to the susceptible parent isolate 040 (Fig. 4b). Although it is noteworthy that the overall accumulation of [³H]-labelled fluconazole appears to be higher in the 040 clinical isolate, when compared to the KUE100 lab strain, likely due to extensive genomic background differences, the impact of CgHXT4/6/7 expression in azole accumulation is clearly strain-independent. Additionally, the G361A missense mutation found in the CgHXT4/6/7 gene from the evolved 040_Psc strain, resulting in a Val121ILe amino acid residue substitution, was evaluated for its impact in the acquired azole-resistant phenotype (Fig. 4c). In that sense, the pGREG576_PDC1_mut_CgHXT4/6/7 plasmid was generated by site-directed mutagenesis. The introduction of the pGREG576_PDC1_mut_CgHXT4/6/7 plasmid in the single deletion mutant strain ∆cghxt4/6/7 did not affect the MIC₅₀ values for fluconazole (MIC₅₀ = 32mg L-1) and posaconazole (MIC₅₀ = 1 mg L⁻¹), while its complementation with the pGREG576_PDC1_CgHXT4/6/7 plasmid, expressing the wild-type CgHxt4/6/7 transporter, resulted in promoted susceptibility of the ∆cghxt4/6/7 strain, e.g. displaying lower MIC₅₀ values for fluconazole (MIC₅₀ = 16 mg L⁻¹) and posaconazole (MIC₅₀ = 0.5 mg L⁻¹) (Fig. 4c).

**Fig. 4: CgHxt4/6/7 promotes azole susceptibility in *C. glabrata* 040 clinical isolate by mediating azoles uptake.**

Altogether, these results strongly suggest that CgHXT4/6/7 plays a role in C. glabrata azole drug susceptibility and that the nsSNP selected in CgHXT4/6/7 of the 040 isolate during the in vitro evolution experiment impaired of the transporter function, contributing to the final resistant phenotype observed in the evolved strain 040_Psc.

Deletion of either CgHXT4/6/7 or CgHXT6/7 rescues the susceptibility phenotype imposed by the absence of the drug resistance regulator CgPDR1

CgPdr1 is the major regulator of azole resistance in C. glabrata, controlling the overexpression of azole drug efflux pumps. Consequently, cells lacking the CgPDR1 gene are highly susceptible to azoles. Surprisingly, the deletion of either CgHXT4/6/7 or CgHXT6/7 was found to rescue the azole susceptibility phenotype of CgPDR1 disrupted cells (Fig. 5a). Strikingly, MIC₅₀ values for fluconazole and posaconazole were found to be similar for the wild-type strain (16 and 0.5 mg L⁻¹, respectively) and for the double deletion strains ∆cgpdr1∆cghxt4/6/7 or ∆cgpdr1∆cghxt6/7 (16 and 0.5 mg L⁻¹, respectively), while for the ∆cgpdr1 strain the MIC₅₀ values were found to be 4–fold lower for fluconazole (4 mg L⁻¹) and 32-fold lower for posaconazole (0.015625 mg L⁻¹). Accordingly, growth curves obtained in the presence of inhibitory concentrations of posaconazole (4 mg L⁻¹) demonstrate that the deletion of either CgHxt4/6/7 or CgHxt6/7 in the ∆cgpdr1 strain fully rescues its azole susceptibility phenotype (Fig. 5b).

**Fig. 5: Deletion of either *CgHXT4/6/7* or *CgHXT6/7* in a ∆*cgpdr1* background rescues the azole susceptible phenotype imposed by the absence of CgPdr1.**

These results further support the hypothesis that these putative hexose transporters play a crucial role in C. glabrata azole drug susceptibility, probably by facilitating azole entrance into fungal cells. More importantly, this points out the critical relevance of these transporters in azole drug mode of action and in the consequent mechanism of drug resistance.

CgHxt4/6/7 is predicted to display high affinity for fluconazole binding

To strengthen our current hypothesis that CgHxt4/6/7 may act as an azole importer, the affinity of this hexose transporter to azoles was evaluated in silico. Since there is no available structure for CgHxt4/6/7, the CgHxt4/6/7 structure was modelled based on the 3D structure of the homologous E. coli transporter XylE (PDB ID 4GBZ) (Supplementary Fig. 4a). This was possible due to the sequence identity between both proteins, which is of 30% for all residues and 50% for the residues exposed to the transporting channel (Supplementary Fig. 4c). The crystal structure of E. coli XylE was solved with a resolution of 2.89 Å and features a D-glucose bound to its internal cavity (Supplementary Fig. 4b), providing information about the positioning of the ligands to be transported. Most of the structural differences between our model and the E. coli XylE crystal structure are found in the loops that connect the transmembrane helices (Fig. 6a). These loops are unstructured and exposed to the solvent regions that are far from the substrate binding regions, therefore not accountable for the quality of the model at the transmembrane region (Fig. 6a). As observed for the E. coli XylE (PDB ID 4GBZ) protein, our model is in an outward-facing, partially occluded conformation with a D-glucose molecule captured in the transmembrane channel. The ligand is trapped within the centre of the transmembrane domain, completely occluded from the intracellular side, yet solvent-accessible from the extracellular side through a channel that is too narrow (5.2 Å diameter) to allow the escape of the ligand³¹.

**Fig. 6: Fluconazole displays a strong predicted affinity for the glucose binding site of CgHxt4/6/7.**

Using the modelled structure of CgHxt4/6/7, its affinity to fluconazole was predicted through in silico docking, using AutoDock Vina, and compared to that of glucose, the natural substrate of this transporter. This study revealed that CgHxt4/6/7 is predicted to have strong affinity to glucose (−5.5 kcal/mol), as expected, and an even stronger predicted affinity to fluconazole (−7.3 kcal/mol) (Fig. 6b, c). Similar binding affinities to glucose and fluconazole were observed for the E. coli XylE transporter (Supplementary Fig. 5a, b). Although occupying the same region in the internal cavity, fluconazole and D-glucose revealed distinct patterns of interactions with the protein in our docking studies. D-glucose participates in more hydrogen bonds than fluconazole, whereas desolvation effects seem to play a major role in the binding affinity of the latter. Indeed, fluconazole shows a higher shape complementarity to the binding pocket compared to D-glucose (Fig. 6b, c). Taken together, our results suggest that Fluconazole is predicted to be a binder of CgHxt4/6/7. Despite these results, posaconazole docking failed to bind to the transporter, what would be expected given the size difference between the fluconazole and posaconazole. However, it is important to consider that this modelling was made from a partially occluded conformation, and, as such we can hypothesize that posaconazole may be accommodated and transported in an open conformation. In order to test this possibility, we decided to make a second modelling from the structure of Homo sapiens glucose transporter (PDB ID 4ZWC)³² that was obtained in an outward-open conformation (Supplementary Fig. 6). Indeed, docking studies showed that the open configuration allows binding of both posaconazole and fluconazole. Interestingly, both drugs bind in the same region in the outward-open structure (Supplementary Fig. 7). It is important to mention that posaconazole is a large molecule with a higher number of possible rotations, which makes it difficult to predict the precise mode of binding, beyond the base structure common to fluconazole, through molecular docking.

Discussion

In this study, two hexose transporters in C. glabrata were identified and characterized. More importantly, a possible role for hexose transporters as drug carriers is proposed in C. glabrata, shedding light into an important feature of azole drug mode of action: its uptake into fungal cells, possibly through hexose transporters. An in vitro directed evolution experiment was used to drive susceptible clinical isolates towards multi azole resistance, leading to the functional characterization of the CgHxt4/6/7 hexose transporter as a determinant of azole susceptibility in C. glabrata. The in vitro evolved resistant isolates 040_Psc, 044_Psc and OL152_Psc acquired multi azole resistance through previously unknown mechanisms. No CgPDR1 GOF mutations were found in these evolved strains, the main mechanism of acquired azole resistance in C. glabrata clinical isolates^{4, 20}. Moreover, according to the general notion that alterations on the drug target are not a frequent mechanism of acquired azole resistance in C. glabrata clinical isolates^{5, 9, 21}, we confirmed that no mutations arose in the CgERG11 gene during posaconazole exposure. Although there were no common nsSNPs among the three evolved resistant strains, CgHXT4/6/7 gene was found to be mutated in all three evolved resistant strains (Supplementary Fig. 2b). Our results show that, although CgPDR1 GOF mutations are a frequent event leading to acquisition of azole resistance, they are not the only mechanism. Whether the posaconazole-driven evolution, when compared to evolution driven by other azole drugs, or the genetic background of the used strains may underlie the results obtained in this study remains unclear and is certainly worthy of further scrutiny.

CgHxt4/6/7 was, so far, an uncharacterized putative hexose transporter in C. glabrata. Based on knowledge gathered for S. cerevisiae homologous transporters, CgHxt4/6/7 belongs to the big family of HXT genes, specifically to the high-affinity glucose transporter cluster³³. With 96% amino acid sequence identity to CgHxt4/6/7, CgHxt6/7 was also characterized. According to their predicted function, CgHxt4/6/7 and CgHxt6/7 were found to be localized to the cell plasma membrane (Fig. 1a), and to be able to import hexoses (Fig. 1b).

Several studies have covered a panoply of drug resistance mechanisms that depend on drug efflux pumps belonging to the ABC and MFS. Nonetheless, despite some efforts^{25, 34}, the study of drug uptake mechanisms has been, to some extent, overlooked in pathogenic fungi²⁴. Besides being an important mechanism of drug effectiveness acknowledged in human parasites²⁴, decreased accumulation of drugs have been associated with azole resistance in Candida clinical isolates²⁵. Nonetheless, the players underlying drug uptake have remained elusive for at least 20 years. HXT genes belong to the MFS class of membrane proteins and were associated with the multidrug resistance phenomenon in S. cerevisiae in 1997, being implicated in cycloheximide, sulfomethuron methyl and 4-NQO (4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide) susceptibility³⁵. In fact, CgHxt4/6/7 and CgHxt6/7 S. cerevisiae orthologues (ScHxt6 and ScHxt7, respectively) were previously shown to be major mediators of arsenic import in yeast³⁶. Our study shows that at least some of S. cerevisiae HXT transporters also play a relevant role in yeast azole susceptibility, probably by being hijacked by these antifungals serving as channels for drug entry into fungal cells (Fig. 3). Consistently, CgHxt4/6/7 or CgHxt6/7 expression was found to confer azole susceptibility to C. glabrata cells (Fig. 2a). The accumulation of radiolabelled fluconazole was shown to be higher in wild-type C. glabrata cells when compared to cells devoid of CgHXT4/6/7 (Fig. 2b), suggesting that fluconazole can enter C. glabrata cells through facilitated diffusion, mediated by this transporter. Furthermore, in silico molecular docking results corroborate this hypothesis, as they predict that CgHxt4/6/7 has affinity to its natural substrate, glucose, but also affinity to fluconazole and posaconazole. Interestingly, the CgHxt4/6/7 related phenotypes were observed in the C. glabrata lab strain KUE100, but also in the 040 clinical isolate (Fig. 4a, b), suggesting that the role of this transporter is not strain dependent. Additionally, the Val121Ile mutation that arose in the 040 clinical isolate upon prolonged exposure to posaconazole was found to render this transporter inactive in terms of azole susceptibility, suggesting that similar point mutations may be used as clinically relevant mechanisms of evolution towards azole resistance (Fig. 4c).

In wild-type C. glabrata cells, the prime mechanism of azole drug resistance involves CgPdr1³. Once this transcription factor acquires GOF mutations, induced by drug exposure, natural selection favours cells harbouring these mutations, ultimately leading to the disappearance of other subpopulations and to the development of fully azole-resistant cells^{20, 28}. Therefore, CgPDR1 disruption in C. glabrata cells restores azole susceptibility⁴. Since there were no GOF mutations in CgPDR1 in the evolved resistant strains 040_Psc, 044_Psc and OL152_Psc, we assessed the impact of the proposed resistance mechanism, involving the reduced uptake of fluconazole, in a strain devoid of CgPDR1. While in wild-type cells the single deletion of CgHxt4/6/7 or CgHxt6/7 results only in a moderate increase in azole resistance, in cells devoid of CgPdr1 the single deletion of either HXT gene fully reverses the strong azole susceptibility phenotype imposed by the absence of CgPdr1 (Fig. 5a, b). This further supports the concept that azoles may enter C. glabrata cells through Hxt proteins and that the impairment of this pathway constitutes an important mechanism of resistance, that, when triggered, renders alternative azole resistance pathways, based on drug extrusion, almost irrelevant.

Overall, we show that hexose transporters affect azole accumulation in C. glabrata and play a role in the acquisition of resistance by clinical isolates as an alternative to the main mechanism of acquired azole resistance involving CgPDR1. Despite the extensive knowledge on the mechanisms of action/resistance to azoles, little was known about how these drugs enter fungal cells to exert their antifungal action. Although indirect effects of HXT transporters in azole susceptibility, eventually affecting energy availability or the expression of drug efflux pumps, cannot be fully discarded, our results show that CgHxt4/6/7 and CgHxt6/7 transporters not only play a role in the uptake of glucose, but also appear to mediate azole uptake into C. glabrata cells. Being two in a family of 11 HXT transporters in C. glabrata, it is likely that their role in azole uptake is just the tip of the iceberg. It will be important to assess how far other homologous hexose transporters may contribute to azole uptake and whether mutations acquired in additional hexose transporter encoding genes may contribute to azole resistance in fungal pathogens, in general.

Methods

Strains and growth media

The reference strain CBS138 and three Candida glabrata clinical isolates (named OL152, 040 and 044) obtained from patients admitted to Centro Hospitalar de S. João (CHSJ) in Porto, Portugal were used in this study²⁷. Isolates 040 and 044 were recovered from blood cultures, while isolate OL152 was recovered from urine. These isolates were characterized by Vitek YBC identification cards (BioMérieux, Paris, France) and mass-spectrometry (Maldi TOF). Until testing, the strains were stored in Brain–Heart broth (Difco) with 5% glycerol at −70 °C. For each experiment, the strains were subcultured twice on Sabouraud agar (Difco) at 35 °C for 48 h.

Candida glabrata parental strain KUE100³⁷ and derived KUE100_Δcgpdr1³⁸ were kindly provided by Hiroji Chibana, Medical Mycology Research Center at Chiba University, Japan. KUE100_Δcghxt4/6/7, KUE100_Δcghxt6/7, KUE100_Δcghxt4/6/7Δcghxt6/7, KUE100_Δcgpdr1Δcghxt4/6/7, KUE100_Δcgpdr1Δcghxt6/7, and KUE100::URA-, were all constructed in this study. Cells were batch-cultured at 30 °C, with orbital agitation (250 rpm) in Basal Medium (BM) or Yeast Extract-Peptone-Dextrose (YPD) medium. BM has the following composition (per litre): 1.7 g yeast nitrogen base without amino acids or NH₄⁺ (Difco), 20 g glucose (Merck) and 2.65 g (NH₄)₂SO₄ (Merck). YPD has the following composition (per liter): 20 g glucose (Merck), 20 g Peptone (Merck) and 10 g Yeast extract (Merck).

Saccharomyces cerevisiae parental strain BY4741 (MATa, ura3∆0, leu2∆0, his3∆1, met15∆0) was obtained from the Euroscarf collection. Wild-type yeast cells harbouring pGREG576 derived plasmids were batch-cultured at 30 °C, with orbital agitation (250 rpm) in BM supplemented with 20 mg L⁻¹ methionine, 20 mg L⁻¹ histidine and 60 mg L⁻¹ leucine (all from Sigma).

S. cerevisiae parental strain CEN.PK2-1C³⁹ and derived hexose transporter-null (Schxt⁰) strain EBY.VW4000²⁹ were kindly provided by Eckhard Boles, Institute of Molecular Biological Sciences, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany. Cells were batch-cultured at 30 °C, with orbital agitation (250 rpm) in Yeast Extract-Peptone-Maltose (YPM) medium containing (per liter): 20 g maltose (Merck), 20 g Peptone (Merck) and 10 g Yeast extract (Merck). CEN.PK2-1C and EBY.VW4000 cells harbouring pGREG576 derived plasmids were grown overnight in BM-Maltose medium containing (per liter): 1.7 g yeast nitrogen base without amino acids or NH₄⁺ (Difco), 20 g maltose (Merck) and 2.65 g (NH₄)₂SO₄ (Merck), supplemented with 20 mg L⁻¹ tryptophan, 20 mg L⁻¹ histidine and 60 mg L⁻¹ leucine (all from Sigma).

Solid media contained, besides the above indicated ingredients, 20 g L⁻¹ agar (Iberagar).

Gene expression analysis

The transcript level of the CgERG11 gene in the initial azole susceptible clinical isolates was compared to the evolved resistant strains using quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). Total-RNA samples were obtained from cell suspensions harvested upon reaching an OD_600nm = 0.8 ± 0.08 in rich YPD medium. cDNA for real-time reverse transcription-PCR was synthesized from total-RNA samples by using the MultiScribeTM reverse transcriptase kit (Applied Biosystems) and the 7500 RT-PCR thermal cycler block (Applied Biosystems) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The quantity of cDNA for subsequent reactions was kept at ca. 10 ng. The subsequent RT-PCR step was carried out using SYBR green reagents. Primers for the amplification of the CgERG11 and CgACT1 genes were designed using Primer Express software (Applied Biosystems) and are summarized in Supplementary Table 3. The RT-PCR was carried out using a thermal cycler block (7500 real-time PCR system, Applied Biosystems). Default parameters established by the manufacturer were used, and fluorescence was detected by the instrument and recorded in an amplification plot (7500 System SDS software, Applied Biosystems). The CgACT1 mRNA level was used as an internal control. The relative values obtained for the initial isolates exhibiting the lower gene expression level were set as 1 and the remaining values are presented relative to that control. To avoid false-positive signals, the absence of nonspecific amplification with the chosen primers was confirmed by the generation of a dissociation curve for each pair of primers.

Plasmids

For CgHXT4/6/7 or CgHXT6/7 gene cloning, the plasmid pGREG576 was obtained from the Drag&Drop collection⁴⁰. For CgHXT4/6/7 or CgHXT6/7 gene disruption, the plasmid pYC44 (Addgene plasmid #63903) was used; for expression of the flippase enzyme, the plasmid pLS10 was used. For CgURA3 gene disruption, the plasmid pV1382⁴¹ was obtained from Addgene (Addgene plasmid #111436).

Disruption of CgHXT4/6/7 (ORF CAGL0A02233g) or CgHXT6/7 (ORF CAGL0A02211g)

The wild-type strain KUE100, derived KUE100_Δcgpdr1 mutant, and 040 clinical isolate were transformed by electroporation with the deletion cassette (a nourseothricin cassette flanked by FRT sites and a ~500 bp region flanking the targeted gene). The deletion cassette was constructed by Gibson Assembly using the pYC44 plasmid, previously cut with XhoI and Not1, ~500 bp of the CgHXT4/6/7 promoter region and ~500 bp of the CgHXT4/6/7 terminator region, or ~500 bp of the CgHXT6/7 promoter region and ~500 bp of the CgHXT6/7 terminator region. Cells were plated on YPD agar medium supplemented with 200 mg L⁻¹ nourseothricin. Transformants were checked for insertion of the deletion cassette by PCR using the control primers. Correct strains were subsequently transformed with plasmid pLS10 to induce expression of the flippase enzyme (300 mg L⁻¹ hygromycin selection). Removal of the nourseothricin cassettes of the transformants was checked by PCR. The pLS10 plasmid was lost by growth on non-selective YPD medium and checked by replating on YPD supplemented with 300 mg L⁻¹ hygromycin. All the primers used for the construction of the mutant strains are depicted in Supplementary Table 3.

Cloning of the CgHXT4/6/7 (ORF CAGL0A02233g) or CgHXT6/7 (ORF CAGL0A02211g)

The pGREG576 plasmid from the Drag&Drop collection was used to clone and express CgHXT4/6/7 or CgHXT6/7 genes, as described before^{14,15,16,17, 19}. pGREG576 contains a galactose inducible promoter (GAL1), the yeast selectable marker URA3 and the GFP gene, encoding a Green Fluorescent Protein (GFPS65T), which allows monitoring of the expression and subcellular localization of the cloned fusion protein. CgHXT4/6/7 and CgHXT6/7 DNA was generated by PCR, using genomic DNA extracted from the sequenced CBS138 C. glabrata strain. The designed primers contain, besides a region with homology to the first ~25 and last ~25 nucleotides of the CgHXT4/6/7 or CgHXT6/7 coding region, nucleotide sequences with homology to the cloning site flanking regions of the pGREG576 vector. The amplified fragments were co-transformed into the parental S. cerevisiae strain BY4741 with the pGREG576 vector, previously cut with the restriction enzyme SalI, to obtain the pGREG576_CgHXT4/6/7 or pGREG576_CgHXT6/7 plasmids. Since the GAL1 promoter needs galactose for induction in S. cerevisiae, and only allows a slight expression of downstream genes in C. glabrata, new constructs were obtained. The GAL1 promoter was replaced by the pPDC1 C. glabrata constitutive promoter⁴², generating the pGREG576_PDC1_CgHXT4/6/7 or pGREG576_PDC1_CgHXT6/7 plasmids, or by the TEF S. cerevisiae constitutive promoter⁴³, generating the pGREG576_TEF_CgHXT4/6/7 or pGREG576_TEF_CgHXT6/7 plasmids. The PDC1 promoter DNA was generated by PCR, using genomic DNA extracted from the sequenced CBS138 C. glabrata strain. The TEF promoter DNA was generated by PCR, using genomic DNA extracted from the sequenced BY4741 S. cerevisiae strain. The amplified fragments were co-transformed into the parental strain BY4741 with the pGREG576_CgHXT4/6/7 or pGREG576_CgHXT6/7 plasmid, previously cut with SacI and NotI restriction enzymes to remove the GAL1 promoter. The recombinant plasmids were obtained through homologous recombination in S. cerevisiae and verified by DNA sequencing. All primers used are present in Supplementary Table 3.

Site-directed mutagenesis

The CgHXT4/6/7 gene sequence in the recombinant pGREG576_PDC1_CgHXT4/6/7 plasmid was mutated by site-directed mutagenesis. The designed primers contain the mutation occurred in the 040_Psc resistant isolate during posaconazole exposure, resulting in the production of the mutated sequence by PCR amplification to obtain the pGREG576_PDC1_mut_CgHXT4/6/7 plasmid. The original template was then degraded by DpnI digestion. All primers used are present in Supplementary Table 3.

Disruption of the CgURA3 (ORF CAGL0I03080g)

The disruption of the C. glabrata URA3 gene, encoded by ORF CAGL0I03080g, was carried out in the KUE100 parental strain as described previously⁴⁴, using the CRISPR-Cas9 system from Vyas et al.⁴¹ Briefly, a CgURA3 gRNA sequence selected from the resources made available by Vyas et al.⁴¹ was cloned in the pV1382 plasmid, previously linearized with the restriction enzyme BsmBI. The CgURA3 gRNA was obtained by oligonucleotide annealing and the product ligated into the previously linearized pV1382 plasmid to obtain the pV1382_CgURA3 vector. The construct was verified by DNA sequencing. The plasmid was transformed into C. glabrata cells which were then directly plated on 5-Fluoroorotic acid (5-FOA) to select for URA- cells. Sequential passages in nonselective medium (YPD) were performed to avoid detrimental effects of further Cas9 expression and CgURA3 loss of function was further confirmed by the inability to grow in medium without uracil. The introduction of pGREG576 derived plasmids in the edited strains was able to rescue the growth impairment in the absence of uracil. Sequencing of the CgURA3 gene from the selected candidates revealed the existence of frameshifts within the ORF, thus resulting in premature stop codons as it is expected from Non-Homologous End Joining (NHEJ) correction of double-strand breaks. All primers used are present in Supplementary Table 3.

In vitro induction of antifungal resistance in C. glabrata clinical isolates and CBS138 strain and assessment of its stability

Standard powders of fluconazole (Pfizer, Groton, CT), voriconazole (Pfizer, New York, NY), posaconazole (Schering-Plough, Kenilworth, NJ) and clotrimazole (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) were obtained from the respective manufacturers. A stock solution of fluconazole was prepared in distilled water, while voriconazole, posaconazole and clotrimazole were prepared with dimethyl sulfoxide (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). Antifungal drugs were diluted afterwards with Roswell Park Memorial Institute 1640 medium (RPMI 1640; Sigma, St. Louis, MO) buffered to pH 7.0 with 0.165 M morpholine propanesulfonic acid buffer (MOPS; Sigma) and stored at −70 °C until further use. The culture medium used for resistance induction assays was RPMI 1640 with 0.165 M MOPS, pH 7.0. A single, randomly selected, colony from each C. glabrata strain (040, 044, OL152 and CBS138) was incubated in 10 mL of RPMI 1640 overnight in a rotating drum at 150 rpm and 35 °C. An aliquot of this culture, containing 10⁶ yeast cells, was transferred to different vials, each containing 10 mL of culture medium with or without posaconazole and incubated overnight as described above. The following day, aliquots from each culture containing 10⁶ yeast cells were again transferred into fresh medium containing the same antifungal and re-incubated as described. Each day, for the 30 days of the assay, a 1 mL aliquot from each subculture was mixed with 0.5 mL of 50% glycerol and frozen at −70 °C for later testing. Incubation took place for 30 days with constant concentrations of posaconazole (1 mg L⁻¹), corresponding to therapeutic plasma levels obtained during antifungal treatment⁴⁵. To assess resistance stability, the evolved resistant isolates obtained were subcultured daily in the absence of the drug for 30 days. A single colony from each isolate was incubated in 10 mL drug-free RPMI 1640 at 35 °C and 150 rpm. In the following day, aliquots were transferred into fresh medium. At each subculture, a 1 mL aliquot of the suspension was mixed with 0.5 mL of 50% glycerol, and frozen at −70 °C, for further testing.

Genome sequencing and data analysis

The draft genome sequences of the three azole susceptible C. glabrata clinical isolates used in this study, 040, 044 and OL152, had been characterized previously, as described in Pais et al.⁴⁶. The genome sequences of the selected in vitro evolved resistant strains 040_Psc, 044_Psc and OL152_Psc derived from 040, 044 and OL152 clinical isolates, respectively, were obtained and characterized in this study. Raw sequencing data and genome assemblies can be found accessing BioProject no. PRJNA525402 (initial isolates) and BioProject no. PRJNA694431 (evolved isolates).

Genome sequencing was performed by Illumina HiSeqX 150-bp, paired-end sequencing. Library preparation (Nextera XT) and sequencing were carried out by Admera Health, LLC. Each resistant isolate was confirmed to be the same as their correspondent initial isolate by Multi Locus Sequence Typing (MLST) using six loci (FKS, LEU2, NMT1, TRP1, UGP1, URA3)⁴⁷ and each sequence typing (ST) was identified according to the Sequence Typing website⁴⁸(https://pubmlst.org/organisms/candida-glabrata). Genome assembly and comparison with the C. glabrata reference genome was carried out as described previously⁴⁶. Briefly, raw sequencing reads were trimmed, and duplicates removed to only keep high-quality reads. Reads were mapped against the C. glabrata reference genome yielding >97% of aligned reads for each isolate. Genomes were assembled using SPAdes⁴⁹ and scaffolds <500 bp discarded to attain final draft genomes. Each assembly was aligned against the reference genome and found to align >97.6% in each case. The high sequencing depth was leveraged to performed Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) identification with increased sensitivity and sensibility across the genome. Briefly, reads were aligned against the reference genome and variant identification was performed using GATK⁵⁰. Low-quality variants were subsequently filtered out with BCFtools⁵¹ as described previously⁴⁶. For subsequent analysis, only variants occurring within gene coding sequences and resulting in missense or non-sense mutations in the encoded protein were considered.

Antifungal susceptibility assays

Clinical isolates

The Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC₅₀) of voriconazole, fluconazole, clotrimazole and posaconazole antifungal drugs was determined according to the M27-A3 protocol of the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute⁵², for all the C. glabrata isolates under study. The MICs were determined after 24 h. Interpretative criteria for fluconazole were those of the CLSI document M60⁵³: susceptible-dose dependent (S-DD)-MIC₅₀≤32 mg L⁻¹ and resistance (R)-MIC₅₀≥64 mg L⁻¹. Although susceptibility breakpoints have not yet been established for voriconazole, posaconazole or clotrimazole for C. glabrata, strains inhibited by ≤2m L⁻¹, ≤1m L⁻¹ and ≤2m L⁻¹, respectively, were considered to be susceptible. Every 5 days of incubation, with or without antifungal, MIC₅₀ values were redetermined for the four antifungals tested. The antifungal concentrations ranged from 0.03125 to 16 mg L⁻¹ for posaconazole and voriconazole, and 0.125-64 mg L⁻¹ for fluconazole and clotrimazole. C. glabrata reference strain CBS138 was used in each testing assay, as recommended.

Lab strains

C. glabrata cells susceptibility to toxic concentrations of the selected azoles was evaluated by spot assays. Cell suspensions used to inoculate agar plates were prepared with mid-exponential cells grown in YPD, YPM or BM until an OD_600nm = 0.5 ± 0.05, and then diluted in sterile water to obtain suspensions with an OD_600nm = 0.05 ± 0.005. These cell suspensions and subsequent 1:5 and 1:25 dilutions were applied as 4 µL spots onto the surface of appropriate solid media supplemented with adequate concentrations of chemical stressors. The drugs tested included the following compounds, used in the specified concentrations: fluconazole 10, 100 or 150 mg L⁻¹, posaconazole 2 or 4 mg L⁻¹ and Itraconazole 1 mg L⁻¹ (all from Sigma).

Yeast cells used for susceptibility assays in liquid medium were grown overnight in YPD broth medium at 30 °C, 250 rpm. New cultures were made in fresh YPD medium, supplemented or not with 4 mg L⁻¹ of posaconazole, with an initial OD_600nm = 0.01 ± 0.001. Growth, taking place in Erlenmeyer flasks, at 30 °C, 250 rpm, was followed by measuring the optical density of the cell suspension at 600 nm. Drug concentrations used for spot and liquid susceptibility assays using YPD medium were higher than the standard range used for MIC determination since YPD is a richer medium, comparing to RPMI, and the initial cell concentration used was higher.

Posaconazole and fluconazole MIC₅₀ values for each strain were determined in accordance with the CLSI guidelines by using 96-well plates containing RPMI 1640 2% glucose medium supplemented with the appropriate drug concentration. The antifungal concentrations ranged from 0.015625 to 8 mg L⁻¹ for posaconazole and 0.125–64 mg L⁻¹ for fluconazole.

CgHxt4/6/7 or CgHxt6/7 subcellular localization assessment

The subcellular localization of the CgHxt4/6/7 or CgHxt6/7 protein was determined based on the observation of KUE100::URA- C. glabrata cells and BY4741 S. cerevisiae cells transformed with pGREG576_PDC1_HXT4/6/7 or pGREG576_PDC1_HXT6/7, and pGREG576_TEF_CgHXT4/6/7 or pGREG576_TEF_CgHXT6/7 plasmids, respectively. These cells express either the CgHxt4/6/7_GFP or the CgHxt6/7_GFP fusion protein, whose localization may be determined using fluorescence microscopy. C. glabrata or S. cerevisiae cells were grown in BM without uracil, for plasmid maintenance, until mid-exponential phase, OD_600nm = 0.5 ± 0.05. The distribution of fusion protein was assessed by fluorescence microscopy in a Zeiss Axioplan microscope (Carl Zeiss MicroImaging), using excitation and emission wavelength of 395 and 509 nm, respectively. Fluorescence images were captured using a cooled Zeiss Axiocam 503 colour (Carl Zeiss Microscopy).

Hexose utilization assays

The ability of CgHxt4/6/7 and CgHxt6/7 to import glucose, mannose, fructose or galactose into fungal cells was accessed in S. cerevisiae by using the hexose transporter-null EBY.VW4000 (Schxt⁰) strain, which grows normally on maltose, and barely on galactose as carbon sources. EBY.VW4000 cells harbouring pGREG576 empty vector or the pGREG576_TEF_CgHXT4/6/7 or pGREG576_TEF_CgHXT4/6/7 plasmids were grown overnight at 30 °C, with orbital agitation (250 rpm) in BM-Maltose, without uracil. Cell suspensions used to inoculate agar plates were mid-exponential cells grown until an OD_600nm = 0.5 ± 0.05, and then suspended in sterile water to an OD_600nm = 0.05 ± 0.005. These cell suspensions and subsequent 1:5 and 1:25 dilutions were applied as 4 µL spots onto the surface of solid BM media plates containing the indicated proportion of carbon sources, supplemented with 20 mg L⁻¹ tryptophan, 20 mg L⁻¹ histidine and 60 mg L⁻¹ leucine.

[³H]-fluconazole and [³H]-clotrimazole accumulation assays

The intracellular accumulation of fluconazole or clotrimazole in the different C. glabrata strains was compared resorting to radiolabelled [³H]-fluconazole and [³H]-clotrimazole, respectively. The internal accumulation was determined by calculating the ratio between the value measured within yeast cells and in the external medium ([Intracellular]/[Extracellular]). The parental strains and the derived mutant strains were grown in YPD medium until mid-exponential phase and harvested by filtration. Cells were washed and resuspended in YPD medium, to obtain dense cell suspensions (OD_600nm = 0.5 ± 0.1, equivalent to approximately 1.57 mg(dry weight) mL⁻¹). Readily, 0.1 µM of [³H]-fluconazole (Moravek Inc.; 1.0 mCi mL⁻¹) or [³H]-clotrimazole (American Radiolabelled Chemicals, St. Louis, MO;1 mCi mL⁻¹) and 100 mg L⁻¹ of unlabelled fluconazole or 30 mg L⁻¹ of unlabelled clotrimazole, respectively, were added to the cell suspensions. The intracellular accumulation of labelled fluconazole was followed for a 15 min period by filtering 200 µL of cell suspension through pre-wetted glass microfiber filters (Whatman GF/C). The filters were washed with ice-cold TM buffer [0.1 M 2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid (Sigma)/41 mM Tris (Sigma)], and the radioactivity measured in a PerkinElmer Tri-Carb 2810TR liquid scintillation analyser. Extracellular ³H-fluconazole was estimated by radioactivity assessment of 50 µL of the supernatant. To calculate the intracellular concentration of radiolabelled fluconazole, the internal cell volume (V_i) of the exponential cells, grown in the absence of drug and used for accumulation assays, was considered constant and equal to 2.5 µL mg (dry weight)⁻¹.

Protein modelling and molecular docking

The homology modelling of the CgHxt4/6/7 membrane protein was performed using MODELLER version 9.23⁵⁴. The crystal structure of E. coli XylE (PDB ID 4GBZ)³¹ was used as a template for the outward-facing, partially occluded conformation and the crystal structure of the H. sapiens glucose transporter (PDB ID 4ZWC)³² was used for the outward-open conformation. For each modulation, twenty independent models were generated. Subsequent analysis were carried on the model with the lowest DOPE score⁵⁵.

The docking calculations were performed using AutoDock Vina⁵⁶, with an exhaustiveness value of 50 and in a search box centralized at the ligand of the PDB ID 4GBZ and with sizes of 16, 16 and 14 Å. For each docking calculation, the docking pose with lowest energy was used in subsequent analysis. Figures of docking results were prepared using PyMOL2.5⁵⁷.

Statistics and reproducibility

All experiments represent the average of three or more independent experiments. Error bars represent the standard deviation. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variance with Tukey’s correction. Significance levels are attributed as follows: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

Raw sequencing data and genome assemblies can be found accessing NCBI BioProjects PRJNA525402 (initial isolates) and PRJNA694431 (evolved isolates). All other data are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. Raw data underlying all graphs have been provided as Supplementary Data 4.

References

Brown, G. D. et al. Hidden killers: human fungal infections. Sci. Transl. Med. 4, 165rv13 (2012).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Colombo, A. L., Júnior, J. N. de. A. & Guinea, J. Emerging multidrug-resistant Candida species. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 30, 528–538 (2017).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Tsai, H.-F., Krol, A. A., Sarti, K. E. & Bennett, J. E. Candida glabrata PDR1, a transcriptional regulator of a pleiotropic drug resistance network, mediates azole resistance in clinical isolates and petite mutants. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50, 1384–92 (2006).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Vermitsky, J.-P. et al. Pdr1 regulates multidrug resistance in Candida glabrata: gene disruption and genome-wide expression studies. Mol. Microbiol. 61, 704–722 (2006).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Caudle, K. E. et al. Genomewide expression profile analysis of the Candida glabrata Pdr1 regulon. Eukaryot. Cell 10, 373–83 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Whaley, S. G. & Rogers, P. D. Azole resistance in Candida glabrata. Curr. Infect. Dis. Rep. 18, 41 (2016).
Ostrosky-Zeichner, L., Casadevall, A., Galgiani, J. N., Odds, F. C. & Rex, J. H. An insight into the antifungal pipeline: selected new molecules and beyond. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 9, 719–727 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Demuyser, L., Van Dyck, K., Timmermans, B. & Van Dijck, P. Inhibition of vesicular transport influences fungal susceptibility to fluconazole. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 63, e01998 (2019).
Sanguinetti, M. et al. Mechanisms of azole resistance in clinical isolates of Candida glabrata collected during a hospital survey of antifungal resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49, 668–79 (2005).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sanglard, D., Ischer, F., Calabrese, D., Majcherczyk, P. A. & Bille, J. The ATP binding cassette transporter gene CgCDR1 from Candida glabrata is involved in the resistance of clinical isolates to azole antifungal agents. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43, 2753–65 (1999).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Akins, R. A. An update on antifungal targets and mechanisms of resistance in Candida albicans. Med. Mycol. 43, 285–318 (2005).
Costa, C. et al. Clotrimazole drug resistance in Candida glabrata clinical isolates correlates with increased expression of the drug: H+ antiporters CgAqr1, CgTpo1_1, CgTpo3, and CgQdr2. Front. Microbiol. 7, 1–11 (2016).
Article Google Scholar
Costa, C., Dias, P. J., Sá-Correia, I. & Teixeira, M. C. MFS multidrug transporters in pathogenic fungi: Do they have real clinical impact? Front. Physiol. 5, 197 (2014).
Costa, C. et al. Candida glabrata drug:H+ antiporter CgQdr2 confers imidazole drug resistance, being activated by transcription factor CgPdr1. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 57, 3159–67 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Pais, P. et al. Membrane proteome-wide response to the antifungal drug clotrimazole in Candida glabrata: role of the transcription factor CgPdr1 and the Drug:H+ antiporters CgTpo1_1 and CgTpo1_2. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 15, 57–72 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Costa, C. et al. The dual role of Candida glabrata drug:H+ antiporter CgAqr1 (ORF CAGL0J09944g) in antifungal drug and acetic acid resistance. Front. Microbiol. 4, 170 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Costa, C. et al. Candida glabrata drug:H+ antiporter CgTpo3 (ORF CAGL0I10384G): Role in azole drug resistance and polyamine homeostasis. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 69, 1767–1776 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Cavalheiro, M., Pais, P., Galocha, M. & Teixeira, M. Host-pathogen interactions mediated by MDR transporters in fungi: as pleiotropic as it gets! Genes 9, 332 (2018).
Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
Pais, P. et al. Membrane proteomics analysis of the candida glabrata response to 5-flucytosine: unveiling the role and regulation of the drug efflux transporters CgFlr1 and CgFlr2. Front. Microbiol. 7, 2045 (2016).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ferrari, S. et al. Gain of function mutations in CgPDR1 of Candida glabrata not only mediate antifungal resistance but also enhance virulence. PLoS Pathog. 5, e1000268 (2009).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Vermitsky, J.-P. & Edlind, T. D. Azole resistance in Candida glabrata: coordinate upregulation of multidrug transporters and evidence for a Pdr1-like transcription factor. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48, 3773–3781 (2004).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ben-Ami, R. et al. Heteroresistance to fluconazole is a continuously distributed phenotype among Candida glabrata clinical strains associated with in vivo persistence. MBio 7, e00655-16 (2016).
Arastehfar, A. et al. Low level of antifungal resistance in iranian isolates of Candida glabrata recovered from blood samples in a multicenter study from 2015 to 2018 and potential prognostic values of genotyping and sequencing of PDR1. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 63, e02503-18 (2019).
Galocha, M., Costa, I. V. & Teixeira, M. C. Carrier-mediated drug uptake in fungal pathogens. Genes 11, 1324 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed Central Google Scholar
Mansfield, B. E. et al. Azole drugs are imported by facilitated diffusion in Candida albicans and other pathogenic fungi. PLoS Pathog. 6, 1–11 (2010).
Article Google Scholar
Roy, A., Dement, A. D., Cho, K. H. & Kim, J. H. Assessing glucose uptake through the yeast hexose transporter 1 (Hxt1). PLoS ONE 10, 1–14 (2015).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Faria-Ramos, I. et al. Species distribution and in vitro antifungal susceptibility profiles of yeast isolates from invasive infections during a Portuguese multicenter survey. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 33, 2241–2247 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Cavalheiro, M. et al. A transcriptomics approach to unveiling the mechanisms of in vitro evolution towards fluconazole resistance of a Candida glabrata clinical isolate. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 63, e00995-18 (2019).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Boles, E. & Oreb, M. In Methods in Molecular Biology, Vol. 1713 123–135 (Humana Press Inc., 2018).
Özcan, S. & Johnston, M. Function and regulation of yeast hexose transporters. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 63, 554–569 (1999).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sun, L. et al. Crystal structure of a bacterial homologue of glucose transporters GLUT1-4. Nature 496, 361–366 (2012).
Deng, D. et al. Molecular basis of ligand recognition and transport by glucose transporters. Nature 526, 391–396 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ng, T. S., Desa, M. N. M., Sandai, D., Chong, P. P. & Than, L. T. L. Phylogenetic and transcripts profiling of glucose sensing related genes in Candida glabrata. Jundishapur J. Microbiol. 8, e25177 (2015).
Esquivel, B. D., Smith, A. R., Zavrel, M. & White, T. C. Azole drug import into the pathogenic fungus Aspergillus fumigatus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 59, 3390–3398 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Nourani, A., Wesolowski-Louvel, M., Delaveau, T., Jacq, C. & Delahodde, A. Multiple-drug-resistance phenomenon in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae: involvement of two hexose transporters. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 5453–5460 (1997).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Liu, Z., Boles, E. & Rosen, B. P. Arsenic trioxide uptake by hexose permeases in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 17312–17318 (2004).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ueno, K. et al. Development of a highly efficient gene targeting system induced by transient repression of YKU80 expression in Candida glabrata. Eukaryot. Cell 6, 1239–1247 (2007).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Galkina, K. V., Okamoto, M., Chibana, H., Knorre, D. A. & Kajiwara, S. Deletion of CDR1 reveals redox regulation of pleiotropic drug resistance in Candida glabrata. Biochimie 170, 49–56 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Entian, K. D. & Kötter, P. 25 Yeast genetic strain and plasmid collections. Methods Microbiol. 36, 629–666 (2007).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Jansen, G., Wu, C., Schade, B., Thomas, D. Y. & Whiteway, M. Drag&Drop cloning in yeast. Gene 344, 43–51 (2005).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Vyas, V. K. et al. New CRISPR mutagenesis strategies reveal variation in repair mechanisms among fungi. mSphere 3, e00154-18 (2018).
Zordan, R. E. et al. Expression plasmids for use in Candida glabrata. G3 Genes Genomes Genet. 3, 1675–1686 (2013).
Google Scholar
Mumberg, D., Müller, R. & Funk, M. Yeast vectors for the controlled expression of heterologous proteins in different genetic backgrounds. Gene 156, 119–122 (1995).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Pais, P. et al. A new regulator in the crossroads of oxidative stress resistance and virulence in Candida glabrata: the transcription factor CgTog1. Virulence 11, 1522–1538 (2020).
Article Google Scholar
Azanza, J. R., García-quetglas, E. & Sádaba, B. Farmacología de los azoles. Rev. Iberoamericana Micol. 24, 223–227 (2007).
Pais, P., Galocha, M., Miranda, I. M., Rodrigues, A. G. & Teixeira, M. C. Draft genome sequences of three clinical isolates of the pathogenic yeast Candida glabrata. Microbiol. Resour. Announc. 8, e00278-19 (2019).
Dodgson, A. R., Pujol, C., Denning, D. W., Soll, D. R. & Fox, A. J. Multilocus sequence typing of Candida glabrata reveals geographically enriched clades. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41, 5709–5717 (2003).
Article Google Scholar
Jolley, K. A., Bray, J. E. & Maiden, M. C. J. Open-access bacterial population genomics: BIGSdb software, the PubMLST.org website and their applications [version 1; referees: 2 approved]. Wellcome Open Res. 3, 124 (2018).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Bankevich, A. et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J. Comput. Biol. 19, 455–477 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
McKenna, A. et al. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 20, 1297–303 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Narasimhan, V. et al. BCFtools/RoH: a hidden Markov model approach for detecting autozygosity from next-generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics 32, 1749–1751 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
M27-A3. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts; approved standard-third edition. www.clsi.org (2008).
M60Ed2. Performance standards for antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts, 2nd edition. https://clsi.org/standards/products/microbiology/documents/m60/ (2020).
Šali, A. & Blundell, T. L. Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J. Mol. Biol. 234, 779–815 (1993).
Shen, M. & Sali, A. Statistical potential for assessment and prediction of protein structures. Protein Sci. 15, 2507–2524 (2006).
Oleg, T. & Arthur J. O. AutoDock Vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. J. Comput. Chem. 31, 455–461 (2010).
The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 1.3r1 (Schrodinger, LLC, 2010).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by “Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia” (FCT) (Contract PTDC/BII-BIO/28216/2017 and AEM PhD grants to M.G. and R.V.) and by the Research Council of the KU Leuven (grant # C14/17/063). Funding received by iBB-Institute for Bioengineering and Biosciences (UIDB/04565/2020) and by i4HB (LA/P/0140/2020) from FCT is also acknowledged. PVD was further supported by a grant from the FWO (Fund for Scientific Research, Flanders, grant # G0C0622N). We acknowledge Eckhard Boles, Institute of Molecular Biological Sciences, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany and Hiroji Chibana, Medical Mycology Research Center at Chiba University, Japan for kindly providing some of the strains used in this study, as indicated in the “Methods” section.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Department of Bioengineering, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
Mónica Galocha, Romeu Viana, Pedro Pais, Mafalda Cavalheiro, Catarina Costa & Miguel C. Teixeira
iBB - Institute for Bioengineering and Biosciences, Biological Sciences Research Group, Instituto Superior Técnico, Lisbon, Portugal
Mónica Galocha, Romeu Viana, Pedro Pais, Mafalda Cavalheiro, Catarina Costa & Miguel C. Teixeira
Associate Laboratory i4HB—Institute for Health and Bioeconomy at Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
Mónica Galocha, Romeu Viana, Pedro Pais, Mafalda Cavalheiro, Catarina Costa & Miguel C. Teixeira
Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
Ana Silva-Dias, Isabel M. Miranda, Joana Branco & Acácio G. Rodrigues
CINTESIS - Center for Health Technology and Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
Ana Silva-Dias, Isabel M. Miranda, Joana Branco & Acácio G. Rodrigues
Cardiovascular R&D Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
Isabel M. Miranda
Laboratory of Molecular Cell Biology, Department of Biology, Institute of Botany and Microbiology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
Mieke Van Ende & Patrick Van Dijck
VIB-KU Leuven Center for Microbiology, Leuven, Belgium
Mieke Van Ende & Patrick Van Dijck
Instituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica António Xavier, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Oeiras, Portugal
Caio S. Souza & Cláudio M. Soares

Authors

Mónica Galocha
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Romeu Viana
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Pedro Pais
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Ana Silva-Dias
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Mafalda Cavalheiro
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Isabel M. Miranda
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Mieke Van Ende
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Caio S. Souza
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Catarina Costa
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Joana Branco
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Cláudio M. Soares
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Patrick Van Dijck
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Acácio G. Rodrigues
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Miguel C. Teixeira
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

M.G. conducted most of the experiments. R.V., C.S.S. and C.M.S. conducted the protein modelling and molecular docking experiments. P.P. contributed to the genome sequencing data generation and analysis. A.S.-D., I.M.M., M.C., C.C. and J.B. contributed to in vitro evolution experiments. R.V., M.C., P.P. and M.V.E. contributed to genetic manipulation and strain construction. M.C.T., A.G.R. and P.V.D. designed the experiments and M.C.T. and A.G.R. coordinated the underlying project. The manuscript was written by M.G., A.G.R. and M.C.T. with contributions from all authors. All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Acácio G. Rodrigues or Miguel C. Teixeira.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Communications Biology thanks Yue Wang, Rajendra Prasad and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary handling editor: George Inglis.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Description of Additional Supplementary Files

Supplementary Data 1

Supplementary Data 2

Supplementary Data 3

Supplementary Data 4

Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Galocha, M., Viana, R., Pais, P. et al. Genomic evolution towards azole resistance in Candida glabrata clinical isolates unveils the importance of CgHxt4/6/7 in azole accumulation. Commun Biol 5, 1118 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-022-04087-0

Download citation

Received: 04 August 2021
Accepted: 11 October 2022
Published: 21 October 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-022-04087-0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.