The harmonized classification of titanium dioxide as a suspected carcinogen has the potential to misinform consumers and promote aversive behaviour. The case exemplifies the limits of a hazard-based classification system that should not be used without exposure assessment in downstream, sector-specific legislation.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
The “EU chemicals strategy for sustainability” questions regulatory toxicology as we know it: is it all rooted in sound scientific evidence?
Archives of Toxicology Open Access 22 June 2021
-
Nanomaterials and hepatic disease: toxicokinetics, disease types, intrinsic mechanisms, liver susceptibility, and influencing factors
Journal of Nanobiotechnology Open Access 16 April 2021
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/217 (European Commission, 2020); https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2020/217/oj.
Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council (The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union, 2008); http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2008/1272/oj
CLH Report for Titanium Dioxide (ANSES, 2016); https://go.nature.com/3aJ23Cp
RAC Opinion Proposing Harmonised Classification and Labelling at EU Level of Titanium Dioxide (ECHA, 2017); https://go.nature.com/3aHyXUj
Guidance on the Application of the CLP Criteria: Guidance to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 on Classification, Labelling and Packaging (CLP) of Substances and Mixtures (ECHA, 2017); https://go.nature.com/3ggE5zL
Cole, C., Shyr, T. & Ou-Yang, H. Photodermatol. Photoimmunol. Photomed. 32, 5–10 (2016).
Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety Opinion on Titanium Dioxide (TiO2) Used in Cosmetic Products (European Commission, 2020); https://go.nature.com/2E85mqY
Arrêté du 17 Avril 2019 Portant Suspension de la Mise Sur le Marché des Denrées Contenant l'Additif E 171 (Dioxyde de Titane - TiO2) [in French] (République Française, 2019); https://go.nature.com/2EnG6N7
Bettini, S. et al. Sci. Rep. 7, 40373 (2017).
Scott, N. A. & Mann, E. R. Immunology 159, 26–38 (2020).
EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS) EFSA J. 16, e05366 (2018).
Commission Regulation (EU) No 10/2011 (European Commission, 2011); http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2011/10/2019-08-29
Borm, P., Cassee, F. R. & Oberdorster, G. Part. Fibre Toxicol. 12, 10 (2015).
Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council (The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union, 2006); https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2006/1907/oj
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Riebeling, C., Haase, A., Tralau, T. et al. Substance classification of titanium dioxide illustrates limitations of EU legislation. Nat Food 1, 523–525 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-020-00149-w
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-020-00149-w
This article is cited by
-
Nanomaterials and hepatic disease: toxicokinetics, disease types, intrinsic mechanisms, liver susceptibility, and influencing factors
Journal of Nanobiotechnology (2021)
-
The “EU chemicals strategy for sustainability” questions regulatory toxicology as we know it: is it all rooted in sound scientific evidence?
Archives of Toxicology (2021)
