Table 2 Performance of the ConvNetHUP and ConvNetUHCMC/CWRU classifiers on the CINJ data cohort in terms of means and standard deviation of Dice coefficient, PPV and NPV.
Group | N | Dice | PPV | NPV |
---|---|---|---|---|
ConvNetHUP | ||||
All cases | 40 | 0.6771 ± 0.2445 | 0.6464 ± 0.2870 | 0.9709 ± 0.0350 |
Only invasive | 19 | 0.7578 ± 0.2166 | 0.7462 ± 0.2480 | 0.9654 ± 0.0355 |
Mixture | 21 | 0.6041 ± 0.2501 | 0.5560 ± 0.2953 | 0.5560 ± 0.2953 |
ConvNetUHCMC/CWRU | ||||
All cases | 40 | 0.6596 ± 0.2527 | 0.6370 ± 0.2941 | 0.9663 ± 0.0421 |
Only invasive | 19 | 0.7596 ± 0.2074 | 0.7499 ± 0.2423 | 0.9614 ± 0.0440 |
Mixture | 21 | 0.5691 ± 0.2602 | 0.5348 ± 0.3045 | 0.9708 ± 0.0409 |