Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Volume 255 Issue 5507, 29 May 1975

Opinion

Top of page ⤴

News

  • On April 28, 1971, the Occupational Safety and Health Act came into effect in the United States, establishing a new agency—the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) in the Department of Labor—with a mandate to enforce health and safety standards for America's 60 million workers. As expected, the act has turned out to be a huge headache to enforce and administer, not only because of the enormous costs to industry in altering its technology and work practices to comply with federal standards, but also because the act does not diminish, but raises, discontent about conditions in the workplace. It exposes the sores of industrial practices and labour union conservatism and raises the profound question of what research in occupational health should be directed towards. Wil Lepkowski reports.

    • Wil Lepkowski
    News
Top of page ⤴

International News

Top of page ⤴

Correspondence

Top of page ⤴

News & Views

Top of page ⤴

Article

Top of page ⤴

Letter

Top of page ⤴

Corrigendum

Top of page ⤴

Matters Arising

Top of page ⤴

Book Review

Top of page ⤴

Announcements

Top of page ⤴

Reports and Other Publications

Top of page ⤴
Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing

Search

Quick links