Filter By:

Journal Check one or more journals to show results from those journals only.

Choose more journals

Article type Check one or more article types to show results from those article types only.
Subject Check one or more subjects to show results from those subjects only.
Date Choose a date option to show results from those dates only.

Custom date range

Clear all filters
Sort by:
Showing 1–2 of 2 results
Advanced filters: Author: "Katherine L Nathanson" Clear advanced filters
  • The field of tumor immunology has been flooded with exciting therapeutic advances on many fronts. Immunotherapies targeting T cell inhibitory molecules have proven highly effective in some cancers, but additional strategies to induce tumor immunity, such as cancer vaccination, could further increase tumor killing. The combination of both will probably be the way forward in future immunotherapy. In 'Bedside to Bench', Robert Vonderheide and Katherine Nathanson discuss the potential of cancer genomics to identify specific tumor mutations in patients that may be used as targets in cancer vaccines to overcome problems linked to self-antigen epitopes used nowadays. Despite the existing biological and technical hurdles, a framework to implement personalized cancer vaccines in the clinic may be worth considering. In 'Bench to Bedside', Glenn Dranoff peruses the clinical efficacy and detrimental effects of two T cell immune-checkpoint inhibitors, alone and in combination, in patients with melanoma. The studies underscore the need to continue investigating specific tumor events directly involving tumor evasion to develop combinatorial strategies that will reduce drug-related pathology while achieving anti-tumor efficacy.

    • Robert H Vonderheide
    • Katherine L Nathanson
    Comments & Opinion
    Nature Medicine
    Volume: 19, P: 1098-1100
  • The use of multigene panels for the assessment of cancer susceptibility is expanding rapidly in clinical practice. The appropriate management of individuals harbouring moderate-penetrance genetic variants in individuals referred for clinical testing is unclear. The authors of this Perspectives article provide a framework for clinical decision-making pending the development of a sufficient evidence base to document the clinical utility of the interventions for individuals with inherited moderate-penetrance gene mutations associated with an increased risk of cancer.

    • Nadine Tung
    • Susan M. Domchek
    • Mark E. Robson
    Reviews
    Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
    Volume: 13, P: 581-588