Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Protection from habituation by lateral inhibition

Abstract

HABITUATION, or response decrement, functions to reduce an animal's responsiveness to maintained or frequently repeated stimuli, while ensuring high responsiveness to novel stimuli. Under some circumstances, however, habituation is inappropriate, in response to sensory afference caused by an animal's own activities, for example. Mechanisms for protection from habituation under such circumstances are likely to be common. Here we show, in locust movement detector (MD) neurones, that whereas habituation is rapid in response to repeated small field movements it is absent in response to maintained whole field movements. Prolonged whole field movements do not therefore reduce the responsiveness of the MD neurones to subsequent small field movements. Protection from habituation is achieved by lateral inhibition which acts prior to the site of response decrement to suppress the response to whole field stimuli.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Burrows, M., and Rowell, C. H. F., J. comp. Physiol., 85, 221–234 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. O'Shea, M., Rowell, C. H. F., and Williams, J. L. D., J. exp. Biol., 60, 1–12 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  3. O'Shea, M., and Williams, J. L. D., J. comp. Physiol., 91, 257–266 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. O'Shea, M., and Rowell, C. H. F., J. comp. Physiol., 95 (in the press).

  5. Palka, J., J. exp. Biol., 50, 723–732 (1969); Am. Zool., 12, 497–505 (1972).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Horn, G., and Rowell, C. H. F., J. exp. Biol., 49, 143–169 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rowell, C. H. F., Z. vergl. Physiol., 73, 167–194 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Palka, J., J. Insect Physol., 13, 235–248 (1967).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ratliff, F., and Hartline, H. K., J. gen. Physiol., 42, 1241–1255 (1959).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Barlow, H. B., in Sensory communication (edit. by Rosenblith, W. A.), 782–786.

  11. Krasne, F. B., and Bryan, J. S., Science, 182, 590–592 (1973).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kennedy, D., Calabrese, R. L., and Wine, J. J., Science, 186, 451–454 (1974).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

O'SHEA, M., ROWELL, C. Protection from habituation by lateral inhibition. Nature 254, 53–55 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1038/254053a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/254053a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing